<!entity % commondata SYSTEM "common.ent" > %commondata;
<!-- CVS revision of this document -->
- <!entity cvs-rev "$Revision: 1.97 $">
+ <!entity cvs-rev "$Revision: 1.168 $">
<!-- if you are translating this document, please notate the CVS
revision of the developers reference here -->
<!--
]>
<debiandoc>
-<!--
- TODO:
- - bugs in upstream versions should be reported upstream!
- - add information on how to get accounts on different architectures
- - talk about CVS access, other ways to submit problems
- - add information on how you can contribute w/o being an official
- developer
- - "official port maintainer" ? (cf. glibc-pre2.1)
- -->
-
<book>
-
<title>Debian Developer's Reference
+
<author>Adam Di Carlo, current maintainer <email>aph@debian.org</email>
+ <author>Raphaël Hertzog, co-maintainer <email>hertzog@debian.org</email>
<author>Christian Schwarz <email>schwarz@debian.org</email>
<author>Ian Jackson <email>ijackson@gnu.ai.mit.edu</email>
<version>ver. &version;, &date-en;
<copyright>
<copyrightsummary>
-copyright ©1998–2002 Adam Di Carlo</copyrightsummary>
+copyright © 1998—2003 Adam Di Carlo</copyrightsummary>
+ <copyrightsummary>
+copyright © 2002 Raphaël Hertzog</copyrightsummary>
<copyrightsummary>
-copyright ©1997, 1998 Christian Schwarz</copyrightsummary>
+copyright © 1997, 1998 Christian Schwarz</copyrightsummary>
<p>
This manual is free software; you may redistribute it and/or modify it
under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
<p>
A copy of the GNU General Public License is available as &file-GPL; in
the &debian-formal; distribution or on the World Wide Web at <url
-id="&url-gpl;" name="the GNU website">. You can also obtain it by
+id="&url-gpl;" name="the GNU web site">. You can also obtain it by
writing to the &fsf-addr;.
- <toc detail="sect2">
+ <toc detail="sect1">
<chapt id="scope">Scope of This Document
<p>
<!-- FIXME: rewrites -->
<p>
The procedures discussed within include how to become a maintainer
-(<ref id="new-maintainer">); how to upload new packages (<ref
-id="upload">); how and when to do ports and interim releases of other
-maintainers' packages (<ref id="nmu">); how to move, remove, or orphan
-packages (<ref id="archive-manip">); and how to handle bug reports
-(<ref id="bug-handling">).
+(<ref id="new-maintainer">); how to create new packages
+(<ref id="newpackage">) and how to upload packages (<ref id="upload">);
+how to handle bug reports (<ref id="bug-handling">); how to move,
+remove, or orphan packages (<ref id="archive-manip">); how to port
+packages (<ref id="porting">); and how and when to do interim
+releases of other maintainers' packages (<ref id="nmu">).
<p>
The resources discussed in this reference include the mailing lists
(<ref id="mailing-lists">) and servers (<ref id="server-machines">); a
to &email-debian-devel-req;. In case of problems, contact the list
administrator at &email-listmaster;. More information on available
mailing lists can be found in <ref id="mailing-lists">.
+&email-debian-devel-announce; is another list which is mandatory
+for anyone who wishes to follow Debian's development.
<p>
You should subscribe and lurk (that is, read without posting) for a
bit before doing any coding, and you should post about your intentions
to work on something to avoid duplicated effort.
<p>
Another good list to subscribe to is &email-debian-mentors;. See <ref
-id="mentors"> for details. The IRC channel <tt>#debian</tt> on the
-Linux People IRC network (e.g., <tt>irc.debian.org</tt>) can also be
+id="mentors"> for details. The IRC channel <tt>#debian</tt> can also be
helpful.
<p>
on similar tasks. That way, you can learn from experienced developers.
For example, if you are interested in packaging existing software for
Debian you should try to get a sponsor. A sponsor will work together
-with you on your package and upload it to the Debian archive once he
-is happy with the packaging work you have done. You can find a sponsor
+with you on your package and upload it to the Debian archive once they
+are happy with the packaging work you have done. You can find a sponsor
by mailing the &email-debian-mentors; mailing list, describing your
package and yourself and asking for a sponsor (see <ref id="sponsoring">
for more information on sponsoring). On the other hand, if you are
Debian uses the <prgn>GNU Privacy Guard</prgn> (package
<package>gnupg</package> version 1 or better) as its baseline standard.
You can use some other implementation of OpenPGP as well. Note that
-OpenPGP is a open standard based on <url id="&url-rfc2440;" name="RFC
+OpenPGP is an open standard based on <url id="&url-rfc2440;" name="RFC
2440">.
<p>
The recommended public key algorithm for use in Debian development
-work is the DSA (sometimes call ``DSS'' or ``DH/ElGamal''). Other key
+work is DSA (sometimes call ``DSS'' or ``DH/ElGamal''). Other key
types may be used however. Your key length must be at least 1024
bits; there is no reason to use a smaller key, and doing so would be
much less secure. Your key must be signed with at least your own user
Some countries restrict the use of cryptographic software by their
citizens. This need not impede one's activities as a Debian package
maintainer however, as it may be perfectly legal to use cryptographic
-products for authentication, rather than encryption purposes (as is
-the case in France). &debian-formal; does not require the use of
-cryptography <em>qua</em> cryptography in any manner. If you live in a
-country where use of cryptography even for authentication is forbidden
+products for authentication, rather than encryption purposes.
+&debian-formal; does not require the use of cryptography <em>qua</em>
+cryptography in any manner. If you live in a country where use of
+cryptography even for authentication is forbidden
then please contact us so we can make special arrangements.
<p>
To apply as a new maintainer, you need an existing Debian maintainer
Maintainer's Corner"> at the Debian web site. Make sure that you
are familiar with the necessary steps of the New Maintainer process
before actually applying. If you are well prepared, you can save
-a lot of timer later on.
+a lot of time later on.
<sect id="mentors">Debian mentors and sponsors
<sect id="user-maint">Maintaining your Debian information
<p>
-There's a LDAP database containing many informations concerning all
+There's a LDAP database containing information about all
developers, you can access it at <url id="&url-debian-db;">. You can
update your password (this password is propagated to most of the machines
that are accessible to you), your address, your country, the latitude and
<sect id="key-maint">Maintaining your public key
<p>
Be very careful with your private keys. Do not place them on any
-public servers or multiuser machines, such as
-<tt>master.debian.org</tt>. Back your keys up; keep a copy offline.
+public servers or multiuser machines, such as the Debian servers
+(see <ref id="server-machines">). Back your keys up; keep a copy offline.
Read the documentation that comes with your software; read the <url
id="&url-pgp-faq;" name="PGP FAQ">.
<p>
If you add signatures to your public key, or add user identities, you
-can update the debian key ring by sending your key to the key server at
+can update the Debian key ring by sending your key to the key server at
<tt>&keyserver-host;</tt>. If you need to add a completely new key,
or remove an old key, send mail to &email-debian-keyring;. The same
key extraction routines discussed in <ref id="registering"> apply.
<p>
You can find a more in-depth discussion of Debian key maintenance in
-the documentation
for the <package>debian-keyring</package> package.
+the documentation
of the <package>debian-keyring</package> package.
<sect id="voting">Voting
<p>
-&FIXME;<url id="url-vote">
+Even if Debian is not always a real democracy, Debian has democratic
+tools and uses a democratic process to elect its leader or
+to approve a general resolution. Those processes are described in
+the <url id="&url-constitution;" name="Debian Constitution">.
+ <p>
+Democratic processes work well only if everybody take part in the
+vote, that's why you have to vote. To be able to vote you have to
+subscribe to &email-debian-devel-announce; since call for votes are sent
+there. If you want to follow the debate preceding a vote, you
+may want to subscribe to &email-debian-vote;.
+ <p>
+The list of all the proposals (past and current) is available on the
+<url id="&url-vote;" name="Debian Voting Information"> page. You will find
+there additional information about how to make a vote proposal.
<sect id="inform-vacation">Going on vacation gracefully
<sect id="rc-bugs">Managing release-critical bugs
<p>
-Release-critical bugs (RCB) are all bugs that have severity
-<em>critical</em>, <em>grave</em> or <em>serious</em>.
+Generally you should deal with bug reports on your packages as described in
+<ref id="bug-handling">. However, there's a special category of bugs that
+you need to take care of -- the so-called release-critical bugs (RC bugs).
+All bug reports that have severity <em>critical</em>, <em>grave</em> or
+<em>serious</em> are considered to have an impact on whether the package can
+be released in the next stable release of Debian.
Those bugs can delay the Debian release
and/or can justify the removal of a package at freeze time. That's why
-these bugs need to be corrected as quickly as possible. You must be
-aware that some developers who are part of the <url
-id="&url-debian-qa;" name="Debian Quality Assurance"> effort are
-following those bugs and try to help you whenever they are able. But if
-you can't fix such bugs within 2 weeks, you should either ask for help
+these bugs need to be corrected as quickly as possible.
+ <p>
+Developers who are part of the <url id="&url-debian-qa;"
+name="Quality Assurance"> group are following all such bugs, and trying
+to help whenever possible. If, for any reason, you aren't able fix an
+RC bug in a package of yours within 2 weeks, you should either ask for help
by sending a mail to the Quality Assurance (QA) group
&email-debian-qa;, or explain your difficulties and present a plan to fix
-them by sending a mail to the proper bug report. Otherwise, people
+them by sending a mail to the bug report. Otherwise, people
from the QA group may want to do a Non-Maintainer Upload (see
<ref id="nmu">) after trying to contact you (they might not wait as long as
usual before they do their NMU if they have seen no recent activity from you
<item>
Orphan all your packages, as described in <ref id="orphaning">.
<item>
-Send an email about how you are leaving the project to
+Send an email about why you are leaving the project to
&email-debian-private;.
<item>
Notify the Debian key ring maintainers that you are leaving by
emailing to &email-debian-keyring;.
- </enumlist>
+</enumlist>
<chapt id="resources">Resources for Debian Developers
<p>
In this chapter you will find a very brief road map of the Debian
-mailing lists, the main Debian servers, and other Debian machines
-which may be available to you as a developer.
+mailing lists, the Debian machines
+which may be available to you as a developer, and all the other
+resources that are available to help you in your maintainer work.
<sect id="mailing-lists">Mailing lists
<p>
-The mailing list server is at <tt>&lists-host;</tt>. Mail
+The mailing list server is at <tt>&lists-host;</tt>.
+ <p>
+Online archives of mailing lists are available at <url
+id="&url-lists-archives;">.
+
+ <sect1 id="core-devel-mailing-lists">Core development mailing lists
+ <p>
+The core Debian mailing lists that developers should use are:
+<list>
+ <item>&email-debian-devel-announce;, used to announce important things to
+ developers.
+ All developers are expected to be subscribed to this list.
+ </item>
+ <item>&email-debian-devel;, used to discuss various development related
+ technical issues.
+ </item>
+ <item>&email-debian-policy;, where the Debian Policy is discussed and
+ voted on.
+ </item>
+ <item>&email-debian-project;, used to discuss various non-technical
+ issues related to the project.
+ </item>
+</list>
+ <p>
+There are
+other mailing lists available for a variety of special topics; see
+<url id="&url-debian-lists-subscribe;"> for a list.
+
+ <sect1 id="mailing-lists-subunsub">Subscribing and unsubscribing
+ <p>
+To subscribe to or unsubscribe from any of the Debian mailing lists, email
<tt>debian-<var>foo</var>-REQUEST@&lists-host;</tt>, where
<tt>debian-<var>foo</var></tt> is the name of the list, with the word
<tt>subscribe</tt> in the <em>Subject</em> to subscribe to the list or
-<tt>unsubscribe</tt> to unsubscribe. More detailed instructions on
-how to subscribe and unsubscribe to the mailing lists can be found at
-<url id="&url-debian-lists-subscribe;">, <url id="&url-debian-lists;">
-or locally in &file-mail-lists; if you have the
-<package>doc-debian</package> package installed.
+<tt>unsubscribe</tt> to unsubscribe.
+ <p>
+If you prefer to use a web page to subscribe to multiple mailing lists,
+there's one at <url id="&url-debian-lists-subscribe;">.
+ <p>
+You can download the current list of mailing lists and basic usage
+instructions from <url id="&url-debian-lists-txt;">
+or install the <package>doc-debian</package> package and have it
+locally in &file-mail-lists;.
+
+ <sect1 id="mailing-lists-rules">Basic rules for use
<p>
When replying to messages on the mailing list, please do not send a
carbon copy (<tt>CC</tt>) to the original poster unless they explicitly
request to be copied. Anyone who posts to a mailing list should read
it to see the responses.
<p>
-The following are the core Debian mailing lists: &email-debian-devel;,
-&email-debian-policy;, &email-debian-user;, &email-debian-private;,
-&email-debian-announce;, and &email-debian-devel-announce;. All
-developers are expected to be subscribed to at least
-&email-debian-devel-announce;. There are
-other mailing lists available for a variety of special topics; see
-<url id="&url-debian-lists-subscribe;"> for a list. Cross-posting
-(sending the same message to multiple lists) is discouraged.
+Cross-posting (sending the same message to multiple lists) is discouraged.
+As ever on the net, please trim down the quoting of articles you're
+replying to. In general, please adhere to the usual conventions for
+posting messages. Please read the <url name="code of conduct"
+id="&url-debian-lists;"> for more information.
+
+ <sect1 id="mailing-lists-special">Special lists
<p>
&email-debian-private; is a special mailing list for private
discussions amongst Debian developers. It is meant to be used for
-posts which for whatever reason should not be published publically.
+posts which for whatever reason should not be published publicly.
As such, it is a low volume list, and users are urged not to use
&email-debian-private; unless it is really necessary. Moreover, do
<em>not</em> forward email from that list to anyone. Archives of this
list are not available on the web for obvious reasons, but you can see
-them using your shell account <tt>master.debian.org</tt> and looking
+them using your shell account on <tt>lists.debian.org</tt> and looking
in the <file>~debian/archive/debian-private</file> directory.
<p>
&email-debian-email; is a special mailing list used as a grab-bag
for Debian related correspondence such as contacting upstream authors
about licenses, bugs, etc. or discussing the project with others where it
might be useful to have the discussion archived somewhere.
- <p>
-As ever on the net, please trim down the quoting of articles you're
-replying to. In general, please adhere to the usual conventions for
-posting messages.
- <p>
-Online archives of mailing lists are available at <url
-id="&url-lists-archives;">.
+ <sect id="irc-channels">IRC channels
+ <p>
+Several IRC channels are dedicated to Debian's development. They are mainly
+hosted on the <url id="&url-openprojects;" name="freenode"> network
+(previously known as Open Projects Network).
+The <tt>irc.debian.org</tt> DNS entry is an alias to
+<tt>irc.freenode.net</tt>.
+ <p>
+The main channel for Debian in general is <em>#debian</em>. This is a large,
+general-purpose channel where users can find recent news in the topic and
+served by bots. <em>#debian</em> is for English speakers; there are also
+<em>#debian.de</em>, <em>#debian-fr</em>, <em>#debian-br</em> and other
+similarly named channels for speakers of other languages.
+ <p>
+The main channel for Debian development is <em>#debian-devel</em>.
+It is a very active channel since usually over 150 people are always
+logged in. It's a channel for people who work
+on Debian, it's not a support channel (there's <em>#debian</em> for that).
+It is however open to anyone who wants to lurk (and learn). Its topic is
+commonly full of interesting information for developers.
+ <p>
+Since <em>#debian-devel</em> it's an open channel, you
+should not speak there of issues that are discussed in
+&email-debian-private;. There's another channel for this purpose,
+it's called <em>#debian-private</em> and it's protected by a key.
+This key is available in the archives of debian-private in
+<file>master.debian.org:&file-debian-private-archive;</file>,
+just <prgn>zgrep</prgn> for <em>#debian-private</em> in
+all the files.
+ <p>
+There are other additional channels dedicated to specific subjects.
+<em>#debian-bugs</em> is used for coordinating bug squash parties.
+<em>#debian-boot</em> is used to coordinate the work on the boot
+floppies (i.e. the installer). <em>#debian-doc</em> is
+occasionally used to talk about documentation, like the document you are
+reading. Other channels are dedicated to an architecture or a set of
+packages: <em>#debian-bsd</em>, <em>#debian-kde</em>, <em>#debian-jr</em>,
+<em>#debian-edu</em>,
+<em>#debian-sf</em> (SourceForge package), <em>#debian-oo</em> (OpenOffice
+package) ...
+ <p>
+Some non-English developers' channels exist as well, for example
+<em>#debian-devel-fr</em> for
+French speaking people interested in Debian's development.
+ <p>
+Channels dedicated to Debian also exist on other IRC networks, notably on
+the <url name="Open and free technology community (OFTC)"
+id="http://www.oftc.net/"> IRC network.
+
<sect id="doc-rsrcs">Documentation
<p>
-&FIXME; <url id="&url-devel-docs;">
-
+This document contains a lot of information very useful to Debian developers,
+but it can not contain everything. Most of the other interesting documents
+are linked from <url id="&url-devel-docs;" name="The Developers' Corner">.
+Take the time to browse all the links, you will learn many more things.
- <sect id="server-machines">Debian servers
+ <sect id="server-machines">Debian machines
+ <p>
+Debian has several computers working as servers, most of which serve
+critical functions in the Debian project. Most of the machines are used
+for porting activities, and they all have a permanent connection to the
+Internet.
+ <p>
+Most of the machines are available for individual developers to use,
+as long as the developers follow the rules set forth in the
+<url name="Debian Machine Usage Policies" id="&url-dmup;">.
+ <p>
+Generally speaking, you can use these machines for Debian-related purposes
+as you see fit. Please be kind to system administrators, and do not use
+up tons and tons of disk space, network bandwidth, or CPU without first
+getting the approval of the system administrators. Usually these machines are run by
+volunteers.
+ <p>
+Please take care to protect your Debian passwords and SSH keys installed on
+Debian machines. Avoid login or upload methods which send passwords over
+the Internet in the clear, such as telnet, FTP, POP etc.
<p>
-Debian servers are well known servers which serve critical functions
-in the Debian project. Every developer should know what these servers
-are and what they do.
+Please do not put any material that doesn't relate to Debian on the Debian
+servers, unless you have prior permission.
+ <p>
+The current list of Debian machines is available at
+<url id="&url-devel-machines;">. That web page contains machine names,
+contact information, information about who can log in, SSH keys etc.
<p>
If you have a problem with the operation of a Debian server, and you
think that the system operators need to be notified of this problem,
-please find the contact address for the particular machine at <url
-id="&url-devel-machines;">. If you have a non-operating problems
-(such as packages to be remove, suggestions for the web site, etc.),
+the Debian system administrator team is reachable at
+<email>debian-admin@lists.debian.org</email>.
+ <p>
+If you have a problem with a certain service, not related to the system
+administration (such as packages to be removed from the archive,
+suggestions for the web site, etc.),
generally you'll report a bug against a ``pseudo-package''. See <ref
id="submit-bug"> for information on how to submit bugs.
- <sect1 id="servers-master">The master server
+ <sect1 id="servers-bugs">The bugs server
<p>
-<tt>master.debian.org</tt> is the canonical location for the Bug
-Tracking System (BTS). If you plan on doing some statistical analysis
-or processing of Debian bugs, this would be the place to do it.
-Please describe your plans on &email-debian-devel; before implementing
+<tt>bugs.debian.org</tt> is the canonical location for the Bug Tracking
+System (BTS). If you plan on doing some statistical analysis or
+processing of Debian bugs, this would be the place to do it. Please
+describe your plans on &email-debian-devel; before implementing
anything, however, to reduce unnecessary duplication of effort or
wasted processing time.
<p>
-All Debian developers have accounts on <tt>master.debian.org</tt>.
-Please take care to protect your password to this machine. Try to
-avoid login or upload methods which send passwords over the Internet
-in the clear.
- <p>
-If you find a problem with <tt>master.debian.org</tt> such as disk
-full, suspicious activity, or whatever, send an email to
-&email-debian-admin;.
+All Debian developers have accounts on <tt>bugs.debian.org</tt>.
<sect1 id="servers-ftp-master">The ftp-master server
<p>
-The ftp-master server, <tt>ftp-master.debian.org</tt> (or
-<tt>auric.debian.org</tt>), holds the canonical copy of the Debian
+The <tt>ftp-master.debian.org</tt> server holds the canonical copy of the Debian
archive (excluding the non-US packages). Generally, package uploads
go to this server; see <ref id="upload">.
<p>
an email to &email-ftpmaster;, but also see the procedures in
<ref id="archive-manip">.
- <sect1 id="servers-www">The WWW server
+ <sect1 id="servers-non-us">The non-US server
<p>
-The main web server, <tt>www.debian.org</tt>, is also known as
-<tt>klecker.debian.org</tt>. All developers are given accounts on this
-machine.
+The non-US server, <tt>non-us.debian.org</tt>,
+holds the canonical copy of the non-US part of the Debian archive.
+If you need to upload a package into one of the non-US sections, upload it
+to this server; see <ref id="upload-non-us">.
<p>
-If you have some Debian-specific information which you want to serve
-up on the web, you can do this by putting material in the
-<file>public_html</file> directory under your home directory. You should
-do this on <tt>klecker.debian.org</tt>. Any material you put in those areas
-are accessible via the URL
-<tt>http://people.debian.org/~<var>user-id</var>/</tt>.
-You should only use this particular location because it will be backed up,
-whereas on other hosts it won't. Please do not put any material on Debian
-servers not relating to Debian, unless you have prior permission.
-Send mail to &email-debian-devel; if you have any questions.
+Problems with the non-US package archive should generally be submitted as
+bugs against the <package>nonus.debian.org</package> pseudo-package (notice
+the lack of hyphen between "non" and "us" in the pseudo-package name
+— that's for backwards compatibility). Remember to check whether or
+not someone else has already reported the problem on the
+<url id="http://bugs.debian.org/nonus.debian.org" name="Bug Tracking System">.
+
+ <sect1 id="servers-www">The www-master server
+ <p>
+The main web server is <tt>www-master.debian.org</tt>.
+It holds the official web pages, the face
+of Debian for most newbies.
<p>
If you find a problem with the Debian web server, you should generally
submit a bug against the pseudo-package,
-<package>www.debian.org</package>. First check whether or not someone
+<package>www.debian.org</package>. Remember to check whether or not someone
else has already reported the problem on the
<url id="http://bugs.debian.org/www.debian.org" name="Bug Tracking System">.
