# - no fast forward checks
# for now only explicit with commitids
- # implicitly uses `upstream'
+# implicitly uses `upstream'
# # (or multiple other branches)
# git-debrebase new-upstream \
# [<subdir>/]=<commitid>
# refs/ffqrebase-prev/BRANCH BRANCH may be refs/...; if not it means
# refs/ffqrebase-base/BRANCH refs/heads/BRANCH
# zero, one, or both of these may exist
+#
+# git-debrebase without start, if already started, is willing
+# to strip pseudomerges provided that they overwrite exactly
+# the previous HEAD
+# xxxx is this right ? what matters is have we pushed
+# I think in fact the right answer is:
+# git-debrebase always strips out pseudomerges from its branch
+# a pseudomerge is put in at the time we want to push
+# at that time, we make a pseudomerge of the remote tracking
+# branch (if raw git) or the dgit view (if dgit)
+# for raw git git-ffqrebase, do want preciseley to record
+# value of remote tracking branch or our branch, on start, so we
+# overwrite only things we intend to
+# the previous pseudomerge check for tags and remote branches ?
use strict;
return $unknown->("complex merge");
}
-sub launder ($$$) {
- my ($input, $pseudos_must_overwrite_this, $wantdebonly) = @_;
+sub walk ($$$;$$$) {
+ my ($input, $pseudos_must_overwrite_this, $wantdebonly,
+ $report, $depth, $report_anomaly, $report_only) = @_;
# go through commits backwards
# we generate two lists of commits to apply
+ # => ($tip, $breakwater_tip)
my (@deb_cl, @ups_cl, @processed);
my %found;
my @pseudomerges;
+ $report //= sub { };
+ $report_anomaly //= sub {
+ my ($cl, $msg) = @_;
+ die "commit $cl: $msg\n";
+ };
+ $depth //= 0;
+
my $cl;
my $xmsg = sub {
my ($appendinfo) = @_;
$cl = classify $cur;
my $ty = $cl->{Type};
my $st = $cl->{SubType};
+ $report->($cl);
$found{$ty. ( defined($st) ? "-$st" : '' )}++;
+ push @processed, $cl;
my $p0 = $cl->{Parents}[0]{CommitId};
if ($ty eq 'AddPatches') {
$cur = $p0;
next;
} elsif ($ty eq 'Packaging') {
push @deb_cl, $cl;
- push @processed, $cl;
$cur = $p0;
next;
} elsif ($ty eq 'Upstream') {
push @ups_cl, $cl;
- push @processed, $cl;
$cur = $p0;
next;
} elsif ($ty eq 'Mixed') {
$rewrite_from_here->();
next;
} elsif ($ty eq 'Pseudomerge') {
- if (defined $pseudos_must_overwrite_this) {
- grep {
+ if (defined $pseudos_must_overwrite_this &&
+ !grep {
is_fast_fwd $pseudos_must_overwrite_this, $_->{CommitId}
},
- @{ $cl->{Overwritten} }
- or
- die "Pseudomerge $cl->{CommitId} does not overwrite ".
- "$pseudos_must_overwrite_this as expected.";
+ @{ $cl->{Overwritten} }) {
+ $report_anomaly->($cl,
+ "Pseudomerge should overwrite".
+ " $pseudos_must_overwrite_this".
+ " but does not do so");
}
push @pseudomerges, $cl;
$rewrite_from_here->();
# precisely right. Otherwise, it was a non-gitish upload
# of a new upstream version. We can tell these apart
# by looking at the tree of the supposed upstream.
+ my $differs = get_differs $previous_breakwater, $cl->{Tree};
if ($differs & D_UPS) {
push @deb_cl, {
%r,
SpecialMethod => 'DgitImportDebianUpdate',
$xmsg->("convert dgit import: upstream changes")
};
- my $differs = get_differs $previous_breakwater, $cl->{Tree};
- $basis = launder $pseudomerges[0]{Overwritten}, undef, 1;
+ $basis = launder $pseudomerges[0]{Overwritten}, undef, 1,
+ $report, $depth+1, $nogenerate;
$rewrite_from_here->();
last;
} else {
- die "Reached difficult commit $cur: ".Dumper($cl);
+ $report_anomaly->($cl, "Cannot cope with this commit");
}
}
# Now we build it back up again
+ if ($nogenerate) {
+ return (undef, $basis);
+ }
+
workarea_fresh();
- in_workarea sub { xxx attributes xxx };
- my $rewriting = 1;
+ my $rewriting = 0;
my $build = $basis;
runcmd @git, qw(update-ref -m), "git-debrebase $mrest", $new, $old;
}
+sub cmd_analyse () {
+
+
sub cmd_launder () {
my $old = get_head();
my ($tip,$breakwater) = launder $old, 0, undef, 0;
- update_head $old, $tip, 'launder'; # no tree changes! xxx debian/patches
+ update_head $old, $tip, 'launder';
+ # no tree changes except debian/patches
+ runcmd @git, qw(rm --quiet -rf debian/patches);
printf "# breakwater tip:\n%s\n", $breakwater;
}