wip experiment merge

[topbloke-formulae.git] / article.tex

diff --git a/article.tex b/article.tex
index 642190f9f823431a058f3aa1b5793bc3f1751396..fde6e2f5cccd274528791679a0be616000352cca 100644 (file)
--- a/article.tex
+++ b/article.tex
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 \documentclass[a4paper,leqno]{strayman}
+\errorcontextlines=50
 \let\numberwithin=\notdef
 \usepackage{amsmath}
 \usepackage{mathabx}
@@ -18,8 +19,12 @@
 \newcommand{\haspatch}{\sqSupset}
 \newcommand{\patchisin}{\sqSubset}
 
-\newcommand{\set}[1]{\mathbb #1}
-\newcommand{\pa}[1]{\varmathbb #1}
+        \newif\ifhidehack\hidehackfalse
+        \DeclareRobustCommand\hidefromedef[2]{%
+          \hidehacktrue\ifhidehack#1\else#2\fi\hidehackfalse}
+        \newcommand{\pa}[1]{\hidefromedef{\varmathbb{#1}}{#1}}
+
+\newcommand{\set}[1]{\mathbb{#1}}
 \newcommand{\pay}[1]{\pa{#1}^+}
 \newcommand{\pan}[1]{\pa{#1}^-}
 
@@ -27,6 +32,10 @@
 \newcommand{\py}{\pay{P}}
 \newcommand{\pn}{\pan{P}}
 
+\newcommand{\pr}{\pa{R}}
+\newcommand{\pry}{\pay{R}}
+\newcommand{\prn}{\pan{R}}
+
 %\newcommand{\hasparents}{\underaccent{1}{>}}
 %\newcommand{\hasparents}{{%
 %  \declareslashed{}{_{_1}}{0}{-0.8}{>}\slashed{>}}}
@@ -40,9 +49,11 @@
 
 \newcommand{\pancs}{{\mathcal A}}
 \newcommand{\pends}{{\mathcal E}}
+\newcommand{\merge}{{\mathcal M}}
 
 \newcommand{\pancsof}[2]{\pancs ( #1 , #2 ) }
 \newcommand{\pendsof}[2]{\pends ( #1 , #2 ) }
+\newcommand{\mergeof}[3]{\merge ( #1 , #2, #3 ) }
 
 \newcommand{\patchof}[1]{{\mathcal P} ( #1 ) }
 \newcommand{\baseof}[1]{{\mathcal B} ( #1 ) }
@@ -137,6 +148,15 @@ patch is applied to a non-Topbloke branch and then bubbles back to
 the Topbloke patch itself, we hope that git's merge algorithm will
 DTRT or that the user will no longer care about the Topbloke patch.
 
+\item[ $ \mergeof{L}{M}{R} $ ]
+$\displaystyle \left\{ C \middle|
+  \begin{cases}
+    (D \isin L \land D \isin R) \lor D = C : & \true \\
+    (D \not\isin L \land D \not\isin R) \land D \neq C : & \false \\
+    \text{otherwise} : & D \not\isin M
+  \end{cases}
+ \right\} $
+
 \end{basedescript}
 \newpage
 \section{Invariants}
@@ -219,6 +239,17 @@ in which case we repeat for $A'$.  Since there are finitely many
 commits, this terminates with $A'' \in \pends()$, ie $A'' \le M$
 by the LHS.  And $A \le A''$.
 }
+\[ \eqn{Calculation Of Ends:}{
+  \bigforall_{C \hasparents \set A}
+    \pendsof{C}{\set P} =
+       \Bigl\{ E \Big|
+           \Bigl[ \Largeexists_{A \in \set A} 
+                       E \in \pendsof{A}{\set P} \Bigr] \land
+           \Bigl[ \Largenexists_{B \in \set A} 
+                       E \neq B \land E \le B \Bigr]
+       \Bigr\}
+}\]
+XXX proof TBD.
 
 \section{Commit annotation}
 
@@ -318,6 +349,29 @@ $\qed$
 If $D = C$, trivial.  For $D \neq C$:
 $D \isin C \equiv D \isin A \equiv D \le A \equiv D \le C$.  $\qed$
 
+\section{Anticommit}
+
+Given $L, R^+, R^-$ where
+$\patchof{R^+} = \pry, \patchof{R^-} = \prn$.  
+Construct $C$ which has $\pr$ removed.
+Used for removing a branch dependency.
+\gathbegin
+ C \hasparents \{ L \}
+\gathnext
+ \patchof{C} = \patchof{L}
+\gathnext
+ D \isin C \equiv
+   \begin{cases}
+      R \in \py : & \baseof{R} \ge \baseof{L}
+              \land [\baseof{L} = M \lor \baseof{L} = \baseof{M}] \\
+      R \in \pn : & R \ge \baseof{L}
+              \land M = \baseof{L} \\
+      \text{otherwise} : & \false
+   \end{cases}
+\end{gather}
+
+xxx want to prove $D \isin C \equiv D \not\in pry \land D \isin L$.
+
 \section{Merge}
 
 Merge commits $L$ and $R$ using merge base $M$ ($M < L, M < R$):
@@ -372,4 +426,38 @@ R$ so $D \le C$.  OK.
 
 $\qed$
 
+\subsection{Unique Base}
+
+Need to consider only $C \in \py$, ie $L \in \py$,
+and calculate $\pendsof{C}{\pn}$.  So we will consider some
+putative ancestor $A \in \pn$ and see whether $A \le C$.
+
+By Exact Ancestors for C, $A \le C \equiv A \le L \lor A \le R \lor A = C$.
+But $C \in py$ and $A \in \pn$ so $A \neq C$.  
+Thus $A \le C \equiv A \le L \lor A \le R$.
+
+By Unique Base of L and Transitive Ancestors,
+$A \le L \equiv A \le \baseof{L}$.
+
+\subsubsection{For $R \in \py$:}
+
+By Unique Base of $R$ and Transitive Ancestors,
+$A \le R \equiv A \le \baseof{R}$.
+
+But by Tip Merge condition on $\baseof{R}$,
+$A \le \baseof{L} \implies A \le \baseof{R}$, so
+$A \le \baseof{R} \lor A \le \baseof{L} \equiv A \le \baseof{R}$.
+Thus $A \le C \equiv A \le \baseof{R}$.  
+That is, $\baseof{C} = \baseof{R}$.
+
+\subsubsection{For $R \in \pn$:}
+
+By Tip Merge condition on $R$,
+$A \le \baseof{L} \implies A \le R$, so
+$A \le R \lor A \le \baseof{L} \equiv A \le R$.  
+Thus $A \le C \equiv A \le R$.  
+That is, $\baseof{C} = R$.
+
+$\qed$
+
 \end{document}