-<!doctype debiandoc system [
-<!-- include version information so we don't have to hard code it
- within the document -->
-<!entity % versiondata SYSTEM "version.ent"> %versiondata;
+<!DOCTYPE debiandoc PUBLIC "-//DebianDoc//DTD DebianDoc//EN" [
+ <!-- include version information so we don't have to hard code it
+ within the document -->
+ <!entity % versiondata SYSTEM "version.ent"> %versiondata;
+ <!entity number-of-pkgs "2250">
+ <!entity number-of-maintainers "400">
]>
<debiandoc>
<!--
TODO:
- bugs in upstream versions should be reported upstream!
- - fill in ftp and www server discussion
- - how to mirror
- - porter instructions - - volunteers needed for this x86-centric maintainer!
- - talk about CVS access
+ - add information on how to get accounts on different architectures
+ - talk about CVS access, other ways to submit problems
+ - add information on how you can contribute w/o being an official
+ developer
+ - "official port maintainer" ? (cf. glibc-pre2.1)
-->
<book>
<title>Debian Developer's Reference
- <author>Adam P. Harris, current maintainer <email/aph@debian.org/
+ <author>Adam Di Carlo, current maintainer <email/aph@debian.org/
<author>Christian Schwarz <email/schwarz@debian.org/
<author>Ian Jackson <email/ijackson@gnu.ai.mit.edu/
- <version>version &version;, &date;
+ <version>ver. &version;, &date;
<copyright>
-Copyright ©1998 Adam P. Harris. Copyright ©1997,1998
-Christian Schwarz.
+ <copyrightsummary>
+copyright ©1998, 1999 Adam Di Carlo</copyrightsummary>
+ <copyrightsummary>
+copyright ©1997, 1998 Christian Schwarz</copyrightsummary>
<p>
This manual is free software; you may redistribute it and/or modify it
under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
General Public License for more details.
<p>
A copy of the GNU General Public License is available as
-<tt>/usr/doc/copyright/GPL</tt> in the Debian GNU/Linux distribution
+<file>/usr/doc/copyright/GPL</file> in the Debian GNU/Linux distribution
or on the World Wide Web at <url
id="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html" name="the GNU website">.
You can also obtain it by writing to the Free Software Foundation,
Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
- <toc sect>
+ <toc detail="sect2">
<chapt id="scope">Scope of This Document
<p>
The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of the
-processes and resources used by Debian developers.
+recommended procedures and the available resources for Debian
+developers.
<p>
-The processes discussed within include how to become a maintainer
+The procedures discussed within include how to become a maintainer
(<ref id="new-maintainer">); how to upload new packages (<ref
-id="upload">); how and when to do interim releases of other
-maintainer's packages (<ref id="nmu">); how to move, remove, or orphan
+id="upload">); how and when to do ports and interim releases of other
+maintainers' packages (<ref id="nmu">); how to move, remove, or orphan
packages (<ref id="archive-manip">); and how to handle bug reports
(<ref id="bug-handling">).
<p>
and servers (<ref id="servers">); a discussion of the structure of the
Debian archive (<ref id="archive">); explanation of the different
servers which accept package uploads (<ref id="upload-master">); and a
-discussion of resources which an help maintainers with the quality of
+discussion of resources which can help maintainers with the quality of
their packages (<ref id="tools">).
<p>
-It should be clear that this reference does not discuss the details of
-the Debian package or how to generate Debian packages; that is
-discussed in the <url
+It should be clear that this reference does not discuss the technical
+details of the Debian package nor how to generate Debian packages;
+that information is discussed in the <url
id="http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/packaging.html/"
-name="Debian Packaging Manual">. Nor is this reference intended to
-give details on standards for how Debian software must behave, which
-is documented in the <url
-id="http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/" name="Debian Policy
-Manual">.
+name="Debian Packaging Manual">. Nor does this reference detail the
+standards to which Debian software must comply; that information can
+be found in the <url id="http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/"
+name="Debian Policy Manual">.
+ <p>
+Furthermore, this document is <em>not an expression of formal
+policy</em>. It contains documentation for the Debian system, and
+generally agreed-upon best practices.
<chapt id="new-maintainer">Applying to Become a Maintainer
<p>
Firstly, subscribe to <email/debian-devel@lists.debian.org/ if you
haven't already. Send the word <tt/subscribe/ in the <em/Subject/ of
-a mail to <email/debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org/. In case of
+an email to <email/debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org/. In case of
problems, contact the list administrator at
<email/listmaster@lists.debian.org/. More information on available
mailing lists can be found in <ref id="mailing-lists">.
(i.e., <tt/irc.debian.org/) can also be helpful.
- <sect>Registering as a Debian developer
+ <sect id="registering">Registering as a Debian developer
<p>
Before you decide to register with the Debian Project, you will need
to read the <url id="http://www.debian.org/social_contract"
<p>
The process of registering as a developer is a process of verifying
your identity and intentions. As the number of people working on
-Debian GNU/Linux has grown to over 400 people and our systems are used
-in several very important places we have to be careful about being
-compromised. Therefore, we need to verify new maintainers before we
-can give them accounts on our servers and letting them upload
-packages.
+Debian GNU/Linux has grown to over &number-of-maintainers; people and
+our systems are used in several very important places we have to be
+careful about being compromised. Therefore, we need to verify new
+maintainers before we can give them accounts on our servers and
+letting them upload packages.
<p>
Registration requires that the following information be sent to
<email/new-maintainer@debian.org/ as part of the registration
Your name.
<item>
Your preferred login name on <tt/master/ (seven characters or
-less<footnote>Can anyone clarify for me why logins on <tt>master</tt>
-cannot be eight characters?</footnote> ), as well as the email address
-at which you'd prefer to be subscribed to
+less<footnote>It is not clear to the author why logins on
+<tt>master</tt> cannot be eight characters or greater. If anyone can
+clarify why, I would appreciate it.</footnote>), as well as the email
+address at which you'd prefer to be subscribed to
<email/debian-private@lists.debian.org/ (typically this will be either
your primary mail address or your new <tt>debian.org</tt> address).
<item>
-A phone number where we can call you.
+A phone number where we can call you. Remember that the new
+maintainer team usually calls during evening hours to save on long
+distance tolls. Please do not give a work number, unless you are
+generally there in the evening.
<item>
A statement of intention, that is, what package(s) you intend to work
on, which Debian port you will be assisting, or how you intend to
<item>
A PGP key signed by any well-known signature, such as:
<list>
- <item>
+ <item>
Any current Debian developer you have met <em/in real life/.
- <item>
+ <item>
Any formal certification service (such as Verisign, etc.) that
verifies your identity. A certification that verifies your email
address, and not you identity, is not sufficient.
If emailed, please sign the mail with your PGP key.
</list>
</list>
+ <p>
If you do not have a PGP key yet, generate one. Every developer needs
a PGP key in order to sign and verify package uploads. You should read
the PGP manual, since it has much important information which is
critical to its security. Many more security failures are due to
human error than to software failure or high-powered spy techniques.
<p>
+Our standard is to use <prgn>pgp</prgn> version 2.x. You can use
+<prgn/pgp/ version 5, if and only if you make an RSA key. Note that
+we are also working with the <prgn/gpg/ team so that we can have a
+free alternative to PGP; however, this may take a little bit of time.
+ <p>
Your PGP key must be at least 1024 bits long. There is no reason to
use a smaller key, and doing so would be much less secure. Your key
must be signed with at least your own user ID. This prevents user ID
-tampering. You can do it by executing `<tt>pgp -ks
-<var/your_userid/</tt>'.
+tampering. You can do it by executing <tt>pgp -ks
+<var>your_userid</var></tt>.
<p>
-If your PGP key isn't on public PGP key servers such as
-<tt>pgp.net</tt>, please read the documentation available locally
-<tt>/usr/doc/pgp/keyserv.doc</tt>. That document contains
-instructions on how to put your key on the public key servers.
+If your PGP key isn't on public key servers such as
+<tt>pgp5.ai.mit.edu</tt>, please read the documentation available
+locally <tt>/usr/doc/pgp/keyserv.doc</tt>. That document contains
+instructions on how to put your key on the public key servers. The
+New Maintainer Group will put your public key on the servers if it
+isn't already there.
<p>
Due to export restrictions by the United States government some Debian
packages, including PGP, have been moved to an ftp site outside of the
available on public key servers, send a message to
<email/new-maintainer@debian.org/ to register as an offical Debian
developer so that you will be able to upload your packages. This
-message must all the information discussed above. The message must
-also contain your PGP or RSA public key (extracted using <tt>pgp
--kxa</tt> in the case of PGP; note that <tt/gpg/ integration is
-underway) for the database of keys which is distributed from
-<ftpsite/ftp.debian.org/ in
+message must contain all the information discussed above. The message
+must also contain your PGP or RSA public key (extracted using <tt>pgp
+-kxa</tt> in the case of PGP) for the database of keys which is
+distributed from <ftpsite/ftp.debian.org/ in
<ftppath>/pub/debian/doc/debian-keyring.tar.gz</ftppath>, or the
-<package/debian-keyring/ package). Please be sure to sign your
-request message with your chosen PGP or RSA key.
+<package/debian-keyring/ package. Please be sure to sign your request
+message with your chosen public key.
<p>
Once this information is received and processed, you should be
contacted with information about your new Debian maintainer account.
-If you don't hear anything within 7-14 days, please re-send your
-original message--the new-maintainer volunteers are typically
-overworked, and mistakes do occasionally happen.
+If you don't hear anything within 7-14 days, please send a followup
+message asking if your original application was received. Do <em/not/
+re-send your original application, that will just confuse the
+new-maintainer team. Please be patient, especially near release
+points; mistakes do occasionally happen, and people do sometimes run
+out of volunteer time.
<sect id="mentors">Debian Mentors
<p>
-There is a mailing list called <email/debian-mentors@lists.debian.org/
-which has been set up for novice maintainers who seek help with
-initial packaging and other developer-related issues. Every new
-developer is invited to subscribe to that list (see <ref
-id="mailing-lists"> for details).
+A mailing list called <email/debian-mentors@lists.debian.org/ which
+has been set up for novice maintainers who seek help with initial
+packaging and other developer-related issues. Every new developer is
+invited to subscribe to that list (see <ref id="mailing-lists"> for
+details).
<p>
-Those who prefer one-on-one help (e.g., via private emails) should
+Those who prefer one-on-one help (e.g., via private email) should
also post to that list and an experienced developer will volunteer to
help.
