X-Git-Url: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ian/git?p=topbloke-formulae.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=strategy.tex;h=bfd392224d6e5c854573b4988f4314fd66d40530;hp=50efed7c8598cbf61a0e9b349b9dece2e3634267;hb=d29c556b0ebedf4081684216f426b83ee9f04573;hpb=d38e61b9455e0d0d4e9faadf5df29bb75a125331 diff --git a/strategy.tex b/strategy.tex index 50efed7..bfd3922 100644 --- a/strategy.tex +++ b/strategy.tex @@ -1,11 +1,27 @@ -\section{Strategy} - -When we are trying to do a merge of some kind, in general, -we want to merge some source commits $S_0 \ldots S_n$. -We'll write $S_0 = L$. We require that $L$ is the current git ref -for $\patchof{L}$. - -\subsection{Notation} +Here we describe the update algorithm. This is responsible for +refreshing patches against updated versions of their dependencies, +for merging different versions of the various braches created by +distributed development, and for implementing decisions to add and +remove dependencies from patches. + +Broadly speaking the update proceeds as follows: during the Ranking +phase we construct the intended graph of dependencies between patches +(and incidentally select a merge order for the base branch of each +patch). Then during the Traversal phase we walk that graph from the +bottom up, constructing for each patch by a series of merges and other +operations first a new base branch head commit and then a new tip +branch head commit. These new head commits are maximums - that is, +each has as ancestors all of its branches' sources and indeed all +relevant commits in that branch. + +We have two possible strategies for constructing new base branch +heads: we can either Merge (works incrementally even if there the +patch has multiple dependencies, but may sometimes not be possible) or +we can Regenerate (trivial if there is a single dependency, and is +always possible, but may involve the user re-resolving conflicts if +there are multiple dependencies). + +\section{Notation} \begin{basedescript}{ \desclabelwidth{5em} @@ -15,77 +31,81 @@ for $\patchof{L}$. The set of direct dependencies (in the form $\py$) requested in the commit $K$ ($K \in \pn$) for the patch $\p$. -\item[ $\pc \succ_1 \{ \p, \pq \ldots \}$ ] -The Topbloke commit set $\pc$ has as direct contributors -(see below) exactly $\p, \pq, \ldots$. This is an acyclic relation. +\item[ $\pc \hasdirdep \p$ ] +The patch $\pc$ has as a direct dependency the +patch $\p$. This is an acyclic relation. -\item[ $\p \succ \pq$ ] -The commit set $\p$ has as direct or indirect contributor the commit -set $\pq$. -This is an acyclic relation, and is the completion of $\succ_1$ into a +\item[ $\p \hasdep \pq$ ] +The patch $\p$ has as direct or indirect dependency the +patch $\pq$. +Acyclic; the completion of $\hasdirdep$ into a partial order. -\item[ $\set E_{\pc}$ ] -$ \bigcup_i \pendsof{S_i}{\pc} $. -All the ends of $\pc$ in the sources. - -\end{basedescript} - -\subsection{Planning phase} - -We use a recursive planning algorith, recursing over Topbloke commit -sets (ie, sets $\py$ or $\pn$). We'll call the commit set we're -processing at each step $\pc$. We start with $\pc = \pl$ -where $\pl = \patchof{L}$. - -At each recursive step -we intend to merge all $\set E_{\pc} = \{ E_{\pc,j \ldots} \}$ -and all the direct contributors of $\pc$ (as determined below) -into the existing git ref for $\pc$, to make $T_{\pc}$. -The direct contributors of $\pcn$ are the Topbloke commit sets -corresponding to the tip branches for the direct dependencies of -$\pc$. -The sole direct contributor of $\pcy$ is $\pcn$. - -\subsubsection{Planning step for $\pc = \pcn$.