From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:45:06 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: commentary about exhaustiveness
X-Git-Tag: f0.3~11
X-Git-Url: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ian/git?p=topbloke-formulae.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=ab5ce6ebd6f3fa445d336f659a6861205ef2564c

commentary about exhaustiveness
---

diff --git a/notation.tex b/notation.tex
index 352781a..413305f 100644
--- a/notation.tex
+++ b/notation.tex
@@ -61,8 +61,10 @@ $\displaystyle \bigforall_{D \in \py} D \isin C \equiv D \le C $.
 $\displaystyle C \zhaspatch \p \land \exists_{F \in \py} F \le C $.
 ~ Informally, $C$ nontrivially has all the reachable contents of $\p$.
 
-Note that $\zhaspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are not mutually exclusive.
-$\haspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are.
+Note that $\zhaspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are neither
+mutually exclusive nor exhaustive.
+$\haspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are mutually exclusive but not
+necessarily exhaustive.
 
 Commits on Non-Topbloke branches are $\nothaspatch \p$ for all $\p$.  This
 includes commits on plain git branches made by applying a Topbloke