From b4f01595e836a2666c22afe3342d1a2fdbdbe06a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Jackson Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:05:24 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] merge tip contentss: clarify arbitrariness of D --- article.tex | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/article.tex b/article.tex index 0f1a24b..faf4152 100644 --- a/article.tex +++ b/article.tex @@ -656,7 +656,8 @@ then by Tip Merge $M = \baseof{L}$ so by Base Acyclic and definition of $\nothaspatch$, $M \nothaspatch \p$. So by Coherence/Inclusion $C \haspatch \p$ (whether $R \haspatch \p$ or $\nothaspatch$). -We will consider some $D$ and prove the Exclusive Tip Contents form. +We will consider an arbitrary commit $D$ +and prove the Exclusive Tip Contents form. \subsubsection{For $D \in \py$:} $C \haspatch \p$ so by definition of $\haspatch$, $D \isin C \equiv D -- 2.30.2