\documentclass[a4paper,leqno]{strayman}
+\errorcontextlines=50
\let\numberwithin=\notdef
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{mathabx}
\renewcommand{\ge}{\geqslant}
\renewcommand{\le}{\leqslant}
+\newcommand{\nge}{\ngeqslant}
+\newcommand{\nle}{\nleqslant}
\newcommand{\has}{\sqsupseteq}
\newcommand{\isin}{\sqsubseteq}
\newcommand{\haspatch}{\sqSupset}
\newcommand{\patchisin}{\sqSubset}
-\newcommand{\set}[1]{\mathbb #1}
-\newcommand{\pa}[1]{\varmathbb #1}
+ \newif\ifhidehack\hidehackfalse
+ \DeclareRobustCommand\hidefromedef[2]{%
+ \hidehacktrue\ifhidehack#1\else#2\fi\hidehackfalse}
+ \newcommand{\pa}[1]{\hidefromedef{\varmathbb{#1}}{#1}}
+
+\newcommand{\set}[1]{\mathbb{#1}}
\newcommand{\pay}[1]{\pa{#1}^+}
\newcommand{\pan}[1]{\pa{#1}^-}
\newcommand{\py}{\pay{P}}
\newcommand{\pn}{\pan{P}}
+\newcommand{\pr}{\pa{R}}
+\newcommand{\pry}{\pay{R}}
+\newcommand{\prn}{\pan{R}}
+
%\newcommand{\hasparents}{\underaccent{1}{>}}
%\newcommand{\hasparents}{{%
% \declareslashed{}{_{_1}}{0}{-0.8}{>}\slashed{>}}}
\newcommand{\pancsof}[2]{\pancs ( #1 , #2 ) }
\newcommand{\pendsof}[2]{\pends ( #1 , #2 ) }
-\newcommand{\patchof}[1]{{\mathcal P} ( #1 ) }
-\newcommand{\baseof}[1]{{\mathcal B} ( #1 ) }
+\newcommand{\merge}{{\mathcal M}}
+\newcommand{\mergeof}[4]{\merge(#1,#2,#3,#4)}
+%\newcommand{\merge}[4]{{#2 {{\frac{ #1 }{ #3 } #4}}}}
+
+\newcommand{\patch}{{\mathcal P}}
+\newcommand{\base}{{\mathcal B}}
+
+\newcommand{\patchof}[1]{\patch ( #1 ) }
+\newcommand{\baseof}[1]{\base ( #1 ) }
\newcommand{\eqn}[2]{ #2 \tag*{\mbox{\bf #1}} }
\newcommand{\corrolary}[1]{ #1 \tag*{\mbox{\it Corrolary.}} }
\newcommand{\Largenexists}{\mathop{\hbox{\Large$\nexists$}}}
\newcommand{\qed}{\square}
-\newcommand{\proof}[1]{{\it Proof.} #1 $\qed$}
+\newcommand{\proofstarts}{{\it Proof:}}
+\newcommand{\proof}[1]{\proofstarts #1 $\qed$}
\newcommand{\gathbegin}{\begin{gather} \tag*{}}
\newcommand{\gathnext}{\\ \tag*{}}
the Topbloke patch itself, we hope that git's merge algorithm will
DTRT or that the user will no longer care about the Topbloke patch.
+\item[ $\displaystyle \mergeof{C}{L}{M}{R} $ ]
+The contents of a git merge result:
+
+$\displaystyle D \isin C \equiv
+ \begin{cases}
+ (D \isin L \land D \isin R) \lor D = C : & \true \\
+ (D \not\isin L \land D \not\isin R) \land D \neq C : & \false \\
+ \text{otherwise} : & D \not\isin M
+ \end{cases}
+$
+
\end{basedescript}
\newpage
\section{Invariants}
commits, this terminates with $A'' \in \pends()$, ie $A'' \le M$
by the LHS. And $A \le A''$.
}
+\[ \eqn{Calculation Of Ends:}{
+ \bigforall_{C \hasparents \set A}
+ \pendsof{C}{\set P} =
+ \left\{ E \Big|
+ \Bigl[ \Largeexists_{A \in \set A}
+ E \in \pendsof{A}{\set P} \Bigr] \land
+ \Bigl[ \Largenexists_{B \in \set A}
+ E \neq B \land E \le B \Bigr]
+ \right\}
+}\]
+XXX proof TBD.
