X-Git-Url: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ian/git?p=topbloke-formulae.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=article.tex;h=0018429e2a80618059f63b2189d3a4103d3b8994;hp=f712ba63fc0e7fdb37b78598eb1f192d357a634b;hb=f627166bfcc401287564e9bc7fdc94a72d2d5f1a;hpb=1511c5c4eb6b930fb76c06b88c4c5f57756e78eb diff --git a/article.tex b/article.tex index f712ba6..0018429 100644 --- a/article.tex +++ b/article.tex @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ \renewcommand{\ge}{\geqslant} \renewcommand{\le}{\leqslant} +\newcommand{\nge}{\ngeqslant} +\newcommand{\nle}{\nleqslant} \newcommand{\has}{\sqsupseteq} \newcommand{\isin}{\sqsubseteq} @@ -53,11 +55,15 @@ \newcommand{\pancsof}[2]{\pancs ( #1 , #2 ) } \newcommand{\pendsof}[2]{\pends ( #1 , #2 ) } -\newcommand{\merge}[4]{{\mathcal M}(#1,#2,#3,#4)} +\newcommand{\merge}{{\mathcal M}} +\newcommand{\mergeof}[4]{\merge(#1,#2,#3,#4)} %\newcommand{\merge}[4]{{#2 {{\frac{ #1 }{ #3 } #4}}}} -\newcommand{\patchof}[1]{{\mathcal P} ( #1 ) } -\newcommand{\baseof}[1]{{\mathcal B} ( #1 ) } +\newcommand{\patch}{{\mathcal P}} +\newcommand{\base}{{\mathcal B}} + +\newcommand{\patchof}[1]{\patch ( #1 ) } +\newcommand{\baseof}[1]{\base ( #1 ) } \newcommand{\eqn}[2]{ #2 \tag*{\mbox{\bf #1}} } \newcommand{\corrolary}[1]{ #1 \tag*{\mbox{\it Corrolary.}} } @@ -149,7 +155,7 @@ patch is applied to a non-Topbloke branch and then bubbles back to the Topbloke patch itself, we hope that git's merge algorithm will DTRT or that the user will no longer care about the Topbloke patch. -\item[ $\displaystyle \merge{C}{L}{M}{R} $ ] +\item[ $\displaystyle \mergeof{C}{L}{M}{R} $ ] The contents of a git merge result: $\displaystyle D \isin C \equiv @@ -245,15 +251,46 @@ by the LHS. And $A \le A''$. \[ \eqn{Calculation Of Ends:}{ \bigforall_{C \hasparents \set A} \pendsof{C}{\set P} = - \Bigl\{ E \Big| + \left\{ E \Big| \Bigl[ \Largeexists_{A \in \set A} E \in \pendsof{A}{\set P} \Bigr] \land \Bigl[ \Largenexists_{B \in \set A} E \neq B \land E \le B \Bigr] - \Bigr\} + \right\} }\] XXX proof TBD. +\subsection{No Replay for Merge Results} + +If we are constructing $C$, given +\gathbegin + \mergeof{C}{L}{M}{R} +\gathnext + L \le C +\gathnext + R \le C +\end{gather} +No Replay is preserved. {\it Proof:} + +\subsubsection{For $D=C$:} $D \isin C, D \le C$. OK. + +\subsubsection{For $D \isin L \land D \isin R$:} +$D \isin C$. And $D \isin L \implies D \le L \implies D \le C$. OK. + +\subsubsection{For $D \neq C \land D \not\isin L \land D \not\isin R$:} +$D \not\isin C$. OK. + +\subsubsection{For $D \neq C \land (D \isin L \equiv D \not\isin R) + \land D \not\isin M$:} +$D \isin C$. Also $D \isin L \lor D \isin R$ so $D \le L \lor D \le +R$ so $D \le C$. OK. + +\subsubsection{For $D \neq C \land (D \isin L \equiv D \not\isin R) + \land D \isin M$:} +$D \not\isin C$. OK. + +$\qed$ + \section{Commit annotation} We annotate each Topbloke commit $C$ with: @@ -355,7 +392,7 @@ $D \isin C \equiv D \isin A \equiv D \le A \equiv D \le C$. $\qed$ \section{Anticommit} Given $L, R^+, R^-$ where -$\patchof{R^+} = \pry, \patchof{R^-} = \prn$. +$R^+ \in \pry, R^- = \baseof{R^+}$. Construct $C$ which has $\pr$ removed. Used for removing a branch dependency. \gathbegin @@ -363,7 +400,7 @@ Used for removing a branch dependency. \gathnext \patchof{C} = \patchof{L} \gathnext - \merge{C}{L}{R^+}{R^-} + \mergeof{C}{L}{R^+}{R^-} \end{gather} \subsection{Conditions} @@ -371,16 +408,60 @@ Used for removing a branch dependency. \[ \eqn{ Unique Tip }{ \pendsof{L}{\pry} = \{ R^+ \} }\] -\[ \eqn{ Correct Base }{ - \baseof{R^+} = R^- -}\] \[ \eqn{ Currently Included }{ L \haspatch \pry }\] +\[ \eqn{ Not Self }{ + L \not\in \{ R^+ \} +}\] + +\subsection{No Replay} + +By Unique Tip, $R^+ \le L$. By definition of $\base$, $R^- \le R^+$ +so $R^- \le L$. So $R^+ \le C$ and $R^- \le C$ and No Replay for +Merge Results applies. $\qed$ + +\subsection{Desired Contents} + +\[ D \isin C \equiv [ D \notin \pry \land D \isin L ] \lor D = C \] +{\it Proof.