- <chapt id="servers">Mailing Lists and Servers
+ <chapt id="user-maint">Maintaining Your Debian Information
+
+ <sect id="key-maint">Maintaining Your Public Key
+ <p>
+Be very careful with your private keys. Do not place them on any
+public servers. Back them up. Read the documentation that comes with
+your software (either PGP or GNUPG); read the FAQs too, for good
+measure.
+ <p>
+If you add or remove signatures from your public key, or add or remove
+user identities, you need to update the key servers and mail your
+public key to <email>keyring-maint@debian.org</email>.
+The same key extraction routines discussed in <ref id="registering">
+apply.
+ <p>
+You can find a more in-depth discussion of Debian key maintenance in
+the documentation for the <package>debian-keyring</package> package.
+
+ <sect>Retiring Gracefully
+ <p>
+If you choose to leave the Debian project, you should make sure you do
+the following steps:
+<enumlist>
+ <item>
+Orphan all your packages, as described in <ref id="orphaning">.
+ <item>
+Send an email about how you are leaving the project to
+<email>debian-private@lists.debian.org</email>.
+ <item>
+Notify the Debian key ring maintainers that you are leaving by emailing
+to <email>keyring-maint@debian.org</email>.
+ </enumlist>
+
+
+ <chapt id="servers">Mailing Lists, Servers, and Other Machines
+ <p>
+In this chapter you will find a very brief road map of the Debian
+mailing lists, the main Debian servers, and other Debian machines
+which may be available to you as a developer.
<sect id="mailing-lists">Mailing lists
<p>
The mailing list server is at <tt/lists.debian.org/. Mail
<tt/debian-<var/foo/-REQUEST@lists.debian.org/, where
<tt/debian-<var/foo// is the name of the list, with the word
-<tt/subscribe/ in the <em/Subject/ to subscribe or <tt/unsubscribe/ to
-unsubscribe. More detailed instructions on how to subscribe and
-unsubscribe to the mailing lists can be found at <url
+<tt/subscribe/ in the <em/Subject/ to subscribe to the list or
+<tt/unsubscribe/ to unsubscribe. More detailed instructions on how to
+subscribe and unsubscribe to the mailing lists can be found at <url
id="http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/subscribe">, <url
id="ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/mailing-lists.txt"> or locally in
-<tt>/usr/doc/debian/mailing-lists.txt</tt> if you have the
+<file>/usr/doc/debian/mailing-lists.txt</file> if you have the
<package>doc-debian</package> package installed.
<p>
-When replying to messages on the mailing list, please do not send
-a carbon copy (<tt/CC/--this does not mean `courtesy copy') to
-the original poster unless they explicitly request that this be
-done. Anyone who posts to a mailing list should read it to see the
-responses.
+When replying to messages on the mailing list, please do not send a
+carbon copy (<tt/CC/) to the original poster unless they explicitly
+request to be copied. Anyone who posts to a mailing list should read
+it to see the responses.
<p>
In addition, all messages should usually only be sent to one of the
following mailing lists: <email/debian-devel@lists.debian.org/,
Online archives of mailing lists are available at <url
id="http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/">.
+ <sect id="server-machines">Debian servers
+ <p>
+Debian servers are well known servers which serve critical functions
+in the Debian project. Every developer should know what these servers
+are and what they do.
+ <p>
+If you have a problem with the operation of Debian server, and you
+think that the system operators need to be notified of this problem,
+please find the contact address for the particular role at <url
+id="http://www.debian.org/devel/maintainer_contacts">. If you have a
+non-operating problems (such as packages to be remove, suggestions for
+the web site, etc.), generally you'll report a bug against a
+``pseudo-package''. See <ref id="submit-bug"> for information on how
+to submit bugs.
- <sect id="servers-master">The master server
+ <sect1 id="servers-master">The master server
<p>
The master server, <tt/master.debian.org/, holds the canonical copy
of the Debian archive (excluding the non-U.S. packages). Generally,
-package uploads go to this server; cf. <ref id="upload">.
+package uploads go to this server; see <ref id="upload">.
<p>
<tt/master.debian.org/ is the canonical location for the Bug Tracking
System (BTS). If you plan on doing some statistical analysis or
<p>
If you find a problem with <tt/master.debian.org/ such as disk full,
suspicious activity, or whatever, send an email to
-<email>debian-admin@debian.org</email>.
-
- <sect id="servers-ftp">The FTP servers
- <p>
+<email>debian-admin@debian.org</email>. Problems with the Debian FTP
+archive generally need to be reported as bugs against the
+<package>ftp.debian.org</package> pseudo-package or an email to
+<email>ftpmaster@debian.org</email>, but also see the procedures in
+<ref id="archive-manip">.
- <sect id="servers-www">The WWW servers
+ <sect1 id="servers-www">The WWW servers
<p>
The main web server, <tt/www.debian.org/, is also known as
<tt/va.debian.org/. All developers are given accounts on this
<p>
If you have some Debian-specific information which you want to serve
up on the web, you can do do this by putting material in the
-<tt>public_html</tt> directory under your home directory. You can do
+<file>public_html</file> directory under your home directory. You can do
this on either <tt/va.debian.org/ or <tt/master.debian.org/. Any
material you put in those areas are accessible via the URLs
<tt>http://www.debian.org/~<var>user-id</var>/</tt> and
<tt>http://master.debian.org/~<var>user-id</var>/</tt>, respectively.
-Please do <em>not</em> put any materials on Debian servers which do
-not relate to Debian.
+Generally, you'll want to use <tt/va/, for the <tt/www.debian.org/
+address, although in some cases you may need to put it on <tt/master/.
+Please do not put any material on Debian servers not relating to
+Debian, unless you have prior permission. Send mail to
+<email/debian-devel@lists.debian.org/ if you have any questions.
<p>
If you find a problem with the Debian web server, you should generally
submit a bug against the pseudo-package,
id="http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/pa/lwww.debian.org.html" name="Bug
Tracking System">.
- <sect id="servers-cvs">The CVS server
+
+ <sect1 id="servers-cvs">The CVS server
<p>
<tt/cvs.debian.org/ is also known as <tt/va.debian.org/, discussed
above. If you need the use of a publically accessible CVS server, for
instance, to help coordinate work on a package between many different
-developers, you can request a CVS area on the server. Generally,
-<tt/cvs.debian.org/ offers a combination of local CVS access,
-anonymous client-server read-only access, and full client-server
-access through <prgn>ssh</prgn>.
+developers, you can request a CVS area on the server.
+ <p>
+Generally, <tt/cvs.debian.org/ offers a combination of local CVS
+access, anonymous client-server read-only access, and full
+client-server access through <prgn>ssh</prgn>. Also, the CVS area can
+be accessed read-only via the Web at <url
+id="http://cvs.debian.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb">.
<p>
To request a CVS area, send a request via email to
-<email>debian-admin@debian.org</email>.
+<email>debian-admin@debian.org</email>. Include the name of the
+requested CVS area, what <tt>va.debian.org</tt> user account should
+own the CVSROOT, and why you need it.
- <sect id="servers-mirrors">Mirrors of Debian servers
+ <sect1 id="servers-mirrors">Mirrors of Debian servers
<p>
The web and FTP servers have several mirrors available. Please do not
put heavy load on the canonical FTP or web servers. Ideally, the
canonical servers only mirror out to a first tier of mirrors, and all
user access is to the mirrors. This allows Debian to better spread
-our bandwidth requirements over several servers and networks. Note
+its bandwidth requirements over several servers and networks. Note
that newer push mirroring techniques ensure that mirrors are as
up-to-date as they can be.
<p>
The main web page listing the available public FTP (and, usually,
HTTP) servers can be found at <url
-id="http://www.debian.org/distrib/ftplist">. More information
-concerning mirrors can be found at <url
-id="http://www.debian.org/mirror/">. This useful page includes
+id="http://www.debian.org/distrib/ftplist">. More information
+concerning Debian mirrors can be found at <url
+id="http://www.debian.org/mirror">. This useful page includes
information and tools which can be helpful if you are interested in
setting up your own mirror, either for internal or public access.
<p>
Note that mirrors are generally run by third-parties who are
interested in helping Debian. As such, developers generally do not
have accounts on these machines.
+ <p>
+Please do not mirror off of <tt/master.debian.org/. This host already
+has too much load. Check the sites above for information, or email
+<email/debian-devel@lists.debian.org/.
+
+
+ <sect id="other-machines">Other Debian Machines
+ <p>
+There are other Debian machines which may be made available to you.
+You can use these for Debian-related purposes as you see fit. Please
+be kind to system administrators, and do not use up tons and tons of
+disk space, network bandwidth, or CPU without first getting the
+approval of the local maintainers. Usually these machines are run by
+volunteers. Generally, these machines are for porting activities.
+ <p>
+Aside from the servers mentioned in <ref id="server-machines">, the
+following machines are, or may be made, available to you. If an email
+address is listed, generally that person is the party to contact about
+issues on the machine. Otherwise, the machine is probably managed by
+<email>debian-admin@debian.org</email>.
+
+<taglist>
+ <tag><tt>faure.debian.org</tt></tag>
+ <item>
+An Alpha; if you have an account on <tt>master</tt>, you probably
+already have an account here.
+
+ <tag><tt>kubrick.debian.org</tt></tag>
+ <item>
+A SPARC; if you have an account on <tt>master</tt>, you probably
+already have an account here.
+
+ <tag><tt>pandora.debian.org</tt></tag>
+ <item>
+An i386; if you have an account on <tt>master</tt>, you probably
+already have an account here.
+
+ <tag><tt>albert.debian.org</tt></tag>
+ <item>
+An Alpha; you probably want to use <tt>faure</tt> instead, but you may
+request an account from <email>debian-admin@debian.org</email>.
+
+ <tag><tt>powerpc.debian.org</tt></tag>
+ <item>
+A PowerPC; also known as <tt>tervola.infodrom.north.de</tt>. You may
+request an account from <email>joey@debian.org</email> or
+<email>koptein@debian.org</email>.
+
+ <tag><tt>m68k.debian.org</tt></tag>
+ <item>
+A Motorola 6800x0 machine; you may request an account from
+<email>joey@debian.org</email> or <email>james@nocrew.org</email>.
+Runs an autobuilder.
+
+ <tag><tt>alpha.debian.nl</tt></tag>
+ <item>
+An Alpha; you may request an account from
+<email>debian@cistron.nl</email>.
+
+ <tag><tt>xia0[123].kachinatech.com</tt></tag>
+ <item>
+SPARC and UltraSPARC machines. <tt>xia0[12]</tt> are used for
+automatic compilation; you can request an account on xia03 (an
+UltraSPARC) from <email>wdeng@kachinatech.com</email>.
