[Uram-rejections] New EMF rules mean that " licensees will need to keep records demonstrating their compliance"

Wed May 19 08:01:46 BST 2021

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 An interesting question. However discussion of CB matters is off-topic.

The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

This appears to the moderator to be off-topic for uk.radio.amateur.moderated
or has insufficient material related to amateur radio.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Wed May 19 06:17:17 2021
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> Received-SPF: softfail (balrog.mythic-beasts.com: transitioning domain of eternal-september.org does not designate 144.76.35.198 as permitted sender) client-ip=144.76.35.198; envelope-from=news at eternal-september.org; helo=reader02.eternal-september.org;
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta at ntlworld.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: New EMF rules mean that " licensees will need to keep records demonstrating their compliance"
> Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 06:17:15 +0100
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Message-ID: <s8270q$uvg$2 at dont-email.me>
> References: <s80mit$k9e$1 at dont-email.me>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:A2Be0jylHRjtbnRD3wjougRdcqY=
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/YgJDBDQEC8et1Lt9z4gmXLHawxga+pu8=
> Content-Language: en-GB
> X-Mythic-Source-External: YES
> X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 84
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=8.4
> Delivered-To: usenet-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-STUMP-Warning-0: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: Subject: User-Agent:
> 
> On 18/05/2021 16:30, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> > Just fresh in my inbox from Ofcom. I wonder how we will have to keep 
> > records.
> > 
> > ### BEGIN QUOTE
> > 
> > New licence condition for spectrum licensees confirmed
> > 
> > Ofcom has today confirmed a new licence condition that now applies to 
> > the vast majority of spectrum licensees.
> > 
> > The changes mean most licensees will need to take action to ensure their 
> > equipment operates within international guidelines on electromagnetic 
> > fields (EMF) for the protection of the general public. Most licensees 
> > will also need to keep records demonstrating their compliance.
> > 
> > Following the publication of our policy statement on EMF in October 
> > 2020, we wrote to licensees in March this year to inform them of our 
> > proposals. We have considered licensees’ feedback carefully and made 
> > some changes to the new licence condition and guidance documents. Today 
> > we have published full details of our final decision on the licence 
> > condition.
> > 
> > We have also published guidance on what licensees should do and how long 
> > they have to ensure compliance – this is dependent on the frequencies 
> > they are using. Our EMF compliance flowchart tells licensees whether or 
> > not they need to take action and, if they do, what action is needed.
> > 
> > A simplified version of the full guidance and specific advice for 
> > holders of amateur, ship radio and aeronautical licences will be 
> > published next month.
> > 
> > We will shortly be writing to affected licensees to inform them of our 
> > final decision and provide a replacement/update for their current licence.
> > 
> > ### END QUOTE
> > 
> how are all the m0 hammy mens that still operate on 27.555 with their 
> burners going to comply ? ...
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJgpLfaAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeykgH/2Dm9hSeIBFA/npPeY32HrDK
QWrLFVQQdOQNqulrDVEwaguoM9Qa8MGQ2jypogEzgiIv+utdY+wLYZEdiFLtai/D
XBi3uUXcwKm5wLvzCV2qFgMMdvDMO34nVZboPBWhAifXKJqIQ9SxgT4B47OiQrsT
DSJrAEuHWSruAxv3ELHofZN9SU+6EXXiKSIy/JTKwwhgI0sf/CFUfArnsNn02NeV
5uTGyaxyQYMypqX3n6GI1BcbG2szn6A731reUMmY/IGzeplvth8LvfPDZsXmbOLX
goQCbAqG51Fom8geG2Zk3BCCwH3lhMvcOi92y2C7M8hAwMFEKxDAiLGfoCcpSdw=
=s4Va
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----