X-Git-Url: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ian/git?p=topbloke-formulae.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=merge.tex;h=b43d30fea899e45b07d47c1aae08d67eb2b7ee2a;hp=2403a49f85ad40bb07e0d502e2057b3fad0175c6;hb=2621bc3962d0f9a3d12b2318aeb3f425fe6a28c7;hpb=35c23b7d2f99196a118cf034c601b42dc31e8815 diff --git a/merge.tex b/merge.tex index 2403a49..b43d30f 100644 --- a/merge.tex +++ b/merge.tex @@ -10,8 +10,9 @@ Merge commits $L$ and $R$ using merge base $M$: \end{gather} We will occasionally use $X,Y$ s.t. $\{X,Y\} = \{L,R\}$. -This can also be used for dependency re-insertion, by setting -$L \in \pn$, $R \in \pry$, $M = \baseof{R}$. +This can also be used for dependency re-insertion, by setting $L \in +\pn$, $R \in \pry$, $M = \baseof{R}$, provided that the Conditions are +satisfied; in particular, provided that $L \ge \baseof{R}$. \subsection{Conditions} \[ \eqn{ Ingredients }{ @@ -46,24 +47,31 @@ $L \in \pn$, $R \in \pry$, $M = \baseof{R}$. \bigforall_{E \in \pendsof{X}{\py}} E \le Y \right] }\] +\[ \eqn{ Suitable Tips }{ + \bigforall_{\p \neq \patchof{L}, \; C \haspatch \p} + \bigexists_T + \pendsof{J}{\py} = \{ T \} + \land + \forall_{E \in \pendsof{K}{\py}} T \ge E + , \text{where} \{J,K\} = \{L,R\} +}\] \[ \eqn{ Foreign Merges }{ - \patchof{L} = \bot \implies \patchof{R} = \bot + \isforeign{L} \implies \isforeign{R} }\] \subsection{Non-Topbloke merges} -We require both $\patchof{L} = \bot$ and $\patchof{R} = \bot$ +We require both $\isforeign{L}$ and $\isforeign{R}$ (Foreign Merges, above). I.e. not only is it forbidden to merge into a Topbloke-controlled branch without Topbloke's assistance, it is also forbidden to merge any Topbloke-controlled branch into any plain git branch. Given those conditions, Tip Merge and Merge Acyclic do not apply. -By Foreign Contents of $L$, $\patchof{M} = \bot$ as well. +By Foreign Contents of $L$, $\isforeign{M}$ as well. So by Foreign Contents for any $A \in \{L,M,R\}$, $\forall_{\p, D \in \py} D \not\le A$ -so by No Replay for $A$, $D \not\isin A$. -Thus $\pendsof{A}{\py} = \{ \}$ and the RHS of both Merge Ends +so $\pendsof{A}{\py} = \{ \}$ and the RHS of both Merge Ends conditions are satisifed. So a plain git merge of non-Topbloke branches meets the conditions and @@ -112,20 +120,29 @@ $\qed$ \subsection{Coherence and Patch Inclusion} -Need to determine $C \haspatch \p$ based on $L,M,R \haspatch \p$. -This involves considering $D \in \py$. +$$ +\begin{cases} + L \nothaspatch \p \land R \nothaspatch \p : & C \nothaspatch \p \\ + L \haspatch \p \land R \haspatch \p : & C \haspatch \p \\ + \text{otherwise} \land M \haspatch \p : & C \nothaspatch \p \\ + \text{otherwise} \land M \nothaspatch \p : & C \haspatch \p +\end{cases} +$$ +\proofstarts +~ Consider $D \in \py$. \subsubsection{For $L \nothaspatch \p, R \nothaspatch \p$:} $D \not\isin L \land D \not\isin R$. $C \not\in \py$ (otherwise $L -\in \py$ ie $\neg[ L \nothaspatch \p ]$ by Tip Own Contents for $L$). +\in \py$ ie $L \haspatch \p$ by Tip Own Contents for $L$). So $D \neq C$. Applying $\merge$ gives $D \not\isin C$ i.e. $C \nothaspatch \p$. +OK. \subsubsection{For $L \haspatch \p, R \haspatch \p$:} $D \isin L \equiv D \le L$ and $D \isin R \equiv D \le R$. (Likewise $D \isin X \equiv