<!entity % commondata SYSTEM "common.ent" > %commondata;
<!-- CVS revision of this document -->
- <!entity cvs-rev "$Revision: 1.126 $">
+ <!entity cvs-rev "$Revision: 1.128 $">
<!-- if you are translating this document, please notate the CVS
revision of the developers reference here -->
<!--
keeping your entry the developer database up-to-date, see <ref
id="user-maint">. Part of this information is also available through
the finger service on Debian servers, try
-<prgn>finger yourlogin@debian.org</prgn> to see what it reports.
-
+<prgn>finger yourlogin@db.debian.org</prgn> to see what it reports.
+ <p>
+This database lets you register some other information like public SSH
+keys that will be automatically installed on the official debian machines
+or like *.debian.net DNS entry. Those features are documented
+here : <url id="&url-debian-db-mail-gw;">
<sect id="servers-mirrors">Mirrors of Debian servers
<p>
to <tt><var>srcpackage</var>_cvs@&pts-host;</tt>. Only people who
accepts the <em>cvs</em> keyword will receive the notifications.
+ <sect id="ddpo">Developer's packages overview
+ <p>
+This is a nice web portal that displays a table of all the packages
+of a single developer (including those where he's listed as
+co-maintainer). The table gives a good summary about his
+packages : number of bugs by severity, list of available versions in each
+distributon, testing status and much more including links to any other
+useful information.
+ <p>
+It is a very good idea to take a look at this table regularly so that
+you don't forget any open bug and so that you don't forget which
+packages are under your responsibility.
+ <p>
+You will find everything here : <url id="&url-ddpo;">
+
<chapt id="pkgs">Managing Packages
<p>
<p>
The <tt>Distribution</tt> field, which originates from the first line of
the <file>debian/changelog</file> file, indicates which distribution the
-package is intended for.
- <p>
-There are three possible values for this field: `stable', `unstable',
-and `experimental'. Normally, packages are uploaded into
-<em>unstable</em>.
+package is intended for.
<p>
-You should avoid combining `stable' with others because of potential
-problems with library dependencies (for your package and for the package
-built by the build daemons for other architecture).
-See <ref id="upload-stable"> for more information on when and how to
-upload to <em>stable</em>.
+There are several possible values for this field: `stable', `unstable',
+`testing-proposed-updates' and `experimental'. Normally, packages are uploaded into
+<em>unstable</em>. Actually, there are two other possible distributions:
+`stable-security' and `testing-security'. However they are used by the
+security team; do not upload there without their agreement.
<p>
-It never makes sense to combine the <em>experimental</em> distribution
-with anything else.
-
-<!--
- <sect2 id="upload-frozen">Uploading to <em>frozen</em>
- <p>
-The Debian freeze is a crucial time for Debian. It is our chance to
-synchronize and stabilize our distribution as a whole. Therefore,
-care must be taken when uploading to <em>frozen</em>.
- <p>
-It is tempting to always try to get the newest release of software
-into the release. However, it's much more important that the system
-as a whole is stable and works as expected.
- <p>
-The watchword for uploading to <em>frozen</em> is <strong>no new
-code</strong>. This is a difficult thing to quantify, so here are
-some guidelines:
- <p>
-<list>
- <item>
-Fixes for bugs of severity <em>critical</em>, <em>grave</em>, or
-<em>serious</em> severity are always allowed for those packages that
-must exist in the final release
- <item>
-<em>critical</em>, <em>grave</em>, and <em>serious</em> bug fixes are
-allowed for non-necessary packages but only if they don't add any new
-features
- <item>
-important, normal and minor bug fixes are allowed (though discouraged)
-on all packages if and only if there are no new features
- <item>
-wishlist fixes are not allowed (they are, after all, not really bugs)
- <item>
-documentation bug fixes are allowed, since good documentation is
-important
- </list>
- <p>
-Experience has shown that there is statistically a 15% chance that
-every bug fix will introduce a new bug. The introduction and
-discovery of new bugs either delays release or weakens the final
-product. There is little correlation between the severity of the
-original bug fixed and the severity of the bug newly introduced by the
-fix.
-
- -->
+It is technically possible to upload a package into several distributions
+at the same time but it usually doesn't make sense to use that feature
+because the dependencies of the package may vary with the distribution.
+In particular, it never makes sense to combine the <em>experimental</em>
+distribution with anything else.
<sect3 id="upload-stable">Uploading to <em>stable</em>
<p>
Uploading to <em>stable</em> means that the package will be placed into the
-<file>proposed-updates</file> directory of the Debian archive for further
+<file>stable-proposed-updates</file> directory of the Debian archive for further
testing before it is actually included in <em>stable</em>.
<p>
Extra care should be taken when uploading to <em>stable</em>. Basically, a
those other packages uninstallable, is strongly discouraged.
<p>
The Release Team (which can be reached at &email-debian-release;) will
-regularly evaluate the uploads in <em>proposed-updates</em> and decide if
+regularly evaluate the uploads in <em>stable-proposed-updates</em> and decide if
your package can be included in <em>stable</em>. Please be clear (and
verbose, if necessary) in your changelog entries for uploads to
<em>stable</em>, because otherwise the package won't be considered for
inclusion.
