From: Ian Jackson Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 17:24:26 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Import: Consolidate emails into coherent plan X-Git-Tag: archive/debian/2.0~104 X-Git-Url: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ianmdlvl/git?p=dgit.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=1ad1f0b16c1383393be69fda98d8326f873cf0e5 Import: Consolidate emails into coherent plan Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson --- diff --git a/README.dsc-import b/README.dsc-import index f5bb0bdb..ede7d9e3 100644 --- a/README.dsc-import +++ b/README.dsc-import @@ -1,45 +1,4 @@ -From ijackson Mon Sep 26 15:37:19 +0100 2016 -X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] - [nil "Monday" "26" "September" "2016" "15:37:19" "+0100" "Ian Jackson" "ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk" nil nil "Intent to commit craziness - source package unpacking" "^From:" nil nil "9" nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] - nil) -X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 -X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -Message-ID: <22505.12959.668142.478444@chiark.greenend.org.uk> -X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.4.1 (i586-pc-linux-gnu) -From: Ian Jackson -To: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org, - Guido Guenther , - Bernhard R. Link , - vcs-pkg-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org -Subject: Intent to commit craziness - source package unpacking -Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:37:19 +0100 - -tl;dr: - - * dpkg developers, please tell me whether I am making assumptions - that are likely to become false. Particularly, on the behaviour of - successive runs of dpkg-source --before-build with successively - longer series files. - - * git-buildpackage and git-dpm developers, please point me to - information about what metadata to put into the commit message for - a git commit which represents a dpkg-source quilt patch. I would - like these commits to be as convenient for gbp and git-dpm users as - possible. - - -Hi. - -Currently when dgit needs to import a .dsc into git, it just uses -dpkg-source -x, and git-add. The result is a single commit where the -package springs into existence fully formed. This is not as good as -it could be. I would like to represent (in the git pseudohistory) the -way that the resulting tree is constructed from the input objects. - -In particular, I would like to: represent the input tarballs as a +I would like to: represent the input tarballs as a commit each (which all get merged together as if by git merge -s subtree), and for quilt packages, each patch as a commit. But I want to avoid (as much as possible) reimplementing the package extraction @@ -68,17 +27,17 @@ So I intend to do as follows. (Please hold your nose.) with the right upstream version component, and the information found there used for the commit object's metadata.) -* dgit will then run dpkg-source -x --skip-patches. +* For `3.0 (quilt), dgit will run + dpkg-source -x --skip-patches - Again, git plumbing will be used to make this into a tree and a + git plumbing will be used to make the result into a tree and a commit. The commit will have as parents all the tarballs previous - mentioned. The metadata will come from the .dsc and/or the - final changelog entry. + mentioned. The metadata will come from the .dsc and/or the final + changelog entry. -* dgit will look to see if the package is `3.0 (quilt)' and if so - whether it has a series file. (dgit already rejects packages with - distro-specific series files, so we need worry only about a single - debian/patches/series file.) + dgit will then see if it has a series file. (dgit already rejects + packages with distro-specific series files, so we need worry only + about a single debian/patches/series file.) If there is a series file, dgit will read it into memory. It will then iterate over the series file, and each time: @@ -92,11 +51,16 @@ So I intend to do as follows. (Please hold your nose.) (either the previous commit, or the commit resulting from dpkg-source -x) - After this the series file has been completely rewritten. + After this the series file has been completely rewritten in + this way, the tree should be identical to the results of + dpkg-source -x. -* dgit will then run one final invocation of dpkg-source - --before-build. This ought not to produce any changes, but if - it does, they will be represented as another commit. +* For source formats other than `3.0 (quilt)', dgit will do simply + dpkg-source -x. + + Again, it will make that into a tree and a commit. (If this commit + has no changes in its tree from the first tarball commit. then the + two are squashed together.) * As currently, there will be a final no-change-to-the-tree pseudomerge commit which stitches the package into the relevant dgit @@ -155,138 +119,4 @@ This has the following properties: Topic". * The scheme I describe avoids introducing a dependency from dgit to - git-buildpackage. I might be able to replace the - successive-patch-application part with an appropriate invocation of - gbp-pq. Would