In later versions of this specification standard service names and interfaces for common services such as mail delivery and WWW CGI -scripts will be specified.
+scripts will be specified. +
-userv-using applications and system services which hide -userv behind wrapper scripts may need to store information in +
+userv-using applications and system services which hide
+userv behind wrapper scripts may need to store information in
the user's filespace to preserve the correct placement of the security
perimiters. Such applications should usually do so in a directory
-(created by them) ~/.userv/.servdata/service, where
-service is the service name or application in question.
+(created by them) ~/.userv/.servdata/service, where +service is the service name or application in question. +
-The use of a dot-directory inside~/.userv will hopefully avoid
++The use of a dot-directory inside ~/.userv will hopefully avoid the user becoming confused by finding parts of a semi-privileged application's internal state in their filespace, and or discourage them from fiddling with and thus corrupting it. (Note that such applications should of course not rely for their global integrity on the integrity of the data on the user's side of the security boundary.) +
+Currently most Unix systems have many components which need to run as root, even though most of their activity does not strictly require it. This gives rise to a large and complex body of code which must be -trusted with the security of the system.
+trusted with the security of the system. +
-Using userv many of these subsystems no longer need any unusual -privilege.+
+Using userv many of these subsystems no longer need any unusual
+privilege.
+
+cron and at, lpr and the system's mail transfer
+agent (sendmail, smail, exim or the like) all
fall into this category.
+
userv-using facilities
+
There is a danger that people reimplementing the facilities I mention
-above using userv will discard much of the security benefit by
+above using userv will discard much of the security benefit by
using a naive implementation technique. This will become clearer with
-an example:
+an example: +
-Consider the lpr program. In current systems this needs to +
+Consider the lpr program. In current systems this needs to
have an absolutely privileged component in order to support delayed
printing without copying: when the user queues a file to be printed
the filename is stored in the print queue, rather than a copy of it,
and the printer daemon accesses the file directly when it is ready to
print the job. In order that the user can print files which are not
world-readable the daemon is given root privilege so that it can open
-the file in the context of the user, rather than its own.
- -A simple-minded approach to converting this scheme to use userv -might involve giving the printer daemon (the lp user) the -ability to read the file by allowing them to run cat (or a -special-purpose file-reading program) as any user. The lpr -program would use a userv service to store the filename in the +the file in the context of the user, rather than its own. +
+ +
+A simple-minded approach to converting this scheme to use userv
+might involve giving the printer daemon (the lp user) the
+ability to read the file by allowing them to run cat (or a
+special-purpose file-reading program) as any user. The lpr
+program would use a userv service to store the filename in the
printer daemon's queues, and the daemon would read the file later when
-it felt like it.
+it felt like it. +
+However, this would allow the printer daemon to read any file on the system, whether or not someone had asked for it to be printed. Since many files will contain passwords and other security-critical information this is nearly as bad as giving the daemon root access in the first place. Any security holes in the print server which allow a -user to execute commands as the lp user will give the user the -ability to read any file on the system.
+user to execute commands as the lp user will give the user the
+ability to read any file on the system.
+
Instead, it is necessary to keep a record of which files the daemon
has been asked to print outside the control of the print daemon.
This record could be kept by a new root-privileged component, but this
is not necessary: the record of which files a user has asked to be
printed can be kept under the control of the user in question. The
-submission program lpr will make a record in an area under the
+submission program lpr will make a record in an area under the
user's control before communicating with the print server, and the
print server would be given the ability to run a special file-reading
program which would only allow files to be read which were listed in
-the user's file of things they'd asked to print.
+the user's file of things they'd asked to print. +
+Now security holes in most of the printing system do not critically affect the security of the entire system: they only allow the attacker to read and interfere with print jobs. Bugs in the programs run by the print server to read users' files (and to remove entries from the list of files when it has done with them) will still be serious, but this -program can be quite simple.
+program can be quite simple. +
-Similar considerations apply to many userv-based versions of -facilities which currently run as root.+
+Similar considerations apply to many userv-based versions of
+facilities which currently run as root.
+
It is debatable whether the user-controlled state should be kept in the user's filespace (in dotfiles, say) or kept in a separate area set aside for the purpose; however, using the user's home directory (and @@ -108,43 +158,68 @@ probably creating a separate subdirectory of it as a dotfile to contain many subsystems' state) has fewer implications for the rest of the system and makes it entirely clear where the security boundaries lie. +
+userv is not a replacement for really and sudo
+
+userv is not intended as a general-purpose system
administration tool with which system administrators can execute
privileged programs when they need to. It is unsuitable for this
purpose precisely because it enforces a strong separation between the
-calling and the called program, which is undesirable in this context.
+calling and the called program, which is undesirable in this context. +
+
Its facilities for restricting activities to running certain programs
may at first glance seem to provide similar functionality to
-sudo[2]. However, the
+sudo[2]. However, the
separation mentioned above is a problem here too, particular for
-interaction - it can be hard for a userv service program to
+interaction - it can be hard for a userv service program to
interact with its real caller or the user in question.
+
+Do not specify general purpose programs like mv or cat
+in execute- directives without careful thought about their
+arguments, and certainly not if no-suppress-args is specified.
If you do so it will give the caller much more privilige than you
-probably intend.
+probably intend. +
+
It is a shame that I have to say this here, but inexperienced
administrators have made similar mistakes with programs like
-sudo.
+sudo.
+