From 2d0b3a5aef1092b55a34bb7e16d8bdcb3415a0be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Jackson Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 03:22:18 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] It has grown a bit --- doc/man/innduct.8 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/man/innduct.8 b/doc/man/innduct.8 index b6c3145..580f317 100644 --- a/doc/man/innduct.8 +++ b/doc/man/innduct.8 @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ constantly "tailing" the feed file, and where implemented uses to reduce the latency which would come from having to constantly poll the feed file. innfeed is capable of feeding multiple peers from a single innfeed instance, whereas each innduct process handles exactly -one peer. innduct is much smaller and simpler, at 3kloc to innfeed's +one peer. innduct is much smaller and simpler, at <4kloc to innfeed's 25kloc. innfeed needs a separate wrapper script or similar infrastructure (of which there is an example in its manpage), whereas innduct can be run directly and doesn't need help from shell scripts. -- 2.30.2