From ab5ce6ebd6f3fa445d336f659a6861205ef2564c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Jackson Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:45:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] commentary about exhaustiveness --- notation.tex | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/notation.tex b/notation.tex index 352781a..413305f 100644 --- a/notation.tex +++ b/notation.tex @@ -61,8 +61,10 @@ $\displaystyle \bigforall_{D \in \py} D \isin C \equiv D \le C $. $\displaystyle C \zhaspatch \p \land \exists_{F \in \py} F \le C $. ~ Informally, $C$ nontrivially has all the reachable contents of $\p$. -Note that $\zhaspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are not mutually exclusive. -$\haspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are. +Note that $\zhaspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are neither +mutually exclusive nor exhaustive. +$\haspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are mutually exclusive but not +necessarily exhaustive. Commits on Non-Topbloke branches are $\nothaspatch \p$ for all $\p$. This includes commits on plain git branches made by applying a Topbloke -- 2.30.2