X-Git-Url: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ianmdlvl/git?a=blobdiff_plain;f=pkgs.dbk;h=8f1f36b9cd1928e497af1ffbc5e1afcd372d2d29;hb=e81cdebedab690ef881d87af6f533e51c026565c;hp=05ebf11c3233ea14a1397939c17b4138226f4216;hpb=e2916421637d1f6fc5e240a46ba9338a1340d7f2;p=developers-reference.git diff --git a/pkgs.dbk b/pkgs.dbk index 05ebf11..8f1f36b 100644 --- a/pkgs.dbk +++ b/pkgs.dbk @@ -28,14 +28,18 @@ description of the package, the license of the prospective package, and the current URL where it can be downloaded from. -You should set the subject of the bug to ``ITP: foo --- short description'', substituting the name of the -new package for foo. The severity of the bug report -must be set to wishlist. If you feel it's necessary, send -a copy to &email-debian-devel; by putting the address in the -X-Debbugs-CC: header of the message (no, don't use -CC:, because that way the message's subject won't indicate -the bug number). +You should set the subject of the bug to ITP: +foo -- short +description, substituting the name of the new +package for foo. +The severity of the bug report must be set to wishlist. +Please send a copy to &email-debian-devel; by using the X-Debbugs-CC +header (don't use CC:, because that way the message's subject won't +indicate the bug number). If you are packaging so many new packages (>10) +that notifying the mailing list in seperate messages is too disruptive, +do send a summary after filing the bugs to the debian-devel list instead. +This will inform the other developers about upcoming packages and will +allow a review of your description and package name. Please include a Closes: @@ -735,9 +739,9 @@ several developers working on the same package. -Once a corrected package is available in the unstable -distribution, you can close the bug. This can be done automatically, read - . +Once a corrected package is available in the archive, the bug should be +closed indicating the version in which it was fixed. This can be done +automatically, read . @@ -1339,14 +1343,20 @@ occur too often anyway.
Replacing or renaming packages -When you make a mistake naming your package, you should follow a two-step -process to rename it. First, set your debian/control file -to replace and conflict with the obsolete name of the package (see the Debian Policy Manual for -details). Once you've uploaded the package and the package has moved into the -archive, file a bug against ftp.debian.org asking to remove -the package with the obsolete name. Do not forget to properly reassign the -package's bugs at the same time. +When the upstream maintainers for one of your packages chose to +rename their software (or you made a mistake naming your package), +you should follow a two-step process to rename it. In the first +step, change the debian/control file to +reflect the new name and to replace, provide and conflict with the +obsolete package name (see the +Debian Policy Manual for details). Please note that you +should only add a Provides relation if all +packages depending on the obsolete package name continue to work +after the renaming. Once you've uploaded the package and the package +has moved into the archive, file a bug against +ftp.debian.org asking to remove the package with the +obsolete name (see ). Do not forget +to properly reassign the package's bugs at the same time. At other times, you may make a mistake in constructing your package and wish to @@ -2275,7 +2285,7 @@ available in unstable, but not affecting the version in It must be available on all architectures on which it has previously been built -in unstable. may be of interest +in unstable. may be of interest to check that information;