X-Git-Url: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ian/git?p=topbloke-formulae.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=article.tex;h=fac5c82efd6483ac6cc865cbd2db836f2d29d81e;hp=4c5f6751682c83a13e478fdb11d64496abd1bd22;hb=13285d550a2eceb866519b89d1ed3c4894f3db65;hpb=1059b2343f8b2979915db881a067cd3307cdead2 diff --git a/article.tex b/article.tex index 4c5f675..fac5c82 100644 --- a/article.tex +++ b/article.tex @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ \renewcommand{\ge}{\geqslant} \renewcommand{\le}{\leqslant} +\newcommand{\nge}{\ngeqslant} +\newcommand{\nle}{\nleqslant} \newcommand{\has}{\sqsupseteq} \newcommand{\isin}{\sqsubseteq} @@ -53,7 +55,8 @@ \newcommand{\pancsof}[2]{\pancs ( #1 , #2 ) } \newcommand{\pendsof}[2]{\pends ( #1 , #2 ) } -\newcommand{\merge}[4]{{\mathcal M}(#1,#2,#3,#4)} +\newcommand{\merge}{{\mathcal M}} +\newcommand{\mergeof}[4]{\merge(#1,#2,#3,#4)} %\newcommand{\merge}[4]{{#2 {{\frac{ #1 }{ #3 } #4}}}} \newcommand{\patch}{{\mathcal P}} @@ -78,7 +81,8 @@ \newcommand{\Largenexists}{\mathop{\hbox{\Large$\nexists$}}} \newcommand{\qed}{\square} -\newcommand{\proof}[1]{{\it Proof.} #1 $\qed$} +\newcommand{\proofstarts}{{\it Proof:}} +\newcommand{\proof}[1]{\proofstarts #1 $\qed$} \newcommand{\gathbegin}{\begin{gather} \tag*{}} \newcommand{\gathnext}{\\ \tag*{}} @@ -152,7 +156,7 @@ patch is applied to a non-Topbloke branch and then bubbles back to the Topbloke patch itself, we hope that git's merge algorithm will DTRT or that the user will no longer care about the Topbloke patch. -\item[ $\displaystyle \merge{C}{L}{M}{R} $ ] +\item[ $\displaystyle \mergeof{C}{L}{M}{R} $ ] The contents of a git merge result: $\displaystyle D \isin C \equiv @@ -259,15 +263,15 @@ XXX proof TBD. \subsection{No Replay for Merge Results} -If we are constructing $C$, given +If we are constructing $C$, with, \gathbegin - \merge{C}{L}{M}{R} + \mergeof{C}{L}{M}{R} \gathnext L \le C \gathnext R \le C \end{gather} -No Replay is preserved. {\it Proof:} +No Replay is preserved. \proofstarts \subsubsection{For $D=C$:} $D \isin C, D \le C$. OK. @@ -397,7 +401,7 @@ Used for removing a branch dependency. \gathnext \patchof{C} = \patchof{L} \gathnext - \merge{C}{L}{R^+}{R^-} + \mergeof{C}{L}{R^+}{R^-} \end{gather} \subsection{Conditions} @@ -408,10 +412,9 @@ Used for removing a branch dependency. \[ \eqn{ Currently Included }{ L \haspatch \pry }\] - -\subsection{Desired Contents} - -xxx need to prove $D \isin C \equiv D \not\in \pry \land D \isin L$. +\[ \eqn{ Not Self }{ + L \not\in \{ R^+ \} +}\] \subsection{No Replay} @@ -419,12 +422,48 @@ By Unique Tip, $R^+ \le L$. By definition of $\base$, $R^- \le R^+$ so $R^- \le L$. So $R^+ \le C$ and $R^- \le C$ and No Replay for Merge Results applies. $\qed$ +\subsection{Desired Contents} + +\[ D \isin C \equiv [ D \notin \pry \land D \isin L ] \lor D = C \] +\proofstarts + +\subsubsection{For $D = C$:} + +Trivially $D \isin C$. OK. + +\subsubsection{For $D \neq C, D \not\le L$:} + +By No Replay $D \not\isin L$. Also $D \not\le R^-$ hence +$D \not\isin R^-$. Thus $D \not\isin C$. OK. + +\subsubsection{For $D \neq C, D \le L, D \in \pry$:} + +By Currently Included, $D \isin L$. + +By Tip Self Inpatch, $D \isin R^+ \equiv D \le R^+$, but