+ <sect1 id="servers-people">The people web server
+ <p>
+<tt>people.debian.org</tt> is the server used
+for developers' own web pages about anything related to Debian.
+ <p>
+If you have some Debian-specific information which you want to serve
+on the web, you can do this by putting material in the
+<file>public_html</file> directory under your home directory on
+<tt>people.debian.org</tt>.
+This will be accessible at the URL
+<tt>http://people.debian.org/~<var>your-user-id</var>/</tt>.
+ <p>
+You should only use this particular location because it will be backed up,
+whereas on other hosts it won't.
+ <p>
+Usually the only reason to use a different host is when you need to publish
+materials subject to the U.S. export restrictions, in which case you can use
+one of the other servers located outside the United States, such as the
+aforementioned <tt>non-us.debian.org</tt>.
+ <p>
+Send mail to &email-debian-devel; if you have any questions.
<sect1 id="servers-cvs">The CVS server
<p>
-<tt>cvs.debian.org</tt> is also known as <tt>klecker.debian.org</tt>,
-discussed above. If you need to use a publically accessible CVS
+Our CVS server is located on <tt>cvs.debian.org</tt>.
+ <p>
+If you need to use a publicly accessible CVS
server, for instance, to help coordinate work on a package between
many different developers, you can request a CVS area on the server.
<p>
<p>
To request a CVS area, send a request via email to
&email-debian-admin;. Include the name of the requested CVS area,
-Debian account should own the CVS root area, and why you need it.
+the Debian account that should own the CVS root area, and why you need it.
- <sect1 id="devel-db">The Developers Database
+ <sect id="devel-db">The Developers Database
<p>
The Developers Database, at <url id="&url-debian-db;">, is an LDAP
directory for managing Debian developer attributes. You can use this
-resource to search the list of Debian developers. For information on
-keeping your entry the developer database up-to-date, see <ref
-id="user-maint">.
-
-
- <sect id="servers-mirrors">Mirrors of Debian servers
- <p>
-The web and FTP servers have several mirrors available. Please do not
-put heavy load on the canonical FTP or web servers. Ideally, the
-canonical servers only mirror out to a first tier of mirrors, and all
-user access is to the mirrors. This allows Debian to better spread
-its bandwidth requirements over several servers and networks. Note
-that newer push mirroring techniques ensure that mirrors are as
-up-to-date as they can be.
- <p>
-The main web page listing the available public FTP (and, usually,
-HTTP) servers can be found at <url id="&url-debian-mirrors;">. More
-information concerning Debian mirrors can be found at <url
-id="&url-debian-mirroring;">. This useful page includes information
-and tools which can be helpful if you are interested in setting up
-your own mirror, either for internal or public access.
- <p>
-Note that mirrors are generally run by third-parties who are
-interested in helping Debian. As such, developers generally do not
-have accounts on these machines.
-
-
- <sect id="other-machines">Other Debian developer machines
+resource to search the list of Debian developers.
+Part of this information is also available through
+the finger service on Debian servers, try
+<prgn>finger yourlogin@db.debian.org</prgn> to see what it reports.
<p>
-There are other Debian machines which may be made available to you.
-You can use these for Debian-related purposes as you see fit. Please
-be kind to system administrators, and do not use up tons and tons of
-disk space, network bandwidth, or CPU without first getting the
-approval of the local maintainers. Usually these machines are run by
-volunteers. Generally, these machines are for porting activities.
+Developers can <url name="log into the database" id="&url-debian-db-login;">
+to change their debian-private list subscription, their personal
+information, to mark themselves on vacation, etc.
+For more information on keeping your entry the developer database
+up-to-date, please see <ref id="user-maint">.
<p>
-Aside from the servers mentioned in <ref id="server-machines">, there
-is a list of machines available to Debian developers at <url
-id="&url-devel-machines;">.
-
+One can also submit their SSH keys to be used for authorization on the
+official Debian machines, and even add new *.debian.net DNS entries.
+Those features are documented at <url id="&url-debian-db-mail-gw;">.
<sect id="archive">The Debian archive
<p>
The &debian-formal; distribution consists of a lot of packages
-(<tt>.deb</tt>'s, currently around &number-of-pkgs;) and a few
+(<file>.deb</file>'s, currently around &number-of-pkgs;) and a few
additional files (such documentation and installation disk images).
<p>
Here is an example directory tree of a complete Debian archive:
&sample-dist-dirtree;
<p>
As you can see, the top-level directory contains two directories,
-<tt>dists/</tt> and <tt>pool/</tt>. The latter is a “pool” in which the
+<file>dists/</file> and <file>pool/</file>. The latter is a “pool” in which the
packages actually are, and which is handled by the archive maintenance
database and the accompanying programs. The former contains the
distributions, <em>stable</em>, <em>testing</em> and <em>unstable</em>.
-Each of those distribution directories is divided in equivalent
-subdirectories purpose of which is equal, so we will only explain how it
-looks in stable. The <tt>Packages</tt> and <tt>Sources</tt> files in the
-distribution subdirectories can reference files in the <tt>pool/</tt>
-directory.
+The <file>Packages</file> and <file>Sources</file> files in the
+distribution subdirectories can reference files in the <file>pool/</file>
+directory. The directory tree below each of the distributions is arranged
+in an identical manner. What we describe below for <em>stable</em> is
+equally applicable to the <em>unstable</em> and <em>testing</em>
+distributions.
<p>
-<tt>dists/stable</tt> contains three directories, namely <em>main</em>,
-<em>contrib</em>, and <em>non-free</em>.
+<file>dists/stable</file> contains three directories, namely <file>main</file>,
+<file>contrib</file>, and <file>non-free</file>.
<p>
-In each of the areas, there is a directory with the source packages
-(<tt>source</tt>), a directory for each supported architecture
-(<tt>binary-i386</tt>, <tt>binary-m68k</tt>, etc.), and a directory
-for architecture independent packages (<tt>binary-all</tt>).
+In each of the areas, there is a directory for the source packages
+(<file>source</file>) and a directory for each supported architecture
+(<file>binary-i386</file>, <file>binary-m68k</file>, etc.).
<p>
-The <em>main</em> area contains additional directories which holds
+The <file>main</file> area contains additional directories which holds
the disk images and some essential pieces of documentation required
for installing the Debian distribution on a specific architecture
-(<tt>disks-i386</tt>, <tt>disks-m68k</tt>, etc.).
- <p>
-The <em>binary-*</em> and <em>source</em> directories are divided
-further into <em>subsections</em>.
+(<file>disks-i386</file>, <file>disks-m68k</file>, etc.).
<sect1>Sections
but may fail other requirements. For instance, they may depend on
non-free packages.
<p>
-Packages which do not apply to the DFSG are placed in the
+Packages which do not conform to the DFSG are placed in the
<em>non-free</em> section. These packages are not considered as part
of the Debian distribution, though we support their use, and we
provide infrastructure (such as our bug-tracking system and mailing
package licenses of the packages in <em>non-free</em> and include as
many on the CD-ROMs as he's allowed to. (Since this varies greatly from
vendor to vendor, this job can't be done by the Debian developers.)
+ <p>
+Note also that the term "section" is also used to refer to categories
+which simplify the organization and browsing of available packages, e.g.
+<em>admin</em>, <em>net</em>, <em>utils</em> etc. Once upon a time, these
+sections (subsections, rather) existed in the form of subdirectories within
+the Debian archive. Nowadays, these exist only in the "Section" header
+fields of packages.
<sect1>Architectures
also have ports underway to non-Linux kernel. Aside from
<em>i386</em> (our name for Intel x86), there is <em>m68k</em>,
<em>alpha</em>, <em>powerpc</em>, <em>sparc</em>, <em>hurd-i386</em>,
-and <em>arm</em>, as of this writing.
+<em>arm</em>, <em>ia64</em>, <em>hppa</em>, <em>s390</em>, <em>mips</em>,
+<em>mipsel</em> and <em>sh</em> as of this writing.
<p>
&debian-formal; 1.3 is only available as <em>i386</em>. Debian 2.0
shipped for <em>i386</em> and <em>m68k</em> architectures. Debian 2.1
ships for the <em>i386</em>, <em>m68k</em>, <em>alpha</em>, and
-<em>sparc</em> architectures. Debian 2.2 adds support for the
-<em>powerpc</em> and <em>arm</em> architectures.
+<em>sparc</em> architectures. Debian 2.2 added support for the
+<em>powerpc</em> and <em>arm</em> architectures. Debian 3.0 adds
+support of five new architectures: <em>ia64</em>, <em>hppa</em>,
+<em>s390</em>, <em>mips</em> and <em>mipsel</em>.
<p>
Information for developers or uses about the specific ports are
available at the <url id="&url-debian-ports;" name="Debian Ports web
pages">.
- <sect1>Subsections
- <p>
-The sections <em>main</em>, <em>contrib</em>, and <em>non-free</em>
-are split into <em>subsections</em> to simplify the installation
-process and the maintenance of the archive. Subsections are not
-formally defined, except perhaps the `base' subsection.
-Subsections simply exist to simplify the organization and browsing of
-available packages. Please check the current Debian distribution to
-see which sections are available.
- <p>
-Note however that with the introduction of package pools (see the top-level
-<em>pool/</em> directory), the subsections in the form of subdirectories
-will eventually cease to exist. They will be kept in the packages' `Section'
-header fields, though.
<sect1>Packages
<p>
There are two types of Debian packages, namely <em>source</em> and
<em>binary</em> packages.
<p>
-Source packages consist of either two or three files: a <tt>.dsc</tt>
-file, and either a <tt>.tar.gz</tt> file or both an
-<tt>.orig.tar.gz</tt> and a <tt>.diff.gz</tt> file.
+Source packages consist of either two or three files: a <file>.dsc</file>
+file, and either a <file>.tar.gz</file> file or both an
+<file>.orig.tar.gz</file> and a <file>.diff.gz</file> file.
<p>
If a package is developed specially for Debian and is not distributed
-outside of Debian, there is just one <tt>.tar.gz</tt> file which
+outside of Debian, there is just one <file>.tar.gz</file> file which
contains the sources of the program. If a package is distributed
-elsewhere too, the <tt>.orig.tar.gz</tt> file stores the so-called
+elsewhere too, the <file>.orig.tar.gz</file> file stores the so-called
<em>upstream source code</em>, that is the source code that's
distributed from the <em>upstream maintainer</em> (often the author of
-the software). In this case, the <tt>.diff.gz</tt> contains the
+the software). In this case, the <file>.diff.gz</file> contains the
changes made by the Debian maintainer.
<p>
-The <tt>.dsc</tt> lists all the files in the source package together
+The <file>.dsc</file> file lists all the files in the source package together
with checksums (<prgn>md5sums</prgn>) and some additional info about
the package (maintainer, version, etc.).
<p>
The directory system described in the previous chapter is itself
contained within <em>distribution directories</em>. Each
-distribution is actually contained in the <tt>pool</tt> directory in the
+distribution is actually contained in the <file>pool</file> directory in the
top-level of the Debian archive itself.
<p>
To summarize, the Debian archive has a root directory within an FTP
server. For instance, at the mirror site,
<ftpsite>ftp.us.debian.org</ftpsite>, the Debian archive itself is
contained in <ftppath>/debian</ftppath>, which is a common location
-(another is <tt>/pub/debian</tt>).
+(another is <file>/pub/debian</file>).
<p>
A distribution is comprised of Debian source and binary packages, and the
-respective <tt>Sources</tt> and <tt>Packages</tt> index files, containing
+respective <file>Sources</file> and <file>Packages</file> index files, containing
the header information from all those packages. The former are kept in the
-<tt>pool/</tt> directory, while the latter are kept in the <tt>dists/</tt>
-directory of the archive (because of backwards compatibility).
+<file>pool/</file> directory, while the latter are kept in the <file>dists/</file>
+directory of the archive (for backwards compatibility).
<sect2 id="sec-dists">Stable, testing, and unstable
<p>
There are always distributions called <em>stable</em> (residing in
-<tt>dists/stable</tt>), one called <em>testing</em> (residing in
-<tt>dists/testing</tt>), and one called <em>unstable</em> (residing in
-<tt>dists/unstable</tt>). This reflects the development process of the
+<file>dists/stable</file>), one called <em>testing</em> (residing in
+<file>dists/testing</file>), and one called <em>unstable</em> (residing in
+<file>dists/unstable</file>). This reflects the development process of the
Debian project.
<p>
Active development is done in the <em>unstable</em> distribution
(that's why this distribution is sometimes called the <em>development
distribution</em>). Every Debian developer can update his or her
packages in this distribution at any time. Thus, the contents of this
-distribution change from day-to-day. Since no special effort is done
+distribution changes from day-to-day. Since no special effort is done
to make sure everything in this distribution is working properly, it is
sometimes literally unstable.
<p>
-Packages get copied from <em>unstable</em> to <em>testing</em> if they
-satisfy certain criteria. To get into <em>testing</em> distribution, a
-package needs to be in the archive for two weeks and not have any
-release critical bugs. After that period, it will propagate into
-<em>testing</em> as soon as anything it depends on is also added. This
-process is automatic. You can see some notes on this system as well
-as <tt>update_excuses</tt> (describing which packages are valid
-candidates, which are not, and why not) at <url
-id="&url-testing-maint;">.
+<ref id="testing"> is generated automatically by taking
+packages from unstable if they satisfy certain criteria. Those
+criteria should ensure a good quality for packages within testing.
+The update to testing is launched each day after the
+new packages have been installed.
<p>
After a period of development, once the release manager deems fit, the
<em>testing</em> distribution is frozen, meaning that the policies
-which control how packages move from <em>unstable</em> to testing are
+which control how packages move from <em>unstable</em> to <em>testing</em> are
tightened. Packages which are too buggy are removed. No changes are
allowed into <em>testing</em> except for bug fixes. After some time
has elapsed, depending on progress, the <em>testing</em> distribution
This development cycle is based on the assumption that the
<em>unstable</em> distribution becomes <em>stable</em> after passing a
period of being in <em>testing</em>. Even once a distribution is
-considered stable, a few bugs inevitably remain &mdash that's why the
+considered stable, a few bugs inevitably remain — that's why the
stable distribution is updated every now and then. However, these
updates are tested very carefully and have to be introduced into the
archive individually to reduce the risk of introducing new bugs. You
can find proposed additions to <em>stable</em> in the
-<tt>proposed-updates</tt> directory. Those packages in
-<tt>proposed-updates</tt> that pass muster are periodically moved as a
+<file>proposed-updates</file> directory. Those packages in
+<file>proposed-updates</file> that pass muster are periodically moved as a
batch into the stable distribution and the revision level of the
-stable distribution is incremented (e.g., ‘3.0’ becomes ‘3.0r1’,
-‘2.2r4’ becomes ‘2.0r5’, and so forth).
+stable distribution is incremented (e.g., ‘3.0’ becomes
+‘3.0r1’, ‘2.2r4’ becomes ‘2.2r5’, and
+so forth).
<p>
Note that development under <em>unstable</em> continues during the
freeze period, since the <em>unstable</em> distribution remains in
<sect2>Experimental
<p>
-The <em>experimental</em> distribution is a specialty distribution.
+The <em>experimental</em> distribution is a special distribution.
It is not a full distribution in the same sense as `stable' and
`unstable' are. Instead, it is meant to be a temporary staging area
for highly experimental software where there's a good chance that the
Some experimental software can still go into <em>unstable</em>, with a few
warnings in the description, but that isn't recommended because packages
from <em>unstable</em> are expected to propagate to <em>testing</em> and
-thus to <em>stable</em>.
+thus to <em>stable</em>. You should not be afraid to use
+<em>experimental</em> since it does not cause any pain to the ftpmasters,
+the experimental packages are automatically removed once you upload
+the package in <em>unstable</em> with a higher version number.
<p>
New software which isn't likely to damage your system can go directly into
<em>unstable</em>.
<p>
An alternative to <em>experimental</em> is to use your personal web space
-on <tt>people.debian.org</tt> (<tt>klecker.debian.org</tt>).
+on <tt>people.debian.org</tt>.
<sect1 id="codenames">Release code names
<em>unstable</em> point to the appropriate release directories.
+ <sect id="mirrors">Debian mirrors
+ <p>
+The various download archives and the web site have several mirrors
+available in order to relieve our canonical servers from heavy load.
+In fact, some of the canonical servers aren't public, and instead a
+first tier of mirrors balances the load. That way, users always access
+the mirrors and get used to using them, which allows Debian to better
+spread its bandwidth requirements over several servers and networks,
+and basically makes users avoid hammering on one primary location.
+Note that the first tier of mirrors is as up-to-date as it can be since
+they update when triggered from the internal sites (we call this
+"push mirroring").
+ <p>
+All the information on Debian mirrors, including a list of the available
+public FTP/HTTP servers, can be found at <url id="&url-debian-mirrors;">.
+This useful page also includes information and tools which can be helpful if
+you are interested in setting up your own mirror, either for internal or
+public access.
+ <p>
+Note that mirrors are generally run by third-parties who are
+interested in helping Debian. As such, developers generally do not
+have accounts on these machines.
+
+
+ <sect id="incoming-system">
+ <heading>The Incoming system
+ <p>
+The Incoming system is responsible of collecting updated packages and
+installing them in the Debian archive. It consists of a set of
+directories and scripts that are installed both on <tt>&ftp-master-host;</tt>
+and <tt>&non-us-host;</tt>.
+ <p>
+Packages are uploaded by all the maintainers into a directory called
+<file>unchecked</file>. This directory is scanned every 15 minutes by
+the <prgn>katie</prgn> script, which verifies the integrity of the uploaded packages and the cryptographic
+signatures. If the package is considered ready to be installed, it
+is moved into the <file>accepted</file> directory. If this is the first upload of
+the package, it is moved in the <file>new</file> directory, where it waits
+for an approval of the ftpmasters. If the package contains files to be installed
+"by-hand" it is moved in the <file>byhand</file> directory, where it waits
+for a manual installation by the ftpmasters. Otherwise, if any error has been detected,
+the package is refused and is moved in the <file>reject</file> directory.
+ <p>
+Once the package is accepted the system sends a confirmation
+mail to the maintainer, closes all the bugs marked as fixed by the upload
+and the auto-builders may start recompiling it. The package is now publicly
+accessible at <url id="&url-incoming;"> (there is no
+such URL for packages in the non-US archive) until it is really installed
+in the Debian archive. This happens only once a day, the package
+is then removed from incoming and installed in the pool along with all
+the other packages. Once all the other updates (generating new
+<file>Packages</file> and <file>Sources</file> index files for example) have been
+made, a special script is called to ask all the primary mirrors to update
+themselves.
+ <p>
+The archive maintenance software will also send the OpenPGP/GnuPG signed
+<file>.changes</file> file that you uploaded to the appropriate mailing
+lists. If a package is released with the <tt>Distribution:</tt> set to
+`stable', the announcement is sent to &email-debian-changes;.
+If a package is released with <tt>Distribution:</tt> set to `unstable'
+or `experimental', the announcement will be posted to
+&email-debian-devel-changes; instead.
+ <p>
+All Debian developers have write access to the <file>unchecked</file>
+directory in order to upload their packages, they also have that access
+to the <file>reject</file> directory in order to remove their bad uploads
+or to move some files back in the <file>unchecked</file> directory. But
+all the other directories are only writable by the ftpmasters, that is
+why you can not remove an upload once it has been accepted.
+
+ <sect1 id="delayed-incoming">Delayed incoming
+ <p>
+The <file>unchecked</file> directory has a special <file>DELAYED</file>
+subdirectory. It is itself subdivided in nine directories
+called <file>1-day</file> to <file>9-day</file>. Packages which are uploaded in
+one of those directories will be moved in the real unchecked
+directory after the corresponding number of days.
+This is done by a script that is run each day and which moves the
+packages between the directories. Those which are in "1-day" are
+installed in <file>unchecked</file> while the others are moved in the
+adjacent directory (for example, a package in <file>5-day</file> will
+be moved in <file>4-day</file>). This feature is particularly useful
+for people who are doing non-maintainer uploads. Instead of
+waiting before uploading a NMU, it is uploaded as soon as it is
+ready but in one of those <file>DELAYED/<var>x</var>-day</file> directories.
+That leaves the corresponding number of days for the maintainer
+to react and upload another fix themselves if they are not
+completely satisfied with the NMU. Alternatively they can remove
+the NMU.
+ <p>
+The use of that delayed feature can be simplified with a bit
+of integration with your upload tool. For instance, if you use
+<prgn>dupload</prgn> (see <ref id="dupload">), you can add this
+snippet to your configuration file:
+<example>
+$delay = ($ENV{DELAY} || 7);
+$cfg{'delayed'} = {
+ fqdn => "&ftp-master-host;",
+ login => "yourdebianlogin",
+ incoming => "/org/ftp.debian.org/incoming/DELAYED/$delay-day/",
+ dinstall_runs => 1,
+ method => "scpb"
+};
+</example>
+Once you've made that change, <prgn>dupload</prgn> can be used to
+easily upload a package in one of the delayed directories:
+<example>DELAY=5 dupload --to delayed <changes-file></example>
+
+
+ <sect id="testing">
+ <heading>The "testing" distribution</heading>
+ <p>
+The scripts that update the <em>testing</em> distribution are run each day
+after the installation of the
+updated packages. They generate the <file>Packages</file> files for
+the <em>testing</em> distribution, but they do so in an intelligent manner
+trying to avoid any inconsistency and trying to use only
+non-buggy packages.
+ <p>The inclusion of a package from <em>unstable</em> is conditional on the following:
+<list>
+ <item>
+The package must have been available in <em>unstable</em> for several days;
+the precise number depends on the upload's urgency field. It
+is 10 days for low urgency, 5 days for medium urgency and 2 days for high
+urgency. Those delays may be doubled during a freeze;
+ <item>
+It must have less release-critical bugs than the version available
+in <em>testing</em>;
+ <item>
+It must be available on all architectures on which it has been
+previously built. <ref id="madison"> may be of interest to
+check that information;
+ <item>
+It must not break any dependency of a package that is already available
+in <em>testing</em>;
+ <item>
+The packages on which it depends must either be available in <em>testing</em>
+or they must be accepted into <em>testing</em> at the same time (and they will
+if they respect themselves all the criteria);
+</list>
+ <p>
+To find out whether a package is progressing into testing or not, see the
+testing script output on the <url name="web page of the testing distribution"
+id="&url-testing-maint;">, or use the program <prgn>grep-excuses</prgn>
+which is in the <package>devscripts</package> package. This utility can
+easily be used in a <manref name="crontab" section="5"> to keep one
+informed of the progression of their packages into <em>testing</em>.
