X-Git-Url: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ian/git?a=blobdiff_plain;f=article.tex;h=e6447d92380b854b40c0c1bf9d61825564f79a4d;hb=1dba870613dc3668dbbcb5cf5afd61f9cd310a1d;hp=d1ce6e884fbd0d2b94646395578f627d148008d6;hpb=e8ddb2493ac0e3bebb48f9151d492f2fcdc3a3ec;p=topbloke-formulae.git

diff --git a/article.tex b/article.tex
index d1ce6e8..e6447d9 100644
--- a/article.tex
+++ b/article.tex
@@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ $ \bigforall_{C \in \py}\bigforall_{D \in \py}
     ( \mathop{\hbox{\huge{$\vee$}}}_{R \in \set R} D \le R )
     \lor D = C
 }\]
+xxx proof tbd
 
 \[ \eqn{Transitive Ancestors:}{
   \left[ \bigforall_{ E \in \pendsof{C}{\set P} } E \le M \right] \equiv
@@ -270,17 +271,23 @@ in which case we repeat for $A'$.  Since there are finitely many
 commits, this terminates with $A'' \in \pends()$, ie $A'' \le M$
 by the LHS.  And $A \le A''$.
 }
+
 \[ \eqn{Calculation Of Ends:}{
   \bigforall_{C \hasparents \set A}
     \pendsof{C}{\set P} =
+      \begin{cases}
+       C \in \p : & \{ C \}
+      \\
+       C \not\in \p : & \displaystyle
        \left\{ E \Big|
            \Bigl[ \Largeexists_{A \in \set A} 
                        E \in \pendsof{A}{\set P} \Bigr] \land
            \Bigl[ \Largenexists_{B \in \set A} 
                        E \neq B \land E \le B \Bigr]
        \right\}
+      \end{cases}
 }\]
-XXX proof TBD.
+xxx proof tbd
 
 \subsection{No Replay for Merge Results}
 
@@ -327,10 +334,25 @@ We annotate each Topbloke commit $C$ with:
  \bigforall_{\pay{Q} \not\ni C} \pendsof{C}{\pay{Q}}
 \end{gather}
 
+$\patchof{C}$, for each kind of Topbloke-generated commit, is stated
+in the summary in the section for that kind of commit.
+
+Whether $\baseof{C}$ is required, and if so what the value is, is
+stated in the proof of Unique Base for each kind of commit.
+
+$C \haspatch \pa{Q}$ or $\nothaspatch \pa{Q}$ is represented as the
+set $\{ \pa{Q} | C \haspatch \pa{Q} \}$.  Whether $C \haspatch \pa{Q}$
+is in stated
+(in terms of $I \haspatch \pa{Q}$ or $I \nothaspatch \pa{Q}$
+for the ingredients $I$),
+in the proof of Coherence for each kind of commit.
+
+$\pendsof{C}{\pa{Q}^+}$ is computed, for all Topbloke-generated commits,
+using the lemma Calculation of Ends, above.
 We do not annotate $\pendsof{C}{\py}$ for $C \in \py$.  Doing so would
 make it wrong to make plain commits with git because the recorded $\pends$
-would have to be updated.  The annotation is not needed because
-$\forall_{\py \ni C} \; \pendsof{C}{\py} = \{C\}$.
+would have to be updated.  The annotation is not needed in that case
+because $\forall_{\py \ni C} \; \pendsof{C}{\py} = \{C\}$.
 
 \section{Simple commit}
 
@@ -347,7 +369,10 @@ Topbloke strips the metadata when exporting.
 Trivial.
 
 \subsection{Unique Base}
-If $A, C \in \py$ then $\baseof{C} = \baseof{A}$. $\qed$
+If $A, C \in \py$ then by Calculation of Ends for
+$C, \py, C \not\in \py$:
+$\pendsof{C}{\pn} = \pendsof{A}{\pn}$ so
+$\baseof{C} = \baseof{A}$. $\qed$
 
 \subsection{Tip Contents}
 We need to consider only $A, C \in \py$.  From Tip Contents for $A$:
@@ -429,21 +454,27 @@ Used for removing a branch dependency.
 
