NMUs: Remove the mention of DELAYED in the first bullet point; this is dealt with...

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 13cbc8b8a24e5b2423fc2cfdd7686c81766bb37d..840f8a4a67642cef798df5d44310a8233727fc04 100644 (file)
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ developers-reference (3.4.14~~iwj) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
     into a separate bullet point to make them clearer.
   * Mention README.source prominently in the context of NMUs, and say not
     to go against the wishes of the maintainer.
+  * NMUs: Remove the mention of DELAYED in the first bullet point; this is
+    dealt with better and at greater length later on.
 
  --
 

diff --git a/pkgs.dbk b/pkgs.dbk
index d2f052216e20fd55114f311b325b9791818df9f3..197f4b03e1029030c2c43a4d23a9ecf175c35fe3 100644 (file)
--- a/pkgs.dbk
+++ b/pkgs.dbk
@@ -1981,11 +1981,6 @@ pay attention to the maintainer's opinions, as expressed in bug
 reports etc. and particularly in
 <literal>debian/README.source</literal>.  Do not NMU against the
 wishes of the maintainer.
-As there might
-be disagreement on the notion of whether the maintainer actually needs
-help on not, the DELAYED queue exists to give time to the maintainer to
-react and has the beneficial side-effect of allowing for independent
-reviews of the NMU diff.
 </para>
 </listitem>
 <listitem>