+
+ </taglist>
+
<chapt id="archive">The Debian Archive
<sect>Overview
<p>
The Debian GNU/Linux distribution consists of a lot of Debian packages
-(<tt/.deb/'s, currently more than 1500) and a few additional files
+(<tt/.deb/'s, currently around &number-of-pkgs;) and a few additional files
(documentation, installation disk images, etc.).
<p>
Here is an example directory tree of a complete Debian distribution:
+ <p>
<example>
main/
main/binary-all/
</example>
<p>
As you can see, the top-level directory of the distribution contains
-three directories, namely <em>main</>, <em>contrib</>, and
-<em>non-free</>. These directories are called <em>sections</>.
+three directories, namely <em/main/, <em/contrib/, and
+<em/non-free/. These directories are called <em/sections/.
<p>
In each section, there is a directory with the source packages
-(source), a directory for each supported architecture (binary-i386,
-binary-m68k, etc.), and a directory for architecture independent
-packages (binary-all).
+(source), a directory for each supported architecture
+(<tt/binary-i386/, <tt/binary-m68k/, etc.), and a directory for
+architecture independent packages (<tt/binary-all/).
<p>
The <em/main/ section contains additional directories which holds the
disk images and some essential pieces of documentation required for
installing the Debian distribution on a specific architecture
-(disks-i386, disks-m68k, etc.).
+(<tt/disks-i386/, <tt/disks-m68k/, etc.).
<p>
The <em/binary/ and <em/source/ directories are divided further into
<em/subsections/.
<sect>Sections
<p>
The <em>main</em> section is what makes up the <em>official Debian
-GNU/Linux distribution</>. This is because the packages in the other
-two sections do not fully comply with all our guidelines. As such,
-they are not officially part of Debian.
- <p>
-For example, every package in the main section must fully comply
-with the <url id="http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines"
-name="Debian Free Software Guidelines"> (DFSG) and with all other
-policy requirements as described in the <url
-id="http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/" name="Debian Policy
-Manual">. (The DFSG is our definition of ``free software.'' Check out
-the Debian Policy Manual for details.)
+GNU/Linux distribution</em>. The <em/main/ section is official because
+it fully complies with all our guidelines. The other two sections do
+not, to different degrees; as such, they are not officially part of
+Debian.
+ <p>
+Every package in the main section must fully comply with the <!-- work
+around quoting of fragment idendifiers bug <url
+id="http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines" name="Debian
+Free Software Guidelines"> --> <url
+id="http://www.debian.org/social_contract" name="Debian Free Software
+Guidelines"> (DFSG) and with all other policy requirements as
+described in the <url id="http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/"
+name="Debian Policy Manual">. The DFSG is our definition of ``free
+software.'' Check out the Debian Policy Manual for details.
<p>
The packages which do not apply to the DFSG are placed in the
<em/non-free/ section. These packages are not considered as part of
infrastructure (such as our bug-tracking system and mailing lists) for
non-free software packages.
<p>
-Packages in the <em/contrib/ section have to apply to the DFSG, but
-fail other requirements. For instance, they might depend on non-free
-packages.
+Packages in the <em/contrib/ section have to comply with the DFSG, but
+may fail other requirements. For instance, they may depend on
+non-free packages.
<p>
-(The <url id="http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/" name="Debian
+The <url id="http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/" name="Debian
Policy Manual"> contains a more exact definition of the three
-sections. The above discussion is just an introduction.)
+sections. The above discussion is just an introduction.
<p>
The separation of the three sections at the top-level of the archive
is important for all people who want to distribute Debian, either via
more and more popular, the kernel was ported to other architectures,
too.
<p>
-The Linux 2.0 kernel supports Intel, DEC Alphas, SUN Sparcs, M68000
-(a.k.a. m68k) machines (like Atari and Amiga), MIPS, and PowerPC
-(a.k.a. ppc).
+The Linux 2.0 kernel supports Intel x86, DEC Alpha, SPARC, Motorola
+680x0 (like Atari, Amiga and Macintoshes), MIPS, and PowerPC.
+The Linux 2.2 kernel supports even more architectures, including ARM
+and UltraSPARC. Since Linux supports these platforms, Debian decided
+that it should, too. Therefore, Debian has ports underway. In fact,
+we also have ports underway to non-Linux kernel. Aside from
+<em>i386</em> (our name for Intel x86), there is <em>m68k</em>,
+<em>alpha</em>, <em>powerpc</em>, <em>sparc</em>, <em>hurd-i386</em>,
+and <em>arm</em>, as of this writing.
+
<p>
-Debian GNU/Linux 1.3 is only available for Intel platforms. Debian
-2.0 supports Intel and m68k architectures. The next version of Debian
-is likely to also support Alpha, PPC, and Sparc architectures, if not
-more.
+Debian GNU/Linux 1.3 is only available as <em>i386</em>. Debian 2.0
+shipped for <em>i386</em> and <em>m68k</em> architectures. Debian 2.1
+ships for the <em>i386</em>, <em>m68k</em>, <em>alpha</em>, and
+<em>sparc</em> architectures.
<sect>Subsections
<p>
The sections <em/main/, <em/contrib/, and <em/non-free/ are split into
<em/subsections/ to simplify the installation process and the
-maintainance of the archive. Subections are not formally defined,
-excepting perhaps for the "base" subsection. Subsections exist simply
-to simpilfy the organization and browsing of available packages.
+maintainance of the archive. Subsections are not formally defined,
+excepting perhaps the `base' subsection. Subsections exist simply
+to simplify the organization and browsing of available packages.
Please check the current Debian distribution to see which sections are
available.
-
<sect>Packages
<p>
There are two types of Debian packages, namely <em/source/ and
<em/binary/ packages.
<p>
Source packages consist of either two or three files: a <tt/.dsc/
-file, and either one <tt/.tar.gz/ file or an <tt/.orig.tar.gz/ and a
-<tt/.diff.gz/ file.
+file, and either a <tt/.tar.gz/ file or both an <tt/.orig.tar.gz/ and
+a <tt/.diff.gz/ file.
<p>
If a package is developed specially for Debian and is not distributed
outside of Debian, there is just one <tt/.tar.gz/ file which contains
-the sources of the program.
- <p>
-If a package is distributed elsewhere too, the <tt/.orig.tar.gz/ file
-stores the so-called <em/upstream source code/, that is the source
-code that's distributed from the <em/upstream maintainer/ (often the
-author of the software). In this case, the <tt/.diff.gz/ contains the
-changes made by the Debian maintainer.
+the sources of the program. If a package is distributed elsewhere
+too, the <tt/.orig.tar.gz/ file stores the so-called <em/upstream
+source code/, that is the source code that's distributed from the
+<em/upstream maintainer/ (often the author of the software). In this
+case, the <tt/.diff.gz/ contains the changes made by the Debian
+maintainer.
<p>
The <tt/.dsc/ lists all the files in the source package together with
checksums (md5sums) and some additional info about the package
<sect>Distribution directories
<p>
-If you have a look at the Debian FTP server or one of its mirrors,
-you'll discover that there is one additional directory level on top of
-the directory tree, as described in the previous chapter. These
-directories are the <em/distribution directories/. All distributions
-are contained in the <tt/dists/ directory in the top-level of the
-Debian archive (the symlinks from the top-level directory to the
-distributions themselves is for backwards compatability and
+The directory system described in the previous chapter, are themselves
+contained within <em/distribution directories/. Every distribution is
+contained in the <tt/dists/ directory in the top-level of the Debian
+archive itself (the symlinks from the top-level directory to the
+distributions themselves are for backwards compatability and are
deprecated).
+ <p>
+To summarize, the Debian archive has a root directory within an FTP
+server. For instance, at the mirror site,
+<ftpsite>ftp.us.debian.org</ftpsite>, the Debian archive itself is
+contained in <ftppath>/debian</ftppath>, which is a common location
+(another is <ftppath>/pub/debian</ftppath>).
+ <p>
+Within that archive root, the actual distributions are contained in
+the <tt/dists/ directory. Here is an overview of the layout:
+ <p>
+<example>
+<var>archive root</var>/dists/<var>distribution</var>/<var>section</var>/<var>architecture</var>/<var>subsection</var>/<var>packages</var>
+</example>
+
+Extrapolating from this layout, you know that to find the i386 base
+packages for the distribution <em/slink/, you would look in
+<ftppath>/debian/dists/slink/main/binary-i386/base/</ftppath>.
<sect1>Stable, unstable, and sometimes frozen
<p>
There is always a distribution called <em/stable/ (residing in
<tt>dists/stable</tt>) and one called <em/unstable/ (residing in
-<tt>dists/unstable</tt>. This reflects the development process of the
+<tt>dists/unstable</tt>). This reflects the development process of the
Debian project.
<p>
-The ``development'' is done in the <em/unstable/ distribution (that's
+Active development is done in the <em/unstable/ distribution (that's
why this distribution is sometimes called the <em/development
-distribution/). Every Debian developer can update his or her packages in
-this distribution at any time. Thus, the contents of this distribution
-change from day to day and since no special effort is done to test
-this distribution it's sometimes ``unstable.''
+distribution/). Every Debian developer can update his or her packages
+in this distribution at any time. Thus, the contents of this
+distribution change from day-to-day. Since no special effort is done
+to test this distribution, it is sometimes ``unstable.''
<p>
After a period of development, the <em/unstable/ distribution is
copied in a new distribution directory, called <em/frozen/. When that
<p>
This development cycle is based on the assumption that the
<em/unstable/ distribution becomes <em/stable/ after passing a period
-of testing as <em/frozen/. Unfortunately, even once a distribution is
-considered stable, a few bugs inevitably remain--that's why the stable
+of testing as <em/frozen/. Even once a distribution is considered
+stable, a few bugs inevitably remain--that's why the stable
distribution is updated every now and then. However, these updates are
tested very carefully and have to be introduced into the archive
individually to reduce the risk of introducing new bugs. You can find
revision level of the stable distribution is incremented (e.g., `1.3'
becomes `1.3r1', `2.0r2' becomes `2.0r3', and so forth).
<p>
-Note that development is continued during the ``freeze'' period, since
-a new <em/unstable/ distribution is be created when the older
-<em/unstable/ is moved to <em/frozen/.
+Note that development under <em/unstable/ is continued during the
+``freeze'' period, since a new <em/unstable/ distribution is be
+created when the older <em/unstable/ is moved to <em/frozen/.
