X-Git-Url: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ian/git?p=topbloke-formulae.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=article.tex;h=01297a8fb0681c79d7ffc1933fe941f02f77adb5;hp=b2f943b04c0b051059c70ab61d44a8cb8535d276;hb=e02ac317b82e521bccdbfadda3ff9c11d6a1533d;hpb=4bdffaf2a0fe8fdd585221aa2e43171028deca7b diff --git a/article.tex b/article.tex index b2f943b..01297a8 100644 --- a/article.tex +++ b/article.tex @@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ \newcommand{\patchof}[1]{\patch ( #1 ) } \newcommand{\baseof}[1]{\base ( #1 ) } +\newcommand{\eqntag}[2]{ #2 \tag*{\mbox{#1}} } \newcommand{\eqn}[2]{ #2 \tag*{\mbox{\bf #1}} } -\newcommand{\corrolary}[1]{ #1 \tag*{\mbox{\it Corrolary.}} } %\newcommand{\bigforall}{\mathop{\hbox{\huge$\forall$}}} \newcommand{\bigforall}{% @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ Ie, the two limbs of the RHS of Tip Contents are mutually exclusive. Let $B = \baseof{C}$ in $D \isin \baseof{C}$. Now $B \in \pn$. So by Base Acyclic $D \isin B \implies D \notin \py$. } -\[ \corrolary{ +\[ \eqntag{{\it Corollary - equivalent to Tip Contents}}{ \bigforall_{C \in \py} D \isin C \equiv \begin{cases} D \in \py : & D \le C \\ @@ -488,13 +488,20 @@ We will occasionally use $X,Y$ s.t. $\{X,Y\} = \{L,R\}$. \text{otherwise} : & \false \end{cases} }\] -\[ \eqn{ Merge Ends }{ +\[ \eqn{ Removal Merge Ends }{ X \not\haspatch \p \land - Y \haspatch \p - \implies \left[ - \bigforall_{E \in \pendsof{X}{\py}} - E \le Y - \right] + Y \haspatch \p \land + M \haspatch \p + \implies + \pendsof{Y}{\py} = \pendsof{M}{\py} +}\] +\[ \eqn{ Addition Merge Ends }{ + X \not\haspatch \p \land + Y \haspatch \p \land + M \nothaspatch \p + \implies \left[ + \bigforall_{E \in \pendsof{X}{\py}} E \le Y + \right] }\] \subsection{No Replay} @@ -577,7 +584,8 @@ $C \haspatch \p \equiv M \nothaspatch \p$. \proofstarts -Merge Ends applies. Recall that we are considering $D \in \py$. +One of the Merge Ends conditions applies. +Recall that we are considering $D \in \py$. $D \isin Y \equiv D \le Y$. $D \not\isin X$. We will show for each of various cases that $D \isin C \equiv M \nothaspatch \p \land D \le C$ @@ -594,27 +602,18 @@ $D \not\isin M$ so by $\merge$, $D \isin C$. OK. Consider $D \neq C, M \nothaspatch P, D \not\isin Y$: $D \not\le Y$. If $D \le X$ then -$D \in \pancsof{X}{\py}$, so by Merge Ends and +$D \in \pancsof{X}{\py}$, so by Addition Merge Ends and Transitive Ancestors $D \le Y$ --- a contradiction, so $D \not\le X$. Thus $D \not\le C$. By $\merge$, $D \not\isin C$. OK. Consider $D \neq C, M \haspatch P, D \isin Y$: -$D \le Y$ so $D \le M$ - -%anyway D \not\isin X -% D \isin Y -% D \le Y - -%bad case -% D \not\le M -% D \not\isin M -% results -% D \isin C wrong - -%ok case -% D \le M -% D \isin M -% results -% D \not\isin C OK +$D \le Y$ so $D \in \pancsof{Y}{\py}$ so by Removal Merge Ends +and Transitive Ancestors $D \in \pancsof{M}{\py}$ so $D \le M$. +Thus $D \isin M$. By $\merge$, $D \not\isin C$. OK. + +Consider $D \neq C, M \haspatch P, D \not\isin Y$: +By $\merge$, $D \not\isin C$. OK. + +$\qed$ \end{document}