+ <p>
+The <file>update_excuses</file> file does not always give the precise reason
+why the package is refused, one may have to find it on their own by looking
+what would break with the inclusion of the package. The <url
+id="&url-testing-maint;" name="testing web page"> gives some more information
+about the usual problems which may be causing such troubles.
+ <p>
+Sometimes, some packages never enter <em>testing</em> because the set of
+inter-relationship is too complicated and can not be sorted out
+by the scripts. In that case, the release manager must be
+contacted, and he will force the inclusion of the packages.
+ <p>
+In general, please refer to the <url name="testing web page"
+id="&url-testing-maint;"> for more information. It also includes
+answers to some of the frequently asked questions.
+
+
+ <sect id="pkg-info">Package information
+ <p>
+
+ <sect1 id="pkg-info-web">On the web
+ <p>
+Each package has several dedicated web pages.
+<tt>http://&packages-host;/<var>package-name</var></tt>
+displays each version of the package
+available in the various distributions. Each version links to a page
+which provides information, including the package description,
+the dependencies and package download links.
+ <p>
+The bug tracking system track bugs for each package. You can
+view the bugs of a given package at the URL
+<tt>http://&bugs-host;/<var>package-name</var></tt>.
+
+ <sect1 id="madison">The <prgn>madison</prgn> utility
+ <p>
+<prgn>madison</prgn> is a command-line utility that is available
+on both <tt>&ftp-master-host;</tt> and <tt>&non-us-host;</tt>. It
+uses a single argument corresponding to a package name. In result
+it displays which version of the package is available for each
+architecture and distribution combination. An example will explain
+it better.
+ <p>
+<example>
+$ madison libdbd-mysql-perl
+libdbd-mysql-perl | 1.2202-4 | stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
+libdbd-mysql-perl | 1.2216-2 | testing | source, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
+libdbd-mysql-perl | 1.2216-2.0.1 | testing | alpha
+libdbd-mysql-perl | 1.2219-1 | unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
+</example>
+ <p>
+In this example, you can see that the version in <em>unstable</em> differs from
+the version in <em>testing</em> and that there has been a binary-only NMU of the
+package for the alpha architecture. Each time the package has been
+recompiled on most of the architectures.
+
+ <sect id="pkg-tracking-system">The Package Tracking System
+ <p>
+The Package Tracking System (PTS) is basically a tool to track by mail
+the activity of a source package. You just have to subscribe
+to a source package to start getting the mails related to it.
+You get the same mails as the maintainer. Each mail
+sent through the PTS is classified and associated to one of
+the keyword listed below. This will let you select the mails that
+you want to receive.
+ <p>
+By default you will get:
+<taglist>
+ <tag><tt>bts</tt>
+ <item>
+All the bug reports and following discussions.
+
+ <tag><tt>bts-control</tt>
+ <item>
+The control mails notifying a status change in one of the bugs.
+
+ <tag><tt>upload-source</tt>
+ <item>
+The confirmation mail from <prgn>katie</prgn> when an uploaded source
+package is accepted.
+
+ <tag><tt>katie-other</tt>
+ <item>
+Other warning and error mails from <prgn>katie</prgn> (like the
+override disparity for the section or priority field).
+
+ <tag><tt>default</tt>
+ <item>
+Any non-automatic mail sent to the PTS by people who wanted to
+contact the subscribers of the package.
+
+ <tag><tt>summary</tt>
+ <item>
+In the future, you may receive regular summary mails to keep you
+informed of the package's status (bug statistics, porting overview,
+progression in <em>testing</em>, ...).
+</taglist>
+ <p>
+You can also decide to receive some more information:
+<taglist>
+ <tag><tt>upload-binary</tt>
+ <item>
+The confirmation mail from <prgn>katie</prgn> when an uploaded binary
+package is accepted (to check that your package is recompiled for all
+architectures).
+
+ <tag><tt>cvs</tt>
+ <item>
+CVS commits if the maintainer has setup a system to forward commit
+notification to the PTS.
+
+ <tag><tt>ddtp</tt>
+ <item>
+Translations of descriptions or debconf templates
+submitted to the Debian Description Translation Project.
+</taglist>
+
+ <sect1 id="pts-commands">The PTS email interface
+ <p>
+You can control your subscription(s) to the PTS by sending
+various commands to <email>pts@qa.debian.org</email>.
+
+<taglist>
+
+<tag><tt>subscribe <srcpackage> [<email>]</tt>
+<item>
+ Subscribes <var>email</var> to communications related to the source package
+ <var>srcpackage</var>. Sender address is used if the second argument is
+ not present. If <var>srcpackage</var> is not a valid source package,
+ you'll get a warning. However if it's a valid binary package, the PTS
+ will subscribe you to the corresponding source package.
+
+<tag><tt>unsubscribe <srcpackage> [<email>]</tt>
+<item>
+ Removes a previous subscription to the source package <var>srcpackage</var>
+ using the specified email address or the sender address if the second
+ argument is left out.
+
+<tag><tt>which [<email>]</tt>
+<item>
+ Lists all subscriptions for the sender or the email address optionally
+ specified.
+
+<tag><tt>keyword [<email>]</tt>
+<item>
+ Tells you the keywords that you are accepting. Each mail sent through
+ the Package Tracking System is associated to a keyword and you receive
+ only the mails associated to keywords that you are accepting. Here is
+ the list of available keywords:
+ <list>
+ <item><tt>bts</tt>: mails coming from the Debian Bug Tracking System
+ <item><tt>bts-control</tt>: reply to mails sent to
+ <email>control@bugs.debian.org</email>
+ <item><tt>summary</tt>: automatic summary mails about the state of a package
+ <item><tt>cvs</tt>: notification of CVS commits
+ <item><tt>ddtp</tt>: translations of descriptions and debconf templates
+ <item><tt>upload-source</tt>: announce of a new source upload that
+ has been accepted
+ <item><tt>upload-binary</tt>: announce of a new binary-only upload (porting)
+ <item><tt>katie-other</tt>: other mails from ftpmasters
+ (override disparity, etc.)
+ <item><tt>default</tt>: all the other mails (those which aren't "automatic")
+ </list>
+
+<tag><tt>keyword <srcpackage> [<email>]</tt>
+<item>
+ Same as previous item but for the given source package since
+ you may select a different set of keywords for each source package.
+
+<tag><tt>keyword [<email>] {+|-|=} <list of keywords></tt>
+<item>
+ Accept (+) or refuse (-) mails associated to the given keyword(s).
+ Define the list (=) of accepted keywords.
+
+<tag><tt>keyword <srcpackage> [<email>] {+|-|=} <list of keywords></tt>
+<item>
+ Same as previous item but overrides the keywords list for the
+ indicated source package.
+
+<tag><tt>quit | thanks | --</tt>
+<item>
+ Stops processing commands. All following lines are ignored by
+ the bot.
+</taglist>
+
+ <sect1 id="pts-mail-filtering">Filtering PTS mails
+ <p>
+Once you are subscribed to a package, you will get the mails sent to
+<tt><var>srcpackage</var>@packages.qa.debian.org</tt>. Those mails
+have special headers appended to let you filter them in a special
+mailbox with <prgn>procmail</prgn>. The added headers are
+<tt>X-Loop</tt>, <tt>X-PTS-Package</tt>, <tt>X-PTS-Keyword</tt> and
+<tt>X-Unsubscribe</tt>.
+ <p>
+Here is an example of added headers for a source upload notification
+on the <package>dpkg</package> package:
+<example>
+X-Loop: dpkg@&pts-host;
+X-PTS-Package: dpkg
+X-PTS-Keyword: upload-source
+X-Unsubscribe: echo 'unsubscribe dpkg' | mail pts@qa.debian.org
+</example>
+
+ <sect1 id="pts-cvs-commit">Forwarding CVS commits in the PTS
+ <p>
+If you use a publicly accessible CVS repository for maintaining
+your Debian package you may want to forward the commit notification
+to the PTS so that the subscribers (possible co-maintainers) can
+closely follow the package's evolution.
+ <p>
+It's very easy to setup. Once your CVS repository generates commit
+notifications, you just have to make sure it sends a copy of those mails
+to <tt><var>srcpackage</var>_cvs@&pts-host;</tt>. Only people who
+accepts the <em>cvs</em> keyword will receive the notifications.
+
+ <sect id="ddpo">Developer's packages overview
+ <p>
+A QA (quality assurance) web portal is available at <url
+ id="&url-ddpo;"> which displays a table listing all the packages
+of a single developer (including those where the party is listed as
+a co-maintainer). The table gives a good summary about the developer's
+packages: number of bugs by severity, list of available versions in each
+distribution, testing status and much more including links to any other
+useful information.
+ <p>
+It is a good idea to look up your own data regularly so that
+you don't forget any open bug, and so that you don't forget which
+packages are under your responsibility.
+
+
<chapt id="pkgs">Managing Packages
<p>
This chapter contains information related to creating, uploading,
maintaining, and porting packages.
- <sect id="upload">Package uploads
- <sect1>New packages
+ <sect id="newpackage">New packages
<p>
If you want to create a new package for the Debian distribution, you
should first check the <url id="&url-wnpp;" name="Work-Needing and
<p>
Assuming no one else is already working on your prospective package,
you must then submit a bug report (<ref id="submit-bug">) against the
-pseudo package <tt>wnpp</tt>
+pseudo-package <package>wnpp</package>
describing your plan to create a new package, including, but not
limiting yourself to, a description of the package, the license of the
prospective package and the current URL where it can be downloaded
better feel of what is going on, and what is new, in the project.
</list>
- <sect1 id="changelog-entries">
- <heading>Adding an entry to <file>debian/changelog</file></heading>
+
+ <sect id="changelog-entries">Recording changes in the package
<p>
Changes that you make to the package need to be recorded in the
<file>debian/changelog</file>. These changes should provide a concise
<file>/usr/share/doc/<var>package</var>/changelog.gz</file> for native
packages.
<p>
-The <file>debian/changelog</file> file conform to a certain structure,
+The <file>debian/changelog</file> file conforms to a certain structure,
with a number of different fields. One field of note, the
<em>distribution</em>, is described in <ref id="upload-dist">. More
information about the structure of this file can be found in
and <ref id="dpkg-dev-el">.
+ <sect id="upload">Package uploads
+
+ <p>
+When a package is uploaded to the Debian archive, it must be accompanied by
+a <tt>.changes</tt> control file, which gives directions to the archive
+maintenance software for its handling. This is generated by
+<prgn>dpkg-genchanges</prgn> during the normal package build process.
<sect1 id="upload-checking">Checking the package prior to upload
<p>
For more information on <prgn>lintian</prgn>, see <ref id="lintian">.
<item>
Downgrade the package to the previous version (if one exists) — this
-tests the <tt>postrm</tt> and <tt>prerm</tt> scripts.
+tests the <file>postrm</file> and <file>prerm</file> scripts.
<item>
Remove the package, then reinstall it.
</list>
- <sect1>Generating the changes file
- <p>
-When a package is uploaded to the Debian FTP archive, it must be
-accompanied by a <tt>.changes</tt> file, which gives directions to the
-archive maintainers for its handling. This is usually generated by
-<prgn>dpkg-genchanges</prgn> during the normal package build process.
+ <sect1>Layout of the source files
<p>
-The changes file is a control file with the following fields:
+There are two types of Debian source packages:
+ <list>
+ <item>the so-called <em>native</em> packages, where there is no
+ distinction between the original sources and the patches
+ applied for Debian
+ <item>the (more common) packages where there's an original source
+ tarball file accompanied by another file that contains the
+ patches applied for Debian
+ </list>
<p>
-&control-file-fields;
+For the native packages, the source package includes a Debian source control
+file (<tt>.dsc</tt>) and the source tarball (<tt>.tar.gz</tt>). A source
+package of a non-native package includes a Debian source control file, the
+original source tarball (<tt>.orig.tar.gz</tt>) and the Debian patches
+(<tt>.diff.gz</tt>).
<p>
-All of these fields are mandatory for a Debian upload. See the list
-of control fields in the <url id="&url-debian-policy;" name="Debian
-Policy Manual"> for the contents of these fields. You can close bugs
-automatically using the <tt>Description</tt> field, see <ref
-id="upload-bugfix">.
-
-
- <sect2>The original source tarball
+Whether a package is native or not is determined when it is built by
+<manref name="dpkg-buildpackage" section="1">. The rest of this section
+relates only to non-native packages.
<p>
The first time a version is uploaded which corresponds to a particular
upstream version, the original source tar file should be uploaded and
-included in the <tt>.changes</tt> file. Subsequently, this very same
-tar file should be used to build the new diffs and <tt>.dsc</tt>
+included in the <file>.changes</file> file. Subsequently, this very same
+tar file should be used to build the new diffs and <file>.dsc</file>
files, and will not need to be re-uploaded.
<p>
By default, <prgn>dpkg-genchanges</prgn> and
<p>
If no original source is included in the upload, the original
source tar-file used by <prgn>dpkg-source</prgn> when constructing the
-<tt>.dsc</tt> file and diff to be uploaded <em>must</em> be
+<file>.dsc</file> file and diff to be uploaded <em>must</em> be
byte-for-byte identical with the one already in the archive.
- <sect2 id="upload-dist">Picking a distribution
+ <sect1 id="upload-dist">Picking a distribution
<p>
-The <tt>Distribution</tt> field, which originates from the first line of
-the <file>debian/changelog</file> file, indicates which distribution the
-package is intended for.
+Each upload needs to specify which distribution the package is intended
+for. The package build process extracts this information from the first
+line of the <file>debian/changelog</file> file and places it in the
+<tt>Distribution</tt> field of the <tt>.changes</tt> file.
<p>
-There are three possible values for this field: `stable', `unstable',
-and `experimental'. Normally, packages are uploaded into
-<em>unstable</em>.
+There are several possible values for this field: `stable', `unstable',
+`testing-proposed-updates' and `experimental'. Normally, packages are
+uploaded into <em>unstable</em>.
<p>
-You should avoid combining `stable' with others because of potential
-problems with library dependencies (for your package and for the package
-built by the build daemons for other architecture).
-See <ref id="upload-stable"> for more information on when and how to
-upload to <em>stable</em>.
+Actually, there are two other possible distributions: `stable-security' and
+`testing-security', but read <ref id="bug-security"> for more information on
+those.
<p>
-It never makes sense to combine the <em>experimental</em> distribution
-with anything else.
-
-<!--
- <sect2 id="upload-frozen">Uploading to <em>frozen</em>
- <p>
-The Debian freeze is a crucial time for Debian. It is our chance to
-synchronize and stabilize our distribution as a whole. Therefore,
-care must be taken when uploading to <em>frozen</em>.
- <p>
-It is tempting to always try to get the newest release of software
-into the release. However, it's much more important that the system
-as a whole is stable and works as expected.
- <p>
-The watchword for uploading to <em>frozen</em> is <strong>no new
-code</strong>. This is a difficult thing to quantify, so here are
-some guidelines:
- <p>
-<list>
- <item>
-Fixes for bugs of severity <em>critical</em>, <em>grave</em>, or
-<em>serious</em> severity are always allowed for those packages that
-must exist in the final release
- <item>
-<em>critical</em>, <em>grave</em>, and <em>serious</em> bug fixes are
-allowed for non-necessary packages but only if they don't add any new
-features
- <item>
-important, normal and minor bug fixes are allowed (though discouraged)
-on all packages if and only if there are no new features
- <item>
-wishlist fixes are not allowed (they are, after all, not really bugs)
- <item>
-documentation bug fixes are allowed, since good documentation is
-important
- </list>
- <p>
-Experience has shown that there is statistically a 15% chance that
-every bug fix will introduce a new bug. The introduction and
-discovery of new bugs either delays release or weakens the final
-product. There is little correlation between the severity of the
-original bug fixed and the severity of the bug newly introduced by the
-fix.
-
- -->
+It is technically possible to upload a package into several distributions
+at the same time but it usually doesn't make sense to use that feature
+because the dependencies of the package may vary with the distribution.
+In particular, it never makes sense to combine the <em>experimental</em>
+distribution with anything else.
-
- <sect3 id="upload-stable">Uploading to <em>stable</em>
+ <sect2 id="upload-stable">Uploading to <em>stable</em>
<p>
Uploading to <em>stable</em> means that the package will be placed into the
-<tt>proposed-updates</tt> directory of the Debian archive for further
+<file>stable-proposed-updates</file> directory of the Debian archive for further
testing before it is actually included in <em>stable</em>.
<p>
Extra care should be taken when uploading to <em>stable</em>. Basically, a
those other packages uninstallable, is strongly discouraged.
<p>
The Release Team (which can be reached at &email-debian-release;) will
-regularly evaluate the uploads in <em>proposed-updates</em> and decide if
+regularly evaluate the uploads in <em>stable-proposed-updates</em> and decide if
your package can be included in <em>stable</em>. Please be clear (and
verbose, if necessary) in your changelog entries for uploads to
<em>stable</em>, because otherwise the package won't be considered for
inclusion.
+ <sect2 id="upload-t-p-u">Uploading to <em>testing-proposed-updates</em>
+ <p>
+The testing distribution is fed with packages from unstable according to the rules
+explained in <ref id="testing">. However, the release manager may stop the testing
+scripts when he wants to freeze the distribution. In that case, you may want to
+upload to <em>testing-proposed-updates</em> to provide fixed packages during the freeze.
+ <p>
+Keep in mind that packages uploaded there are not automatically processed, they
+have to go through the hands of the release manager. So you'd better have a good
+reason to upload there. In order to know what a good reason is in the
+release manager's eyes, you should read the instructions that he regularly
+gives on &email-debian-devel-announce;.
+ <p>
+You should not upload to <em>testing-proposed-updates</em> when you can update your
+packages through <em>unstable</em>. If you can't (for example because you have a
+newer development version in unstable), you may use it but it is recommended to ask
+the authorization of the release manager before.
<sect1 id="uploading">Uploading a package
<sect2 id="upload-ftp-master">Uploading to <tt>ftp-master</tt>
<p>
To upload a package, you need a personal account on
-<ftpsite>ftp-master.debian.org</ftpsite>, which you should have as an
+<ftpsite>&ftp-master-host;</ftpsite>, which you should have as an
official maintainer. If you use <prgn>scp</prgn> or <prgn>rsync</prgn>
-to transfer the files, place them into <tt>&us-upload-dir;</tt>;
+to transfer the files, place them into &us-upload-dir;;
if you use anonymous FTP to upload, place them into
-<ftppath>/pub/UploadQueue/</ftppath>. Please note that you should transfer
+&upload-queue;. Please note that you should transfer
the changes file last. Otherwise, your upload may be rejected because the
archive maintenance software will parse the changes file and see that not
all files have been uploaded. If you don't want to bother with transferring
the changes file last, you can simply copy your files to a temporary
directory on <tt>ftp-master</tt> and then move them to
-<tt>&us-upload-dir;</tt>.
+&us-upload-dir;.
<p>
-<em>Note:</em> Do not upload to <tt>ftp-master</tt> packages
-containing software that is patent-restricted by the United States
-government, nor any cryptographic packages which belong to
-<em>contrib</em> or <em>non-free</em>. If you can't upload it to
-<tt>ftp-master</tt>, then neither can you upload it to the overseas
-upload queues on <tt>chiark</tt> or <tt>erlangen</tt>. Uploads of
+<em>Note:</em> Do not upload to <tt>ftp-master</tt> cryptographic
+packages which belong to <em>contrib</em> or <em>non-free</em>. Uploads of
such software should go to <tt>non-us</tt> (see <ref
-id="upload-non-us">). If you are not sure whether U.S. patent
-controls or cryptographic controls apply to your package, post a
-message to &email-debian-devel; and ask.
+id="upload-non-us">). Furthermore packages containing code that is
+patent-restricted by the United States government can not be uploaded to
+<tt>ftp-master</tt>; depending on the case they may still be uploaded to
+<file>non-US/non-free</file> (it's in non-free because of distribution issues
+and not because of the license of the software). If you can't upload it to
+<tt>ftp-master</tt>, then neither can you upload it to the overseas upload
+queues on <tt>chiark</tt> or <tt>erlangen</tt>. If you are not sure
+whether U.S. patent controls or cryptographic controls apply to your
+package, post a message to &email-debian-devel; and ask.
<p>
-You may also find the Debian packages <package>dupload</package> or
-<package>dput</package> useful
-when uploading packages. These handy program are distributed with
-defaults for uploading via <prgn>ftp</prgn> to <tt>ftp-master</tt>,
-<tt>chiark</tt>, and <tt>erlangen</tt>. They can also be configured to
-use <prgn>ssh</prgn> or <prgn>rsync</prgn>. See <manref name="dupload"
-section="1">, <manref name="dupload" section="5"> and <manref name="dput"
-section="1"> for more information.
+You may also find the Debian packages <ref id="dupload"> or
+<ref id="dput"> useful
+when uploading packages. These handy programs help automate the
+process of uploading packages into Debian.
<p>
-After uploading your package, you can check how the archive maintenance
-software will process it by running <prgn>dinstall</prgn> on your changes
-file: <example>dinstall -n foo.changes</example>
+After uploading your package, you can check how the archive
+maintenance software will process it by running <prgn>dinstall</prgn>
+on your changes file: <example>dinstall -n foo.changes</example>.
+Note that <prgn>dput</prgn> can do this for you automatically.
- <sect2 id="upload-non-us">Uploading to <tt>non-US</tt> (pandora)
+ <sect2 id="upload-non-us">Uploading to <tt>non-US</tt>
<p>
As discussed above, export controlled software should not be uploaded
to <tt>ftp-master</tt>. Instead, upload the package to
<ftpsite>non-us.debian.org</ftpsite>, placing the files in
-<tt>&non-us-upload-dir;</tt> (both <ref id="dupload"> and <ref
-id="dput"> can be used also, with the right invocation). By default,
+&non-us-upload-dir; (again, both <ref id="dupload"> and <ref
+id="dput"> can do this for you if invoked properly). By default,
you can use the same account/password that works on
<tt>ftp-master</tt>. If you use anonymous FTP to upload, place the
-files into <ftppath>/pub/UploadQueue/</ftppath>.
+files into &upload-queue;.