 \subsection{Conditions}
 
+\[ \eqn{ Into Base }{
+ L \in \pn
+}\]
 \[ \eqn{ Unique Tip }{
  \pendsof{L}{\pry} = \{ R^+ \}
 }\]
 \[ \eqn{ Currently Included }{
  L \haspatch \pry
 }\]
-\[ \eqn{ Not Self }{
- L \not\in \{ R^+ \}
-}\]
 
-\subsection{No Replay}
+\subsection{Ordering of ${L, R^+, R^-}$:}
 
 By Unique Tip, $R^+ \le L$.  By definition of $\base$, $R^- \le R^+$
-so $R^- \le L$.  So $R^+ \le C$ and $R^- \le C$ and No Replay for
-Merge Results applies. $\qed$
+so $R^- \le L$.  So $R^+ \le C$ and $R^- \le C$.
+
+(Note that the merge base $R^+ \not\le R^-$, i.e. the merge base is
+later than one of the branches to be merged.)
+
+\subsection{No Replay}
+
+No Replay for Merge Results applies.  $\qed$
 
 \subsection{Desired Contents}
 
@@ -481,11 +512,47 @@ $\qed$
 
 \subsection{Unique Base}
 
-Need to consider only $C \in \py$, ie $L \in \py$.
+Into Base means that $C \in \pn$, so Unique Base is not
+applicable. $\qed$
+
+\subsection{Tip Contents}
+
+Again, not applicable. $\qed$
+
+\subsection{Base Acyclic}
+
+By Base Acyclic for $L$, $D \isin L \implies D \not\in \py$.
+And by Into Base $C \not\in \py$.
+Now from Desired Contents, above, $D \isin C
+\implies D \isin L \lor D = C$, which thus
+$\implies D \not\in \py$.  $\qed$.
+
+\subsection{Coherence and Patch Inclusion}
+
+Need to consider some $D \in \py$.  By Into Base, $D \neq C$.
+
+\subsubsection{For $\p = \pr$:}
+By Desired Contents, above, $D \not\isin C$.
+So $C \nothaspatch \pr$.
+
+\subsubsection{For $\p \neq \pr$:}
+By Desired Contents, $D \isin C \equiv D \isin L$
+(since $D \in \py$ so $D \not\in \pry$).
+
+If $L \nothaspatch \p$, $D \not\isin L$ so $D \not\isin C$.
+So $L \nothaspatch \p \implies C \nothaspatch \p$.
+
+Whereas if $L \haspatch \p$, $D \isin L \equiv D \le L$.
+so $L \haspatch \p \implies C \haspatch \p$.
+
+\section{Foreign Inclusion}
 
-xxx tbd
+Consider some $D$ s.t. $\patchof{D} = \bot$.  $D \neq C$.
+So by Desired Contents $D \isin C \equiv D \isin L$.
+By Foreign Inclusion of $D$ in $L$, $D \isin L \equiv D \le L$.
 
-xxx need to finish anticommit
+And $D \le C \equiv D \le L$.
+Thus $D \isin C \equiv D \le C$.  $\qed$
 
 \section{Merge}
 
@@ -544,7 +611,7 @@ Merge Ends condition applies.  Good.
 
 \subsection{No Replay}
 
-See No Replay for Merge Results.
+No Replay for Merge Results applies.  $\qed$
 
 \subsection{Unique Base}
 
@@ -618,7 +685,8 @@ So indeed $L \haspatch \p \land R \haspatch \p \implies C \haspatch \p$.
 
 \subsubsection{For (wlog) $X \not\haspatch \p, Y \haspatch \p$:}
 
-$C \haspatch \p \equiv M \nothaspatch \p$.
+$M \haspatch \p \implies C \nothaspatch \p$.
+$M \nothaspatch \p \implies C \haspatch \p$.
 
 \proofstarts