[Uram-rejections] Leixen VV-898- Mic connector weakness?

webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Fri Aug 30 14:07:29 BST 2019


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 Needs a bit more narrative.



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

This post contains insufficient new material. Similar points have been
made already in this discussion, which is in danger of becoming too
repetitive.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Fri Aug 30 08:27:29 2019
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> Received-SPF: none (balrog.mythic-beasts.com: domain of fx08.am4.highwinds-media.com does not provide an SPF record) client-ip=2001:19f0:5c01:c22:5400:1ff:fead:27ae; envelope-from=news at fx08.am4.highwinds-media.com; helo=mod-relay.zaccari.net;
> Delivered-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> Subject: Re: Leixen VV-898- Mic connector weakness?
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> References: <qem5jr$q74$1 at dont-email.me> <PfaQE.184172$w74.177768 at fx03.am4>
>  <qet3kg$50h$1 at dont-email.me> <gkqQE.512672$Szs1.21011 at fx08.am4>
>  <qeuvf3$uuc$1 at dont-email.me>
> From: "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj at ntlworld.com>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> Content-Language: en-GB
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Message-ID: <Rc4aF.610127$c8w1.382114 at fx08.am4>
> Organization: virginmedia.com
> Bytes: 4504
> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:26:41 +0100
> X-Mythic-Source-External: YES
> X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 53
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.3
> Delivered-To: usenet-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-STUMP-Warning-0: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: User-Agent:
> 
> On 26/06/2019 06:22, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
> > "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj at ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> > news:gkqQE.512672$Szs1.21011 at fx08.am4...
> >>
> >> "Brian Reay" <no.sp at m.com> wrote in message
> >> news:qet3kg$50h$1 at dont-email.me...
> >>> On 24/06/2019 21:19, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
> >>>> "Brian Reay" <no.sp at m.com> wrote in message
> >>>> news:qem5jr$q74$1 at dont-email.me...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    During a recent visit to a relative who is fairly new to the hobby,
> >>>>> he
> >>>>> showed me a Leixen VV-898 with a very worn mic socket.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The radio was bought new, hasn't been used much (it was kept a static
> >>>>> caravan for use there), nor has it any signs of rough handling etc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> While I accept these are cheap radios, almost in the 'throw away' price
> >>>>> class, I find it hard to believe such a standard component as an RJ45
> >>>>> socket is something you can save much on by buying poor quality ones.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Another radio, owned by the same amateur for longer, and used
> >>>>> regularly,
> >>>>> doesn't show similar wear.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This drags me towards wondering if Leixen  have a mountain of
> >>>>> cheap/poor
> >>>>> sockets and others have the same issue- specifically the area where the
> >>>>> latching tab locks wearing away.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've brought the radio to the 'OSN shack with the intention of
> >>>>> replacing
> >>>>> the connector- I'm just hoping the PCB is up to being reworked. I
> >>>>> ordered
> >>>>> some sockets off Ebay while still on holiday - hopefully they will
> >>>>> arrive
> >>>>> in a few days.
> >>>>
> >>>> mine had two faults out of the box...got rid of it very quickly
> >>>> ...quality
> >>>> control non existent ......
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I removed the old socket this morning.
> >>>
> >>> The radio is actually a good bit of manufacturing design. Easy assembly
> >>> etc and very easy to access- just a 3 screws to remove the front panel
> >>> assembly, which you can lift aside to access the mic socket.
> >>>
> >>> I also removed the main cover, again just a couple of screws, to have a
> >>> more detailed look. The PCB is much the same as any you'd see in a modern
> >>> radio- surprising well made, neatly laid out. Everything easy to get at.
> >>>
> >>> Of course, the size of the bits can be an issue but that is the same
> >>> regardless of the make.
> >>>
> >>> I removed the connector- outer plastic part first. Then cut the wires
> >>> that make the 'pins' along the top, that allowed me to remove the inner
> >>> plastic part. I then removed each pin in turn and cleared the holes in
> >>> the PCB. As far as I can tell, the PCB survived the process- the pads
> >>> look good.
> >>>
> >>> The inner part of the connector  is where the wear is. It seems it was
> >>> badly formed- on the underside, away from anywhere subject to wear/heat
> >>> etc. It was removed before I applied my soldering iron.
> >>>
> >>> Replacement connector is on order- I placed the order while on holiday-
> >>> should be here any day.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I still think it is a nasty little rig...I had a wire off the speaker from
> >> new and other things I can't remember..so bad the seller who just had a
> >> box shifting presence in the UK refunded me and told me to keep it...which
> >> I couldn't bring myself to do ............
> > just remembered what the other fault was ...it didn't work unless you put
> > pressure on the circuit board with your finger.......dry joint or
> > something....ended up sticking some rubber feet in between the board and the
> > case to keep it working....hope the new owner, who was going to use it on
> > PMR never opened it up ........
> > 
> >
> Dodgy Jim's radios and Motors strikes again....
> 
> 	
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJdaR+RAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeSFUH/3BJlcVL5XoXZhqXbZsUSihG
sVgOQAhl6JHMVyBRWeZsTLBSNTpYhZ6jpUV/qpQpm/etj2MK25mPWUCRkw0MQ59K
APX3z/KPy1PEBNsYQjTymse9rQTVOR3+L95UeQONIRNZKMYUTGhqRW1aictH8df9
WUXj4dEKI06yiXanu9kYrMrs2J0kuAy0sppBbo1nh9KuKIhgqiHzv6ZnFi4u9rXg
I2nomJbvNukP6coIcPTz9a/YabDtxTYU/KtoYVYCGM+aijaxNzQyv1Zwdz1BWjEM
DkpJDBJJ9TFL3VFbX1tz4GKWd8nXD45GyHP7f8z0jth+hSmFyJffNs6V7WD1TH8=
=Q268
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Uram-rejections mailing list