[Uram-rejections] how old ? ...
webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Mon Jan 3 14:07:32 GMT 2022
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Would you like to finish the sentence?
The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator.
The moderator assumes that you posted this by mistake. It may be that
it quotes a previous post without adding your own comment, or the text
you have added may appear incomplete. We hope you will review and then
re-submit your message.
The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
uk.net.news.moderation
============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Mon Jan 03 10:03:12 2022
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> Received-SPF: none (balrog.mythic-beasts.com: domain of aioe.org does not provide an SPF record) client-ip=130.133.4.7; envelope-from=news at aioe.org; helo=moderators.individual.net;
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> From: Jeff <jeff at ukra.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: how old ? ...
> Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 10:02:52 +0000
> Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
> Message-ID: <squhkd$16rs$1 at gioia.aioe.org>
> References: <sqsl91$sbt$3 at dont-email.me>
> <0lg4tgdcsb4jpg1h2g6pmh684sf5e60rqd at 4ax.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Injection-Info: ; logging-data=""; posting-host="LPuWOkTxuhBhIqWszpsvqg.user."; mail-complaints-to="";
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1
> X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
> Content-Language: en-GB
> X-No-Archive: yes
> X-Mythic-Source-External: YES
> X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 41
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.2
> Delivered-To: usenet-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-STUMP-Warning-0: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: User-Agent:
>
> On 03/01/2022 00:36, Custos Custodum wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 16:52:48 +0000, "Jim GM4DHJ ..."
> > <kinvig.netta at ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >
> >> How can I tell if my FT857D IS A 2006 OR A 2016 model ? ...SER NO starts
> >> with a 6 ....
> >
> > The 6 might iindicate 2006 but there's no standard for serial
> > prefixes. Open it up and read the date codes from some of the
> > components. ICs and larger electrolytics are usually the easiest to
> > read. The formats vary but will usually consist of a week number and a
> > year, e.g., "2604" probably means week 26 of 2004. You'll probably
> > have to apply some guesswork to interpret the most likely combination,
> > but at least you will then know that the unit couldn't have been built
> > before that date.
>
> Position 1 = year made
>
> Position 2 = month made
>
> C = January
> D = February
> E = March
> F = April
> G = May
> H = June
> I = July
> J = August
> K = September
> L = October
> M = November
> N = December
>
> Pos 3 &/or 4 = lot number(s)
>
> Pos 5<-8 sequence in that lot
>
> Position 1: last digit of the year in which the radio was produced
>
> Position 2: Determine the position of the letter in the alphabet
> (C=3,D=4,E=5, etc) and then subtract 2. The result gives the month in
> which the radio was manufactured. Note that the letters will range from
> C (January) throughN (December). Thus, a radio with a serial number of
> 5H221234 would have been
>
>
>
> 73
> Jeff
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJh0wMkAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeTjMIAKGjZBVNf/hbwFYZCPQbomMP
mqNa/Jed6dHKOTO5PPt0lvqbI5ds1C0W25Q6mDjnc2YxRReyhfSiXQgrQmDxchcn
AvnnXdLeQBWXOomqflGr9Zw96r/Ard4ikfcqk3kvBgUsnzwnwab/QIzzG+FBSrbK
xu3yDRiPK4xXCDVnukGVZNZQZTwaNaDqprzIYpiPIowrfj9Ch+FP+CBv7GWFgtT5
XysocnsoX0pLjehc8BHKmN73rp+l+8QQKlWErxlpqgrFW9f77KSthMpg2GBqPvuG
d5iOYHzyw4OCRDAwNdAhhfZMEfAVmcvYhpR0CBuaGZDXkxprYMYy7RV9iOVTJD8=
=BMmn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Uram-rejections
mailing list