<p>
You can check your upload the same way it's done on <tt>ftp-master</tt>,
with:
<sect2>Uploads via <tt>chiark</tt>
<p>
If you have a slow network connection to <tt>ftp-master</tt>, there are
-alternatives. One is to upload files to <tt>Incoming</tt> via a
+alternatives. One is to upload files to <file>Incoming</file> via a
upload queue in Europe on <tt>chiark</tt>. For details connect to
<url id="&url-chiark-readme;">.
<p>
via anonymous FTP to <url id="&url-upload-erlangen;">.
<p>
The upload must be a complete Debian upload, as you would put it into
-<tt>ftp-master</tt>'s <tt>Incoming</tt>, i.e., a <tt>.changes</tt> files
-along with the other files mentioned in the <tt>.changes</tt>. The
-queue daemon also checks that the <tt>.changes</tt> is correctly
+<tt>ftp-master</tt>'s <file>Incoming</file>, i.e., a <file>.changes</file> files
+along with the other files mentioned in the <file>.changes</file>. The
+queue daemon also checks that the <file>.changes</file> is correctly
signed with GnuPG or OpenPGP by a Debian developer, so that no bogus files can find
their way to <tt>ftp-master</tt> via this queue. Please also make sure that
-the <tt>Maintainer</tt> field in the <tt>.changes</tt> contains
+the <tt>Maintainer</tt> field in the <file>.changes</file> contains
<em>your</em> e-mail address. The address found there is used for all
replies, just as on <tt>ftp-master</tt>.
<p>
anonymous FTP to <url id="&url-upload-jp;">.
-
- <sect1 id="upload-announce">Announcing package uploads
- <p>
-When a package is uploaded, an announcement should be posted to one of
-the ``debian-changes'' lists. This is now done automatically by the archive
-maintenance software when it runs (usually once a day). You just need to use
-a recent <package>dpkg-dev</package> (>= 1.4.1.2). The mail generated by
-the archive maintenance software will contain the OpenPGP/GnuPG signed
-<tt>.changes</tt> files that you uploaded with your package.
-Previously, <prgn>dupload</prgn> used to send those announcements, so
-please make sure that you configured your <prgn>dupload</prgn> not to
-send those announcements (check its documentation and look for
-``dinstall_runs'').
- <p>
-If a package is released with the <tt>Distribution:</tt> set to
-`stable', the announcement is sent to &email-debian-changes;. If a
-package is released with <tt>Distribution:</tt> set to `unstable',
-or `experimental', the announcement will be
-posted to &email-debian-devel-changes; instead.
- <p>
-The <prgn>dupload</prgn> program is clever enough to determine
-where the announcement should go, and will automatically mail the
-announcement to the right list. See <ref id="dupload">.
-
<sect1 id="upload-notification">
<heading>Notification that a new package has been installed</heading>
<p>
the change to the archive may take up to a month to occur. Please be
patient.
<p>
-In any case, you will receive email notification indicating that the
-package has added to the archive, which also indicates which bugs will
+In any case, you will receive an email notification indicating that the
+package has been added to the archive, which also indicates which bugs will
be closed by the upload. Please examine this notification carefully,
checking if any bugs you meant to close didn't get triggered.
<p>
section the package was inserted into. If there is a disparity, you
will receive a separate email notifying you of that. Read on below.
- <sect2 id="override-file">The override file
+ <sect1 id="override-file">Determining section and priority of a package
<p>
The <file>debian/control</file> file's <tt>Section</tt> and
<tt>Priority</tt> fields do not actually specify where the file will
priority to the new one. Be sure to explain your reasoning.
<p>
For more information about <em>override files</em>, see <manref
-name="dpkg-scanpackages" section="8">, &file-bts-mailing;, and
-&file-bts-info;.
-
-
+name="dpkg-scanpackages" section="8"> and
+<url id="&url-bts-devel;#maintincorrect">.
+ <p>
+Note also that the term "section" is used for the separation of packages
+according to their licensing, e.g. <em>main</em>, <em>contrib</em> and
+<em>non-free</em>. This is described in another section, <ref id="archive">.
- <sect id="nmu">Non-Maintainer Uploads (NMUs)
- <p>
-Under certain circumstances it is necessary for someone other than the
-official package maintainer to make a release of a package. This is
-called a non-maintainer upload, or NMU.
- <p>
-Debian porters, who compile packages for different architectures,
-occasionally do binary-only NMUs as part of their porting activity
-(see <ref id="porting">). Another reason why NMUs are done is when a
-Debian developers needs to fix another developers' packages in order to
-address serious security problems or crippling bugs, especially during
-the freeze, or when the package maintainer is unable to release a fix
-in a timely fashion.
- <p>
-This chapter contains information providing guidelines for when and
-how NMUs should be done. A fundamental distinction is made between
-source and binary-only NMUs, which is explained in the next section.
- <sect1 id="nmu-terms">Terminology
- <p>
-There are two new terms used throughout this section: ``binary-only NMU''
-and ``source NMU''. These terms are used with specific technical
-meaning throughout this document. Both binary-only and source NMUs are
-similar, since they involve an upload of a package by a developer who
-is not the official maintainer of that package. That is why it's a
-<em>non-maintainer</em> upload.
+ <sect id="bug-handling">Handling package bugs
<p>
-A source NMU is an upload of a package by a developer who is not the
-official maintainer, for the purposes of fixing a bug in the package.
-Source NMUs always involves changes to the source (even if it is just
-a change to <file>debian/changelog</file>). This can be either a
-change to the upstream source, or a change to the Debian bits of the
-source. Note, however, that source NMUs may also include
-architecture-dependent packages, as well as an updated Debian diff.
+Often as a package maintainer, you find bugs in other packages or else
+have bugs reported to your packages which need to be reassigned. The
+<url id="&url-bts-control;" name="BTS instructions"> can tell you how
+to do this. Some information on filing bugs can be found in <ref
+id="submit-bug">.
+
+ <sect1>Monitoring bugs
<p>
-A binary-only NMU is a recompilation and upload of a binary package
-for a given architecture. As such, it is usually part of a porting
-effort. A binary-only NMU is a non-maintainer uploaded binary version
-of a package, with no source changes required. There are many cases
-where porters must fix problems in the source in order to get them to
-compile for their target architecture; that would be considered a
-source NMU rather than a binary-only NMU. As you can see, we don't
-distinguish in terminology between porter NMUs and non-porter NMUs.
+If you want to be a good maintainer, you should periodically check the
+<url id="&url-bts;" name="Debian bug tracking system (BTS)"> for your
+packages. The BTS contains all the open bugs against your packages.
+You can check them by browsing this page:
+<tt>http://&bugs-host;/<var>yourlogin</var>@debian.org</tt>.
<p>
-Both classes of NMUs, source and binary-only, can be lumped by the
-term ``NMU''. However, this often leads to confusion, since most
-people think ``source NMU'' when they think ``NMU''. So it's best to
-be careful. In this chapter, if we use the unqualified term ``NMU'',
-we refer to any type of non-maintainer upload NMUs, whether source and
-binary, or binary-only.
-
-
- <sect1 id="nmu-who">Who can do an NMU
+Maintainers interact with the BTS via email addresses at
+<tt>&bugs-host;</tt>. Documentation on available commands can be
+found at <url id="&url-bts;">, or, if you have installed the
+<package>doc-debian</package> package, you can look at the local files
+&file-bts-docs;.
<p>
-Only official, registered Debian maintainers can do binary or source
-NMUs. An official maintainer is someone who has their key in the
-Debian key ring. Non-developers, however, are encouraged to download
-the source package and start hacking on it to fix problems; however,
-rather than doing an NMU, they should just submit worthwhile patches
-to the Bug Tracking System. Maintainers almost always appreciate
-quality patches and bug reports.
-
+Some find it useful to get periodic reports on open bugs. You can add
+a cron job such as the following if you want to get a weekly email
+outlining all the open bugs against your packages:
+<example>
+# ask for weekly reports of bugs in my packages
+&cron-bug-report;
+</example>
+Replace <var>address</var> with your official Debian
+maintainer address.
- <sect1 id="nmu-when">When to do a source NMU
- <p>
-Guidelines for when to do a source NMU depend on the target
-distribution, i.e., stable, unstable, or experimental. Porters have
-slightly different rules than non-porters, due to their unique
-circumstances (see <ref id="source-nmu-when-porter">).
+ <sect1 id="bug-answering">Responding to bugs
<p>
-When a security bug is detected, a fixed package should be uploaded
-as soon as possible. In this case, the Debian security officers get in
-contact with the package maintainer to make sure a fixed package is
-uploaded within a reasonable time (less than 48 hours). If the package
-maintainer cannot provide a fixed package fast enough or if he/she
-cannot be reached in time, a security officer may upload a fixed
-package (i.e., do a source NMU).
+Make sure that any discussion you have about bugs are sent both to
+the original submitter of the bug, and the bug itself (e.g.,
+<email>123@bugs.debian.org</email>). If you're writing a new
+mail and you don't remember the submitter email address, you can
+use the <email>123-submitter@bugs.debian.org</email> email to
+contact the submitter <em>and</em> to record your mail within the
+bug log (that means you don't need to send a copy of the mail to
+<email>123@bugs.debian.org</email>).
<p>
-During the release cycle (see <ref id="sec-dists">), NMUs which fix
-serious or higher severity bugs are encouraged and accepted. Even
-during this window, however, you should endeavor to reach the current
-maintainer of the package; they might be just about to upload a fix
-for the problem. As with any source NMU, the guidelines found in <ref
-id="nmu-guidelines"> need to be followed.
+Once you've dealt with a bug report (e.g. fixed it), mark it as
+<em>done</em> (close it) by sending an explanation message to
+<email>123-done@bugs.debian.org</email>. If you're fixing a bug by
+changing and uploading the package, you can automate bug closing as
+described in <ref id="upload-bugfix">.
<p>
-Bug fixes to unstable by non-maintainers are also acceptable, but only
-as a last resort or with permission. Try the following steps first,
-and if they don't work, it is probably OK to do an NMU:
+You should <em>never</em> close bugs via the bug server <tt>close</tt>
+command sent to &email-bts-control;. If you do so, the original
+submitter will not receive any information about why the bug was
+closed.
+
+ <sect1 id="bug-housekeeping">Bug housekeeping
<p>
-<list>
- <item>
-Make sure that the package bug is in the Debian Bug Tracking System
-(BTS). If not, submit a bug.
- <item>
-Email the maintainer, and offer to help fix the package bug. Give it a
-few days.
- <item>
-Go ahead and fix the bug, submitting a patch to the right bug in the
-BTS. Build the package and test it as discussed in <ref
-id="upload-checking">. Use it locally.
- <item>
-Wait a couple of weeks for a response.
- <item>
-Email the maintainer, asking if it is OK to do an NMU.
- <item>
-Double check that your patch doesn't have any unexpected side effects.
-Make sure your patch is as small and as non-disruptive as it can be.
- <item>
-Wait another week for a response.
- <item>
-Go ahead and do the source NMU, as described in <ref
-id="nmu-guidelines">.
- </list>
+As a package maintainer, you will often find bugs in other packages or
+have bugs reported against your packages which are actually bugs in
+other packages. The bug tracking system's features interesting to developers
+are described in the <url id="&url-bts-devel;" name="BTS documentation for
+Debian developers">. Operations such as reassigning, merging, and tagging
+bug reports are described in the <url id="&url-bts-control;" name="BTS
+control bot documentation">. This section contains
+some guidelines for managing your own bugs, based on the collective
+Debian developer experience.
+ <p>
+Filing bugs for problems that you find in other packages is one of
+the "civic obligations" of maintainership, see <ref id="submit-bug">
+for details. However, handling the bugs in your own packages is
+even more important.
+ <p>
+Here's a list of steps that you may follow to handle a bug report:
+<enumlist>
+ <item>
+Decide whether the report corresponds to a real bug or not. Sometimes
+users are just calling a program in the wrong way because they haven't
+read the documentation. If you diagnose this, just close the bug with
+enough information to let the user correct his problem (give pointers
+to the good documentation and so on). If the same report comes up
+again and again you may ask yourself if the documentation is good
+enough or if the program shouldn't detect its misuse in order to
+give an informative error message. This is an issue that may need
+to be brought to the upstream author.
+ <p>
+If the bug submitter disagree with your decision to close the bug,
+they may reopen it until you find an agreement on how to handle it.
+If you don't find any, you may want to tag the bug <tt>wontfix</tt>
+to let people know that the bug exists but that it won't be corrected.
+If this situation is unacceptable, you (or the submitter) may want to
+require a decision of the technical committee by reassigning the bug
+to <package>tech-ctte</package> (you may use the clone command of
+the BTS if you wish to keep it reported against your package). Before
+doing so, please read the <url id="&url-tech-ctte;" name="recommended procedure">.
+ <item>
+If the bug is real but it's caused by another package, just reassign
+the bug the right package. If you don't know which package it should
+be reassigned to, you may either ask for help on &email-debian-devel; or
+reassign it to <package>debian-policy</package> to let them decide which
+package is in fault.
+ <p>
+Sometimes you also have to adjust the severity of the bug so that it
+matches our definition of the severity. That's because people tend to
+inflate the severity of bugs to make sure their bugs are fixed quickly.
+Some bugs may even be dropped to wishlist severity when the requested
+change is just cosmetic.
+ <item>
+The bug submitter may have forgotten to provide some information, in that
+case you have to ask him the information required. You may use the
+<tt>moreinfo</tt> tag to mark the bug as such. Moreover if you can't
+reproduce the bug, you tag it <tt>unreproducible</tt>. Anyone who
+can reproduce the bug is then invited to provide more information
+on how to reproduce it. After a few months, if this information has not
+been sent by someone, the bug may be closed.
+ <item>
+If the bug is related to the packaging, you just fix it. If you are not
+able to fix it yourself, then tag the bug as <tt>help</tt>. You can
+also ask for help on &email-debian-devel; or &email-debian-qa;. If it's an
+upstream problem, you have to forward it to the upstream author.
+Forwarding a bug is not enough, you have to check at each release if
+the bug has been fixed or not. If it has, you just close it, otherwise
+you have to remind the author about it. If you have the required skills
+you can prepare a patch that fixes the bug and that you send at the
+same time to the author. Make sure to send the patch in the BTS and to
+tag the bug as <tt>patch</tt>.
+ <item>
+If you have fixed a bug in your local copy, or if a fix has been
+committed to the CVS repository, you may tag the bug as
+<tt>pending</tt> to let people know that the bug is corrected and that
+it will be closed with the next upload (add the <tt>closes:</tt> in
+the <file>changelog</file>). This is particularly useful if you
+are several developers working on the same package.
+ <item>
+Once a corrected package is available in the <em>unstable</em>
+distribution, you can close the bug. This can be done automatically,
+read <ref id="upload-bugfix">.
+</enumlist>
+ <sect1 id="upload-bugfix">When bugs are closed by new uploads
+ <p>
+If you fix a bug in your packages, it is your responsibility as the
+package maintainer to close the bug when it has been fixed. However,
+you should not close the bug until the package which fixes the bug has
+been accepted into the Debian archive. Therefore, once you get
+notification that your updated package has been installed into the
+archive, you can and should close the bug in the BTS.
+ <p>
+However, it's possible to avoid having to manually close bugs after the
+upload -- just list the fixed bugs in your <file>debian/changelog</file>
+file, following a certain syntax, and the archive maintenance software
+will close the bugs for you. For example:
+<example>
+acme-cannon (3.1415) unstable; urgency=low
- <sect1 id="nmu-guidelines">How to do a source NMU
+ * Frobbed with options (closes: Bug#98339)
+ * Added safety to prevent operator dismemberment, closes: bug#98765,
+ bug#98713, #98714.
+ * Added man page. Closes: #98725.
+</example>
+
+Technically speaking, the following Perl regular expression is what is
+used:
+<example>
+ /closes:\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+(?:,\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+)*/ig
+</example>
+
+The author prefers the <tt>closes: #<var>XXX</var></tt> syntax, as
+one of the most concise and easiest to integrate with the text of the
+<file>changelog</file>.
<p>
-The following applies to porters insofar as they are playing the dual
-role of being both package bug-fixers and package porters. If a
-porter has to change the Debian source archive, automatically their
-upload is a source NMU and is subject to its rules. If a porter is
-simply uploading a recompiled binary package, the rules are different;
-see <ref id="porter-guidelines">.
+If you happen to mistype a bug number or forget one in the changelog file,
+don't hesitate to undo any damage the error caused. To reopen wrongly closed
+bugs, send an <tt>reopen <var>XXX</var></tt> command in the bug tracking
+system's control bot. To close any remaining bugs that were fixed by your
+upload, email the <file>.changes</file> file to
+<email>XXX-done@bugs.debian.org</email>, where <var>XXX</var> is your
+bug number.
<p>
-First and foremost, it is critical that NMU patches to source should
-be as non-disruptive as possible. Do not do housekeeping tasks, do
-not change the name of modules or files, do not move directories; in
-general, do not fix things which are not broken. Keep the patch as
-small as possible. If things bother you aesthetically, talk to the
-Debian maintainer, talk to the upstream maintainer, or submit a bug.
-However, aesthetic changes must <em>not</em> be made in a non-maintainer
-upload.
+Bear in mind that it is not obligatory to close bugs using the changelog
+like described above -- if you simply want to close bugs that don't have
+anything to do with an upload of yours, do it simply by emailing an
+explanation to <email>XXX-done@bugs.debian.org</email>.
+ <sect1 id="bug-security">Handling security-related bugs
+ <p>
+Due to their sensitive nature, security-related bugs must be handled
+carefully. The Debian Security Team exists to coordinate this
+activity, keeping track of outstanding security problems, helping
+maintainers with security problems or fix them themselves, sending
+security advisories, and maintaining security.debian.org.
- <sect2 id="nmu-version">Source NMU version numbering
- <p>
-Whenever you have made a change to a package, no matter how trivial,
-the version number needs to change. This enables our packing system
-to function.
- <p>
-If you are doing a non-maintainer upload (NMU), you should add a new
-minor version number to the <var>debian-revision</var> part of the
-version number (the portion after the last hyphen). This extra minor
-number will start at `1'. For example, consider the package `foo',
-which is at version 1.1-3. In the archive, the source package control
-file would be <file>foo_1.1-3.dsc</file>. The upstream version is
-`1.1' and the Debian revision is `3'. The next NMU would add a new
-minor number `.1' to the Debian revision; the new source control file
-would be <file>foo_1.1-3.1.dsc</file>.
- <p>
-The Debian revision minor number is needed to avoid stealing one of
-the package maintainer's version numbers, which might disrupt their
-work. It also has the benefit of making it visually clear that a
-package in the archive was not made by the official maintainer.
- <p>
-If there is no <var>debian-revision</var> component in the version
-number then one should be created, starting at `0.1'. If it is
-absolutely necessary for someone other than the usual maintainer to
-make a release based on a new upstream version then the person making
-the release should start with the <var>debian-revision</var> value
-`0.1'. The usual maintainer of a package should start their
-<var>debian-revision</var> numbering at `1'. Note that if you do
-this, you'll have to invoke <prgn>dpkg-buildpackage</prgn> with the
-<tt>-sa</tt> switch to force the build system to pick up the new
-source package (normally it only looks for Debian revisions of '0' or
-'1' — it's not yet clever enough to know about `0.1').
+<!-- information about the security database goes here once it's ready -->
+<!-- (mdz) -->
+ <sect2 id="bug-security-you">What to do when you learn of a
+ security problem
+ <p>
+When you become aware of a security-related bug in a Debian package,
+whether or not you are the maintainer, collect pertinent information
+about the problem, and promptly contact the security team at
+&email-security-team;.
+Useful information includes, for example:
- <sect2 id="nmu-changelog">
- <heading>Source NMUs must have a new changelog entry</heading>
- <p>
-A non-maintainer doing a source NMU must create a changelog entry,
-describing which bugs are fixed by the NMU, and generally why the NMU
-was required and what it fixed. The changelog entry will have the
-non-maintainer's email address in the log entry and the NMU version
-number in it.
- <p>
-By convention, source NMU changelog entries start with the line
-<example>
- * Non-maintainer upload
-</example>
+<list compact>
+ <item>What versions of the package are known to be affected by the
+ bug. Check each version that is present in a supported Debian
+ release, as well as testing and unstable.
+ <item>The nature of the fix, if any is available (patches are
+ especially helpful)
- <sect2 id="nmu-patch">Source NMUs and the Bug Tracking System
- <p>
-Maintainers other than the official package maintainer should make as
-few changes to the package as possible, and they should always send a
-patch as a unified context diff (<tt>diff -u</tt>) detailing their
-changes to the Bug Tracking System.
- <p>
-What if you are simply recompiling the package? If you just need to
-recompile it for a single architecture, then you may do a binary-only
-NMU as described in <ref id="binary-only-nmu"> which doesn't require any
-patch to be sent. If you want the package to be recompiled for all
-architectures, then you do a source NMU as usual and you will have to
-send a patch.
- <p>
-If the source NMU (non-maintainer upload) fixes some existing bugs,
-these bugs should be tagged <em>fixed</em> in the Bug Tracking
-System rather than closed. By convention, only the official package
-maintainer or the original bug submitter are allowed to close bugs.
-Fortunately, Debian's archive system recognizes NMUs and thus marks
-the bugs fixed in the NMU appropriately if the person doing the NMU
-has listed all bugs in the changelog with the <tt>Closes:
-bug#<var>nnnnn</var></tt> syntax (see <ref id="upload-bugfix"> for
-more information describing how to close bugs via the changelog).
-Tagging the bugs <em>fixed</em> ensures that everyone knows that the
-bug was fixed in an NMU; however the bug is left open until the
-changes in the NMU are incorporated officially into the package by
-the official package maintainer.
- <p>
-Also, after doing an NMU, you have to open a new bug and include a
-patch showing all the changes you have made. Alternatively you can send
-that information to the existing bugs that are fixed by your NMU.
-The normal maintainer will either apply the patch or employ an alternate
-method of fixing the problem. Sometimes bugs are fixed independently
-upstream, which is another good reason to back out an NMU's patch.
-If the maintainer decides not to apply the NMU's patch but to release a
-new version, the maintainer needs to ensure that the new upstream version
-really fixes each problem that was fixed in the non-maintainer release.
- <p>
-In addition, the normal maintainer should <em>always</em> retain the
-entry in the changelog file documenting the non-maintainer upload.