by +by Unique Tip, $D \le R^+ \equiv D \le L$. +So $D \isin R^+$. + +By Base Acyclic, $D \not\isin R^-$. + +Apply $\merge$: $D \not\isin C$. OK. + +\subsubsection{For $D \neq C, D \le L, D \notin \pry$:} + +By Tip Contents for $R^+$, $D \isin R^+ \equiv D \isin R^-$. + +Apply $\merge$: $D \isin C \equiv D \isin L$. OK. + +$\qed$ + \subsection{Unique Base} Need to consider only $C \in \py$, ie $L \in \py$. xxx tbd +xxx need to finish anticommit + \section{Merge} Merge commits $L$ and $R$ using merge base $M$ ($M < L, M < R$): @@ -433,8 +472,9 @@ Merge commits $L$ and $R$ using merge base $M$ ($M < L, M < R$): \gathnext \patchof{C} = \patchof{L} \gathnext - \merge{C}{L}{M}{R} + \mergeof{C}{L}{M}{R} \end{gather} +We will occasionally use $X,Y$ s.t. $\{X,Y\} = \{L,R\}$. \subsection{Conditions} @@ -448,6 +488,14 @@ Merge commits $L$ and $R$ using merge base $M$ ($M < L, M < R$): \text{otherwise} : & \false \end{cases} }\] +\[ \eqn{ Merge Ends }{ + X \not\haspatch \p \land + Y \haspatch \p + \implies \left[ + \bigforall_{E \in \pendsof{X}{\py}} + E \le Y + \right] +}\] \subsection{No Replay} @@ -487,4 +535,57 @@ That is, $\baseof{C} = R$. $\qed$ +\subsection{Coherence and patch inclusion} + +Need to determine $C \haspatch \p$ based on $L,M,R \haspatch \p$. +This involves considering $D \in \py$. + +\subsubsection{For $L \nothaspatch \p, R \nothaspatch \p$:} +$D \not\isin L \land D \not\isin R$. $C \not\in \py$ (otherwise $L +\in \py$ ie $L \haspatch \p$ by Tip Self Inpatch). So $D \neq C$. +Applying $\merge$ gives $D \not\isin C$ i.e. $C \nothaspatch \p$. + +\subsubsection{For $L \haspatch \p, R \haspatch \p$:} +$D \isin L \equiv D \le L$ and $D \isin R \equiv D \le R$. +(Likewise $D \isin X \equiv D \le X$ and $D \isin Y \equiv D \le Y$.) + +Consider $D = C$: $D \isin C$, $D \le C$, OK for $C \haspatch \p$. + +For $D \neq C$: $D \le C \equiv D \le L \lor D \le R + \equiv D \isin L \lor D \isin R$. +(Likewise $D \le C \equiv D \le X \lor D \le Y$.) + +Consider $D \neq C, D \isin X \land D \isin Y$: +By $\merge$, $D \isin C$. Also $D \le X$ +so $D \le C$. OK for $C \haspatch \p$. + +Consider $D \neq C, D \not\isin X \land D \not\isin Y$: +By $\merge$, $D \not\isin C$. +And $D \not\le X \land D \not\le Y$ so $D \not\le C$. +OK for $C \haspatch \p$. + +Remaining case, wlog, is $D \not\isin X \land D \isin Y$. +$D \not\le X$ so $D \not\le M$ so $D \not\isin M$. +Thus by $\merge$, $D \isin C$. And $D \le Y$ so $D \le C$. +OK for $C \haspatch \p$. + +So indeed $L \haspatch \p \land R \haspatch \p \implies C \haspatch \p$. + +\subsubsection{For (wlog) $X \not\haspatch \p, Y \haspatch \p$:} + +$C \haspatch \p \equiv M \nothaspatch \p$. + +\proofstarts + +Merge Ends applies. Recall that we are considering $D \in \py$. +$D \isin Y \equiv D \le Y$. $D \not\isin X$. +We will show for each of +various cases that $D \isin C \equiv M \nothaspatch \p \land D \le C$ +(which suffices by definition of $\haspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$). + +Consider $D = C$. Thus $C \in \py, L \in \py$, and by Tip +Self Inpatch $L \haspatch \p$, so $L=Y, R=X$. By Tip Merge, +$M=\baseof{L}$. So by Base Acyclic $D \not\isin M$, i.e. +$M \nothaspatch \p$. And indeed $D \isin C$ and $D \le C$. OK. + \end{document}