that be better ? - - Bear in mind that because the output of gbp-pq import doesn't - contain debian/patches, I would need to rewrite its output (perhaps - with git-filter-branch). - - -Comments welcome. Please be quick - this is very close to the top of -my dgit todo list. - - -Thanks, -Ian. - - --- -Ian Jackson These opinions are my own. - -If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is -a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter. - -From ijackson Wed Sep 28 10:50:49 +0100 2016 -X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil t nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] - [nil "Wednesday" "28" "September" "2016" "10:50:49" "+0100" "Ian Jackson" "ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk" "<22507.37497.633622.843659@chiark.greenend.org.uk>" nil "Re: Intent to commit craziness - source package unpacking" "^From:" nil nil "9" nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] - nil) -X-Mozilla-Status: 0003 -X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 -Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -Message-ID: <22507.37497.633622.843659@chiark.greenend.org.uk> -In-Reply-To: <20160928010117.nqe2prbsbaqkbjza@gaara.hadrons.org> -References: <22505.12959.668142.478444@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - <20160928010117.nqe2prbsbaqkbjza@gaara.hadrons.org> -X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.4.1 (i586-pc-linux-gnu) -From: Ian Jackson -To: Guillem Jover -Cc: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org, - Guido Guenther , - "Bernhard R. Link" , - vcs-pkg-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org -Subject: Re: Intent to commit craziness - source package unpacking -Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:50:49 +0100 - -Guillem Jover writes ("Re: Intent to commit craziness - source package = -unpacking"): -> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 15:37:19 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: -> > tl;dr: -> >=20 -> > * dpkg developers, please tell me whether I am making assumptions -> > that are likely to become false. Particularly, on the behaviour= - of -> > successive runs of dpkg-source --before-build with successively -> > longer series files. ->=20 -> For format =AB3.0 (quilt)=BB, that seems fine, to the point I'm fine = -even -> documenting this, which I can probably do for 1.18.11. - -Great. - -> For other formats, such as =AB2.0=BB, I don't think that's true, but = -I -> assume you don't care about that one anyway. But just mentioning -> because this behavior is probably format-specific. For =AB2.0=BB I -> think it could be fixed, and should not be too hard (not sure if it's= - -> worth it though). - -I think the right approach is perhaps to use --skip-patches and ---before-build only with 3.0 (quilt). The that would leave 2.0 (or -other strange or future formats) producing a correct (although -possibly sub-optimal) import. - -> > dpkg-source does not currently provide interfaces that look like th= -ey -> > are intended for what I want to do. And dgit wants to work with ol= -d -> > versions of dpkg, so I don't want to block on getting such interfac= -es -> > added (even supposing that a sane interface could be designed, whic= -h -> > is doubtful). ->=20 -> Even then I'm still interested in a decription of what you'd need -> ideally, to take into account when having a pass at cleaning up that -> part of the interface. I think you could be interested in a cleaner -> Dpkg::Source::* hierarchy, for the mid/long-term? - -For `3.0 (quilt)' explicit interfaces for applying and unapplying -individual patches would help. But really IMO such an interface ought -to be exposed on the command line rather than (or as well as) via a -Perl module. - -Beyond that I find it hard to see what could make dgit's life easier. -Since dgit wants to construct a commit graph representing the source -package's innards, unless dpkg-source explicitly provides an interface -along those lines ("please output a graph of unpacked source tree -states and corresponding commit messages") dgit is still going to have -to know specially about most of the source package formats. - -> > * dgit will untar each input tarball (other than the Debian tarball= -). -> >=20 -> > This will be done by scanning the .dsc for things whose names loo= -k -> > like (compressed) tarballs, and using the interfaces provided by -> > Dpkg::Compression to get at the tarball. ->=20 -> Hmm, Dpkg::Source::Archive is currently private, but I might have a -> look at making it public if that would be helpful here. - -I think the amount of logic I would have to replicate is minimal. - -> > * As currently, dgit will take steps so that none of the git trees -> > discussed above contain a .pc directory. ->=20 -> As long as the directory does not disappear from the working tree, -> that should work. - -Right, indeed it won't. - -Thanks for your comments. I feel unblocked :-). - -Ian. - ---=20 -Ian Jackson These opinions are my o= -wn. - -If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is -a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter. - + git-buildpackage.