+ <item>Any fixed packages that you have prepared yourself (send only
+ the <tt>.diff.gz</tt> and <tt>.dsc</tt> files)
+ <item>Any information needed for the advisory (see <ref
+ id="bug-security-advisories">)
- <sect2 id="nmu-build">Building source NMUs
- <p>
-Source NMU packages are built normally. Pick a distribution using the
-same rules as found in <ref id="upload-dist">. Just as described in
-<ref id="uploading">, a normal changes file, etc., will be built. In
-fact, all the prescriptions from <ref id="upload"> apply.
- <p>
-Make sure you do <em>not</em> change the value of the maintainer in
-the <file>debian/control</file> file. Your name as given in the NMU entry of
-the <file>debian/changelog</file> file will be used for signing the
-changes file.
+</list>
+ <sect2 id="bug-security-confidentiality">Confidentiality
+ <p>
+Unlike most other activities within Debian, information about security
+issues must sometimes be kept private for a time. Whether this is the
+case depends on the nature of the problem and corresponding fix, and
+whether it is already a matter of public knowledge.
+<p>
+There are a few ways a developer can learn of a security problem:
+
+<list compact>
+ <item>he notices it on a public forum (mailing list, web site, etc.)
+ <item>someone files a bug report
+ <item>someone informs him via private email
+</list>
+ In the first two cases, the information is public and it is important
+ to have a fix as soon as possible. In the last case, however, it
+ might not be public information. In that case there are a few
+ possible options for dealing with the problem:
+<list>
+ <item>if it is a trivial problem (like insecure temporary files)
+ there is no need to keep the problem a secret and a fix should be
+ made and released.
+
+ <item>if the problem is severe (remotely exploitable, possibility to
+ gain root privileges) it is preferable to share the information with
+ other vendors and coordinate a release. The security team keeps
+ contacts with the various organizations and individuals and can take
+ care of that.
+</list>
- <sect id="porting">Porting and Being Ported
- <p>
-Debian supports an ever-increasing number of architectures. Even if
-you are not a porter, and you don't use any architecture but one, it
-is part of your duty as a maintainer to be aware of issues of
-portability. Therefore, even if you are not a porter, you should read
-most of this chapter.
+<p>
+ In all cases if the person who reports the problem asks to not
+ disclose the information that should be respected, with the obvious
+ exception of informing the security team (make sure you tell the
+ security team that the information can not be disclosed).
+
+<p>
+Please note that if secrecy is needed you can also not upload a fix to
+unstable (or anywhere else), since the changelog and diff information
+for unstable is public.
+
+<p>
+There are two reasons for releasing information even though secrecy is
+requested: the problem has been known for a while, or that the problem
+or exploit has become public.
+
+ <sect2 id="bug-security-advisories">Security Advisories
+ <p>
+Security advisories are only issued for the current, released stable
+distribution, not for testing or unstable. When released, advisories
+are sent to the &email-debian-security-announce;
+mailing list and posted on <url
+id="&url-debian-security-advisories;" name="the security web page">.
+Security advisories are written and posted by the security
+team. However they certainly do not mind if a maintainer can supply
+some of the information for them, or write part of the
+text. Information that should be in an advisory includes:
+
+<list compact>
+ <item>A description of the problem and its scope, including:
+ <list>
+ <item>The type of problem (privilege escalation, denial of
+ service, etc.)
+ <item>How it can be exploited
+ <item>Whether it is remotely or locally exploitable
+ <item>How the problem was fixed
+ </list>
+ <item>Version numbers of affected packages
+ <item>Version numbers of fixed packages
+ <item>Information on where to obtain the updated packages
+ <item>References to upstream advisories, <url
+ id="http://cve.mitre.org" name="CVE"> identifiers, and any other
+ information useful in cross-referencing the vulnerability
+</list>
+
+ <sect2 id="bug-security-building">
+ <heading>Preparing packages to address security issues</heading>
+ <p>
+One way that you can assist the security team in their duties is to
+provide fixed packages suitable for a security advisory for the stable
+Debian release.
+ <p>
+ When an update is made to the stable release, care must be taken to
+ avoid changing system behavior or introducing new bugs. In order to
+ do this, make as few changes as possible to fix the bug. Users and
+ administrators rely on the exact behavior of a release once it is
+ made, so any change that is made might break someone's system.
+ This is especially true of libraries: make sure you never change the
+ API or ABI, no matter how small the change.
+<p>
+This means that moving to a new upstream version is not a good
+solution. Instead, the relevant changes should be back-ported to the
+version present in the current stable Debian release. Generally,
+upstream maintainers are willing to help if needed. If not, the
+Debian security team may be able to help.
+<p>
+In some cases, it is not possible to back-port a security fix, for
+example when large amounts of source code need to be modified or
+rewritten. If this happens, it may be necessary to move to a new
+upstream version. However, you must always coordinate that with the
+security team beforehand.
+<p>
+Related to this is another important guideline: always test your
+changes. If you have an exploit available, try it and see if it
+indeed succeeds on the unpatched package and fails on the fixed
+package. Test other, normal actions as well, as sometimes a security
+fix can break seemingly unrelated features in subtle ways.
+<p>
+Review and test your changes as much as possible. Check the
+differences from the previous version repeatedly
+(<prgn>interdiff</prgn> from the <package>patchutils</package> package
+and <prgn>debdiff</prgn> from <package>devscripts</package> are useful tools for
+this).
+
+When packaging the fix, keep the following points in mind:
+
+<list>
+ <item>Make sure you target the right distribution in your
+ <file>debian/changelog</file>. For stable this is <tt>stable-security</tt> and for
+ testing this is <tt>testing-security</tt>, and for the previous
+ stable release, this is <tt>oldstable-security</tt>. Do not target
+ <var>distribution</var>-proposed-updates!
+
+ <item>Make sure the version number is proper. It must be greater
+ than the current package, but less than package versions in later
+ distributions. If in doubt, test it with <tt>dpkg
+ --compare-versions</tt>. For <em>testing</em>, there must be
+ a higher version in <em>unstable</em>. If there is none yet (for example,
+ if <em>testing</em> and <em>unstable</em> have the same version) you must upload a
+ new version to unstable first.
+
+ <item>Do not make source-only uploads if your package has any
+ binary-all packages (do not use the <tt>-S</tt> option to
+ <prgn>dpkg-buildpackage</prgn>). The <prgn>buildd</prgn> infrastructure will
+ not build those. This point applies to normal package uploads as
+ well.
+
+ <item>If the upstream source has been uploaded to
+ security.debian.org before (by a previous security update), build
+ the upload without the upstream source (<tt>dpkg-buildpackage
+ -sd</tt>). Otherwise, build with full source
+ (<tt>dpkg-buildpackage -sa</tt>).
+
+ <item>Be sure to use the exact same <file>*.orig.tar.gz</file> as used in the
+ normal archive, otherwise it is not possible to move the security
+ fix into the main archives later.
+
+ <item>Be sure, when compiling a package, to compile on a clean
+ system which only has packages installed from the distribution you
+ are building for. If you do not have such a system yourself, you
+ can use a debian.org machine (see <ref id="server-machines">)
+ or setup a chroot (see <ref id="pbuilder"> and
+ <ref id="debootstrap">).
+</list>
+
+ <sect2 id="bug-security-upload">Uploading the fixed package
+<p>
+<em>DO NOT</em> upload a package to the security upload queue without
+prior authorization from the security team. If the package does not
+exactly meet the team's requirements, it will cause many problems and
+delays in dealing with the unwanted upload.
+<p>
+<em>DO NOT</em> upload your fix to proposed-updates without
+coordinating with the security team. Packages from
+security.debian.org will be copied into the proposed-updates directory
+automatically. If a package with the same or a higher version number
+is already installed into the archive, the security update will be
+rejected by the archive system. That way, the stable distribution
+will end up without a security update for this package instead.
+<p>
+Once you have created and tested the new package and it has been
+approved by the security team, it needs to be uploaded so that it can
+be installed in the archives. For security uploads, the place to
+upload to is
+<tt>ftp://security.debian.org/pub/SecurityUploadQueue/</tt> .
+
+<p>
+Once an upload to the security queue has been accepted, the package
+will automatically be rebuilt for all architectures and stored for
+verification by the security team.
+
+<p>
+Uploads which are waiting for acceptance or verification are only
+accessible by the security team. This is necessary since there might
+be fixes for security problems that cannot be disclosed yet.
+
+<p>
+If a member of the security team accepts a package, it will be
+installed on security.debian.org as well as the proper
+<var>distribution</var>-proposed-updates on ftp-master or in the non-US
+archive.
+
+
+ <sect id="archive-manip">
+ <heading>Moving, removing, renaming, adopting, and orphaning
+ packages</heading>
<p>
-Porting is the act of building Debian packages for architectures that
-is different from the original architecture of the package
-maintainer's binary package. It is a unique and essential activity.
-In fact, porters do most of the actual compiling of Debian packages.
-For instance, for a single <em>i386</em> binary package, there must be
-a recompile for each architecture, which amounts to
-&number-of-arches; more builds.
+Some archive manipulation operations are not automated in the Debian
+upload process. These procedures should be manually followed by
+maintainers. This chapter gives guidelines in what to do in these
+cases.
+
+ <sect1 id="moving-pkgs">Moving packages
+ <p>
+Sometimes a package will change its section. For instance, a
+package from the `non-free' section might be GPL'd in a later version,
+in which case, the package should be moved to `main' or
+`contrib'.<footnote> See the <url id="&url-debian-policy;"
+name="Debian Policy Manual"> for guidelines on what section a package
+belongs in.
+ </footnote>
+ <p>
+If you need to change the section for one of your packages, change the
+package control information to place the package in the desired
+section, and re-upload the package (see the <url id="&url-debian-policy;"
+name="Debian Policy Manual"> for details). If your new section is
+valid, it will be moved automatically. If it does not, then contact
+the ftpmasters in order to understand what happened.
+ <p>
+If, on the other hand, you need to change the <em>subsection</em> of
+one of your packages (e.g., ``devel'', ``admin''), the procedure is
+slightly different. Correct the subsection as found in the control
+file of the package, and re-upload that. Also, you'll need to get the
+override file updated, as described in <ref id="override-file">.
- <sect1 id="kind-to-porters">Being kind to porters
+ <sect1 id="removing-pkgs">Removing packages
<p>
-Porters have a difficult and unique task, since they are required to
-deal with a large volume of packages. Ideally, every source package
-should build right out of the box. Unfortunately, this is often not
-the case. This section contains a checklist of ``gotchas'' often
-committed by Debian maintainers — common problems which often stymie
-porters, and make their jobs unnecessarily difficult.
+If for some reason you want to completely remove a package (say, if it
+is an old compatibility library which is no longer required), you
+need to file a bug against <tt>ftp.debian.org</tt> asking that the
+package be removed. Make sure you indicate which distribution the
+package should be removed from. Normally, you can only have packages
+removed from <em>unstable</em> and <em>experimental</em>. Packages
+are not removed from <em>testing</em> directly. Rather, they will be
+removed automatically after the package has been removed from
+<em>unstable</em> and no package in <em>testing</em> depends on it.
<p>
-The first and most important watchword is to respond quickly to bug or
-issues raised by porters. Please treat porters with courtesy, as if
-they were in fact co-maintainers of your package (which in a way, they
-are). Please be tolerant of succinct or even unclear bug reports,
-doing your best to hunt down whatever the problem is.
+You also have to detail the reasons justifying that request. This is to
+avoid unwanted removals and to keep a trace of why a package has been
+removed. For example, you can provide the name of the package that
+supersedes the one to be removed.
<p>
-By far, most of the problems encountered by porters are caused by
-<em>packaging bugs</em> in the source packages. Here is a checklist
-of things you should check or be aware of.
+Usually you only ask the removal of a package maintained by yourself.
+If you want to remove another package, you have to get the approval
+of its last maintainer.
+ <p>
+If in doubt concerning whether a package is disposable, email
+&email-debian-devel; asking for opinions. Also of interest is the
+<prgn>apt-cache</prgn> program from the <package>apt</package>
+package. When invoked as <tt>apt-cache showpkg
+<var>package</var></tt>, the program will show details for
+<var>package</var>, including reverse depends.
+ <p>
+Once the package has been removed, the package's bugs should be handled.
+They should either be reassigned to another package in the case where
+the actual code has evolved into another package (e.g. <tt>libfoo12</tt>
+was removed because <tt>libfoo13</tt> supersedes it) or closed if the
+software is simply no more part of Debian.
-<enumlist>
- <item>
-Make sure that your <tt>Build-Depends</tt> and
-<tt>Build-Depends-Indep</tt> settings in <file>debian/control</file>
-are set properly. The best way to validate this is to use the
-<package>debootstrap</package> package to create an unstable chroot
-environment. Within that chrooted environment, install the
-<package>build-essential</package> package and any package
-dependencies mention in <tt>Build-Depends</tt> and/or
-<tt>Build-Depends-Indep</tt>. Finally, try building your package
-within that chrooted environment.
+ <sect2>Removing packages from <file>Incoming</file>
+ <p>
+In the past, it was possible to remove packages from <file>incoming</file>.
+However, with the introduction of the new incoming system, this is no longer
+possible. Instead, you have to upload a new revision of your package with
+a higher version as the package you want to replace. Both versions will be
+installed in the archive but only the higher version will actually be
+available in <em>unstable</em> since the previous version will immediately
+be replaced by the higher. However, if you do proper testing of your
+packages, the need to replace a package should not occur too often anyway.
+
+ <sect1>Replacing or renaming packages
+ <p>
+Sometimes you made a mistake naming the package and you need to rename
+it. In this case, you need to follow a two-step process. First, set
+your <file>debian/control</file> file to replace and conflict with the
+obsolete name of the package (see the <url id="&url-debian-policy;"
+name="Debian Policy Manual"> for details). Once you've uploaded
+the package and the package has moved into the archive, file a bug
+against <tt>ftp.debian.org</tt> asking to remove the package with the
+obsolete name. Do not forget to properly reassign the package's bugs
+at the same time.
+ <p>
+At other times, you may make a mistake in constructing your package and
+wish to replace it. The only way to do this is to increase the version
+number and upload a new version. The old version will be expired in
+the usual manner. Note that this applies to each part of your package,
+including the sources: if you wish to replace the upstream source tarball
+of your package, you will need to upload it with a different version. An
+easy possibility is to replace <file>foo_1.00.orig.tar.gz</file> with
+<file>foo_1.00+0.orig.tar.gz</file>. This restriction gives each file
+on the ftp site a unique name, which helps to ensure consistency across the
+mirror network.
+
+ <sect1 id="orphaning">Orphaning a package
+ <p>
+If you can no longer maintain a package, you need to inform the others
+about that, and see that the package is marked as orphaned.
+You should set the package maintainer to <tt>Debian QA Group
+&orphan-address;</tt> and submit a bug report
+against the pseudo package <package>wnpp</package>. The bug report should be
+titled <tt>O: <var>package</var> -- <var>short description</var></tt>
+indicating that the package is now orphaned. The severity of the bug
+should be set to <em>normal</em>. If you feel it's necessary, send a copy
+to &email-debian-devel; by putting the address in the X-Debbugs-CC: header
+of the message (no, don't use CC:, because that way the message's subject
+won't indicate the bug number).
+ <p>
+If the package is especially crucial to Debian, you should instead submit
+a bug against <package>wnpp</package> and title it <tt>RFA: <var>package</var> --
+<var>short description</var></tt> and set its severity to
+<em>important</em>. <tt>RFA</tt> stands for <em>Request For Adoption</em>.
+Definitely copy the message to debian-devel in this case, as described
+above.
+ <p>
+Read instructions on the <url id="&url-wnpp;" name="WNPP web pages">
+for more information.
+
+ <sect1 id="adopting">Adopting a package
+ <p>
+A list of packages in need of a new maintainer is available at in the
+<url name="Work-Needing and Prospective Packages list (WNPP)"
+id="&url-wnpp;">. If you wish to take over maintenance of any of the
+packages listed in the WNPP, please take a look at the aforementioned
+page for information and procedures.
+ <p>
+It is not OK to simply take over a package that you feel is neglected
+— that would be package hijacking. You can, of course, contact the
+current maintainer and ask them if you may take over the package.
+If you have reason to believe a maintainer has gone AWOL
+(absent without leave), see <ref id="mia-qa">.
+ <p>
+Generally, you may not take over the package without the assent of the
+current maintainer. Even if they ignore you, that is still not grounds to
+take over a package. Complaints about maintainers should be brought up on
+the developers' mailing list. If the discussion doesn't end with a positive
+conclusion, and the issue is of a technical nature, consider bringing it to
+the attention of the technical committee (see the <url name="technical
+committee web page" id="&url-tech-ctte;"> for more information).
+ <p>
+If you take over an old package, you probably want to be listed as the
+package's official maintainer in the bug system. This will happen
+automatically once you upload a new version with an updated
+<tt>Maintainer:</tt> field, although it can take a few hours after the
+upload is done. If you do not expect to upload a new version for a while,
+you can use <ref id="pkg-tracking-system"> to get the bug reports. However,
+make sure that the old maintainer has no problem with the fact that
+they will continue to receive the bugs during that time.
+
+
+ <sect id="porting">Porting and being ported
+ <p>
+Debian supports an ever-increasing number of architectures. Even if
+you are not a porter, and you don't use any architecture but one, it
+is part of your duty as a maintainer to be aware of issues of
+portability. Therefore, even if you are not a porter, you should read
+most of this chapter.
+ <p>
+Porting is the act of building Debian packages for architectures that
+is different from the original architecture of the package
+maintainer's binary package. It is a unique and essential activity.
+In fact, porters do most of the actual compiling of Debian packages.
+For instance, for a single <em>i386</em> binary package, there must be
+a recompile for each architecture, which amounts to
+&number-of-arches; more builds.
+
+
+ <sect1 id="kind-to-porters">Being kind to porters
+ <p>
+Porters have a difficult and unique task, since they are required to
+deal with a large volume of packages. Ideally, every source package
+should build right out of the box. Unfortunately, this is often not
+the case. This section contains a checklist of ``gotchas'' often
+committed by Debian maintainers — common problems which often stymie
+porters, and make their jobs unnecessarily difficult.
+ <p>
+The first and most important watchword is to respond quickly to bug or
+issues raised by porters. Please treat porters with courtesy, as if
+they were in fact co-maintainers of your package (which in a way, they
+are). Please be tolerant of succinct or even unclear bug reports,
+doing your best to hunt down whatever the problem is.
+ <p>
+By far, most of the problems encountered by porters are caused by
+<em>packaging bugs</em> in the source packages. Here is a checklist
+of things you should check or be aware of.
+
+<enumlist>
+ <item>
+Make sure that your <tt>Build-Depends</tt> and
+<tt>Build-Depends-Indep</tt> settings in <file>debian/control</file>
+are set properly. The best way to validate this is to use the
+<package>debootstrap</package> package to create an unstable chroot
+environment. Within that chrooted environment, install the
+<package>build-essential</package> package and any package
+dependencies mentioned in <tt>Build-Depends</tt> and/or
+<tt>Build-Depends-Indep</tt>. Finally, try building your package
+within that chrooted environment. These steps can be automated
+by the use of the <prgn>pbuilder</prgn> program which is provided by
+the package of the same name.
<p>
See the <url id="&url-debian-policy;" name="Debian Policy
Manual"> for instructions on setting build dependencies.
Make sure your source package is correct. Do <tt>dpkg-source -x
<var>package</var>.dsc</tt> to make sure your source package unpacks
properly. Then, in there, try building your package from scratch with
-<tt>dpkg-buildpackage</tt>.
+<prgn>dpkg-buildpackage</prgn>.
<item>
Make sure you don't ship your source package with the
<file>debian/files</file> or <file>debian/substvars</file> files.
Sometimes the initial porter upload is problematic because the environment
in which the package was built was not good enough (outdated or obsolete
library, bad compiler, ...). Then you may just need to recompile it in
-an updated environment. However, you do have to bump the version number in
+an updated environment. However, you have to bump the version number in
this case, so that the old bad package can be replaced in the Debian archive
(<prgn>katie</prgn> refuses to install new packages if they don't have a
version number greater than the currently available one). Despite the
blessing or status, so buyer, beware.
- <sect1>Tools for porters
- <p>
-There are several tools available for the porting effort. This section
-contains a brief introduction to these tools; see the package
-documentation or references for full information.
-
-
- <sect2 id="quinn-diff">
- <heading><package>quinn-diff</package>
- <p>
-<package>quinn-diff</package> is used to locate the differences from
-one architecture to another. For instance, it could tell you which
-packages need to be ported for architecture <var>Y</var>, based on
-architecture <var>X</var>.
-
-
- <sect2 id="buildd">
- <heading><package>buildd</package>
- <p>
+ <sect1 id="porter-automation">
+ <heading>Porting infrastructure and automation</heading>
+ <p>
+There is infrastructure and several tools to help automate the package
+porting. This section contains a brief overview of this automation and
+porting to these tools; see the package documentation or references for
+full information.</p>
+
+ <sect2>
+ <heading>Mailing lists and web pages</heading>
+ <p>
+Web pages containing the status of each port can be found at <url
+id="&url-debian-ports;">.
+ <p>
+Each port of Debian has a mailing list. The list of porting mailing
+lists can be found at <url id="&url-debian-port-lists;">. These lists
+are used to coordinate porters, and to connect the users of a given
+port with the porters.</p>
+ </sect2>
+
+ <sect2>
+ <heading>Porter tools</heading>
+ <p>
+Descriptions of several porting tools can be found in <ref
+id="tools-porting">.</p>
+ </sect2>
+
+ <sect2 id="buildd">
+ <heading><package>buildd</package></heading>
+ <p>
The <package>buildd</package> system is used as a distributed,
client-server build distribution system. It is usually used in
conjunction with <em>auto-builders</em>, which are ``slave'' hosts
which simply check out and attempt to auto-build packages which need
to be ported. There is also an email interface to the system, which
allows porters to ``check out'' a source package (usually one which
-cannot yet be autobuilt) and work on it.
+cannot yet be auto-built) and work on it.
<p>
<package>buildd</package> is not yet available as a package; however,
most porting efforts are either using it currently or planning to use
-it in the near future. It collects a number of as yet unpackaged
+it in the near future. The actual automated builder is packaged as
+<package>sbuild</package>, see its description in <ref id="sbuild">.
+The complete <package>buildd</package> system also collects a number of as yet unpackaged
components which are currently very useful and in use continually,
-such as <prgn>andrea</prgn>, <prgn>sbuild</prgn> and
+such as <prgn>andrea</prgn> and
<prgn>wanna-build</prgn>.
