commentary about exhaustiveness

diff --git a/notation.tex b/notation.tex
index 352781a8202a1799fad747d827a416fd5e3ed23f..413305fd86341add556b5d0eec37265e0dab4919 100644 (file)
--- a/notation.tex
+++ b/notation.tex
@@ -61,8 +61,10 @@ $\displaystyle \bigforall_{D \in \py} D \isin C \equiv D \le C $.
 $\displaystyle C \zhaspatch \p \land \exists_{F \in \py} F \le C $.
 ~ Informally, $C$ nontrivially has all the reachable contents of $\p$.
 
 $\displaystyle C \zhaspatch \p \land \exists_{F \in \py} F \le C $.
 ~ Informally, $C$ nontrivially has all the reachable contents of $\p$.
 

-Note that $\zhaspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are not mutually exclusive.
-$\haspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are.
+Note that $\zhaspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are neither
+mutually exclusive nor exhaustive.
+$\haspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$ are mutually exclusive but not
+necessarily exhaustive.

 
 Commits on Non-Topbloke branches are $\nothaspatch \p$ for all $\p$.  This
 includes commits on plain git branches made by applying a Topbloke
 
 Commits on Non-Topbloke branches are $\nothaspatch \p$ for all $\p$.  This
 includes commits on plain git branches made by applying a Topbloke