+Another wrinkle is that when the <em/frozen/ distribution is offically
+released, the old stable distribution is completely removed from the
+Debian archives (although you can still find it from servers which
+serve up older, obsolete distributions).
<p>
In summary, there is always a <em/stable/ and an <em/unstable/
distribution available, and the <em/frozen/ distribution shows up for
<sect1>Experimental
<p>
The <em/experimental/ distribution is a specialty distribution. It is
-not a full distribution in the same sense that 'stable' and 'unstable'
+not a full distribution in the same sense that `stable' and `unstable'
are. Instead, it is meant to be a temporary staging area for highly
experimental software where there's a good chance that the software
could break your system. Users who download and install packages from
<em/experimental/.
<p>
For instance, an experimental encrypted file system should probably go
-into experimental. A new, beta, version of some software which uses
-completely different configuration might go into experimental at the
-maintainer's discretion. New software which isn't likely to damage
-your system can go into <em/unstable/.
+into <em>experimental</em>. A new, beta, version of some software
+which uses completely different configuration might go into
+<em>experimental</em> at the maintainer's discretion. New software
+which isn't likely to damage your system can go into
+<em>unstable</em>. If you are working on an incompatible or complex
+upgrade situation, you can also use <em>experimental</em> as a staging
+area, so that testers can get early access.
+ <p>
+However, using <em>experimental</em> as a personal staging area is not
+always the best idea. You can't replace or upgrade the files in there
+on your own (<prgn>dinstall</prgn> and the Debian archive maintainers
+do that). Additionally, you'll have to remember to ask the archive
+maintainers to delete the package one you have uploaded it to
+<em>unstable</em>. Using your personal web space on
+<tt>va.debian.org</tt> is generally a better idea, so that you put
+less strain on the Debian archive maintainers.
<sect id="codenames">Release code names
<p>
Every released Debian distribution has a <em/code name/: Debian 1.1 is
-called <em/buzz/; Debian 1.2, <em/rex/; Debian 1.3, <em/bo/; Debian
-2.0, <em/hamm/; Debian 2.1, <em/slink/. There is also a
-"pseudo-distribution", called <em/sid/, which is contains packages for
-architectures which are not yet officially supported or released by
-Debian. These architectures are planned to be integrated into the
-mainstream distribution at some future date.
+called `buzz'; Debian 1.2, `rex'; Debian 1.3, `bo'; Debian 2.0,
+`hamm'; Debian 2.1, `slink'; and Debian 2.2, `potato'. There is
+also a ``pseudo-distribution'', called `sid' which is contains
+packages for architectures which are not yet officially supported or
+released by Debian. These architectures are planned to be integrated
+into the mainstream distribution at some future date.
<p>
Since the Debian has an open development model (i.e., everyone can
-participate and follow the development) even the ``development
-versions'' (unstable) are distributed via the Internet on the Debian
-FTP server. This FTP server is mirrored by lots of other
-systems. Thus, if we'd call the directory which contains the
-development version simply `unstable', then we would have to rename it
+participate and follow the development) even the unstable distribution
+is distributed via the Internet on the Debian FTP and HTTP server
+network. Thus, if we had called the directory which contains the
+development version `unstable', then we would have to rename it
to `stable' when the version is released, which would cause all FTP
-mirrors to re-get the whole distribution (which is already very
+mirrors to re-retrieve the whole distribution (which is already very
large!).
<p>
-On the other hand, if we would call the distribution directories
+On the other hand, if we called the distribution directories
<em>Debian-x.y</em> from the beginning, people would think that Debian
-release <em>x.y</> is available. (This happened in the past, where a
+release <em>x.y</em> is available. (This happened in the past, where a
CD-ROM vendor built a Debian 1.0 CD-ROM based on a pre-1.0 development
version. That's the reason why the first official Debian release was
1.1, and not 1.0.)
<p>
-Thus, the names of the distribution directories in the archive should
-stay the same during the development period and after the release but
-there may be symbolic links, which can be changed.
- <p>
-That's why the distribution directories use the <em/code names/ and
-there are symbolic links <em/stable/, <em/unstable/, <em/frozen/,
-etc., which point to the appriopriate release directories.
+Thus, the names of the distribution directories in the archive are
+determined by their code names and not their release status (i.e.,
+`slink'). These names stay the same during the development period
+and after the release; symbolic links, which can be changed, are made
+to indicate the currently released stable distribution. That's why
+the real distribution directories use the <em/code names/ and symbolic
+links for <em/stable/, <em/unstable/, and <em/frozen/ point to the
+appropriate release directories.
<chapt id="upload">Package uploads
If you want to create a new package for the Debian distribution, you
should first check the <url
id="http://www.debian.org/doc/prospective-packages.html"
-name="Work-Needing and Prospective Packages (WNPP)"> page. Checking
+name="Work-Needing and Prospective Packages (WNPP)"> list. Checking
the WNPP ensures that no one is already working on packaging that
software, and that effort is not duplicated. Assuming no one else is
already working on your prospective package, you must then send a
short email to <email/debian-devel@lists.debian.org/ describing your
plan to create a new package. You should set the subject of the email
-to "intent to package <var/foobar/", substituting the name of the new
+to ``intent to package <var/foobar/'', substituting the name of the new
package for <var/foobar/.
<p>
There are a number of reasons why we ask maintainers to follow these
-steps.
+steps:
<list compact>
<item>
It helps the (potentially new) maintainer to tap into the experience
of people on the list, and lets them know if any one else is working
on it already.
-
<item>
It lets other people thinking about working on the package know that
-there already is a volunteer, and efforts may be shared. The "intent
-to package" message to <email/debian-devel@lists.debian.org/ will be
+there already is a volunteer, and efforts may be shared. The ``intent
+to package'' message to <email/debian-devel@lists.debian.org/ will be
picked up the the WNPP maintainer, and your intention will be
published in subsequent versions of the WNPP document.
-
<item>
It lets the rest of the maintainers know more about the package than
-the one line description and the changelog entry "Initial version"
+the one line description and the changelog entry ``Initial version''
that generally gets posted to <tt/debian-devel-changes/ by default.
-
<item>
It is helpful to the people who live off unstable (and form our first
line of testers); we should encourage these people.
-
<item>
The announcements give maintainers and other interested parties a
better feel of what is going on, and what is new, in the project.
-
-
- <item>
-We should not dismiss anybody who installs from unstable and helps us
-debug our packages as "fools, fools, you installed from unstable; you
-deserve what you get"--we derive a certain benefit from the alpha
-testers.
-
</list>
<sect1>Generating the changes file
<p>
When a package is uploaded to the Debian FTP archive, it must be
-accompanied by a <tt/.changes/ file which gives directions for its
-handling. This is usually generated by <prgn/dpkg-genchanges/.
+accompanied by a <tt/.changes/ file, which gives directions to the
+archive maintainers for its handling. This is usually generated by
+<prgn/dpkg-genchanges/ during the normal package build process.
+ <p>
+The changes file is a control file with the following fields:
<p>
-This file is a control file with the following fields:
<list compact>
<item><tt/Format/
<item><tt/Date/
<item><tt/Files/
</list>
<p>
-All of them are mandatory for a Debian upload. See the list of
-control fields in the <url
+All of these fields are mandatory for a Debian upload. See the list
+of control fields in the <url
id="http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/packaging.html/"
name="Debian Packaging Manual"> for the contents of these fields.
+Only the <tt/Distribution/ field is discussed here, since it relates
+to the archive maintenance policies.
+
+ <sect1 id="upload-dist">Picking a distribution
<p>
Notably, the <tt/Distribution/ field, which originates from the
-<tt>debian/changelog</tt> file, should indicate which distribution the
+<file>debian/changelog</file> file, indicates which distribution the
package is intended for. There are four possible values for this
-field: <em/stable/, <em/unstable/, <em/frozen/, or <em/experimental/;
-these values can also be combined. For instance, if you have a
-crucial security fix release of a package, and the package has not
-diverged between the <em/stable/ and <em/unstable/ distributions, then
-you might put <tt/stable unstable/ in the <tt>debian/changelog</tt>'s
-distribution field. Or, if Debian has been frozen, and you want to
-get a bug-fix release into <em/frozen/, you would set the distribution
-to <tt/frozen unstable/. Note that setting the distribution to
-<tt/stable/ means that the pacakge will be placed into the
-<tt>proposed-updates</tt> directory of the Debian archive for further
-testing, before it is actually included in <em/stable/. Also note
-that it never makes sense to combine the <em/experimental/
-distribution with anything else.
+field: `stable', `unstable', `frozen', or `experimental'; these values
+can also be combined. For instance, if you have a crucial security
+fix release of a package, and the package has not diverged between the
+<em/stable/ and <em/unstable/ distributions, then you might put
+`stable unstable' in the <file>changelog</file>'s <tt/Distribution/ field.
+Or, if Debian has been frozen, and you want to get a bug-fix release
+into <em/frozen/, you would set the distribution to `frozen unstable'.
+(See <ref id="upload-frozen"> for more information on when to upload to
+<em/frozen/.) Note that setting the distribution to `stable' means
+that the package will be placed into the <tt>proposed-updates</tt>
+directory of the Debian archive for further testing before it is
+actually included in <em/stable/. Also note that it never makes sense
+to combine the <em/experimental/ distribution with anything else.
<p>
The first time a version is uploaded which corresponds to a particular
upstream version the original source tar file should be uploaded and
reason why this is not the case then the new version of the original
source should be uploaded, possibly by using the <tt/-sa/ flag.
+ <sect2 id="upload-frozen">Uploading to <em/frozen/
+ <p>
+The Debian freeze is a crucial time for Debian. It is our chance to
+synchronize and stabilize our distribution as a whole. Therefore,
+care must be taken when uploading to <em/frozen/.
+ <p>
+It is tempting to always try to get the newest release of software
+into the release. However, it's much more important that the system
+as a whole is stable and works as expected.
+ <p>
+The watchword for uploading to <em/frozen/ is <strong>no new
+code</strong>. This is a difficult thing to quantify, so here are
+some guidelines:
+ <p>
+<list>
+ <item>
+Fixes for bugs of severity <em/critical/, <em/grave/, or
+<em/important/ severity are always allowed for those packages that
+must exist in the final release
+ <item>
+<em/critical/, <em/grave/, and <em/important/ bug fixes are only
+allowed for non-necessary packages if they don't add any new features
+ <item>
+normal bug fixes are allowed (though discouraged) on all packages if
+and only if there are no new features
+ <item>
+wishlist fixes are not allowed (they are, after all, not really bugs)
+ <item>
+documentation bug fixes are allowed, since good documentation is
+important
+ </list>
+ <p>
+Remember, there is statistically a 15% chance that every bug fix will
+introduce a new bug. The introduction and discovery of new bugs
+either delays release or weakens the final product. There is little
+correlation between the severity of the original bug and the severity
+of the introduced bug.