<p>
Some of the data produced by <package>buildd</package> which is
from <prgn>andrea</prgn> (source dependencies) and
<package>quinn-diff</package> (packages needing recompilation).
<p>
-We are very excited about this system, since it potentially has so
-many uses. Independent development groups can use the system for
+We are quite proud of this system, since it has so
+many possible uses. Independent development groups can use the system for
different sub-flavors of Debian, which may or may not really be of
-general interest (for instance, a flavor of Debian built with gcc
+general interest (for instance, a flavor of Debian built with <prgn>gcc</prgn>
bounds checking). It will also enable Debian to recompile entire
distributions quickly.
+ </sect2>
- <sect2 id="dpkg-cross">
- <heading><package>dpkg-cross</package>
- <p>
-<package>dpkg-cross</package> is a tool for installing libraries and
-headers for cross-compiling in a way similar to
-<package>dpkg</package>. Furthermore, the functionality of
-<prgn>dpkg-buildpackage</prgn> and <prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn> is
-enhanced to support cross-compiling.
-
-
-
-
- <sect id="archive-manip">
- <heading>Moving, Removing, Renaming, Adopting, and Orphaning
- Packages</heading>
+ <sect id="nmu">Non-Maintainer Uploads (NMUs)
<p>
-Some archive manipulation operation are not automated in the Debian
-upload process. These procedures should be manually followed by
-maintainers. This chapter gives guidelines in what to do in these
-cases.
+Under certain circumstances it is necessary for someone other than the
+official package maintainer to make a release of a package. This is
+called a non-maintainer upload, or NMU.
+ <p>
+Debian porters, who compile packages for different architectures,
+occasionally do binary-only NMUs as part of their porting activity
+(see <ref id="porting">). Another reason why NMUs are done is when a
+Debian developers needs to fix another developers' packages in order to
+address serious security problems or crippling bugs, especially during
+the freeze, or when the package maintainer is unable to release a fix
+in a timely fashion.
+ <p>
+This chapter contains information providing guidelines for when and
+how NMUs should be done. A fundamental distinction is made between
+source and binary-only NMUs, which is explained in the next section.
- <sect1 id="moving-pkgs">Moving packages
+ <sect1 id="nmu-terms">Terminology
<p>
-Sometimes a package will change its section. For instance, a
-package from the `non-free' section might be GPL'd in a later version,
-in which case, the package should be moved to `main' or
-`contrib'.<footnote> See the <url id="&url-debian-policy;"
-name="Debian Policy Manual"> for guidelines on what section a package
-belongs in.
- </footnote>
+There are two new terms used throughout this section: ``binary-only NMU''
+and ``source NMU''. These terms are used with specific technical
+meaning throughout this document. Both binary-only and source NMUs are
+similar, since they involve an upload of a package by a developer who
+is not the official maintainer of that package. That is why it's a
+<em>non-maintainer</em> upload.
<p>
-If you need to change the section for one of your packages, change the
-package control information to place the package in the desired
-section, and re-upload the package (see the <url id="&url-debian-policy;"
-name="Debian Policy Manual"> for details). If your new section is
-valid, it will be moved automatically. If it does not, then contact
-the ftpmasters in order to understand what happened.
+A source NMU is an upload of a package by a developer who is not the
+official maintainer, for the purposes of fixing a bug in the package.
+Source NMUs always involves changes to the source (even if it is just
+a change to <file>debian/changelog</file>). This can be either a
+change to the upstream source, or a change to the Debian bits of the
+source. Note, however, that source NMUs may also include
+architecture-dependent packages, as well as an updated Debian diff.
<p>
-If, on the other hand, you need to change the <em>subsection</em> of
-one of your packages (e.g., ``devel'', ``admin''), the procedure is
-slightly different. Correct the subsection as found in the control
-file of the package, and re-upload that. Also, you'll need to get the
-override file updated, as described in <ref id="override-file">.
+A binary-only NMU is a recompilation and upload of a binary package
+for a given architecture. As such, it is usually part of a porting
+effort. A binary-only NMU is a non-maintainer uploaded binary version
+of a package, with no source changes required. There are many cases
+where porters must fix problems in the source in order to get them to
+compile for their target architecture; that would be considered a
+source NMU rather than a binary-only NMU. As you can see, we don't
+distinguish in terminology between porter NMUs and non-porter NMUs.
+ <p>
+Both classes of NMUs, source and binary-only, can be lumped by the
+term ``NMU''. However, this often leads to confusion, since most
+people think ``source NMU'' when they think ``NMU''. So it's best to
+be careful. In this chapter, if we use the unqualified term ``NMU'',
+we refer to any type of non-maintainer upload NMUs, whether source and
+binary, or binary-only.
- <sect1 id="removing-pkgs">Removing packages
- <p>
-If for some reason you want to completely remove a package (say, if it
-is an old compatibility library which is no longer required), you
-need to file a bug against <tt>ftp.debian.org</tt> asking that the
-package be removed. Make sure you indicate which distribution the
-package should be removed from. Normally, you can only have packages
-removed from <em>unstable</em> and <em>experimental</em>. Packages
-are not removed from <em>testing</em> directly. Rather, they will be
-removed automatically after the package has been removed from
-<em>unstable</em> and no package in <em>testing</em> depends on it.
- <p>
-You also have to detail the reasons justifying that request. This is to
-avoid unwanted removals and to keep a trace of why a package has been
-removed. For example, you can provide the name of the package that
-supersedes the one to be removed.
- <p>
-Usually you only ask the removal of a package maintained by yourself.
-If you want to remove another package, you have to get the approval
-of its last maintainer.
+ <sect1 id="nmu-who">Who can do an NMU
<p>
-If in doubt concerning whether a package is disposable, email
-&email-debian-devel; asking for opinions. Also of interest is the
-<prgn>apt-cache</prgn> program from the <package>apt</package>
-package. When invoked as <tt>apt-cache showpkg
-<var>package</var></tt>, the program will show details for
-<var>package</var>, including reverse depends.
+Only official, registered Debian maintainers can do binary or source
+NMUs. An official maintainer is someone who has their key in the
+Debian key ring. Non-developers, however, are encouraged to download
+the source package and start hacking on it to fix problems; however,
+rather than doing an NMU, they should just submit worthwhile patches
+to the Bug Tracking System. Maintainers almost always appreciate
+quality patches and bug reports.
- <sect2>Removing packages from <tt>Incoming</tt>
- <p>
-In the past, it was possible to remove packages from <tt>incoming</tt>.
-With the introduction of the New Incoming system this is no longer
-possible. Instead, you have to upload a new revision of your package with
-a higher version as the package you want to replace. Both versions will be
-installed in the archive but only the higher version will actually be
-available in <em>unstable</em> since the previous version will immediately
-be replaced by the higher. However, if you do proper testing of your
-packages, the need to replace a package should not occur too often anyway.
- <sect1>Replacing or renaming packages
+ <sect1 id="nmu-when">When to do a source NMU
<p>
-Sometimes you made a mistake naming the package and you need to rename
-it. In this case, you need to follow a two-step process. First, set
-your <file>debian/control</file> file to replace and conflict with the
-obsolete name of the package (see the <url id="&url-debian-policy;"
-name="Debian Policy Manual"> for details). Once you've uploaded
-that package, and the package has moved into the archive, file a bug
-against <tt>ftp.debian.org</tt> asking to remove the package with the
-obsolete name.
-
- <sect1 id="orphaning">Orphaning a package
+Guidelines for when to do a source NMU depend on the target
+distribution, i.e., stable, unstable, or experimental. Porters have
+slightly different rules than non-porters, due to their unique
+circumstances (see <ref id="source-nmu-when-porter">).
<p>
-If you can no longer maintain a package, you need to inform the others
-about that, and see that the package is marked as orphaned.
-you should set the package maintainer to <tt>Debian QA Group
-&orphan-address;</tt> and submit a bug report
-against the pseudo package <package>wnpp</package>. The bug report should be
-titled <tt>O: <var>package</var> -- <var>short description</var></tt>
-indicating that the package is now orphaned. The severity of the bug
-should be set to <em>normal</em>. If you feel it's necessary, send a copy
-to &email-debian-devel; by putting the address in the X-Debbugs-CC: header
-of the message (no, don't use CC:, because that way the message's subject
-won't indicate the bug number).
+When a security bug is detected, the security team may do an NMU.
+Please refer to <ref id="bug-security"> for more information.
<p>
-If the package is especially crucial to Debian, you should instead submit
-a bug against <tt>wnpp</tt> and title it <tt>RFA: <var>package</var> --
-<var>short description</var></tt> and set its severity to
-<em>important</em>. Definitely copy the message to debian-devel in this
-case, as described above.
+During the release cycle (see <ref id="sec-dists">), NMUs which fix
+serious or higher severity bugs are encouraged and accepted. Even
+during this window, however, you should endeavor to reach the current
+maintainer of the package; they might be just about to upload a fix
+for the problem. As with any source NMU, the guidelines found in <ref
+id="nmu-guidelines"> need to be followed. Special exceptions are made
+for <ref id="qa-bsp">.
<p>
-Read instructions on the <url id="&url-wnpp;" name="WNPP web pages">
-for more information.
-
- <sect1 id="adopting">Adopting a package
+Uploading bug fixes to unstable by non-maintainers should only be done
+by following this protocol:
<p>
-A list of packages in need of a new maintainer is available at in the
-<url name="Work-Needing and Prospective Packages list (WNPP)"
-id="&url-wnpp;">. If you wish to take over maintenance of any of the
-packages listed in the WNPP, please take a look at the aforementioned
-page for information and procedures.
+<list>
+ <item>
+Make sure that the package's bugs that the NMU is meant to address are all
+filed in the Debian Bug Tracking System (BTS).
+If they are not, submit them immediately.
+ <item>
+Wait a few days the response from the maintainer. If you don't get
+any response, you may want to help him by sending the patch that fixes
+the bug. Don't forget to tag the bug with the "patch" keyword.
+ <item>
+Wait a few more days. If you still haven't got an answer from the
+maintainer, send him a mail announcing your intent to NMU the package.
+Prepare an NMU as described in <ref id="nmu-guidelines">, test it
+carefully on your machine (cf. <ref id="upload-checking">).
+Double check that your patch doesn't have any unexpected side effects.
+Make sure your patch is as small and as non-disruptive as it can be.
+ <item>
+Upload your package to incoming in <file>DELAYED/7-day</file> (cf.
+<ref id="delayed-incoming">), send the final patch to the maintainer via
+the BTS, and explain to them that they have 7 days to react if they want
+to cancel the NMU.
+ <item>
+Follow what happens, you're responsible for any bug that you introduced
+with your NMU. You should probably use <ref id="pkg-tracking-system"> (PTS)
+to stay informed of the state of the package after your NMU.
+</list>
<p>
-It is not OK to simply take over a package that you feel is neglected
-— that would be package hijacking. You can, of course, contact the
-current maintainer and ask them if you may take over the package.
-However, without their assent, you may not take over the package.
-Even if they ignore you, that is still not grounds to take over a
-package. If you really feel that a maintainer has gone AWOL (absent
-without leave), post a query to &email-debian-private;.
+At times, the release manager or an organized group of developers can
+announce a certain period of time in which the NMU rules are relaxed.
+This usually involves shortening the period during which one is to wait
+before uploading the fixes, and shortening the DELAYED period. It is
+important to notice that even in these so-called "bug squashing party"
+times, the NMU'er has to file bugs and contact the developer first,
+and act later.
+
+ <sect1 id="nmu-guidelines">How to do a source NMU
<p>
-If you take over an old package, you probably want to be listed as the
-package's official maintainer in the bug system. This will happen
-automatically once you upload a new version with an updated
-<tt>Maintainer:</tt> field, although it can take a few hours after the
-upload is done. If you do not expect to upload a new version for a while,
-send an email to &email-override; so that bug reports will go to you
-right away.
+The following applies to porters insofar as they are playing the dual
+role of being both package bug-fixers and package porters. If a
+porter has to change the Debian source archive, automatically their
+upload is a source NMU and is subject to its rules. If a porter is
+simply uploading a recompiled binary package, the rules are different;
+see <ref id="porter-guidelines">.
+ <p>
+First and foremost, it is critical that NMU patches to source should
+be as non-disruptive as possible. Do not do housekeeping tasks, do
+not change the name of modules or files, do not move directories; in
+general, do not fix things which are not broken. Keep the patch as
+small as possible. If things bother you aesthetically, talk to the
+Debian maintainer, talk to the upstream maintainer, or submit a bug.
+However, aesthetic changes must <em>not</em> be made in a non-maintainer
+upload.
+ <sect2 id="nmu-version">Source NMU version numbering
+ <p>
+Whenever you have made a change to a package, no matter how trivial,
+the version number needs to change. This enables our packing system
+to function.
+ <p>
+If you are doing a non-maintainer upload (NMU), you should add a new
+minor version number to the <var>debian-revision</var> part of the
+version number (the portion after the last hyphen). This extra minor
+number will start at `1'. For example, consider the package `foo',
+which is at version 1.1-3. In the archive, the source package control
+file would be <file>foo_1.1-3.dsc</file>. The upstream version is
+`1.1' and the Debian revision is `3'. The next NMU would add a new
+minor number `.1' to the Debian revision; the new source control file
+would be <file>foo_1.1-3.1.dsc</file>.
+ <p>
+The Debian revision minor number is needed to avoid stealing one of
+the package maintainer's version numbers, which might disrupt their
+work. It also has the benefit of making it visually clear that a
+package in the archive was not made by the official maintainer.
+ <p>
+If there is no <var>debian-revision</var> component in the version
+number then one should be created, starting at `0.1'. If it is
+absolutely necessary for someone other than the usual maintainer to
+make a release based on a new upstream version then the person making
+the release should start with the <var>debian-revision</var> value
+`0.1'. The usual maintainer of a package should start their
+<var>debian-revision</var> numbering at `1'.
+
- <sect id="bug-handling">Handling package bugs
- <p>
-Often as a package maintainer, you find bugs in other packages or else
-have bugs reported to your packages which need to be reassigned. The
-<url id="&url-bts-control;" name="BTS instructions"> can tell you how
-to do this. Some information on filing bugs can be found in <ref
-id="submit-bug">.
+ <sect2 id="nmu-changelog">
+ <heading>Source NMUs must have a new changelog entry</heading>
+ <p>
+A non-maintainer doing a source NMU must create a changelog entry,
+describing which bugs are fixed by the NMU, and generally why the NMU
+was required and what it fixed. The changelog entry will have the
+non-maintainer's email address in the log entry and the NMU version
+number in it.
+ <p>
+By convention, source NMU changelog entries start with the line
+<example>
+ * Non-maintainer upload
+</example>
+
+
+ <sect2 id="nmu-patch">Source NMUs and the Bug Tracking System
+ <p>
+Maintainers other than the official package maintainer should make as
+few changes to the package as possible, and they should always send a
+patch as a unified context diff (<tt>diff -u</tt>) detailing their
+changes to the Bug Tracking System.
+ <p>
+What if you are simply recompiling the package? If you just need to
+recompile it for a single architecture, then you may do a binary-only
+NMU as described in <ref id="binary-only-nmu"> which doesn't require any
+patch to be sent. If you want the package to be recompiled for all
+architectures, then you do a source NMU as usual and you will have to
+send a patch.
+ <p>
+If the source NMU (non-maintainer upload) fixes some existing bugs,
+these bugs should be tagged <em>fixed</em> in the Bug Tracking
+System rather than closed. By convention, only the official package
+maintainer or the original bug submitter are allowed to close bugs.
+Fortunately, Debian's archive system recognizes NMUs and thus marks
+the bugs fixed in the NMU appropriately if the person doing the NMU
+has listed all bugs in the changelog with the <tt>Closes:
+bug#<var>nnnnn</var></tt> syntax (see <ref id="upload-bugfix"> for
+more information describing how to close bugs via the changelog).
+Tagging the bugs <em>fixed</em> ensures that everyone knows that the
+bug was fixed in an NMU; however the bug is left open until the
+changes in the NMU are incorporated officially into the package by
+the official package maintainer.
+ <p>
+Also, after doing an NMU, you have to open a new bug and include a
+patch showing all the changes you have made. Alternatively you can send
+that information to the existing bugs that are fixed by your NMU.
+The normal maintainer will either apply the patch or employ an alternate
+method of fixing the problem. Sometimes bugs are fixed independently
+upstream, which is another good reason to back out an NMU's patch.
+If the maintainer decides not to apply the NMU's patch but to release a
+new version, the maintainer needs to ensure that the new upstream version
+really fixes each problem that was fixed in the non-maintainer release.
+ <p>
+In addition, the normal maintainer should <em>always</em> retain the
+entry in the changelog file documenting the non-maintainer upload.
+
+
+ <sect2 id="nmu-build">Building source NMUs
+ <p>
+Source NMU packages are built normally. Pick a distribution using the
+same rules as found in <ref id="upload-dist">. Just as described in
+<ref id="uploading">, a normal changes file, etc., will be built. In
+fact, all the prescriptions from <ref id="upload"> apply.
+ <p>
+Make sure you do <em>not</em> change the value of the maintainer in
+the <file>debian/control</file> file. Your name as given in the NMU entry of
+the <file>debian/changelog</file> file will be used for signing the
+changes file.
- <sect1>Monitoring bugs
+ <sect1 id="ack-nmu">Acknowledging an NMU
<p>
-If you want to be a good maintainer, you should periodically check the
-<url id="&url-bts;" name="Debian bug tracking system (BTS)"> for your
-packages. The BTS contains all the open bugs against your packages.
- <p>
-Maintainers interact with the BTS via email addresses at
-<tt>bugs.debian.org</tt>. Documentation on available commands can be
-found at <url id="&url-bts;">, or, if you have installed the
-<package>doc-debian</package> package, you can look at the local files
-&file-bts-docs;.
+If one of your packages has been NMU'ed, you have to incorporate the
+changes in your copy of the sources. This is easy, you just have
+to apply the patch that has been sent to you. Once this is done, you
+have to close the bugs that have been tagged fixed by the NMU. You
+can either close them manually by sending the required mails to the
+BTS or by adding the required <tt>closes: #nnnn</tt> in the changelog
+entry of your next upload.
<p>
-Some find it useful to get periodic reports on open bugs. You can add
-a cron job such as the following if you want to get a weekly email
-outlining all the open bugs against your packages:
+In any case, you should not be upset by the NMU. An NMU is not a
+personal attack against the maintainer. It is a proof that
+someone cares enough about the package and that they were willing to help
+you in your work, so you should be thankful. You may also want to
+ask them if they would be interested to help you on a more frequent
+basis as co-maintainer or backup maintainer
+(see <ref id="collaborative-maint">).
+
+
+ <sect id="collaborative-maint">
+ <heading>Collaborative maintenance</heading>
+ <p>
+"Collaborative maintenance" is a term describing the sharing of Debian
+package maintenance duties by several people. This collaboration is
+almost always a good idea, since it generally results in higher quality and
+faster bug fix turnaround time. It is strongly recommended that
+packages in which a priority of <tt>Standard</tt> or which are part of
+the base set have co-maintainers.</p>
+ <p>
+Generally there is a primary maintainer and one or more
+co-maintainers. The primary maintainer is the whose name is listed in
+the <tt>Maintainer</tt> field of the <file>debian/control</file> file.
+Co-maintainers are all the other maintainers.</p>
+ <p>
+In its most basic form, the process of adding a new co-maintainer is
+quite easy:<list>
+ <item>
+ <p>
+Setup the co-maintainer with access to the sources you build the
+package from. Generally this implies you are using a network-capable
+version control system, such as <prgn>CVS</prgn> or
+<prgn>Subversion</prgn>.</p>
+ </item>
+ <item>
+ <p>
+Add the co-maintainer's correct maintainer name and address to the
+<tt>Uploaders</tt> field in the global part of the
+<file>debian/control</file> file.
<example>
-# ask for weekly reports of bugs in my packages
-&cron-bug-report;
+Uploaders: John Buzz <jbuzz@debian.org>, Adam Rex <arex@debian.org>
</example>
-Replace <var>address</var> with your official Debian
-maintainer address.
+</p>
+ </item>
+ <item>
+ <p>
+Using the PTS (<ref id="pkg-tracking-system">), the co-maintainers
+should subscribe themselves to the appropriate source package.</p>
+ </item>
+ </list></p>
+ </sect>
- <sect1 id="bug-answering">Responding to bugs
- <p>
-Make sure that any discussions you have about bugs are sent both to
-the original submitter of the bug, and the bug itself (e.g.,
-<email>123@bugs.debian.org</email>).
- <p>
-You should <em>never</em> close bugs via the bug server <tt>close</tt>
-command sent to &email-bts-control;. If you do so, the original
-submitter will not receive any information about why the bug was
-closed.
- <sect1 id="bug-housekeeping">Bug housekeeping
+
+ <chapt id="best-pkging-practices">
+ <heading>Best Packaging Practices</heading>
+ <p>
+Debian's quality is largely due to the <url id="&url-debian-policy;"
+name="Debian Policy">, which defines explicit baseline requirements
+which all Debian packages must fulfill. Yet there is also a shared
+history of experience which goes beyond the Debian Policy, an
+accumulation of years of experience in packaging. Many very
+talented people have created great tools, tools which help you, the
+Debian maintainer, create and maintain excellent packages.
+ <p>
+This chapter provides some best practices for Debian developers. All
+recommendations are merely that, and are not requirements or policy.
+These are just some subjective hints, advice and pointers collected
+from Debian developers. Feel free to pick and choose whatever works
+best for you.
+
+ <sect id="bpp-debian-rules">
+ <heading>Best practices for <file>debian/rules</file></heading>
+ <p>
+The following recommendations apply to the <file>debian/rules</file>
+file. Since <file>debian/rules</file> controls the build process and
+selects the files which go into the package (directly or indirectly),
+it's usually the file maintainers spend the most time on.
+
+ <sect1 id="helper-scripts">Helper scripts
+ <p>
+The rationale for using helper scripts in <file>debian/rules</file> is
+that lets maintainers use and share common logic among many packages.
+Take for instance the question of installing menu entries: you need to
+put the file into <file>/usr/lib/menu</file>, and add commands to the
+maintainer scripts to register and unregister the menu entries. Since
+this is a very common thing for packages to do, why should each
+maintainer rewrite all this on their own, sometimes with bugs? Also,
+supposing the menu directory changed, every package would have to be
+changed.