+
+\subsection{No Replay for Merge Results}
+
+If we are constructing $C$, given
+\gathbegin
+ \mergeof{C}{L}{M}{R}
+\gathnext
+ L \le C
+\gathnext
+ R \le C
+\end{gather}
+No Replay is preserved. \proofstarts
+
+\subsubsection{For $D=C$:} $D \isin C, D \le C$. OK.
+
+\subsubsection{For $D \isin L \land D \isin R$:}
+$D \isin C$. And $D \isin L \implies D \le L \implies D \le C$. OK.
+
+\subsubsection{For $D \neq C \land D \not\isin L \land D \not\isin R$:}
+$D \not\isin C$. OK.
+
+\subsubsection{For $D \neq C \land (D \isin L \equiv D \not\isin R)
+ \land D \not\isin M$:}
+$D \isin C$. Also $D \isin L \lor D \isin R$ so $D \le L \lor D \le
+R$ so $D \le C$. OK.
+
+\subsubsection{For $D \neq C \land (D \isin L \equiv D \not\isin R)
+ \land D \isin M$:}
+$D \not\isin C$. OK.
+
+$\qed$
\section{Commit annotation}
If $D = C$, trivial. For $D \neq C$:
$D \isin C \equiv D \isin A \equiv D \le A \equiv D \le C$. $\qed$
+\section{Anticommit}
+
+Given $L, R^+, R^-$ where
+$R^+ \in \pry, R^- = \baseof{R^+}$.
+Construct $C$ which has $\pr$ removed.
+Used for removing a branch dependency.
+\gathbegin
+ C \hasparents \{ L \}
+\gathnext
+ \patchof{C} = \patchof{L}
+\gathnext
+ \mergeof{C}{L}{R^+}{R^-}
+\end{gather}
+
+\subsection{Conditions}
+
+\[ \eqn{ Unique Tip }{
+ \pendsof{L}{\pry} = \{ R^+ \}
+}\]
+\[ \eqn{ Currently Included }{
+ L \haspatch \pry
+}\]
+\[ \eqn{ Not Self }{
+ L \not\in \{ R^+ \}
+}\]
+
+\subsection{No Replay}
+
+By Unique Tip, $R^+ \le L$. By definition of $\base$, $R^- \le R^+$
+so $R^- \le L$. So $R^+ \le C$ and $R^- \le C$ and No Replay for
+Merge Results applies. $\qed$
+
+\subsection{Desired Contents}
+
+\[ D \isin C \equiv [ D \notin \pry \land D \isin L ] \lor D = C \]
+\proofstarts
+
+\subsubsection{For $D = C$:}
+
+Trivially $D \isin C$. OK.
+
+\subsubsection{For $D \neq C, D \not\le L$:}
+
+By No Replay $D \not\isin L$. Also $D \not\le R^-$ hence
+$D \not\isin R^-$. Thus $D \not\isin C$. OK.
+
+\subsubsection{For $D \neq C, D \le L, D \in \pry$:}
+
+By Currently Included, $D \isin L$.
+
+By Tip Self Inpatch, $D \isin R^+ \equiv D \le R^+$, but by
+by Unique Tip, $D \le R^+ \equiv D \le L$.
+So $D \isin R^+$.
+
+By Base Acyclic, $D \not\isin R^-$.
+
+Apply $\merge$: $D \not\isin C$. OK.
+
+\subsubsection{For $D \neq C, D \le L, D \notin \pry$:}
+
+By Tip Contents for $R^+$, $D \isin R^+ \equiv D \isin R^-$.
+
+Apply $\merge$: $D \isin C \equiv D \isin L$. OK.
+
+$\qed$
+
+\subsection{Unique Base}
+
+Need to consider only $C \in \py$, ie $L \in \py$.
+
+xxx tbd
+
+xxx need to finish anticommit
+
\section{Merge}
Merge commits $L$ and $R$ using merge base $M$ ($M < L, M < R$):
\gathnext
\patchof{C} = \patchof{L}
\gathnext
- D \isin C \equiv
- \begin{cases}
- (D \isin L \land D \isin R) \lor D = C : & \true \\
- (D \not\isin L \land D \not\isin R) \land D \neq C : & \false \\
- \text{otherwise} : & D \not\isin M
- \end{cases}
+ \mergeof{C}{L}{M}{R}
\end{gather}
\subsection{Conditions}
\subsection{No Replay}
-\subsubsection{For $D=C$:} $D \isin C, D \le C$. OK.
+See No Replay for Merge Results.
-\subsubsection{For $D \isin L \land D \isin R$:}
-$D \isin C$. And $D \isin L \implies D \le L \implies D \le C$. OK.