-
+ <sect3 id="upload-t-p-u">Uploading to <em>testing-proposed-updates</em>
+ <p>
+The testing distribution is fed with packages from unstable according to the rules
+explained in <ref id="testing">. However, the release manager may stop the testing
+scripts when he wants to freeze the distribution. In that case, you may want to
+upload to <em>testing-proposed-udaptes</em> to provide fixed packages during the freeze.
+ <p>
+Keep in mind that packages uploaded there are not automatically processed, they
+have to go through the hands of the release manager. So you'd better have a good
+reason to upload there. In order to know what a good reason is in the
+release manager's eyes, you should read the instructions that he regularly
+gives on &email-debian-devel-announce;.
+ <p>
+You should not upload to <em>testing-proposed-updates</em> when you can update your
+packages through <em>unstable</em>. If you can't (for example because you have a
+newer development version in unstable), you may use it but it is recommended to ask
+the authorization of the release manager before.
<sect1 id="uploading">Uploading a package
slightly different rules than non-porters, due to their unique
circumstances (see <ref id="source-nmu-when-porter">).
<p>
-When a security bug is detected, a fixed package should be uploaded
-as soon as possible. In this case, the Debian security officers get in
-contact with the package maintainer to make sure a fixed package is
-uploaded within a reasonable time (less than 48 hours). If the package
-maintainer cannot provide a fixed package fast enough or if he/she
-cannot be reached in time, a security officer may upload a fixed
-package (i.e., do a source NMU).
+When a security bug is detected, the security team may do an NMU.
+Please refer to <ref id="bug-security"> for more information.
<p>
During the release cycle (see <ref id="sec-dists">), NMUs which fix
serious or higher severity bugs are encouraged and accepted. Even
for the problem. As with any source NMU, the guidelines found in <ref
id="nmu-guidelines"> need to be followed.
<p>
-Bug fixes to unstable by non-maintainers are also acceptable, but only
-as a last resort or with permission. The following protocol should
-be respected to do an NMU:
+Uploading bug fixes to unstable by non-maintainers should only be done
+by following this protocol:
<p>
<list>
<item>
-Make sure that the package's bug is in the Debian Bug Tracking System
-(BTS). If not, submit a bug.
+Make sure that the package's bugs that the NMU is meant to address are all
+filed in the Debian Bug Tracking System (BTS).
+If they are not, submit them immediately.
<item>
Wait a few days the response from the maintainer. If you don't get
any response, you may want to help him by sending the patch that fixes
Follow what happens, you're responsible for any bug that you introduced
with your NMU. You should probably use <ref id="pkg-tracking-system"> (PTS)
to stay informed of the state of the package after your NMU.
- </list>
+</list>
+ <p>
+At times, the release manager or an organized group of developers can
+announce a certain period of time in which the NMU rules are relaxed.
+This usually involves shortening the period during which one is to wait
+before uploading the fixes, and shortening the DELAYED period. It is
+important to notice that even in these so-called "bug squashing party"
+times, the NMUer has to file bugs and contact the developer first,
+and act later.
<sect1 id="nmu-guidelines">How to do a source NMU
<p>
against <tt>ftp.debian.org</tt> asking to remove the package with the
obsolete name. Do not forget to properly reassign the package's bugs
at the same time.
+ <p>
+At other times, you may make a mistake in constructing your package, and
+wish to replace it. The only way to do this is to increase the version
+number, and upload a new version. The old version will be expired in
+the usual manner. Note that this applies to each part of your package,
+including the sources: if you wish to replace the upstream source tarball
+of your package, you will need to upload it with a different version. An
+easy possibility is to replace <file>foo_1.00.orig.tar.gz</file> with
+<file>foo_1.00+0.orig.tar.gz</file>. This restriction gives each file
+on the ftp site a unique name, which helps to ensure consistency across the
+mirror network.
<sect1 id="orphaning">Orphaning a package
<p>
If this situation is unacceptable, you (or the submitter) may want to
require a decision of the technical committee by reassigning the bug
to <package>tech-ctte</package> (you may use the clone command of
-the BTS if you wish to keep it reported against your package).
-<!-- FIXME: Follow the procedure described at
- tech-ctte-url (there's no such url yet). -->
+the BTS if you wish to keep it reported against your package). Before
+doing so, please read the <url id="&url-tech-ctte;" name="recommended procedure">.
<item>
If the bug is real but it's caused by another package, just reassign
the bug the right package. If you don't know which package it should
/etc/modutils/ for module configuration.
-->
+ <sect1 id="bpp-autotools">Packages using autoconf/automake
+ <p>
+Some very good packaging practices for packages using autoconf and/or
+automake have been synthetized in &file-bpp-autotools;. You're strongly
+encouraged to read this file and to follow the given recommandations.
+
+
<sect1 id="bpp-libraries">Libraries
<p>
Libraries are always difficult to package for various reasons. The policy
mistakes. Ensure that you spell check it.
<prgn>ispell</prgn> has a special option (<tt>-g</tt>) for that:
<example>ispell -d american -g debian/control</example>.
-
+If you want someone to proofread the description that you
+intend to use you may ask on &email-debian-l10n-english;.
~ianmdlvl / developers-reference.git / blobdiff