From f08fe72e25a850f312a342ea4e2ce15de43cfcf6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Message-Id: From: Mark Wooding Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 11:19:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] peerdb/peers.in.5.in: Finish the example configuration fragment. Organization: Straylight/Edgeware From: Mark Wooding --- peerdb/peers.in.5.in | 16 +++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/peerdb/peers.in.5.in b/peerdb/peers.in.5.in index 9ce9561c..27992838 100644 --- a/peerdb/peers.in.5.in +++ b/peerdb/peers.in.5.in @@ -127,9 +127,23 @@ section (though falling back to scanning parent sections). For example, given the sections .VS [parent] -detail = in parent +detail = in $(name) blurb = expand $(detail) + +[child] +@inherit = parent .VE +the key +.B blurb +takes the value +.RB ` "expand in parent" ' +in section +.BR parent , +and +.RB ` "expand in child" ' +in section +.BR child . +.PP Apart from its effect on lookups, as just described, the .B @inherit key is entirely ignored. In particular, it is never written to the -- [mdw]