+
+
<sect1 id="upload-checking">Checking the package prior to upload
<p>
Install the package and make sure the software works, or upgrade the
package from an older version to your new version if a Debian package
for it already exists.
-
<item>
Run <prgn/lintian/ over the package. You can run <prgn/lintian/ as
-follows: <tt>lintian -v <var>package-NN</var>.changes</tt>. This will
+follows: <tt>lintian -v <var>package-version</var>.changes</tt>. This will
check the source package as well as the binary package. If you don't
understand the output that <prgn/lintian/ generates, try adding the
<tt/-i/ switch, which will cause <prgn/lintian/ to output a very
<item>
Downgrade the package to the previous version (if one exists) -- this
tests the <tt/postrm/ and <tt/prerm/ scripts.
-
<item>
Remove the package, then reinstall it.
-
</list>
- <sect1 id="upload-master">Transferring the files to master
+ <sect1 id="upload-master">Uploading to <tt/master/
<p>
To upload a package, you need a personal account on
<ftpsite>master.debian.org</ftpsite>. All maintainers should already
-have this account. You can use either <prgn/ssh/ or <prgn/ftp/ to
-transfer the files. In either case, the files need to be placed into
+have this account, see <ref id="servers-master">. You can use either
+<prgn/ssh/ or <prgn/ftp/ to transfer the files. In either case, the
+files need to be placed into
<ftppath>/home/Debian/ftp/private/project/Incoming</ftppath>. (You
-cannot upload to Incoming on master using anonymous FTP -- you must use
-your username and password.)
+cannot upload to Incoming on master using anonymous FTP -- you must
+use your user-name and password.)
<p>
<em/Note:/ Do not upload packages containing software that is
-export-controlled by the United States government to <tt/master/.
-This includes almost all cryptographic software, and even software
-that contains "hooks" to cryptographic software, such as electronic
-mail readers that support PGP encryption and authentication. Uploads
-of such software should go to <tt/non-us/ (see below). If you are
-not sure whether U.S. export controls apply to your package, post a
-message to <email/debian-devel@lists.debian.org/ and ask.
+export-controlled by the United States government to <tt/master/, or
+to the overseas upload queues on <tt/chiark/ or <tt/erlangen/. This
+prohibition covers almost all cryptographic software, and even
+sometimes software that contains ``hooks'' to cryptographic software,
+such as electronic mail readers that support PGP encryption and
+authentication. Uploads of such software should go to <tt/non-us/
+(see below). If you are not sure whether U.S. export controls apply
+to your package, post a message to
+<email/debian-devel@lists.debian.org/ and ask.
<p>
You may also find the Debian package <package/dupload/ useful when
uploading packages. This handy program is distributed with defaults
section="5"> for more information.
- <sect1>Uploads via Chiark
+ <sect1>Uploads via <tt/chiark/
<p>
-If you have a slow network connection to <tt/master/, there are two
-alternatives: You can upload files to Incoming via a cron-driven
-upload queue in Europe on <tt/chiark/. For details connect to
-<ftpsite>ftp.chiark.greenend.org.uk</ftpsite> using anonymous FTP and
-read
+If you have a slow network connection to <tt/master/, there are
+alternatives. One is to upload files to <tt/Incoming/ via a
+upload queue in Europe on <tt/chiark/. For details connect
+to <ftpsite>ftp.chiark.greenend.org.uk</ftpsite> using anonymous FTP
+and read
<ftppath>/pub/debian/private/project/README.how-to-upload</ftppath>.
<p>
-The program <tt/dupload/ supports uploads to chiark, please refer to
-the documentation that comes with the program for details.
+<em/Note:/ Do not upload packages containing software that is
+export-controlled by the United States government to the queue on
+<tt/chiark/. Since this upload queue goes to <tt/master/, the
+prescription found in <ref id="upload-master"> applies here as well.
+ <p>
+The program <tt/dupload/ supports uploads to <tt/chiark/; please refer
+to the documentation that comes with the program for details.
- <sect1>Uploads via Erlangen
+ <sect1>Uploads via <tt/erlangen/
<p>
-Another cron-driven upload queue is available in Germany: just upload
+Another upload queue is available in Germany: just upload
the files via anonymous FTP to <url
id="ftp://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/Linux/debian/UploadQueue">.
<p>
The upload must be a complete Debian upload, as you would put it into
-master's <tt/Incoming/, i.e., a <tt/.changes/ files along with the
+<tt/master/'s <tt/Incoming/, i.e., a <tt/.changes/ files along with the
other files mentioned in the <tt/.changes/. The queue daemon also
checks that the <tt/.changes/ is correctly PGP-signed by a Debian
-developer, so that no bogus files can find their way to master via the
-queue. Please also make sure that the <tt/Maintainer:/ field in the
-<tt/.changes/ contains <em/your/ e-mail address. The address found
-there is used for all replies, just as on master.
+developer, so that no bogus files can find their way to <tt/master/
+via the queue. Please also make sure that the <tt/Maintainer/ field
+in the <tt/.changes/ contains <em/your/ e-mail address. The address
+found there is used for all replies, just as on <tt/master/.
<p>
There's no need to move your files into a second directory after the
-upload as on chiark. And, in any case, you should get some mail reply
-from the queue daemon what happened to your upload. Hopefully it
-should have been moved to master, but in case of errors you're
+upload as on <tt/chiark/. And, in any case, you should get some mail
+reply from the queue daemon what happened to your upload. Hopefully it
+should have been moved to <tt/master/, but in case of errors you're
notified, too.
<p>
-The program <prgn/dupload/ supports uploads to erlangen, please refer
+<em/Note:/ Do not upload packages containing software that is
+export-controlled by the United States government to the queue on
+<tt/erlangen/. Since this upload queue goes to <tt/master/, the
+prescription found in <ref id="upload-master"> applies here as well.
+ <p>
+The program <prgn/dupload/ supports uploads to <tt/erlangen/; please refer
to the documentation that comes with the program for details.
the keys of the developers key-ring.
- <sect>Announcing package uploads
+ <sect id="upload-announce">Announcing package uploads
<p>
When a package is uploaded an announcement should be posted to one of
-the debian-changes lists. The announcement should give the (source)
+the ``debian-changes'' lists. The announcement should give the (source)
package name and version number, and a very short summary of the
changes, in the <em/Subject/ field, and should contain the PGP-signed
<tt/.changes/ file. Some additional explanatory text may be added
before the start of the <tt/.changes/ file.
<p>
If a package is released with the <tt/Distribution:/ set to
-<tt/stable/, the announcement is sent to
-<email/debian-changes@lists.debian.org/.
- <p>
-If a package is released with <tt/Distribution:/ set to <tt/unstable/,
-<tt/experimental/, or <tt/frozen/ (when present), the announcement
-should be posted to <email/debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org/
-instead.
- <p>
-On occasion, it is necessary to upload a package to both the <tt/stable/
-and <tt/unstable/ distributions; this is done by putting both distributions
-in the <tt/Distribution:/ line. In such a case the upload announcement
-should go to both of the above mailing lists.
+`stable', the announcement is sent to
+<email/debian-changes@lists.debian.org/. If a package is released
+with <tt/Distribution:/ set to `unstable', `experimental', or
+`frozen' (when present), the announcement should be posted to
+<email/debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org/ instead.
+ <p>
+On occasion, it is necessary to upload a package to both the
+<em/stable/ and <em/unstable/ distributions; this is done by putting
+both distributions in the <tt/Distribution:/ line. In such a case the
+upload announcement should go to both of the above mailing lists.
<p>
The <prgn/dupload/ program is clever enough to determine for itself
where the announcement should go, and will automatically mail the
-announcement. See <ref id="dupload">.
+announcement to the right list. See <ref id="dupload">.
- <sect>Notification that a new package has been installed
+ <sect id="upload-notification">Notification that a new package has been installed
<p>
The Debian archive maintainers are responsible for handling package
uploads. For the most part, uploads are automatically handled on a
<p>
In any case, you will receive notification indicating that the package
has been uploaded via email. Please examine this notification
-carefully. Sometimes the "override" file which the archive
-maintainers use to indicate where packages go, is incorrect or
-out-of-sync with your control file. In these cases, you should either
-correct your control file or file a bug against <tt/ftp.debian.org/
-using the BTS.
+carefully. You may notice that the package didn't go into the section
+you thought you set it to go into. Read on for why.
- <sect id="nmu">Interim releases
- <p>
+ <sect1 id="override-file">The override file
+ <p>
+The <file>debian/control</file> file's <tt/Section/ and <tt/Priority/
+fields do not actually specify where the file will be placed in the
+archive, nor its priority. In order to retain the overall integrity
+of the archive, it is the archive maintainers who have control over
+these fields. The values in the <file>debian/control</file> file are
+actually just hints.
+ <p>
+The archive maintainers keep track of the canonical sections and
+priorities for packages in the <em/override file/. Sometimes the
+<em/override file/ needs correcting. Simply changing the package's
+<file>control</file> file is not going to work. Instead, you should email
+<email/override-change@debian.org/ or submit a bug against
+<package/ftp.debian.org/.
+ <p>
+For more information about <em/override files/, see
+<manref name="dpkg-scanpackages" section="8"/>,
+<file>/usr/doc/debian/bug-log-mailserver.txt</file>, and
+<file>/usr/doc/debian/bug-maint-info.txt</file>.
+
+
+
+ <chapt id="nmu">Non-Maintainer Uploads (NMUs)
+ <p>
Under certain circumstances it is necessary for someone other than the
-usual package maintainer to make a release of a package. For example,
-a porter for another architecture may have to make some small changes
-to the source package and does not wish to wait with uploading their
-release until the main maintainer has incorporated the patch, or a
-serious security problem or bug may have come to light requiring
-immediate attention.
- <p>
-When a security bug is detected a fixed package should be uploaded as
-soon as possible. In this case, the Debian Security Managers should
-get in contact with the package maintainer to make sure a fixed
-package is uploaded within a reasonable time (less than 48 hours). If
-the package maintainer cannot provide a fixed package fast enough or
-if he/she cannot be reached in time, the Security Manager may upload a
-fixed package.
- <p>
-When someone other than the usual maintainer releases a package they
-should add a new component to the <var/debian-revision/ component of
-the version number--that is, the portion after the (last) hyphen.