D \le X$ and $D \isin Y \equiv D \le Y$.) -Consider $D = C$: $D \isin C$, $D \le C$, OK for $C \haspatch \p$. +Consider $D = C$: $D \isin C$, $D \le C$, OK for $C \zhaspatch \p$. For $D \neq C$: $D \le C \equiv D \le L \lor D \le R \equiv D \isin L \lor D \isin R$. @@ -133,40 +150,41 @@ For $D \neq C$: $D \le C \equiv D \le L \lor D \le R Consider $D \neq C, D \isin X \land D \isin Y$: By $\merge$, $D \isin C$. Also $D \le X$ -so $D \le C$. OK for $C \haspatch \p$. +so $D \le C$. OK for $C \zhaspatch \p$. Consider $D \neq C, D \not\isin X \land D \not\isin Y$: By $\merge$, $D \not\isin C$. And $D \not\le X \land D \not\le Y$ so $D \not\le C$. -OK for $C \haspatch \p$. +OK for $C \zhaspatch \p$. Remaining case, wlog, is $D \not\isin X \land D \isin Y$. $D \not\le X$ so $D \not\le M$ so $D \not\isin M$. Thus by $\merge$, $D \isin C$. And $D \le Y$ so $D \le C$. -OK for $C \haspatch \p$. +OK for $C \zhaspatch \p$. -So indeed $L \haspatch \p \land R \haspatch \p \implies C \haspatch \p$. +So, in all cases, $C \zhaspatch \p$. +And by $L \haspatch \p$, $\exists_{F \in \py} F \le L$ +and this $F \le C$ so indeed $C \haspatch \p$. \subsubsection{For (wlog) $X \not\haspatch \p, Y \haspatch \p$:} -$M \haspatch \p \implies C \nothaspatch \p$. -$M \nothaspatch \p \implies C \haspatch \p$. - -\proofstarts - One of the Merge Ends conditions applies. Recall that we are considering $D \in \py$. $D \isin Y \equiv D \le Y$. $D \not\isin X$. We will show for each of -various cases that $D \isin C \equiv M \nothaspatch \p \land D \le C$ -(which suffices by definition of $\haspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$). +various cases that +if $M \haspatch \p$, $D \not\isin C$, +whereas if $M \nothaspatch \p$, $D \isin C \equiv D \le C$. +And by $Y \haspatch \p$, $\exists_{F \in \py} F \le Y$ and this +$F \le C$ so this suffices. Consider $D = C$: Thus $C \in \py, L \in \py$. -By Tip Own Contents, $\neg[ L \nothaspatch \p ]$ so $L \neq X$, +By Tip Own Contents, $L \haspatch \p$ so $L \neq X$, therefore we must have $L=Y$, $R=X$. -By Tip Merge $M = \baseof{L}$ so $M \in \pn$ so +Conversely $R \not\in \py$ +so by Tip Merge $M = \baseof{L}$. Thus $M \in \pn$ so by Base Acyclic $M \nothaspatch \p$. By $\merge$, $D \isin C$, -and $D \le C$, consistent with $C \haspatch \p$. OK. +and $D \le C$. OK. Consider $D \neq C, M \nothaspatch \p, D \isin Y$: $D \le Y$ so $D \le C$. @@ -249,9 +267,20 @@ Therefore $D \isin C \equiv D \isin \baseof{C}$. OK. $\qed$ +\subsection{Unique Tips} + +For $L \in \py$, trivially $\pendsof{C}{\py} = C$ so $T = C$ is +suitable. + +For $L \not\in \py$, $\pancsof{C}{\py} = \pancsof{L}{\py} \cup +\pancsof{R}{\py}$. So $T$ from Suitable Tips is a suitable $T$ for +Unique Tips. + +$\qed$ + \subsection{Foreign Inclusion} -Consider some $D$ s.t. $\patchof{D} = \bot$. +Consider some $D \in \foreign$. By Foreign Inclusion of $L, M, R$: $D \isin L \equiv D \le L$; $D \isin M \equiv D \le M$; @@ -282,6 +311,6 @@ $\qed$ \subsection{Foreign Contents} -Only relevant if $\patchof{L} = \bot$, in which case -$\patchof{C} = \bot$ and by Foreign Merges $\patchof{R} = \bot$, +Only relevant if $\isforeign{L}$, in which case +$\isforeign{C}$ and by Foreign Merges $\isforeign{R}$, so Totally Foreign Contents applies. $\qed$