X-Git-Url: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ianmdlvl/git?p=developers-reference.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=pkgs.dbk;h=3ce0bee233e232f7cf885803f653de9916e43363;hp=33d5924c058ae050faa5c4c0d00a33cb1e203481;hb=f772cb279e04bf01fa1c2282f98834e593fe5dfd;hpb=c09c82f1b52e695b757b7567acfab26acbae2f67 diff --git a/pkgs.dbk b/pkgs.dbk index 33d5924..3ce0bee 100644 --- a/pkgs.dbk +++ b/pkgs.dbk @@ -429,7 +429,8 @@ When the specified waiting time is over, the package is moved into the regular incoming directory for processing. This is done through automatic uploading to &ftp-upload-host; in upload-directory -DELAYED/[012345678]-day. 0-day is uploaded +DELAYED/X-day +(X between 0 and 15). 0-day is uploaded multiple times per day to &ftp-upload-host;. @@ -1308,7 +1309,10 @@ distribution. Packages are not removed from testing directly. Rather, they will be removed automatically after the package has been removed from unstable and no package in -testing depends on it. +testing depends on it. (Removals from +testing are possible though by filing a removal bug report +against the &release-debian-org; +pseudo-package. See the section .) There is one exception when an explicit removal request is not necessary: If a @@ -1394,7 +1398,7 @@ Policy Manual for details). Please note that you should only add a Provides relation if all packages depending on the obsolete package name continue to work after the renaming. Once you've uploaded the package and the package -has moved into the archive, file a bug against ftp.debian.org +has moved into the archive, file a bug against &ftp-debian-org; asking to remove the package with the obsolete name (see ). Do not forget to properly reassign the package's bugs at the same time. @@ -1954,11 +1958,11 @@ maintainer by other means (private email, IRC). If the maintainer is usually active and responsive, have you tried to contact -him? In general it should be considered preferable that a maintainer takes care -of an issue himself and that he is given the chance to review and correct your -patch, because he can be expected to be more aware of potential issues which an -NMUer might miss. It is often a better use of everyone's time if the maintainer -is given an opportunity to upload a fix on their own. +them? In general it should be considered preferable that maintainers take care +of an issue themselves and that they are given the chance to review and +correct your patch, because they can be expected to be more aware of potential +issues which an NMUer might miss. It is often a better use of everyone's time +if the maintainer is given an opportunity to upload a fix on their own. @@ -2120,7 +2124,7 @@ allows the developer doing the NMU to perform all the necessary tasks at the same time. For instance, instead of telling the maintainer that you will upload the updated package in 7 days, you should upload the package to -DELAYED/7 and tell the maintainer that he has 7 days to +DELAYED/7 and tell the maintainer that they have 7 days to react. During this time, the maintainer can ask you to delay the upload some more, or cancel your upload. @@ -2129,12 +2133,12 @@ more, or cancel your upload. The DELAYED queue should not be used to put additional pressure on the maintainer. In particular, it's important that you are available to cancel or delay the upload before the delay expires since the -maintainer cannot cancel the upload himself. +maintainer cannot cancel the upload themselves. If you make an NMU to DELAYED and the maintainer updates -his package before the delay expires, your upload will be rejected because a +the package before the delay expires, your upload will be rejected because a newer version is already available in the archive. Ideally, the maintainer will take care to include your proposed changes (or at least a solution for the problems they address) in that upload.