-This extra component will start at <tt/1/. This is to avoid
-`stealing' one of the usual maintainer's version numbers, possibly
-disrupting their work. If there is no <var/debian-revision/ component
-in the version number then one should be created, starting at <tt/1/.
- <p>
-If it is absolutely necessary for someone other than the usual
-maintainer to make a release based on a new upstream version then the
-person making the release should start with the <var/debian-revision/
-value <tt/0.1/. The usual maintainer of a package should start their
-<var/debian-revision/ numbering at <tt/1/.
- <p>
-Maintainers other than the usual package maintainer should make as few
-changes to the package as possible, and they should always send a
-unified context diff (<tt/diff -u/) detailing their changes to the bug
-tracking system properly flagged with the correct package so that the
-usual maintainer is kept aware of the situation.
- <p>
-If the non-maintainer upload (as known as an "NMU") fixes some
-existing bugs, the bug reports should not be closed. Technically,
-only the official package maintainer or the original bug submitter are
-allowed to close bugs. However, the person making the non-maintainer
-release should send a short message to the bug tracking system to all
-the fixed bugs explaining that they have been fixed. Using
-<email/control@bugs.debian.org/, the party doing the NMU should also
-set the severity of the bugs fixed in the NMU to "fixed". This
-ensures that everyone knows that the bug was fixed in an NMU; however
-the bug is left open until the changes in the NMU are incorporated
-"officially" into the package by the official package maintainer.
- <p>
-The normal maintainer should do at least one of the following:
- <list compact>
+official package maintainer to make a release of a package. This is
+called a non-maintainer upload, or NMU.
+ <p>
+Debian porters, who compile packages for different architectures, do
+NMUs as part of their normal porting activity (see <ref
+id="porting">). Another reason why NMUs are done is when a Debian
+developers needs to fix another developers' packages in order to
+address serious security problems or crippling bugs, especially during
+the freeze, or when the package maintainer is unable to release a fix
+in a timely fashion.
+ <p>
+This chapter contains information providing guidelines for when and
+how NMUs should be done. A fundamental distinction is made between
+source and binary NMUs, which is explained in the next section.
+
+ <sect id="nmu-terms">Terminology
+ <p>
+There are two new terms used throughout this section: ``binary NMU''
+and ``source NMU''. These terms are used with specific technical
+meaning throughout this document. Both binary and source NMUs are
+similar, since they involve an upload of a package by a developer who
+is not the official maintainer of that package. That is why it's a
+<em/non-maintainer/ upload.
+ <p>
+A source NMU is a upload of a package by a developer who is not the
+official maintainer, for the purposes of fixing a bug in the package.
+Source NMUs always involves changes to the source (even if it is just
+a change to <file>debian/changelog</file>). This can be either a change
+to the upstream source, or a change to the Debian bits of the source.
+ <p>
+A binary NMU is a recompilation and upload of a binary package for a
+new architecture. As such, it is usually part of a porting effort. A
+binary NMU is non-maintainer uploaded binary version of a package
+(often for another architecture), with no source changes required.
+There are many cases where porters must fix problems in the source in
+order to get them to compile for their target architecture; that would
+be considered a source NMU rather than a binary NMU. As you can see,
+we don't distinguish in terminology between porter NMUs and non-porter
+NMUs.
+ <p>
+Both classes of NMUs, source and binary, can be lumped by the term
+``NMU''. However, this often leads to confusion, since most people
+think ``source NMU'' when they think ``NMU''. So it's best to be
+careful. In this chapter, if I use the unqualified term ``NMU'', I
+mean both source and binary NMUs.
+
+
+ <sect id="nmu-who">Who can do an NMU
+ <p>
+Only official, registered Debian maintainers can do binary or source
+NMUs. An official maintainer is someone who has their key in the
+Debian key ring. Non-developers, however, are encouraged to download
+the source package and start hacking on it to fix problems; however,
+rather than doing an NMU, they should just submit worthwhile patches
+to the Bug Tracking System. Maintainers almost always appreciate
+quality patches and bug reports.
+
+
+ <sect id="nmu-when">When to do a source NMU
+ <p>
+Guidelines for when to do a source NMU depend on the target
+distribution, i.e., stable, unstable, or frozen. Porters have
+slightly different rules than non-porters, due to their unique
+circumstances (see <ref id="source-nmu-when-porter">).
+ <p>
+Only critical changes or security bug fixes make it into stable. When
+a security bug is detected a fixed package should be uploaded as soon
+as possible. In this case, the Debian Security Managers should get in
+contact with the package maintainer to make sure a fixed package is
+uploaded within a reasonable time (less than 48 hours). If the package
+maintainer cannot provide a fixed package fast enough or if he/she
+cannot be reached in time, the Security Manager may upload a fixed
+package (i.e., do a source NMU).
+ <p>
+During the release freeze (see <ref id="upload-frozen">), NMUs which
+fix important or higher severity bugs are encouraged and accepted.
+Even during this window, however, you should endeavor to reach the
+current maintainer of the package; they might be just about to upload
+a fix for the problem. As with any source NMU, the guidelines found
+in <ref id="nmu-guidelines"> need to be followed.
+ <p>
+Bug fixes to unstable by non-maintainers are also acceptable, but only
+as a last resort or with permission. Try the following steps first,
+and if they don't work, it is probably OK to do an NMU:
+ <p>
+<list>
<item>
-apply the diff,
+Make sure that the package bug is in the Debian Bug Tracking System
+(BTS). If not, submit a bug.
<item>
-read the diff and decide on each part of it themselves, or
+Email the maintainer, and offer to help fix the package bug. Give it a
+few days.
<item>
-if the maintainer decides not to apply the patch but to release a new
-version, read the description of the changes to the next upstream
-version and ensure that they fix each problem that was fixed in the
-non-maintainer release.
+Go ahead and fix the bug, submitting a patch to the right bug in the
+BTS. Build the package and test it as discussed in <ref
+id="upload-checking">. Use it locally.
+ <item>
+Wait a couple of weeks for a response.
+ <item>
+Email the maintainer, asking if it is OK to do an NMU.
+ <item>
+Double check that your patch doesn't have any unexpected side effects.
+Make sure your patch is as small and as non-disruptive as it can be.
+ <item>
+Wait another week for a response.
+ <item>
+Go ahead and do the source NMU, as described in <ref
+id="nmu-guidelines">.
</list>
+
+
+
+ <sect id="nmu-guidelines">How to do a source NMU
+ <p>
+The following applies to porters insofar as they are playing the dual
+role of being both package bug-fixers and package porters. If a
+porter has to change the Debian source archive, automatically their
+upload is a source NMU and is subject to its rules. If a porter is
+simply uploading a recompiled binary package, the rules are different;
+see <ref id="porter-guidelines">.
<p>
-In addition, the normal maintainer should <em/always/ include an entry
+First and foremost, it is critical that NMU patches to source should
+be as non-disruptive as possible. Do not do housekeeping tasks, do
+not change the name of modules or files, do not move directories; in
+general, do not fix things which are not broken. Keep the patch as
+small as possible. If things bother you aesthetically, talk to the
+Debian maintainer, talk to the upstream maintainer, or submit a bug.
+However, aesthetic changes must <em/not/ be made in a non-maintainer
+upload.
+
+
+ <sect1 id="nmu-version">Source NMU version numbering
+ <p>
+Whenever you have made a change to a package, no matter how trivial,
+the version number needs to change. This enables our packing system
+to function.
+ <p>
+If you are doing a non-maintainer upload (NMU), you should add a new
+minor version number to the <var/debian-revision/ part of the version
+number (the portion after the last hyphen). This extra minor number
+will start at `1'. For example, consider the package `foo', which is
+at version 1.1-3. In the archive, the source package control file
+would be <file>foo_1.1-3.dsc</file>. The upstream version is `1.1' and
+the Debian revision is `3'. The next NMU would add a new minor number
+`.1' to the Debian revision; the new source control file would be
+<file>foo_1.1-3.1.dsc</file>.
+ <p>
+The Debian revision minor number is needed to avoid stealing one of
+the package maintainer's version numbers, which might disrupt their
+work. It also has the benefit of making it visually clear that a
+package in the archive was not made by the official maintainer.
+ <p>
+If there is no <var/debian-revision/ component in the version number
+then one should be created, starting at `0.1'. If it is absolutely
+necessary for someone other than the usual maintainer to make a
+release based on a new upstream version then the person making the
+release should start with the <var/debian-revision/ value `0.1'. The
+usual maintainer of a package should start their <var/debian-revision/
+numbering at `1'. Note that if you do this, you'll have to invoke
+<prgn>dpkg-buildpackage</prgn> with the <tt/-sa/ switch to force the
+build system to pick up the new source package (normally it only looks
+for Debian revisions of '0' or '1' -- it's not yet clever enough to
+know about `0.1').
+ <p>
+Remember, porters who are simply recompiling a package for a different
+architecture do not need to renumber. Porters should use new version
+numbers if and only if they actually have to modify the source package
+in some way, i.e., if they are doing a source NMU and not a binary
+NMU.
+
+
+ <sect1 id="nmu-changelog">Source NMUs must have a new changelog entry
+ <p>
+A non-maintainer doing a source NMU must create a changelog entry,
+describing which bugs are fixed by the NMU, and generally why the NMU
+was required and what it fixed. The changelog entry will have the
+non-maintainer's email address in the log entry and the NMU version
+number in it.
+ <p>
+By convention, source NMU changelog entries start with the line
+<example>
+ * Non-maintainer upload
+</example>
+
+
+ <sect1 id="nmu-patch">Source NMUs and the Bug Tracking System
+ <p>
+Maintainers other than the official package maintainer should make as
+few changes to the package as possible, and they should always send a
+patch as a unified context diff (<tt/diff -u/) detailing their
+changes to the Bug Tracking System.
+ <p>
+What if you are simply recompiling the package? In this case, the
+process is different for porters than it is for non-porters, as
+mentioned above. If you are not a porter and are doing an NMU that
+simply requires a recompile (i.e., a new shared library is available
+to be linked against, a bug was fixed in <package/debhelper/), there
+must still be a changelog entry; therefore, there will be a patch. If
+you are a porter, you are probably just doing a binary NMU. (Note:
+this leaves out in the cold porters who have to do recompiles -- chalk
+it up as a weakness in how we maintain our archive.)
+ <p>
+If the source NMU (non-maintainer upload) fixes some existing bugs,
+the bugs in the Bug Tracking System which are fixed need to be
+<em/notified/ but not actually <em/closed/ by the non-maintainer.
