[Uram-rejections] Network smartphones - Amateur radio?
webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Wed Oct 24 14:45:39 BST 2018
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Did you hit send prematurely? Not sure what you are disagreeing with.
The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator.
The moderator assumes that you posted this by mistake. It may be that
it quotes a previous post without adding your own comment, or the text
you have added may appear incomplete. We hope you will review and then
re-submit your message.
The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
uk.net.news.moderation
============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Wed Oct 24 12:00:23 2018
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> Received-SPF: none (haggis.mythic-beasts.com: domain of fx03.am4.highwinds-media.com does not provide an SPF record) client-ip=130.133.4.7; envelope-from=news at fx03.am4.highwinds-media.com; helo=moderators.individual.net;
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> From: "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj at ntlworld.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> References: <pfsudg$mab$1 at dont-email.me> <0aAzD.108034$aX1.79215 at fx21.am4> <uZIYs+zwc4zbFwKJ at b-howie.co.uk> <852515726.562049123.626785.usenet-stephenthomascole.com at news.individual.net> <ZAUzD.142589$vf.109172 at fx05.am4> <1nx64nw.1o5sxpuvc1zw0N%roger at hayter.org>
> Subject: Re: Network smartphones - Amateur radio?
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
> X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 181024-0, 24/10/2018), Outbound message
> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
> Message-ID: <%gYzD.574045$134.313553 at fx03.am4>
> Organization: virginmedia.com
> Bytes: 2895
> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:00:10 +0100
> X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 37
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.7
> Delivered-To: usenet-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-STUMP-Warning-0: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: Received:
>
>
> "Roger Hayter" <roger at hayter.org> wrote in message
> news:1nx64nw.1o5sxpuvc1zw0N%roger at hayter.org...
> > Jim GM4DHJ ... <jim.gm4dhj at ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Stephen Thomas Cole" <usenet at stephenthomascole.com> wrote in message
> >> news:852515726.562049123.626785.usenet-stephenthomascole.com at news.individu
> >> al.net... > Brian Howie <brian at b-howie.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >> In message <0aAzD.108034$aX1.79215 at fx21.am4>, Jim GM4DHJ ...
> >> >> <jim.gm4dhj at ntlworld.com> writes
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "David Taylor" <david-taylor at blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> wrote in
> >> >>> message
> >> >>> news:pfsudg$mab$1 at dont-email.me...
> >> >>>> The latest RadCom has articles on "Network Radio", accompanied by
> >> >>>> several
> >> >>>> suppliers making "special offers" on this kit.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Appropriate material, or could the pages have been better used?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>> It is the only way that the smartphone generation are going to
> >> >>> discover
> >> >>> amateur radio these days......
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm not disagreeing, but do you not think the smartphone generation
> >> >> would be disappointed by amateur radio ? Communications quality,
> >> >> coverage etc.
> >> >
> >> > The comparative "roughness" of analogue might itself be a draw, similar
> >> > to
> >> > how vinyl records have had a resurgence. Cassette tapes, believe it or
> >> > not,
> >> > are popular with teenagers for their sheer archaicness[1], so it's
> >> > feasible
> >> > that at least some young people might take a liking to analogue just
> >> > because it's so queer.
> >> >
> >> > [1] Tapes are crap, I hated them circa early/mid-90s when I couldn't
> >> > afford
> >> > CDs.
> >> >
> >> I had a cassette player in one of my cars just a year ago......I like the
> >> linier functionality with a beginning middle and end...and two sides
> >> .......auto reverse helps too .....
> >
> > And the tense anticipation of the next time the tape jams in the
> > mechanism and drapes itself all over the car.
> >
> no
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJb0HeDAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeFgYIAK+CR0GqS0GVlXiScFqeZ2zc
L95n2bnuzkidVO71sXps1Q9Dmq7zKzpieqJ0FG8YbXclcWoKl1UKWpAFnxTUUnRH
IAWSqB8cnvqEHsbo4C70lRLdc+yyUH20hGnKsMA28rgxOQ50R9TnNeoPuI3Gr7C3
FtO4DScO3RGcElwRajEs3E0wxMItXRfc6tKwol4SlBDWZZDcHhls+DD5tN+cax6R
rhDiBeXIZvr54+K4YiUQQuN/ohVfMCpHlUudAn8mU6WITDj6IXifRMECYjEF23fQ
uAKiBXRWSBUurjOukNsCAz8pbkGSgrkY7vWUGu9ZtH1Kcb1XQQ4EoX6v7X6PFBY=
=t8GN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Uram-rejections
mailing list