} - -Choose an (arbitrary, but ideally somehow optimal in -a way not discussed here) ordering of $\set E_{\pc}$, $E_j$ (for -$j = 1 \ldots m$). Remove from that set (and ordering) any $E_j$ which -are $\le$ and $\neq$ some other $E_k$. - -Initially let $T_{\pc,0}$ be the git ref for $\pcn$. And let -$\set D_0 = \depsreqof{T_{\pc,0}}$. -For each $E_j$ starting with $j=1$ choose a corresponding intended -merge base $M_j$ such that $M_j \le E_j \land M_j \le T_{\pc,j-1}$. -Calculate $\set D_j$ as the 3-way merge of the sets $\set D_{j-1}$ and -$\depsreqof{E_j}$ using as a base $\depsreqof{M_j}$. This will -generate $D_m$ as the putative direct contributors for $\pcn$. - -However, the invocation may specify that certain direct dependencies -are definitely to be included, or excluded. As a result the set -of actual direct contributors is some arbitrary set of patches. - +\item[ $\pendsof{\set J}{\p}$ ] +Convenience notation for +the $\le$-maximal elements of $\bigcup_{J \in \set J} \pendsof{J}{\p}$ +(where $\set J$ is some set of commits). +\item[ $\pendsof{\set X}{\p} \le T$ ] +Convenience notation for +$\bigforall_{E \in \pendsof{\set X}{\p}} E \le T$ +\item[ $\allsrcs$ ] +$\bigcup_{\p \in \allpatches} \set H^{\pn} \cup \set H^{\py}$. +All the input commits to the update algorithm. (See below.) +%\item[ $\set E_{\pc}$ ] +%$ \bigcup_i \pendsof{S_{\pc,i}}{\pc} $. +%All the ends of $\pc$ in the sources. +%\item[ $ \tipzc, \tipcc, \tipuc, \tipfc $ ] +%The git ref for the Topbloke commit set $\pc$: respectively, +%the original, current, updated, and final values. -Imagine that we will merge the direct +\end{basedescript} -with $M=M_j, L=T_{\pc,j-1}, R=E_j$, -and calculate what the resulting desired direct dependencies file -(ie, the set of patches $\set D_j$) -would be. Eventually we +\stdsection{Inputs to the update algorithm} -So, formally, we select somehow an order of sources $S_i$. For each +\begin{basedescript}{ +\desclabelwidth{5em} +\desclabelstyle{\nextlinelabel} +} +\item[ $\pc_0$ ] +The topmost patch which we are trying to update. This and +all of its dependencies will be updated. + +\item[ $h : \pc^{+/-} \mapsto \set H^{\pc^{+/-}}$ ] +Function for getting the existing heads $\set H$ of the branch $\pc^{+/-}$. +These are the heads which will be merged and used in this update. +This will include the current local and remote git refs, as desired. + +\item[ $g : \pc, \Gamma \mapsto \Gamma'$ ] +Function to allow explicit adjustment of the direct dependencies +of $\pc$. It is provided with a putative set of direct dependencies +$\Gamma$ computed as an appropriate merge of the dependencies requested by the +sources and should return the complete actual set $\Gamma'$ of direct +dependencies to use. This allows the specification of any desired +(acyclic) relations $\hasdirdep$ and $\hasdep$. +\end{basedescript} -Make use of the following recursive algorithm, Plan +\stdsection{Important variables and values in the update algorithm} +\begin{basedescript}{ +\desclabelwidth{5em} +\desclabelstyle{\nextlinelabel} +} +\item[ $\Gamma_{\pc}$ ] +The desired direct dependencies of $\pc$, a set of patches. +\item[ $\allpatches$ ] +The set of all the patches we are dealing with (constructed +during the update algorithm). +\item[ $\tipcn, \tipcy$ ] +The new tips of the git branches $\pcn$ and $\pcy$, containing +all the appropriate commits (and the appropriate other patches), +as generated by the Traversal phase of the update algorithm. - recursively make a plan to merge all $E = \pends$ +\end{basedescript} -Specifically, in