+\subsection{Unique Base}
-\subsubsection{For $D \neq C \land D \not\isin L \land D \not\isin R$:}
-$D \not\isin C$. OK.
+Need to consider only $C \in \py$, ie $L \in \py$,
+and calculate $\pendsof{C}{\pn}$. So we will consider some
+putative ancestor $A \in \pn$ and see whether $A \le C$.
-\subsubsection{For $D \neq C \land D \not\isin L \land D \not\isin R$:}
-$D \not\isin C$. OK.
+By Exact Ancestors for C, $A \le C \equiv A \le L \lor A \le R \lor A = C$.
+But $C \in py$ and $A \in \pn$ so $A \neq C$.
+Thus $A \le C \equiv A \le L \lor A \le R$.
-\subsubsection{For $D \neq C \land (D \isin L \equiv D \not\isin R)
- \land D \not\isin M$:}
-$D \isin C$. Also $D \isin L \lor D \isin R$ so $D \le L \lor D \le
-R$ so $D \le C$. OK.
+By Unique Base of L and Transitive Ancestors,
+$A \le L \equiv A \le \baseof{L}$.
-\subsubsection{For $D \neq C \land (D \isin L \equiv D \not\isin R)
- \land D \isin M$:}
-$D \not\isin C$. Also $D \isin L \lor D \isin R$ so $D \le L \lor D \le
-R$ so $D \le C$. OK.
+\subsubsection{For $R \in \py$:}
+
+By Unique Base of $R$ and Transitive Ancestors,
+$A \le R \equiv A \le \baseof{R}$.
+
+But by Tip Merge condition on $\baseof{R}$,
+$A \le \baseof{L} \implies A \le \baseof{R}$, so
+$A \le \baseof{R} \lor A \le \baseof{L} \equiv A \le \baseof{R}$.
+Thus $A \le C \equiv A \le \baseof{R}$.
+That is, $\baseof{C} = \baseof{R}$.
+
+\subsubsection{For $R \in \pn$:}
+
+By Tip Merge condition on $R$,
+$A \le \baseof{L} \implies A \le R$, so
+$A \le R \lor A \le \baseof{L} \equiv A \le R$.
+Thus $A \le C \equiv A \le R$.
+That is, $\baseof{C} = R$.
$\qed$
+\subsection{Coherence and patch inclusion}
+
+Need to determine $C \haspatch P$ based on $L,M,R \haspatch P$.
+This involves considering $D \in \py$.
+
+We will use $X,Y$ s.t. $\{X,Y\} = \{L,R\}$.
+
+\subsubsection{For $L \nothaspatch P, R \nothaspatch P$:}
+$D \not\isin L \land D \not\isin R$. $C \not\in \py$ (otherwise $L
+\in \py$ ie $L \haspatch P$ by Tip Self Inpatch). So $D \neq C$.
+Applying $\merge$ gives $D \not\isin C$ i.e. $C \nothaspatch P$.
+
+\subsubsection{For $L \haspatch P, R \haspatch P$:}
+$D \isin L \equiv D \le L$ and $D \isin R \equiv D \le R$.
+(Likewise $D \isin X \equiv D \le X$ and $D \isin Y \equiv D \le Y$.)
+
+Consider $D = C$: $D \isin C$, $D \le C$, OK for $C \haspatch P$.
+
+For $D \neq C$: $D \le C \equiv D \le L \lor D \le R
+ \equiv D \isin L \lor D \isin R$.
+(Likewise $D \le C \equiv D \le X \lor D \le Y$.)
+
+Consider $D \neq C, D \isin X \land D \isin Y$:
+By $\merge$, $D \isin C$. Also $D \le X$
+so $D \le C$. OK for $C \haspatch P$.
+
+Consider $D \neq C, D \not\isin X \land D \not\isin Y$:
+By $\merge$, $D \not\isin C$.
+And $D \not\le X \land D \not\le Y$ so $D \not\le C$.
+OK for $C \haspatch P$.
+
+Remaining case, wlog, is $D \not\isin X \land D \isin Y$.
+$D \not\le X$ so $D \not\le M$ so $D \not\isin M$.
+Thus by $\merge$, $D \isin C$. And $D \le Y$ so $D \le C$.
+OK for $C \haspatch P$.
+
+So indeed $L \haspatch P \land R \haspatch P \implies C \haspatch P$.
+
\end{document}
~ian / topbloke-formulae.git / blobdiff