+ <p>
+Helper scripts take care of these issues. Assuming you comply with
+the conventions expected by the helper script, the helper takes care
+of all the details. Changes in policy can be made in the helper
+script, then packages just need to be rebuilt with the new version of
+the helper and no other changes.
+ <p>
+<ref id="tools"> contains a couple of different helpers. The most
+common and best (in our opinion) helper system is
+<package>debhelper</package>. Previous helper systems, such as
+<package>debmake</package>, were "monolithic": you couldn't pick and
+choose which part of the helper you found useful, but had to use the
+helper to do everything. <package>debhelper</package>, however, is a
+number of separate little <prgn>dh_*</prgn> programs. For instance,
+<prgn>dh_installman</prgn> installs and compresses man pages,
+<prgn>dh_installmenu</prgn> installs menu files, and so on. Thus, it
+offers enough flexibility to be able to use the little helper scripts,
+where useful, in conjunction with hand-crafted commands in
+<file>debian/rules</file>.
<p>
-As a package maintainer, you will often find bugs in other packages or
-have bugs reported against your packages which are actually bugs in
-other packages. The <url id="&url-bts-control;" name="BTS
-instructions"> document the technical operation of the BTS, such as
-how to file, reassign, merge, and tag bugs. This section contains
-some guidelines for managing your own bugs, based on the collective
-Debian developer experience.
+You can get started with <package>debhelper</package> by reading
+<manref name="debhelper" section="1">, and looking at the examples
+that come with the package. <prgn>dh_make</prgn>, from the
+<package>dh-make</package> package (see <ref id="dh-make">), can be
+used to convert a "vanilla" source package to a
+<package>debhelper</package>ized package. This shortcut, though,
+should not convince you that you do not need to bother understanding
+the individual <prgn>dh_*</prgn> helpers. If you are going to use a
+helper, you do need to take the time to learn to use that helper, to
+learn its expectations and behavior.
+ <p>
+Some people feel that vanilla <file>debian/rules</file> files are
+better, since you don't have to learn the intricacies of any helper
+system. This decision is completely up to you. Use what works for
+you. Many examples of vanilla <file>debian/rules</file> files are
+available at <url id="&url-rules-files;">.
+
+
+ <sect1 id="multiple-patches">
+ <heading>Separating your patches into multiple files</heading>
+ <p>
+Big, complex packages may have many bugs that you need to deal with.
+If you correct a number of bug directly in the source, if you're not
+careful, it can get hard to differentiate the various patches that you
+applied. It can get quite messy when you have to update the package
+to a new upstream version which integrates some of the fixes (but not
+all). You can't take the total set of diffs (e.g., from
+<file>.diff.gz</file>) and work out which patch sets to back out as a
+unit as bugs are fixed upstream.
+ <p>
+Unfortunately, the packaging system as such currently doesn't provide for
+separating the patches into several files. Nevertheless, there are ways to
+separate patches: the patch files are shipped within the Debian patch file
+(<file>.diff.gz</file>), usually within the <file>debian/</file> directory.
+The only difference is that they aren't applied immediately by dpkg-source,
+but by the <tt>build</tt> rule of <file>debian/rules</file>. Conversely,
+they are reverted in the <tt>clean</tt> rule.
+ <p>
+<prgn>dbs</prgn> is one of the more popular approaches to this. It does all
+of the above, and provides a facility for creating new and updating old
+patches. See the package <package>dbs</package> for more information and
+<package>hello-dbs</package> for an example.
+ <p>
+<prgn>dpatch</prgn> also provides these facilities, but it's intented to be
+even easier to use. See the package <package>dpatch</package> for
+documentation and examples (in <file>/usr/share/doc/dpatch</file>).
+
+
+ <sect1 id="multiple-binary">Multiple binary packages
+ <p>
+A single source package will often build several binary packages,
+either to provide several flavors of the same software (examples are
+the <package>vim-*</package> packages) or to make several small
+packages instead of a big one (e.g., if the user can install only the
+subset she needs, and thus save some disk space).
+ <p>
+The second case can be easily managed in <file>debian/rules</file>.
+You just need to move the appropriate files from the build directory
+into the package's temporary trees. You can do this using
+<prgn>install</prgn> (vanilla approach) or <prgn>dh_install</prgn>
+(from <package>debhelper</package>). Be sure to check the different
+permutations of the various packages, ensuring that you have the
+inter-package dependencies set right in <file>debian/control</file>.
+ <p>
+The first case is a bit more difficult since it involves multiple
+recompiles of the same software but with different configure
+options. The <package>vim</package> is an example of how to manage
+this using an hand-crafted <file>debian/rules</file> file.
+
+<!-- &FIXME; Find a good debhelper example with multiple configure/make
+ cycles -->
+ </sect1>
+ </sect>
+
+ <sect id="bpp-debian-maint-scripts">
+ <heading>Best practices for maintainer scripts</heading>
<p>
-Filing bugs for problems that you find in other packages is one of
-the "civic obligations" of maintainership, see <ref id="submit-bug">
-for details.
+Maintainer scripts include the files <file>debian/postinst</file>,
+<file>debian/preinst</file>, <file>debian/prerm</file> and
+<file>debian/postrm</file>. These scripts take care of any package
+installation or deinstallation setup which isn't handled merely by the
+creation or removal of files and directories. The following
+instructions supplement the <url id="&url-debian-policy;" name="Debian
+Policy">.
+ <p>
+Maintainer scripts must be idempotent. That means that you need to
+make sure nothing bad will happen if the script is called twice where
+it would usually be called once.
+ <p>
+Standard input and output may be redirected (e.g. into pipes) for
+logging purposes, so don't rely on them being a tty.
<p>
-&FIXME;Talk about tags, forwarding bugs, or else break it into
-different sections...
+All prompting or interactive configuration should be kept to a
+minimum. When it is necessary, you should use the
+<package>debconf</package> package for the interface. Remember that
+prompting in any case can only be in the <tt>configure</tt> stage of
+the <file>postinst</file> script.
+ <p>
+Keep the maintainer scripts as simple as possible. We suggest you use
+pure POSIX shell scripts. Remember, if you do need any bash features,
+the maintainer script must have a bash sh-bang line. POSIX shell or
+Bash are preferred to Perl, since they enable
+<package>debhelper</package> to easily add bits to the scripts.
+ <p>
+If you change your maintainer scripts, be sure to test package
+removal, double installation, and purging. Be sure that a purged
+package is completely gone, that is, it must remove any files created,
+directly or indirectly, in any maintainer script.
+ <p>
+If you need to check for the existence of a command, you should use
+something like
+<example>if [ -x /usr/sbin/install-docs ]; then ...</example>
+If you don't wish to hard-code the path of the command in your
+maintainer script, the following POSIX-compliant shell function may
+help:
- <sect1 id="upload-bugfix">When bugs are closed by new uploads
+&example-pathfind;
+
+You can use this function to search <tt>$PATH</tt> for a command name,
+passed as an argument. It returns true (zero) if the command was
+found, and false if not. This is really the most portable way, since
+<tt>command -v</tt>, <prgn>type</prgn>, and <prgn>which</prgn> are not
+POSIX.
<p>
-If you fix a bug in your packages, it is your responsibility as the
-package maintainer to close the bug when it has been fixed. However,
-you should not close the bug until the package which fixes the bug has
-been accepted into the Debian archive. Therefore, once you get
-notification that your updated package has been installed into the
-archive, you can and should close the bug in the BTS.
+While <prgn>which</prgn> is an acceptable alternative, since
+it is from the required <package>debianutils</package> package, it's
+not on the root partition. That is, it's in <file>/usr/bin</file> rather
+than <file>/bin</file>, so one can't use it in scripts which are run
+before the <file>/usr</file> partition is mounted. Most scripts won't have
+this problem, though.
+
+
+ <sect id="bpp-debian-control">
+ <heading>Best practices for <file>debian/control</file></heading>
+ <p>
+The following practices supplement the <url
+ id="&url-debian-policy;ch-miscellaneous.html#s-descriptions"
+ name="Policy on package descriptions">.</p>
+
+ <sect1 id="bpp-pkg-desc">
+ <heading>Writing useful descriptions</heading>
+ <p>
+The description of the package (as defined by the corresponding field
+in the <file>control</file> file) is the primary information available
+to the user about a package before they install it. It should provide
+all the required information to let the user decide whether to install
+the package.
+ <p>
+For consistency and aesthetics, you should capitalize the first letter
+of the Synopsis. Don't put a full stop (period) at the end. The
+description itself should consist of full sentences.
+ <p>
+Since the first user impression is based on the description, be
+careful to avoid spelling and grammar mistakes. Ensure that you
+spell-check it. <prgn>ispell</prgn> has a special <tt>-g</tt> option
+for <file>debian/control</file> files:
+
+<example>ispell -d american -g debian/control</example>
+
+If you want someone to proofread the description that you
+intend to use you may ask on &email-debian-l10n-english;.
+ </sect1>
+
+ <sect1 id="bpp-upstream-info">
+ <heading>Upstream home page</heading>
+ <p>
+We recommend that you add the URL for the package's home page to the
+package description in <file>debian/control</file>. This information
+should be added at the
+end of description, using the following format:
+
+<example> .
+ Homepage: http://some-project.some-place.org/</example>
+
+Note the spaces prepending the line, which serves to break the lines
+correctly. To see an example of how this displays, see <url
+id="&url-eg-desc-upstream-info;">.
+ <p>
+If there is no home page for the software, this should naturally be
+left empty.
+ <p>
+Note that we expect this field will eventually be replaced by a proper
+<file>debian/control</file> field understood by <prgn>dpkg</prgn> and
+<tt>&packages-host;</tt>. If you don't want to bother migrating the
+home page from the description to this field, you should probably wait
+until that is available.</p>
+ </sect1>
+ </sect>
+
+<!--
+ <sect1 id="pkg-mgmt-cvs">Managing a package with CVS
<p>
-If you are using a new version of <package>dpkg-dev</package> and you do
-your changelog entry properly, the archive maintenance software will close
-the bugs automatically. All you have to do is follow a certain syntax in
-your <file>debian/changelog</file> file:
-<example>
-acme-cannon (3.1415) unstable; urgency=low
+ &FIXME; presentation of cvs-buildpackage, updating sources
+ via CVS (debian/rules refresh).
+-->
- * Frobbed with options (closes: Bug#98339)
- * Added safety to prevent operator dismemberment, closes: bug#98765,
- bug#98713, #98714.
- * Added man page. Closes: #98725.
-</example>
-Technically speaking, the following Perl regular expression is what is
-used:
-<example>
- /closes:\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+(?:,\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+)*/ig
-</example>
+ <sect id="bpp-config-mgmt">
+ <heading>Configuration management with <package>debconf</package></heading>
+
+ <p>
+<package>Debconf</package> is a configuration management system which
+can be used by all the various packaging scripts
+(<file>postinst</file> mainly) to request feedback from the user
+concerning how to configure the package. Direct user interactions must
+now be avoided in favor of <package>debconf</package>
+interaction. This will enable non-interactive installations in the
+future.
+ <p>
+Debconf is a great tool but it is often poorly used. Many common mistakes
+are listed in the <manref name="debconf-devel" section="8"> man page.
+It is something that you must read if you decide to use debconf.
+ </sect>
-The author prefers the <tt>closes: #<var>XXX</var>)</tt> syntax, as
-one of the most concise and easiest to integrate with the text of the
-<file>changelog</file>.
+
+ <sect id="bpp-i18n">
+ <heading>Internationalization</heading>
+
+ <sect1 id="bpp-i18n-debconf">
+ <heading>Handling debconf translations</heading>
+ <p>
+Like porters, translators have a difficult task. They work on many
+packages and must collaborate with many different
+maintainers. Moreover, most of the time, they are not native English
+speakers, so you may need to be particularly patient with them.
+ <p>
+The goal of <package>debconf</package> was to make packages
+configuration easier for maintainers and for users. Originally,
+translation of debconf templates was handled with
+<prgn>debconf-mergetemplate</prgn>. However, that technique is now
+deprecated; the best way to accomplish <package>debconf</package>
+internationalization is by using the <package>po-debconf</package>
+package. This method is easier both for maintainer and translators;
+transition scripts are provided.
+ <p>
+Using <package>po-debconf</package>, the translation is stored in
+<file>po</file> files (drawing from <prgn>gettext</prgn> translation
+techniques). Special template files contain the original messages and
+mark which fields are translatable. When you change the value of a
+translatable field, by calling <prgn>debconf-updatepo</prgn>, the
+translation is marked as needing attention from the translators. Then,
+at build time, the <prgn>dh_installdebconf</prgn> program takes care
+of all the needed magic to add the template along with the up-to-date
+translations into the binary packages. Refer to the <manref
+name="po-debconf" section="7"> manual page for details.
+ </sect1>
+
+ <sect1 id="bpp-i18n-docs">
+ <heading>Internationalized documentation</heading>
+ <p>
+Internationalizing documentation is crucial for users, but a lot of
+labor. There's no way to eliminate all that work, but you can make things
+easier for translators.
+ <p>
+If you maintain documentation of any size, its easier for translators
+if they have access to a source control system. That lets translators
+see the differences between two versions of the documentation, so, for
+instance, they can see what needs to be retranslated. It is
+recommended that the translated documentation maintain a note about
+what source control revision the translation is based on. An
+interesting system is provided by <url id="&url-i18n-doc-check;"
+name="doc-check"> in the <package>boot-floppies</package> package,
+which shows an overview of the translation status for any given
+language, using structured comments for the current revision of the
+file to be translated and, for a translated file, the revision of the
+original file the translation is based on. You might wish to adapt
+and provide that in your CVS area.
+ <p>
+If you maintain XML or SGML documentation, we suggest that you isolate
+any language-independent information and define those as entities in a
+separate file which is included by all the different
+translations. This makes it much easier, for instance, to keep URLs
+up-to-date across multiple files.
+ </sect1>
+ </sect>
+
+ <sect id="bpp-common-situations">
+ <heading>Common packaging situations</heading>
+
+<!--
+ <sect1 id="bpp-kernel">Kernel modules/patches
<p>
-If you want to close bugs the old fashioned, manual way, it is usually
-sufficient to mail the <tt>.changes</tt> file to
-<email>XXX-done@bugs.debian.org</email>, where <var>XXX</var> is your
-bug number.
+ &FIXME; Heavy use of kernel-package. provide files in
+ /etc/modutils/ for module configuration.
+-->
+
+ <sect1 id="bpp-autotools">
+ <heading>Packages using
+ <prgn>autoconf</prgn>/<prgn>automake</prgn></heading>
+ <p>
+Keeping <prgn>autoconf</prgn>'s <file>config.sub</file> and
+<file>config.guess</file> files up-to-date is critical for porters,
+especially on more volatile architectures. Some very good packaging
+practices for any package using <prgn>autoconf</prgn> and/or
+<prgn>automake</prgn> have been synthesized in
+&file-bpp-autotools; from the <package>autotools-dev</package>
+package. You're strongly encouraged to read this file and
+to follow the given recommendations.
+
+
+ <sect1 id="bpp-libraries">Libraries
+ <p>
+Libraries are always difficult to package for various reasons. The policy
+imposes many constraints to ease their maintenance and to make sure
+upgrades are as simple as possible when a new upstream version comes out.
+A breakage in a library can result in dozens of dependent packages
+breaking.
+ <p>
+Good practices for library packaging have been grouped in
+<url id="&url-libpkg-guide;" name="the library packaging guide">.
+
+
+ <sect1 id="bpp-docs">Documentation
+ <p>
+Be sure to follow the <url id="&url-debian-policy;ch-docs.html"
+ name="Policy on documentation">.</p>
+ <p>
+If your package contains documentation built from XML or SGML, we
+recommend you not ship the XML or SGML source in the binary
+package(s). If users want the source of the documentation, they
+should retrieve the source package.</p>
+ <p>
+Policy specifies that documentation should be shipped in HTML format.
+We also recommend shipping documentation in PDF and plain text format if
+convenient and quality output is possible. However, it is generally
+not appropriate to ship plain text versions of documentation whose source
+format is HTML.</p>
+ <p>
+Major shipped manuals should register themselves with
+<package>doc-base</package> on installation. See the
+<package>doc-base</package> package documentation for more
+information.</p>
+
+
+ <sect1 id="bpp-other">Specific types of packages
+ <p>
+Several specific types of packages have special sub-policies and
+corresponding packaging rules and practices:
+<list>
+ <item>
+Perl related packages have a <url name="Perl policy"
+id="&url-perl-policy;">, some examples of packages following that
+policy are <package>libdbd-pg-perl</package> (binary perl module) or
+<package>libmldbm-perl</package> (arch independent perl module).
+ <item>
+Python related packages have their python policy; see
+&file-python-policy; in the <package>python</package> package.
+ <item>
+Emacs related packages have the <url id="&url-emacs-policy;"
+name="emacs policy">.
+ <item>
+Java related packages have their <url id="&url-java-policy;"
+name="java policy">.
+ <item>
+Ocaml related packages have their own policy, found in
+&file-ocaml-policy; from the <package>ocaml</package> package. A good
+example is the <package>camlzip</package> source package.
+ <item>
+Packages providing XML or SGML DTDs should conform to the
+recommendations found in the <package>sgml-base-doc</package>
+package.
+ <item>
+Lisp packages should register themselves with
+<package>common-lisp-controller</package>, about which see
+&file-lisp-controller;.
+</list>
+ </sect1>
+ </sect>
+<!--
+ <sect1 id="custom-config-files">Custom configuration files
+ <p>
+ &FIXME; speak of "ucf", explain solution with a template,
+ explain conf.d directories
- <sect1 id="lintian-reports">Lintian reports
+ <sect1 id="config-with-db">Use of an external database
<p>
-You should periodically get the new <package>lintian</package> from
-`unstable' and check over all your packages. Alternatively you can
-check for your maintainer email address at the <url id="&url-lintian;"
-name="online lintian report">. That report, which is updated
-automatically, contains <prgn>lintian</prgn> reports against the
-latest version of the distribution (usually from 'unstable') using the
-latest <package>lintian</package>.
+ &FIXME; The software may require a database that you need to setup.
+ But the database may be local or distant. Thus you can't depend
+ on a database server but just on the corresponding library.
+
+ sympa may be an example package
+-->
+
+
<chapt id="beyond-pkging">
simply creating and maintaining packages.
<p>
As a volunteer organization, Debian relies on the discretion of its
-members in choosing what they want to work on, and choosing what is
+members in choosing what they want to work on and in choosing
the most critical thing to spend their time on.
<sect id="submit-bug">
- <heading>Bug Reporting</heading>
+ <heading>Bug reporting</heading>
<p>
We encourage you to file bugs as you find them in Debian packages. In
fact, Debian developers are often the first line testers. Finding and
neither the bug submitter nor the package maintainer, you should
not actually close the bug (unless you secure permission from the
maintainer).
+ <p>
+From time to time you may want to check what has been going on
+with the bug reports that you submitted. Take this opportunity to
+close those that you can't reproduce anymore. To find
+out all the bugs you submitted, you just have to visit
+<tt>http://&bugs-host;/from:<your-email-addr></tt>.
<sect1 id="submit-many-bugs">Reporting lots of bugs at once
<p>
Reporting a great number of bugs for the same problem on a great
-number of different packages &mdash i.e., more than 10 &mdash is a deprecated
+number of different packages — i.e., more than 10 — is a deprecated
practice. Take all possible steps to avoid submitting bulk bugs at
all. For instance, if checking for the problem can be automated, add
a new check to <package>lintian</package> so that an error or warning
<sect id="qa-effort">Quality Assurance effort
+
+ <sect1 id="qa-daily-work">Daily work
<p>
Even though there is a dedicated group of people for Quality
Assurance, QA duties are not reserved solely for them. You can
participate in this effort by keeping your packages as bug-free as
-possible, and as lintian-clean (see <ref id="lintian-reports">) as
+possible, and as lintian-clean (see <ref id="lintian">) as
possible. If you do not find that possible, then you should consider
orphaning some of your packages (see <ref
id="orphaning">). Alternatively, you may ask the help of other people
in order to catch up the backlog of bugs that you have (you can ask
-for help on &email-debian-qa; or &email-debian-devel;).
-
- <sect id="mia-qa">Dealing with unreachable maintainers
+for help on &email-debian-qa; or &email-debian-devel;). At the same
+time, you can look for co-maintainers (see <ref id="collaborative-maint">).
+
+ <sect1 id="qa-bsp">Bug squashing parties
+ <p>
+From time to time the QA group organizes bug squashing parties to get rid of
+as many problems as possible. They are announced on &email-debian-devel-announce;
+and the announce explains what area will be focused on during the party:
+usually they focus on release critical bugs but it may happen that they
+decide to help finish a major upgrade going on (like a new perl version
+which requires recompilation of all the binary modules).
+ <p>
+The rules for non-maintainer uploads differ during the parties because
+the announce of the party is considered like a prior notice for NMU. If
+you have packages that may be affected by the party (because they have
+release critical bugs for example), you should send an update to each of
+the corresponding bug to explain their current status and what you expect
+from the party. If you don't want an NMU, or if you're only interested in a
+patch, or if you will deal yourself with the bug, please explain that in
+the BTS.
+ <p>
+People participating in the party have special rules for NMU, they can
+NMU without prior notice if they upload their NMU to
+DELAYED/3-day at least. All other NMU rules applies as usually, they
+should send the patch of the NMU in the BTS (in one of the open bugs
+fixed by the NMU or in a new bug tagged fixed). They should
+also respect the maintainer's wishes if he expressed some.
+ <p>
+If someone doesn't feel confident with an NMU, he should just send a patch
+to the BTS. It's far better than a broken NMU.
+
+
+ <sect id="contacting-maintainers">Contacting other maintainers
<p>
-If you notice that a package is lacking maintenance, you should
-make sure the maintainer is active and will continue to work on
-his packages. Try contacting him yourself.
+During your lifetime within Debian, you will have to contact other
+maintainers for various reasons. You may want to discuss a new
+way of cooperating between a set of related packages, or you may
+simply remind someone that a new upstream version is available
+and that you need it.
<p>
-If you do not get a reply after a few weeks you should collect all
-useful information about this maintainer. Start by logging into
-the <url id="&url-debian-db;" name="Debian Developer's Database">
-and doing a full search to check whether the maintainer is on vacation
-and when he was last seen. Collect any important package names
-he maintains and any Release Critical bugs filled against them.
