X-Git-Url: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ian/git?p=topbloke-formulae.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=article.tex;h=cbd56840b63d5579073f30786bcac5ed76fa1773;hp=a0adacbdee9b8d02bb1f2421f8158b1a43b505b2;hb=d5e22c8cccab5fb2ed73e3944e022edae9429082;hpb=d3266383df1c90e7ff2f28acd9ebbd217ffc6d55 diff --git a/article.tex b/article.tex index a0adacb..cbd5684 100644 --- a/article.tex +++ b/article.tex @@ -488,6 +488,21 @@ We will occasionally use $X,Y$ s.t. $\{X,Y\} = \{L,R\}$. \text{otherwise} : & \false \end{cases} }\] +\[ \eqn{ Removal Merge Ends }{ + X \not\haspatch \p \land + Y \haspatch \p \land + M \haspatch \p + \implies + \pendsof{Y}{\py} = \pendsof{M}{\py} +}\] +\[ \eqn{ Addition Merge Ends }{ + X \not\haspatch \p \land + Y \haspatch \p \land + M \nothaspatch \p + \implies \left[ + \bigforall_{E \in \pendsof{X}{\py}} E \le Y + \right] +}\] \subsection{No Replay} @@ -529,19 +544,19 @@ $\qed$ \subsection{Coherence and patch inclusion} -Need to determine $C \haspatch P$ based on $L,M,R \haspatch P$. +Need to determine $C \haspatch \p$ based on $L,M,R \haspatch \p$. This involves considering $D \in \py$. -\subsubsection{For $L \nothaspatch P, R \nothaspatch P$:} +\subsubsection{For $L \nothaspatch \p, R \nothaspatch \p$:} $D \not\isin L \land D \not\isin R$. $C \not\in \py$ (otherwise $L -\in \py$ ie $L \haspatch P$ by Tip Self Inpatch). So $D \neq C$. -Applying $\merge$ gives $D \not\isin C$ i.e. $C \nothaspatch P$. +\in \py$ ie $L \haspatch \p$ by Tip Self Inpatch). So $D \neq C$. +Applying $\merge$ gives $D \not\isin C$ i.e. $C \nothaspatch \p$. -\subsubsection{For $L \haspatch P, R \haspatch P$:} +\subsubsection{For $L \haspatch \p, R \haspatch \p$:} $D \isin L \equiv D \le L$ and $D \isin R \equiv D \le R$. (Likewise $D \isin X \equiv D \le X$ and $D \isin Y \equiv D \le Y$.) -Consider $D = C$: $D \isin C$, $D \le C$, OK for $C \haspatch P$. +Consider $D = C$: $D \isin C$, $D \le C$, OK for $C \haspatch \p$. For $D \neq C$: $D \le C \equiv D \le L \lor D \le R \equiv D \isin L \lor D \isin R$. @@ -549,18 +564,56 @@ For $D \neq C$: $D \le C \equiv D \le L \lor D \le R Consider $D \neq C, D \isin X \land D \isin Y$: By $\merge$, $D \isin C$. Also $D \le X$ -so $D \le C$. OK for $C \haspatch P$. +so $D \le C$. OK for $C \haspatch \p$. Consider $D \neq C, D \not\isin X \land D \not\isin Y$: By $\merge$, $D \not\isin C$. And $D \not\le X \land D \not\le Y$ so $D \not\le C$. -OK for $C \haspatch P$. +OK for $C \haspatch \p$. Remaining case, wlog, is $D \not\isin X \land D \isin Y$. $D \not\le X$ so $D \not\le M$ so $D \not\isin M$. Thus by $\merge$, $D \isin C$. And $D \le Y$ so $D \le C$. -OK for $C \haspatch P$. +OK for $C \haspatch \p$. + +So indeed $L \haspatch \p \land R \haspatch \p \implies C \haspatch \p$. + +\subsubsection{For (wlog) $X \not\haspatch \p, Y \haspatch \p$:} + +$C \haspatch \p \equiv M \nothaspatch \p$. + +\proofstarts -So indeed $L \haspatch P \land R \haspatch P \implies C \haspatch P$. +One of the Merge Ends conditions applies. +Recall that we are considering $D \in \py$. +$D \isin Y \equiv D \le Y$. $D \not\isin X$. +We will show for each of +various cases that $D \isin C \equiv M \nothaspatch \p \land D \le C$ +(which suffices by definition of $\haspatch$ and $\nothaspatch$). + +Consider $D = C$: Thus $C \in \py, L \in \py$, and by Tip +Self Inpatch $L \haspatch \p$, so $L=Y, R=X$. By Tip Merge, +$M=\baseof{L}$. So by Base Acyclic $D \not\isin M$, i.e. +$M \nothaspatch \p$. And indeed $D \isin C$ and $D \le C$. OK. + +Consider $D \neq C, M \nothaspatch P, D \isin Y$: +$D \le Y$ so $D \le C$. +$D \not\isin M$ so by $\merge$, $D \isin C$. OK. + +Consider $D \neq C, M \nothaspatch P, D \not\isin Y$: +$D \not\le Y$. If $D \le X$ then +$D \in \pancsof{X}{\py}$, so by Addition Merge Ends and +Transitive Ancestors $D \le Y$ --- a contradiction, so $D \not\le X$. +Thus $D \not\le C$. By $\merge$, $D \not\isin C$. OK. + +Consider $D \neq C, M \haspatch P, D \isin Y$: +$D \le Y$ so $D \in \pancsof{Y}{\py}$ so by Removal Merge Ends +and Transitive Ancestors $D \in \pancsof{M}{\py}$ so $D \le M$. +Thus $D \isin M$. By $\merge$, $D \not\isin C$. OK. + +Consider $D \neq C, M \haspatch P, D \not\isin Y$: +By $\merge$, $D \not\isin C$. OK. + +$\qed$ \end{document}