- * move to 3-level version number -- still not sure why I shouldn't just
- go with a 2-level scheme, that needs more thought. For now,
- top-level version number probably won't change for a while, the
- second-level number means significant content changes, and the
- third-level change means corrections and minor improvements.
+ * Sec. "Maintainer changes": renamed to "Adopting a package" and moved
+ to Chapter "Moving, Removing, Renaming, Adopting, and Orphaning
+ Packages".
+ * Ch. "Non-Maintainer Uploads (NMUs) and Porters": new chapter
+ discussing NMUs and porters; Section "Interim Releases" integrated out
+ of existance
+ * of course the obligatory typo, grammar, and spelling corrections
+
+ -- Adam P. Harris <aph@debian.org> Sun, 15 Nov 1998 15:08:22 -0500
+
+developers-reference (2.5.0) frozen unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * move to 3-level version number:
+ top-level version number probably won't change for a whil, it is the
+ "major", the second-level number means significant content changes,
+ and the third-level change means corrections and minor improvements.
+ Since this version has significant content changes, we are now 2.5.0.
+ Since I'm going to put porter instructions in the next major rev, that
+ will be 2.6.0...