+Looking up the email address of the maintainer for the package can be
+distracting. Fortunately, there is a simple email alias,
+<tt><package>@&packages-host;</tt>, which provides a way to
+email the maintainer, whatever their individual email address (or
+addresses) may be. Replace <tt><package></tt> with the name of
+a source or a binary package.
<p>
-Send all this information to &email-debian-qa;, in order to let the
-QA people do whatever is needed.
+You may also be interested in contacting the persons who are
+subscribed to a given source package via <ref id="pkg-tracking-system">.
+You can do so by using the <tt><package-name>@&pts-host;</tt>
+email address.
+ <sect id="mia-qa">Dealing with inactive and/or unreachable maintainers
+ <p>
+If you notice that a package is lacking maintenance, you should
+make sure that the maintainer is active and will continue to work on
+their packages. It is possible that they are not active any more, but
+haven't registered out of the system, so to speak. On the other hand,
+it is also possible that they just need a reminder.
+ <p>
+The first step is to politely contact the maintainer, and wait for a
+response, for a reasonable time. It is quite hard to define "reasonable
+time", but it is important to take into account that real life is sometimes
+very hectic. One way to handle this would be send a reminder after two
+weeks.
+ <p>
+If the maintainer doesn't reply within four weeks (a month), one can
+assume that a response will probably not happen. If that happens, you
+should investigate further, and try to gather as much useful information
+about the maintainer in question as possible. This includes:
+ <p>
+ <list>
+ <item>The "echelon" information available through the
+ <url id="&url-debian-db;" name="developers' LDAP database">,
+ which indicates when's the last time a developer has posted to
+ a Debian mailing list. (This includes uploads via
+ debian-*-changes lists.) Also, remember to check whether the
+ maintainer is marked as "on vacation" in the database.
+
+ <item>The number of packages this maintainer is responsible for,
+ and the condition of those packages. In particular, are there
+ any RC bugs that have been open for ages? Furthermore, how
+ many bugs are there in general? Another important piece of
+ information is whether the packages have been NMUed, and if
+ so, by whom?
+
+ <item>Is there any activity of the maintainer outside of Debian?
+ For example, they might have posted something recently to
+ non-Debian mailing lists or news groups.
+ </list>
+ <p>
+One big problem are packages which were sponsored -- the maintainer is not
+an official Debian developer. The echelon information is not available for
+sponsored people, for example, so you need to find and contact the Debian
+developer who has actually uploaded the package. Given that they signed the
+package, they're responsible for the upload anyhow, and should know what
+happened to the person they sponsored.
+ <p>
+It is also allowed to post a query to &email-debian-devel;, asking if anyone
+is aware of the whereabouts of the missing maintainer.
+ <p>
+Once you have gathered all of this, you can contact &email-debian-qa;.
+People on this alias will use the information you provided in order to
+decide how to proceed. For example, they might orphan one or all of the
+packages of the maintainer. If a packages has been NMUed, they might prefer
+to contact the NMUer before orphaning the package -- perhaps the person who
+has done the NMU is interested in the package.
+ <p>
+One last word: please remember to be polite. We are all volunteers and
+cannot dedicate all of our time to Debian. Also, you are not aware of the
+circumstances of the person who is involved. Perhaps they might be
+seriously ill or might even had died -- you do not know who may be on the
+receiving side -- imagine how a relative will feel if they read the e-mail
+of the deceased and find a very impolite, angry and accusing message!)
+ <p>
+On the other hand, although we are volunteers, we do have a responsibility.
+So you can stress the importance of the greater good -- if a maintainer does
+not have the time or interest anymore, they should "let go" and give the
+package to someone with more time.
<sect id="newmaint">
<heading>Interacting with prospective Debian developers</heading>
<p>
-Debian's success depends on it's ability to attract and retain new and
+Debian's success depends on its ability to attract and retain new and
talented volunteers. If you are an experienced developer, we
recommend that you get involved with the process of bringing in new
developers. This section describes how to help new prospective
New maintainers usually have certain difficulties creating Debian packages
— this is quite understandable. That is why the sponsor is there, to check
the package and verify that it is good enough for inclusion in Debian.
-(Note that if the sponsored package is new, the FTP admins will also have to
+(Note that if the sponsored package is new, the ftpmasters will also have to
inspect it before letting it in.)
<p>
Sponsoring merely by signing the upload or just recompiling is
changelog and the control file, the upload can still be traced to you.
<p>
If you are an application manager for a prospective developer, you can also
-be their sponsor. That way you can also verify the how the applicant is
+be their sponsor. That way you can also verify how the applicant is
handling the 'Tasks and Skills' part of their application.
+ <sect1>Managing sponsored packages
+ <p>
+By uploading a sponsored package to Debian, you are certifying that
+the package meets minimum Debian standards. That implies that you
+must build and test the package on your own system before uploading.
+ <p>
+You can not simply upload a binary <file>.deb</file> from the sponsoree. In
+theory, you should only ask for the diff file and the location of the
+original source tarball, and then you should download the source and apply
+the diff yourself. In practice, you may want to use the source package
+built by your sponsoree. In that case, you have to check that they haven't
+altered the upstream files in the <file>.orig.tar.gz</file> file that
+they're providing.
+ <p>
+Do not be afraid to write the sponsoree back and point out changes
+that need to be made. It often takes several rounds of back-and-forth
+email before the package is in acceptable shape. Being a sponsor
+means being a mentor.
+ <p>
+Once the package meets Debian standards, build the package with
+<example>dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc</example> and sign it
+with <example>debsign -m"<var>FULLNAME</var> <var>email-addr</var>" <var>changes-file</var></example>
+before uploading it to the incoming directory.
+ <p>
+The Maintainer field of the <file>control</file> file and the
+<file>changelog</file> should list the person who did the packaging, i.e. the
+sponsoree. The sponsoree will therefore get all the BTS mail about the
+package.
+ <p>
+If you prefer to leave a more evident trace of your sponsorship job, you
+can add a line stating it in the most recent changelog entry.
+ <p>
+You are encouraged to keep tabs on the package you sponsor using
+<ref id="pkg-tracking-system">.
<sect1>Advocating new developers
<p>
Most of the descriptions of these packages come from the actual
package descriptions themselves. Further information can be found in
the package documentation itself. You can also see more info with the
-command <tt>apt-cache show <var>package_name</var></tt>.
+command <tt>apt-cache show <package-name></tt>.</p>
+ <sect id="tools-core">
+ <heading>Core tools</heading>
+ <p>
+The following tools are pretty much required for any maintainer.</p>
- <sect id="dpkg-dev">
+ <sect1 id="dpkg-dev">
<heading><package>dpkg-dev</package>
<p>
<package>dpkg-dev</package> contains the tools (including
functionality required to create and manipulated packages; as such,
they are required for any Debian maintainer.
-
- <sect id="lintian">
- <heading><package>lintian</package>
- <p>
-<package>Lintian</package> dissects Debian packages and reports bugs
-and policy violations. It contains automated checks for many aspects
-of Debian policy as well as some checks for common errors. The use of
-<package>lintian</package> has already been discussed in <ref
-id="upload-checking"> and <ref id="lintian-reports">.
-
-
- <sect id="debconf">
+ <sect1 id="debconf">
<heading><package>debconf</package></heading>
<p>
<package>debconf</package> provides a consistent interface to
<package>debconf-doc</package> package.
<p>
Many feel that this system should be used for all packages requiring
-interactive configuration. <package>debconf</package> is not
-currently required by Debian Policy, however, that may change in the
-future.
+interactive configuration; see <ref id="bpp-config-mgmt">.
+<package>debconf</package> is not currently required by Debian Policy,
+but that may change in the future.
+ </sect1>
+
+ <sect1 id="fakeroot">
+ <heading><package>fakeroot</package>
+ <p>
+<package>fakeroot</package> simulates root privileges. This enables
+you to build packages without being root (packages usually want to
+install files with root ownership). If you have
+<package>fakeroot</package> installed, you can build packages as a
+user: <tt>dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot</tt>.
+ </sect1>
+ </sect>
+
+ <sect id="tools-lint">
+ <heading>Package lint tools</heading>
<p>
+According to the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing (FOLDOC), `lint'
+is "a Unix C language processor which carries out more thorough checks
+on the code than is usual with C compilers." Package lint tools help
+package maintainers by automatically finding common problems and
+policy violations with their packages.</p>
+
+ <sect1 id="lintian">
+ <heading><package>lintian</package></heading>
+ <p>
+<package>lintian</package> dissects Debian packages and emits
+information on bugs
+and policy violations. It contains automated checks for many aspects
+of Debian policy as well as some checks for common errors.
+ <p>
+You should periodically get the newest <package>lintian</package> from
+`unstable' and check over all your packages. Notice that the <tt>-i</tt>
+option provides detailed explanations of what each error or warning means,
+what is its basis in Policy, and commonly how you can fix the problem.
+ <p>
+Refer to <ref id="upload-checking"> for more information on how and when
+to use Lintian.
+ <p>
+You can also see a summary of all problems reported by Lintian on your
+packages at <url id="&url-lintian;">. Those reports contain the latest
+<prgn>lintian</prgn> output on the whole development distribution
+("unstable").
+ </sect1>
+
+ <sect1 id="linda">
+ <heading><package>linda</package></heading>
+ <p>
+<package>linda</package> is another package linter. It is similar to
+<package>lintian</package> but has a different set of checks. Its
+written in Python rather than Perl.</p>
+ </sect1>
+ </sect>
+ <sect id="tools-helpers">
+ <heading>Helpers for <file>debian/rules</file></heading>
+ <p>
+Package building tools make the process of writing
+<file>debian/rules</file> files easier. See <ref id="helper-scripts">
+for more information on why these might or might not be desired.
- <sect id="debhelper">
- <heading><package>debhelper</package>
+ <sect1 id="debhelper">
+ <heading><package>debhelper</package></heading>
<p>
<package>debhelper</package> is a collection of programs that can be
used in <file>debian/rules</file> to automate common tasks related to
There are a number of little <package>debhelper</package> add-on
packages, too transient to document. You can see the list of most of
them by doing <tt>apt-cache search ^dh-</tt>.
+ </sect1>
-
- <sect id="debmake">
- <heading><package>debmake</package>
+ <sect1 id="debmake">
+ <heading><package>debmake</package>
<p>
<package>debmake</package>, a pre-cursor to
<package>debhelper</package>, is a less granular
The consensus is that <package>debmake</package> is now deprecated in
favor of <package>debhelper</package>. However, it's not a bug to use
<package>debmake</package>.
+ </sect1>
+ <sect1 id="dh-make">
+ <heading><package>dh-make</package>
+ <p>
+The <package/dh-make/ package contains <prgn/dh_make/, a program that
+creates a skeleton of files necessary to build a Debian package out of
+a source tree. As the name suggests, <prgn/dh_make/ is a rewrite of
+<package/debmake/ and its template files use dh_* programs from
+<package/debhelper/.
+ <p>
+While the rules files generated by <prgn/dh_make/ are in general a
+sufficient basis for a working package, they are still just the groundwork:
+the burden still lies on the maintainer to finely tune the generated files
+and make the package entirely functional and Policy-compliant.
+ </sect1>
- <sect id="yada">
- <heading><package>yada</package>
+ <sect1 id="yada">
+
<heading><package>yada</package>
<p>
<package>yada</package> is another packaging helper tool. It uses a
<file>debian/packages</file> file to auto-generate
Note that <package>yada</package> is called "essentially unmaintained"
by it's own maintainer, Charles Briscoe-Smith. As such, it can be
considered deprecated.
+ </sect1>
-
- <sect id="equivs">
- <heading><package>equivs</package>
+ <sect1 id="equivs">
+ <heading><package>equivs</package>
<p>
<package>equivs</package> is another package for making packages. It
is often suggested for local use if you need to make a package simply
to fulfill dependencies. It is also sometimes used when making
``meta-packages'', which are packages whose only purpose is to depend
-on other packages.
+on other packages.</p>
+ </sect1>
+ </sect>
+
- <sect id="cvs-buildpackage">
- <heading><package>cvs-buildpackage</package>
+ <sect id="tools-builders">
+ <heading>Package builders</heading>
+ <p>
+The following packages help with the package building process, general
+driving <prgn>dpkg-buildpackage</prgn> as well as handling supporting
+tasks.</p>
+
+ <sect1 id="cvs-buildpackage">
+ <heading><package>cvs-buildpackage</package>
<p>
<package>cvs-buildpackage</package> provides the capability to inject
or import Debian source packages into a CVS repository, build a Debian
<p>
These utilities provide an infrastructure to facilitate the use of CVS
by Debian maintainers. This allows one to keep separate CVS branches
-of a package for <em>stable</em>, <em>unstable</em>, and possibly
+of a package for <em>stable</em>, <em>unstable</em> and possibly
<em>experimental</em> distributions, along with the other benefits of
a version control system.
+ </sect1>
-
- <sect id="dupload">
- <heading><package>dupload</package>
+ <sect1 id="debootstrap">
+ <heading><package>debootstrap</package></heading>
+ <p>
+The <package>debootstrap</package> package and script allows you to
+"bootstrap" a Debian base system into any part of your file-system.
+By "base system", we mean the bare minimum of packages required to
+operate and install the rest of the system.
<p>
+Having a system like this can be useful in many ways. For instance,
+you can <prgn>chroot</prgn> into it if you want to test your build
+depends. Or, you can test how your package behaves when installed
+into a bare base system. Chroot builders use this package, see below.
+ </sect1>
+
+ <sect1 id="pbuilder">
+ <heading><package>pbuilder</package></heading>
+ <p>
+<package>pbuilder</package> constructs a chrooted system, and builds a
+package inside the chroot. It is very useful to check that a package's
+build-dependencies are correct, and to be sure that unnecessary and
+wrong build dependencies will not exist in the resulting package.</p>
+ <p>
+A related package is <package>pbuilder-uml</package>, which goes even
+further build doing the build within User-mode-linux.</p>
+ </sect1>
+
+ <sect1 id="sbuild">
+ <heading><package>sbuild</package></heading>
+ <p>
+<package>sbuild</package> is another automated builder. It can use
+chrooted environments as well. It can be used stand-alone, or as part
+of a networked, distributed build environment. As the latter, it is
+part of the system used by porters to build binary packages for all
+the available architectures. See <ref id="buildd"> for more
+information, and <url id="&url-buildd;"> to see the system in
+action.</p>
+ </sect1>
+ </sect>
+
+ <sect id="uploaders">
+ <heading>Package uploaders</heading>
+ <p>
+The following packages help automate or simplify the process of
+uploading packages into the official archive.</p>
+
+ <sect1 id="dupload">
+ <heading><package>dupload</package></heading>
+ <p>
<package>dupload</package> is a package and a script to automatically
upload Debian packages to the Debian archive, to log the upload, and
to send mail about the upload of a package. You can configure it for
new upload locations or methods.
+ </sect1>
-
- <sect id="dput">
- <heading><package>dput</package>
- <p>
+ <sect1 id="dput">
+ <heading><package>dput</package></heading>
+ <p>
The <package>dput</package> package and script does much the same
thing as <package>dupload</package>, but in a different way. It has
some features over <package>dupload</package>, such as the ability to
check the GnuPG signature and checksums before uploading, and the
-possibility of running <tt>dinstall</tt> in dry-run mode after the
+possibility of running <prgn>dinstall</prgn> in dry-run mode after the
upload.
+ </sect1>
+ </sect>
+ <sect id="tools-maint-automate">
+ <heading>Maintenance automation</heading>
+ <p>
+The following tools help automate different maintenance tasks, from
+adding changelog entries or signature lines, looking up bugs in Emacs,
+to making use of the newest and official use of
+<file>config.sub</file>.</p>
- <sect id="fakeroot">
- <heading><package>fakeroot</package>
- <p>
-<package>fakeroot</package> simulates root privileges. This enables
-you to build packages without being root (packages usually want to
-install files with root ownership). If you have
-<package>fakeroot</package> installed, you can build packages as a
-user: <tt>dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot</tt>.
-
-
- <sect id="debootstrap">
- <heading><package>debootstrap</package>
- <p>
-The <package>debootstrap</package> package and script allows you to
-"bootstrap" a Debian base system into any part of your file-system.
-By "base system", we mean the bare minimum of packages required to
-operate and install the rest of the system.
- <p>
-Having a system like this can be useful in many ways. For instance,
-you can <prgn>chroot</prgn> into it if you want to test your build
-depends. Or, you can test how your package behaves when installed
-into a bare base system.
-
-
- <sect id="devscripts">
- <heading><package>devscripts</package>
- <p>
-<package>devscripts</package> is a package containing a few wrappers
-and tools which you may find helpful for maintaining your Debian
+ <sect1 id="devscripts">
+ <heading><package>devscripts</package></heading>
+ <p>
+<package>devscripts</package> is a package containing wrappers
+and tools which are very helpful for maintaining your Debian
packages. Example scripts include <prgn>debchange</prgn> and
<prgn>dch</prgn>, which manipulate your <file>debian/changelog</file>
file from the command-line, and <prgn>debuild</prgn>, which is a
-wrapper around <prgn>dpkg-buildpackage</prgn>.
+wrapper around <prgn>dpkg-buildpackage</prgn>. The <prgn>bts</prgn>
+utility is also very helpful to update the state of bug reports on the
+command line. <prgn>uscan</prgn> can be used to watch for new upstream
+versions of your packages. The <prgn>debrsign</prgn> can be used to
+remotely sign a package prior to upload, which is nice when the
+machine you build the package on is different from where your GPG keys
+are.</p>
+ <p>
+See the <manref name="devscripts" section="1"> manual page for a
+complete list of available scripts.</p>
+ </sect1>
+ <sect1 id="autotools-dev">
+ <heading><package>autotools-dev</package></heading>
+ <p>
+Contains best practices for people maintaining packages that use
+<prgn>autoconf</prgn> and/or <prgn>automake</prgn>. Also contains
+canonical <file>config.sub</file> and <file>config.guess</file> files
+which are known to work on all Debian ports.</p>
+ </sect1>
+
+ <sect1 id="dpkg-repack">
+ <heading><package>dpkg-repack</package></heading>
+ <p>
+<prgn>dpkg-repack</prgn> creates Debian package file out of a package
+that has already been installed. If any changes have been made to the
+package while it was unpacked (e.g., files in <file>/etc</file> were
+modified), the new package will inherit the changes.</p>
+ <p>
+This utility can make it easy to copy packages from one computer to
+another, or to recreate packages that are installed on your system
+but no longer available elsewhere, or to store the current state of a
+package before you upgrade it.</p>
+ </sect1>
+
+ <sect1 id="alien">
+ <heading><package>alien</package></heading>
+ <p>
+<prgn>alien</prgn> converts binary packages between various packaging
+formats, including Debian, RPM (RedHat), LSB (Linux Standard Base),
+Solaris and Slackware packages.</p>
+ </sect1>
+ <sect1 id="debsums">
+ <heading><package>debsums</package></heading>
+ <p>
+<prgn>debsums</prgn> checks installed packages against their MD5 sums.
+Note that not all packages have MD5 sums, since they aren't required
+by Policy.</p>
+ </sect1>
- <sect id="dpkg-dev-el">
- <heading><package>dpkg-dev-el</package>
- <p>
+ <sect1 id="dpkg-dev-el">
+ <heading><package>dpkg-dev-el</package></heading>
<package>dpkg-dev-el</package> is an Emacs lisp package which provides
assistance when editing some of the files in the <file>debian</file>
directory of your package. For instance, when editing
<file>debian/changelog</file>, there are handy functions for
-finalizing a version and listing the package's current bugs.
+finalizing a version and listing the package's current bugs.</p>
+ </sect1>
+ </sect>
- <sect id="debget">
- <heading><package>debget</package>
- <p>
-<package>debget</package> is a package containing a convenient script
-which can be helpful in downloading files from the Debian archive.
-You can use it to download source packages, for instance (although
-<tt>apt-get source <var>package</var></tt> does pretty much the same
-thing).
+ <sect id="tools-porting">
+ <heading>Porting tools</heading>
+ <p>
+The following tools are helpful for porters and for
+cross-compilation.</p>
+
+ <sect1 id="quinn-diff">
+ <heading><package>quinn-diff</package>
+ <p>
+<package>quinn-diff</package> is used to locate the differences from
+one architecture to another. For instance, it could tell you which
+packages need to be ported for architecture <var>Y</var>, based on
+architecture <var>X</var>.
+
+ <sect1 id="dpkg-cross">
+ <heading><package>dpkg-cross</package>
+ <p>
+<package>dpkg-cross</package> is a tool for installing libraries and
+headers for cross-compiling in a way similar to
+<package>dpkg</package>. Furthermore, the functionality of
+<prgn>dpkg-buildpackage</prgn> and <prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn> is
+enhanced to support cross-compiling.
+ </sect1>
+
+
+ <sect id="tools-doc">
+ <heading>Documentation and information</heading>
+ <p>
+The following packages provide information for maintainers or help
+with building documentation.
+
+ <sect1 id="debiandoc-sgml">
+ <heading><package>debiandoc-sgml</package></heading>
+ <p>
+<package>debiandoc-sgml</package> provides the DebianDoc SGML DTD,
+which is commonly used for Debian documentation. This manual, for
+instance, is written in DebianDoc. It also provides scripts for
+building and styling the source to various output formats.</p>
+ <p>
+Documentation for the DTD can be found in the
+<package>debiandoc-sgml-doc</package> package.</p>
+ </sect1>
+
+ <sect1 id="debian-keyring">
+ <heading><package>debian-keyring</package></heading>
+ <p>
+Contains the public GPG and PGP keys of Debian developers. See <ref
+id="key-maint"> and the package documentation for more
+information.</p>
+ </sect1>
+ <sect1 id="debview">
+ <heading><package>debview</package></heading>
+ <p>
+<package>debview</package> provides an Emacs mode for viewing Debian
+binary packages. This lets you examine a package without unpacking
+it.</p>
+ </sect1>
+ </sect>
<!-- FIXME: add the following
+
+questionable:
+ ucf
dpkg-awk
- alien
- dpkg-repack
grep-dctrl
- pbuilder -->
-
+ d-shlibs
+ wajig
+ magpie
+ apt-dpkg-ref
+ apt-show-source
+ apt-show-versions
+ pdbv
+ epm
+ apt-src
+ apt-build
+
+rejected:
+ debaux: too new, unmaintained?
+ dh-make-perl: too new, unmaintained?
+-->
+ </appendix>
</book>
</debiandoc>
~ianmdlvl / developers-reference.git / blobdiff