[Uram-rejections] Keeping logs

[webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Wed Jun 05 22:18:05 2019
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> Received-SPF: fail (balrog.mythic-beasts.com: domain of four.schnuerpel.eu does not designate 2a01:4f8:120:9382::145 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a01:4f8:120:9382::145; envelope-from=news at four.schnuerpel.eu; helo=four.schnuerpel.eu;
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> From: <crn at mailserv.netunix.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Keeping logs
> Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 21:17:54 +0000 (UTC)
> Organization: albasani.net
> Message-ID: <qd9bi2$gf0$1 at news.albasani.net>
> References: <qd1fk7$1pfm$1 at gioia.aioe.org> <6p2dfed3mo24c5foj0ptg841ilkv3s81li at 4ax.com> <1HyJE.817759$0R6.450074 at fx33.am4> <MPG.37616964bfd701e79896b2 at news.eternal-september.org> <qd8hrk$94j$1 at news.albasani.net> <hg+8OiEDMB+cFwtz at brattleho.plus.com>
> User-Agent: tin/2.4.2-20171224 ("Lochhead") (UNIX) (Linux/4.14.48-v7-arm (armv7l))
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:rd7t7bOTvKVdL7bQE7uISaXftP0=
> X-Mythic-Source-External: YES
> X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 23
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3
> Delivered-To: usenet-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-STUMP-Warning-0: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Received:
> 
> Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson at g3ohx.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> How anybody can manage without logging QSOs while still claiming to be
> >>> an active radio amateur amazes me. The licencing requirement doesn't
> >>> even come into it.
> >>
> >>And what, might I ask, is the point of logging the local rag chew net ?
> >>Contests and any DX who might ask for a QSL card fine, but I see no
> >>point in logging regular chats with well known stations.
> >>
> >>G4JCI
> > 
> > Not keeping a log is CB. But (I believe) even some CBers keep logs!
> 
> Are you trying to be insulting, if so it is a rather childish attempt.
> Grow up.
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJc+DwuAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeLPYH/3hng5un4uU0pP/gEVhYhEWX
c14DfBOlqFt75MKkv6HfsZ4UrGQmR4WMN7LQjAsKwiklz+iX7Qqb9Fi7L+tI4k5u
iwsdau5sP0e25rHc3av0BRkLpaQwJTkawYtdBkf1RB3psnPHIDBa7VMGNIwXWhq9
f/3Ogk+o+1d9igXaRip8vinDSe6xkx9Q815GlOmbHczyV50b5nnbQT2F/g7MLvF1
t95/Qu9ojhY1C+BgYaL1fq8KRBcMeZvMDt9l+3IBx/TaUSIVw0R/DEwhKZIiaQRb
Lyt7865BI8/wz6sxaNFT2PlnQo1vO940rYg1VI+nLl39Wh1yBKUXJXlqGgJ5+0o=
=6hh1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----