From ab5ce6ebd6f3fa445d336f659a6861205ef2564c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Jackson
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:45:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] commentary about exhaustiveness
---
notation.tex | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/notation.tex b/notation.tex
index 352781a..413305f 100644
--- a/notation.tex
+++ b/notation.tex
@@ -61,8 +61,10 @@ $\displaystyle \bigforall_{D \in \py} D \isin C \equiv D \le C $.
$\displaystyle C \zhaspatch \p \land \exists_{F \in \py} F \le C $.
~ Informally, $C$ nontrivially has all the reachable contents of $\p$.
-Note that $\zhaspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are not mutually exclusive.
-$\haspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are.
+Note that $\zhaspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are neither
+mutually exclusive nor exhaustive.
+$\haspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are mutually exclusive but not
+necessarily exhaustive.
Commits on Non-Topbloke branches are $\nothaspatch \p$ for all $\p$. This
includes commits on plain git branches made by applying a Topbloke
--
2.1.4