</%doc>
-<html><head><title>Website documentation - YARRG</title>
+<html lang="en"><head><title>Website documentation - YARRG</title>
</head><body>
<a href="lookup">YARRG</a> -
and select `Update' to get a new plan. The unticked trades will be
excluded from the voyage plan (if any) and also from the totals.
-<h3>Vessel capacity</h3>
+<h3><a name="capacity">Vessel capacity</a></h3>
If you don't specify a vessel or a vessel capacity, the trading plan
will not take into account the fact that your voyage will be on a ship
<dl>
<dt>sloop
<dd>The capacity of a sloop, leaving no allowance for rum and shot
-<dt>sloop - 1%
-<dd>The capacity of a sloop minus 1%
-<dt>20t 13kl
+<dt>wb - 1%
+<dd>The capacity of a war brig minus 1%
+<dt>13t 20kl
<dd>13 tonnes (13,000kg), 20 kilolitres (20,000l)
<dt>sloop - 100l 100kg
<dd>The capacity of a sloop minus 100l, minus 100kg
abbrevation instead. If the first term specifies only one of mass or
volume, all the subsequent terms may only adjust that same value.
-<h3>Expected losses</h3>
+<h3><a name="losses">Expected losses</a></h3>
In theory if you were guaranteed to have a trouble-free voyage it
would be worth trading goods at very low margins. However, in
<p>
-Trades whose margin is less than the expected loss are never selected.
-For example, if you select 1% loss per league, and plan a voyage of 5
-leagues, then any trade with a margin of less than 5.15% would be
-completely excluded (5.15% not 5% because the loss works like compound
-interest). Theoretically very profitable trades which are close to
-the expected break-even point because of the distance can also be
-rejected by the optimiser in favour of shorter distance trades with
-theoretically smaller margins.
+Trades whose margin is less than the expected loss are never included
+in the suggested plan. For example, if you select 1% loss per league,
+and plan a voyage of 5 leagues, then any trade with a margin of less
+than 5.15% would be completely excluded (5.15% not 5% because the loss
+works like compound interest). Theoretically very profitable trades
+which are close to the expected break-even point because of the
+distance can also be rejected by the optimiser in favour of shorter
+distance trades with theoretically smaller margins, if it's not
+possible to do both.
<p>
fraction 1/<em>divisor</em>, eg 1/200 is the same as 0.5%; in each
case it is taken as the loss for each league of the voyage.
+<h3><a name="capital">Available capital</a></h3>
+
+If you don't specify the amount of capital you have available to
+invest in the voyage, the trading plan will assume that your capital
+is unlimited. If you specify an amount in PoE here, the trading plan
+will never require you to spend more than that amount on commodities.
+
+<p>
+
+The trading plan does not take into account accumulated profits from
+each leg of the journey when applying the available capital
+constraint. For example, if you specify a journey from A to B to C
+and a capital limit of 10000 PoE, the trading plan will not tell you
+to buy 1000 peas at A for 10 PoE each, sail them to B and sell all of
+them for 20 PoE each, and then buy 2000 beans at B for 10 PoE each and
+sail them to C to sell for 20 PoE each even if such a trade would in
+fact be possible. In practice this is unlikely to be a problem!
+
<& footer &>
~yarrgweb / ypp-sc-tools.main.git / blobdiff