} + +\subsubsection{For $D = C$:} + +Trivially $D \isin C$. OK. + +\subsubsection{For $D \neq C, D \not\le L$:} + +By No Replay $D \not\isin L$. Also $D \not\le R^-$ hence +$D \not\isin R^-$. Thus $D \not\isin C$. OK. + +\subsubsection{For $D \neq C, D \le L, D \in \pry$:} + +By Currently Included, $D \isin L$. + +By Tip Self Inpatch, $D \isin R^+ \equiv D \le R^+$, but by +by Unique Tip, $D \le R^+ \equiv D \le L$. +So $D \isin R^+$. + +By Base Acyclic, $D \not\isin R^-$. +Apply $\merge$: $D \not\isin C$. OK. +\subsubsection{For $D \neq C, D \le L, D \notin \pry$:} -xxx want to prove $D \isin C \equiv D \not\in \pry \land D \isin L$. +By Tip Contents for $R^+$, $D \isin R^+ \equiv D \isin R^-$. + +Apply $\merge$: $D \isin C \equiv D \isin L$. OK. + +$\qed$ + +\subsection{Unique Base} + +Need to consider only $C \in \py$, ie $L \in \py$. + +xxx tbd + +xxx need to finish anticommit \section{Merge} @@ -390,7 +471,7 @@ Merge commits $L$ and $R$ using merge base $M$ ($M < L, M < R$): \gathnext \patchof{C} = \patchof{L} \gathnext - \merge{C}{L}{M}{R} + \mergeof{C}{L}{M}{R} \end{gather} \subsection{Conditions} @@ -408,28 +489,7 @@ Merge commits $L$ and $R$ using merge base $M$ ($M < L, M < R$): \subsection{No Replay} -\subsubsection{For $D=C$:} $D \isin C, D \le C$. OK. - -\subsubsection{For $D \isin L \land D \isin R$:} -$D \isin C$. And $D \isin L \implies D \le L \implies D \le C$. OK. - -\subsubsection{For $D \neq C \land D \not\isin L \land D \not\isin R$:} -$D \not\isin C$. OK. - -\subsubsection{For $D \neq C \land D \not\isin L \land D \not\isin R$:} -$D \not\isin C$. OK. - -\subsubsection{For $D \neq C \land (D \isin L \equiv D \not\isin R) - \land D \not\isin M$:} -$D \isin C$. Also $D \isin L \lor D \isin R$ so $D \le L \lor D \le -R$ so $D \le C$. OK. - -\subsubsection{For $D \neq C \land (D \isin L \equiv D \not\isin R) - \land D \isin M$:} -$D \not\isin C$. Also $D \isin L \lor D \isin R$ so $D \le L \lor D \le -R$ so $D \le C$. OK. - -$\qed$ +See No Replay for Merge Results. \subsection{Unique Base} @@ -465,4 +525,42 @@ That is, $\baseof{C} = R$. $\qed$ +\subsection{Coherence and patch inclusion} + +Need to determine $C \haspatch P$ based on $L,M,R \haspatch P$. +This involves considering $D \in \py$. + +We will use $X,Y$ s.t. $\{X,Y\} = \{L,R\}$. + +\subsubsection{For $L \nothaspatch P, R \nothaspatch P$:} +$D \not\isin L \land D \not\isin R$. $C \not\in \py$ (otherwise $L +\in \py$ ie $L \haspatch P$ by Tip Self Inpatch). So $D \neq C$. +Applying $\merge$ gives $D \not\isin C$ i.e. $C \nothaspatch P$. + +\subsubsection{For $L \haspatch P, R \haspatch P$:} +$D \isin L \equiv D \le L$ and $D \isin R \equiv D \le R$. +(Likewise $D \isin X \equiv D \le X$ and $D \isin Y \equiv D \le Y$.) + +Consider $D = C$: $D \isin C$, $D \le C$, OK for $C \haspatch P$. + +For $D \neq C$: $D \le C \equiv D \le L \lor D \le R + \equiv D \isin L \lor D \isin R$. +(Likewise $D \le C \equiv D \le X \lor D \le Y$.) + +Consider $D \neq C, D \isin X \land D \isin Y$: +By $\merge$, $D \isin C$. Also $D \le X$ +so $D \le C$. OK for $C \haspatch P$. + +Consider $D \neq C, D \not\isin X \land D \not\isin Y$: +By $\merge$, $D \not\isin C$. +And $D \not\le X \land D \not\le Y$ so $D \not\le C$. +OK for $C \haspatch P$. + +Remaining case, wlog, is $D \not\isin X \land D \isin Y$. +$D \not\le X$ so $D \not\le M$ so $D \not\isin M$. +Thus by $\merge$, $D \isin C$. And $D \le Y$ so $D \le C$. +OK for $C \haspatch P$. + +So indeed $L \haspatch P \land R \haspatch P \implies C \haspatch P$. + \end{document}