From: stevenj <stevenj@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 21:25:43 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: tweak
X-Git-Url: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ianmdlvl/git?a=commitdiff_plain;h=34b855b078f316b3c23a2483c0d45401cfe10a96;p=nlopt.git

tweak

darcs-hash:20070905212543-c8de0-a6f8bacf2db3c0b3ae79cd0f06ad946f2afdb898.gz
---

diff --git a/util/sobolseq.c b/util/sobolseq.c
index 12c3d5d..7698d03 100644
--- a/util/sobolseq.c
+++ b/util/sobolseq.c
@@ -27,13 +27,14 @@
    as modified by:
         S. Joe and F. Y. Kuo, ACM Trans. Math. Soft 29 (1), 49-57 (2003).
 
-   Note that the code below was written without even looking at the Fortran
-   code, which is only semi-free (being under the restrictive ACM copyright
-   terms).  Then I went to the Fortran code and took out the table of
-   primitive polynomials and starting direction #'s ... since this is just
-   a table of numbers generated by a deterministic algorithm, it is not
-   copyrightable.  (Obviously, the format of these tables necessitated
-   some slight modifications to the code.)
+   Note that the code below was written without even looking at the
+   Fortran code from the TOMS paper, which is only semi-free (being
+   under the restrictive ACM copyright terms).  Then I went to the
+   Fortran code and took out the table of primitive polynomials and
+   starting direction #'s ... since this is just a table of numbers
+   generated by a deterministic algorithm, it is not copyrightable.
+   (Obviously, the format of these tables then necessitated some
+   slight modifications to the code.)
 
    For the test integral of Joe and Kuo (see the main() program
    below), I get exactly the same results for integrals up to 1111