+Technically, only the official package maintainer or the original bug
+submitter are allowed to close bugs. However, the person making the
+non-maintainer release must send a short message to the relevant bugs
+explaining that the bugs have been
+fixed by the NMU. Using <email/control@bugs.debian.org/, the party
+doing the NMU should also set the severity of the bugs fixed in the
+NMU to `fixed'. This ensures that everyone knows that the bug was
+fixed in an NMU; however the bug is left open until the changes in the
+NMU are incorporated officially into the package by the official
+package maintainer. Also, open a bug with the patches needed to
+fix the problem, or make sure that one of the other (already open) bugs
+has the patches.
+ <p>
+The normal maintainer will either apply the patch or employ an
+alternate method of fixing the problem. Sometimes bugs are fixed
+independently upstream, which is another good reason to back out an
+NMU's patch. If the maintainer decides not to apply the NMU's patch
+but to release a new version, the maintainer needs to ensure that the
+new upstream version really fixes each problem that was fixed in the
+non-maintainer release.
+ <p>
+In addition, the normal maintainer should <em/always/ retain the entry
in the changelog file documenting the non-maintainer upload.
- <sect>Maintainer changes
+ <sect1 id="nmu-build">Building source NMUs
+ <p>
+Source NMU packages are built normally. Pick a distribution using the
+same rules as found in <ref id="upload-dist">. Just as described in
+<ref id="uploading">, a normal changes file, etc., will be built. In
+fact, all the prescriptions from <ref id="upload"> apply, including
+the need to announce the NMU to the proper lists.
+ <p>
+Make sure you do <em/not/ change the value of the maintainer in the
+<file>debian/control</file> file. Your name from the NMU entry of the
+<file>debian/changelog</file> file will be used for signing the changes
+file.
+
+
+
+
+ <chapt id="porting">Porting and Being Ported
+ <p>
+Debian supports an ever-increasing number of architectures. Even if
+you are not a porter, and you don't use any architecture but one, it
+is part of your duty as a maintainer to be aware of issues of
+portability. Therefore, even if you are not a porter, you should read
+most of this chapter.
+ <p>
+Porting is the act of building Debian packages for architectures which
+is different from the original architecture of the package
+maintainer's binary package. It is a unique and essential activity.
+In fact, porters do most of the actual compiling of Debian packages.
+For instance, for one <em>i386</em> binary package, there has to be a
+recompile for each architecture, which is around five more builds.
+
+
+ <sect id="kind-to-porters">Being Kind to Porters
<p>
-Periodically, a listing of packages in need of new maintainers will be
-sent to <email/debian-devel@lists.debian.org</email> list. This list
-is also available at in the Work-Needing and Prospective Packages
-document (WNPP), <url
-id="ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/package-developer/prospective-packages.html">
-and at <url id="http://www.debian.org/doc/prospective-packages.html">.
-If you wish to take over maintenance of any of the packages listed in
-the WNPP, or if you can no longer maintain a packages you have, or you
-simply want to know if any one is working on a new package, send a
-message to <email/wnpp@debian.org/.
+Porters have a difficult and unique task, since they are required to
+deal with a large volume of packages. Ideally, every source package
+should build right out of the box; unfortunately, this is often not
+the case. This section contains a checklist of ``gotchas'' often
+committed by Debian maintainers -- common problems which often stymie
+porters, and make their jobs unnecessarily more difficult.
+ <p>
+The first and most important watchword is to respond quickly to bug or
+issues raised by porters. Please treat porters with courtesy, as if
+they were in fact co-maintainers of your package (which in a way, they
+are).
+ <p>
+By far, most of the problems encountered by porters are caused by
+<em>packaging bugs</em> in the source packages. Here is a checklist
+of things you should check or be aware of.
+<enumlist>
+ <item>
+Don't set architecture to a value other than ``all'' or ``any'' unless
+you really mean it. In too many cases, maintainers don't follow the
+instructions in the <url
+id="http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/packaging.html/"
+name="Debian Packaging Manual">. Setting your architecture to ``i386''
+is usually incorrect.
+ <item>
+Make sure your source package is correct. Do <tt>dpkg-source -x
+<var>package</var>.dsc</tt> to make sure your source package unpacks
+properly. Then, in there, try building your package from scratch with
+<tt>dpkg-buildpackage</tt>.
+ <item>
+Make sure you don't ship your source package with the
+<file>debian/files</file> or <file>debian/substvars</file> files.
+They should be removed by the `clean' target of
+<file>debian/rules</file>.
+ <item>
+Make sure you don't rely on locally installed or hacked configurations
+or programs. For instance, you should never be calling programs in
+<file>/usr/local/bin</file> or the like. Try not to rely on programs
+be setup in a special way. Try building your package on another
+machine, even if it's the same architecture.
+ <item>
+Don't depend on the package your building already being installed (a
+sub-case of the above issue).
+ <item>
+Don't rely on <prgn>egcc</prgn> being available; don't rely on
+<prgn>gcc</prgn> being a certain version.
+ <item>
+Make sure your debian/rules contains separate ``binary-arch'' and
+``binary-indep'' targets, as the Debian Packaging Manual requires.
+Make sure that both targets work independently, that is, that you can
+call the target without having called the other before. To test this,
+try to run <tt>dpkg-buildpackage -b</tt>.
+ </enumlist>
+
+
+ <sect id="porter-guidelines">Guidelines for Porter Uploads
<p>
-If you take over an old package, you probably want to be listed as the
-package's official maintainer in the bug system. This will happen
-automatically once you upload a new version with an updated
-<tt/Maintainer:/ field. If you do not expect to upload a new version
-for a while, send an email to <email/override-change@debian.org/ so
-that bug reports will go to you.
+If the package builds out of the box for the architecture to be ported
+to, you are in luck and your job is easy. This section applies to
+that case; it describes how to build and upload your binary NMU so
+that it is properly installed into the archive. If you do have to
+patch the package in order to get it to compile for the other
+architecture, you are actually doing a source NMU, so consult <ref
+id="nmu-guidelines"> instead.
+ <p>
+In a binary NMU, no real changes are being made to the source. You do
+not need to touch any of the files in the source package. This
+includes <file>debian/changelog</file>.
+ <p>
+The way to invoke <prgn/dpkg-buildpackage/ is as <tt>dpkg-buildpackage
+-B -m<var/porter-email/</tt>. Of course, set <var/porter-email/ to
+your email address. This will do a binary-only build of only the
+architecture-dependant portions of the package, using the
+`binary-arch' target in <file>debian/rules</file>.
+
+ <sect1 id="source-nmu-when-porter">
+ <heading>When to do a source NMU if you are a porter</heading>
+ <p>
+Porters doing a source NMU generally follow the guidelines found in
+<ref id="nmu">, just like non-porters. However, it is expected that
+the wait cycle for a porter's source NMU is smaller than for a
+non-porter, since porters have to cope with a large quantity of
+packages.
+ <p>
+Again, the situation varies depending on the distribution they are
+uploading to. Crucial fixes (i.e., changes need to get a source
+package to compile for a released-targeted architecture) can be
+uploaded with <em/no/ waiting period for the `frozen' distribution.
+ <p>
+However, if you are a porter doing an NMU for `unstable', the above
+guidelines for porting should be followed, with two variations.
+Firstly, the acceptable waiting period -- the time between when the
+bug is submitted to the BTS and when it is OK to do an NMU -- is seven
+days for porters working on the unstable distribution. This period
+can be shortened if the problem is critical and imposes hardship on
+the porting effort, at the discretion of the porter group. (Remember,
+none of this is Policy, just mutually agreed upon guidelines.)
+ <p>
+Secondly, porters doing source NMUs should make sure that the bug they
+submit to the BTS should be of severity `important' or greater. This
+ensures that a single source package can be used to compile every
+supported Debian architecture by release time. It is very important
+that we have one version of the binary and source package for all
+architecture in order to comply with many licenses.
+ <p>
+Porters should try to avoid patches which simply kludge around bugs in
+the current version of the compile environment, kernel, or libc.
+Sometimes such kludges can't be helped. If you have to kludge around
+compilers bugs and the like, make sure you <tt>#ifdef</tt> your work
+properly; also, document your kludge so that people know to remove it
+once the external problems have been fixed.
+ <p>
+Porters may also have an unofficial location where they can put the
+results of their work during the waiting period. This helps others
+running the port have the benefit of the porter's work, even during
+the waiting period. Of course, such locations have no official
+blessing or status, so buyer, beware.
+
+
+ <sect>Tools for Porters
+ <p>
+There are several tools available for the porting effort. This section
+contains a brief introduction to these tools; see the package
+documentation or references for full information.
+
+
+ <sect1 id="quinn-diff">
+ <heading><package>quinn-diff</package>
+ <p>
+<package/quinn-diff/ is used to locate the differences from one
+architecture to another. For instance, it could tell you which
+packages need to be ported for architecture <var/Y/, based on
+architecture <var/X/.
- <chapt id="archive-manip">Moving, Removing, Renaming, and Orphaning Packages
+
+ <sect1 id="buildd">
+ <heading><package>buildd</package>
+ <p>
+The <package/buildd/ system is used as a distributed, client-server
+build distribution system. It is usually used in conjunction with
+<em/auto-builders/, which are ``slave'' hosts which simply check out
+and attempt to auto-build packages which need to be ported. There is
+also an email interface to the system, which allows porters to ``check
+out'' a source package (usually one which cannot yet be autobuilt) and
+work on it.
+ <p>
+<package/buildd/ is not yet available as a package; however, most
+porting efforts are either using it currently or planning to use it in
+the near future. It collects a number of as yet unpackaged components
+which are currently very useful and in use continually, such as
+<prgn/sbuild/ and <prgn/wanna-build/.
+ <p>
+We are very excited about this system, since it potentially has so
+many uses. Independent development groups can use the system for
+different sub-flavors of Debian, which may or may not really be of
+general interest (for instance, a flavor of Debian built with gcc
+bounds checking). It will also enable Debian to recompile entire
+distributions quickly.
+
+
+ <sect1 id="dpkg-cross">
+ <heading><package>dpkg-cross</package>
+ <p>
+<package>dpkg-cross</package> is a tool for installing libraries and
+headers for cross-compiling in a way similar to
+<package>dpkg</package>. Furthermore, the functionality of
+<prgn>dpkg-buildpackage</prgn> and <prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn> is
+enhanced to support cross-compiling.
