From 97f8e71c422c4951a94d4f10bfe2c0a3b026e078 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lucas Nussbaum Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:34:31 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Mention rationale for including the description in ITPs. Closes: #494332 --- debian/changelog | 2 ++ pkgs.dbk | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 45b1a47..b59cd24 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ developers-reference (3.4.14) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium * Drop section on debsums as this functionality is now integrated in dpkg. Closes: #750990 * Mention other types of checksums besides MD5. Closes: #750994 + * Mention rationale for including the description in ITPs. Closes: + #494332 -- Paul Wise Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:43:04 -0700 diff --git a/pkgs.dbk b/pkgs.dbk index ba53ef0..5a34b95 100644 --- a/pkgs.dbk +++ b/pkgs.dbk @@ -23,8 +23,9 @@ pages for more information. Assuming no one else is already working on your prospective package, you must then submit a bug report () against the pseudo-package wnpp describing your -plan to create a new package, including, but not limiting yourself to, a -description of the package, the license of the prospective package, and the +plan to create a new package, including, but not limiting yourself to, the +description of the package (so that others can review it), +the license of the prospective package, and the current URL where it can be downloaded from. -- 2.30.2