+
+
+
+
+ <chapt id="archive-manip"><heading>Moving, Removing, Renaming,
+ Adopting, and Orphaning Packages</heading>
<p>
Some archive manipulation operation are not automated in the Debian
-upload process. This chapter gives guidelines in what to do in these
+upload process. These procedures should be manually followed by
+maintainers. This chapter gives guidelines in what to do in these
cases.
<sect>Moving packages
package should be removed from.
<p>
If in doubt concerning whether a package is disposable, email
-<email/debian-devel@lists.debian.org/ asking for opinions.
+<email/debian-devel@lists.debian.org/ asking for opinions. Also of
+interest is the <prgn/apt-cache/ program from the <package/apt/
+package. When invoked as <tt>apt-cache showpkg
+/var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin <var/package/</tt>, the program will show
+details for <var/package/, including reverse depends.
+ <sect1>Removing packages from <tt/Incoming/
+ <p>
+If you decide to remove a package from <tt/Incoming/, it is nice but
+not required to send a notification of that to the appropriate
+announce list (either <email/debian-changes@lists.debian.org/ or
+<email/debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org/).
<sect>Replacing or renaming packages
<p>
Sometimes you made a mistake naming the package and you need to rename
it. In this case, you need to follow a two-step process. First, set
-your <tt>debian/control</tt> file to replace and conflict with the
+your <file>debian/control</file> file to replace and conflict with the
obsolete name of the package (see the <url
id="http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/packaging.html/"
name="Debian Packaging Manual"> for details). Once you've uploaded
obsolete name.
- <sect>Orphaning a package
+
+ <sect id="orphaning">Orphaning a package
<p>
If you can no longer maintain a package, then you should set the
-package maintainer to <tt>Debian QA
+package maintainer to <tt>Debian QA Group
<debian-qa@lists.debian.org></tt> and email
<email/wnpp@debian.org/ indicating that the package is now orphaned.
If the package is especially crucial to Debian, you should instead
maintainer.
- <chapt id="bug-handling">Handling Bug Reports
+ <sect id="adopting">Adopting a package
+ <p>
+Periodically, a listing of packages in need of new maintainers will be
+sent to <email/debian-devel@lists.debian.org</email> list. This list
+is also available at in the Work-Needing and Prospective Packages
+document (WNPP), <url
+id="ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/package-developer/prospective-packages.html">
+and at <url id="http://www.debian.org/doc/prospective-packages.html">.
+If you wish to take over maintenance of any of the packages listed in
+the WNPP, or if you can no longer maintain a packages you have, or you
+simply want to know if any one is working on a new package, send a
+message to <email/wnpp@debian.org/.
+ <p>
+It is not OK to simply take over a package that you feel is neglected
+-- that would be package hijacking. You can, of course, contact the
+current maintainer and ask them if you may take over the package.
+However, without their assent, you may not take over the package.
+Even if they ignore you, that is still not grounds to take over a
+package. If you really feel that a maintainer has gone AWOL (absent
+without leave), post a query to
+<email/debian-private@lists.debian.org/.
+ <p>
+If you take over an old package, you probably want to be listed as the
+package's official maintainer in the bug system. This will happen
+automatically once you upload a new version with an updated
+<tt/Maintainer:/ field, although it can take a couple of weeks. If you
+do not expect to upload a new version for a while, send an email to
+<email/override-change@debian.org/ so that bug reports will go to you
+right away.
+
+
+
+
+ <chapt id="bug-handling">Handling Bugs
<sect>Monitoring bugs
<p>
<tt/bugs.debian.org/. Documentation on available commands can be
found at <url id="http://www.debian.org/Bugs/">, or, if you have
installed the <package/debian-doc/ package, you can look at the local
-files <tt>/usr/doc/debian/bug-*</tt>.
+files <file>/usr/doc/debian/bug-*</file>.
+ <p>
+Some find it useful to get periodic reports on open bugs. You can add
+a cron job such as the following if you want to get a weekly email
+outlining all the open bugs against your packages:
+<example>
+# ask for weekly reports of bugs in my packages
+0 17 * * fri echo "index maint <var>maintainer-address</var>" | mail request@bugs.debian.org
+</example>
+Replace <var>maintainer-address</var> with you official Debian
+maintainer address.
+
+ <sect id="submit-bug">Submitting Bugs
<p>
Often as a package maintainer, you find bugs in other packages or else
have bugs reported to your packages which need to be reassigned. The
-BTS instructions can tell you how to do this. Make sure the bug is
-not already filed against a package. Try to do a good job reporting a
-bug and redirecting it to the proper location. For extra credit, you
-can go through other packages, merging bugs which are reported more
-than once, or setting bug severities to "fixed" when they have already
-been fixed. Note that when you are neither the bug submitter nor the
-package maintainer, you are not empowered to actually close the bug
-(unless you secure permission from the maintainer).
+BTS <url id="http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control.html"
+name="instructions"> can tell you how to do this.
+ <p>
+We encourage you to file bugs when there are problems. Try to submit
+the bug from a normal user account at which you are likely to receive
+mail. Do not submit bugs as root.
+ <p>
+Make sure the bug is not already filed against a package. Try to do a
+good job reporting a bug and redirecting it to the proper location.
+For extra credit, you can go through other packages, merging bugs
+which are reported more than once, or setting bug severities to
+`fixed' when they have already been fixed. Note that when you are
+neither the bug submitter nor the package maintainer, you are should
+not actually close the bug (unless you secure permission from the
+maintainer).
+ <sect>Responding to Bugs
+ <p>
+Make sure that any discussions you have about bugs are sent both to
+the original submitter of the bug, and the bug itself (i.e.,
+<email>123@bugs.debian.org</email>).
+ <p>
+You should <em>never</em> close bugs via the bug server `close'
+command sent to <email>control@bugs.debian.org</email>. If you do so,
+the original submitter will not receive any feedback on why the bug
+was closed.
<sect>When bugs are closed by new uploads
<p>
archive, you can and should close the bug in the BTS.
<p>
Again, see the BTS documentation for details on how to do this.
-Often, it's sufficient to mail the <tt/.changes file to
+Often, it is sufficient to mail the <tt/.changes file to
<email/<var/XXX/-done@bugs.debian.org/, where <var/XXX/ is your bug
number.
+
<sect id="lintian-reports">Lintian reports
<p>
You should periodically get the new <package/lintian/ from `unstable' and
<sect>Reporting lots of bugs at once
<p>
-If you report more then 10 bugs on the same topic at once, it is
+Reporting a great number of bugs for the same problem on a great
+number of different packages -- i.e., more than 10 -- is a deprecated
+practice. Take all possible steps to avoid submitting bulk bugs at
+all. For instance, if checking for the problem can be automated, add
+a new check to <package/lintian/ so that an error or warning is
+emitted.
+ <p>
+If you report more than 10 bugs on the same topic at once, it is
recommended that you send a message to
<email/debian-devel@lists.debian.org/ describing your intention before
-submitting the report. This will allow other developers to verify
-that the bug is a real problem. In addition, it will help prevent
-a situation in which several maintainers start filing the same bug
+submitting the report. This will allow other developers to verify that
+the bug is a real problem. In addition, it will help prevent a
+situation in which several maintainers start filing the same bug
report simultaneously.
<p>
Note that when sending lots of bugs on the same subject, you should
endorse any particular tool to the exclusion of a competing tool.
<p>
Most of the descriptions of these packages come from the actual
-package descriptions themselves.
+package descriptions themselves. Further information can be found in
+the package documentation itself.
+
<sect id="dpkg-dev">
<heading><package/dpkg-dev/
functionality required to create and manipulated packages; as such,
they are required for any Debian maintainer.
+
<sect id="lintian">
<heading><package/lintian/
<p>
<package/lintian/ has already been discussed in <ref
id="upload-checking"> and <ref id="lintian-reports">.
+
<sect id="debhelper">
<heading><package/debhelper/
<p>
<package/debhelper/ is a collection of programs that can be used in
-<tt>debian/rules</tt> to automate common tasks related to building
+<file>debian/rules</file> to automate common tasks related to building
binary Debian packages. Programs are included to install various files
into your package, compress files, fix file permissions, integrate
your package with the Debian menu system.
such, it allows a greater granularity of control than
<package/debmake/.
+
<sect id="debmake">
<heading><package/debmake/
<p>
<package/debmake/, a pre-cursor to <package/debhelper/, is a
-less granular <tt>debian/rules</tt> assistant. It includes two main
+less granular <file>debian/rules</file> assistant. It includes two main
programs: <prgn>deb-make</prgn>, which can be used to help a
maintainer convert a regular (non-Debian) source archive into a Debian
source package; and <prgn>debstd</prgn>, which incorporates in one big
shot the same sort of automated functions that one finds in
<package/debhelper/.
+ <p>
+The consensus is that <package>debmake</package> is now deprecated in
+favor of <package>debhelper</package>. However, it's not a bug to use
+<package>debmake</package>.
+
<sect id="cvs-buildpackage">
<heading><package/cvs-buildpackage/
<em/experimental/ distributions, along with the other benefits of a
version control system.
+
<sect id="dupload">
- <heading><package/dupload/
+ <heading><package>dupload</package>
<p>
<package/dupload/ is a package and a script to automagically upload
Debian packages to the Debian archive, to log the upload, and to send
mail about the upload of a package. You can configure it for new
upload locations or methods.
+
+ <sect id="fakeroot">
+ <heading><package>fakeroot</package>
+ <p>
+<package>fakeroot</package> simulates root privileges. This enables
+you to build packages without being root (packages usually want to
+install files with root ownership). If you have
+<package>fakeroot</package> installed, you can say, i.e.,
+<tt>dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot</tt> as a user.
+
+
+ <sect id="devscripts">
+ <heading><package>devscripts</package>
+ <p>
+<package>devscripts</package> is a package containing a few wrappers
+and tools which you may find helpful for maintaining your Debian
+packages. Example scripts include <prgn>debchange</prgn>, which will
+manipulate your <file>debian/changelog</file> file from the
+command-line, and <prgn>build</prgn>, which is a wrapper around
+<prgn>dpkg-buildpackage</prgn>.
+
+
+ <sect id="debget">
+ <heading><package>debget</package>
+ <p>
+<package>debget</package> is a package containing a convenient script
+which can be helpful in downloading files from the Debian archive.
+You can use it to download source packages, for instance.
+
+
</book>
</debiandoc>
sgml-indent-data:nil
sgml-parent-document:nil
sgml-exposed-tags:nil
+sgml-declaration:nil
sgml-local-catalogs:nil
sgml-local-ecat-files:nil
End:
~ianmdlvl / developers-reference.git / blobdiff