[Uram-rejections] New Low VHF frequencies for Ireland

[webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 First part of reply is a bit abrasive towards Guy. The rest of the post  does make a useful and valid point. Resubmit ?  



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Fri May 04 17:45:29 2018
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> Delivered-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: mm0fmf <none at invalid.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: New Low VHF frequencies for Ireland
> Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 17:45:25 +0100
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Message-ID: <pci2n8$h0d$1 at dont-email.me>
> References: <UWrmfiBbBL6aFwQt at b-howie.co.uk> <saljed1j6146ralho2gk6d0bt00g017csf at 4ax.com> <pcev3h$l9v$1 at dont-email.me> <60bmed5ep59lvsm9t8gu2t8voi1a1nh63t at 4ax.com> <7IVN49Bhp16aFw14 at b-howie.co.uk> <1f9oedd6vv2alo3jt599bhhj64bfehhbdd at 4ax.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+UHc628q1QcayzATxwGeZmxd8SqY1sI+E=
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:Nzdtu69T5dZPWipP39g0r620plg=
> 
> On 04/05/2018 10:22, Guy G4DWV 4X1LT wrote:
> >> Https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/51198/ofw306.pdf
> >
> > Thanks for the link Brian. I wonder what happens if somebody does not
> > wish their details to be passed on to the RSGB. Even as a member, I am
> > not happy that they have the chance to have their say. AFAIAC, the
> > matter is purely between OFCOM and the applicant.
> >
> It doesn't matter whether you are happy or not though. Ofcom have 
> decided they value the RSGB's comments on an application or they would 
> not ask the RSGB for an opinion.
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJa7ahuAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeTdMH/i6oBw6fupvN1o/+Jv6CkiwM
aJcEYteqOcD3VDCboK+AIFNTIohjE1Yy5iJoaaobHWHrkEkkkSsVnsW1ExWLtnwy
i6+VeYpPqv7Ify9BBcGaoLveDb2EDCQisBB++OIy7yNmRuhonIFtREN+5xO8XbtL
8h/q+QMIu1iuxR4ym/CQpdIbBF6p3lvbuVs1rEZVX6wq49iqOVStAVjSyDsKhz8/
JW8J6n5EPUPZttnJ4fKMqV93s1bMtrBS1LwA85YI2AXJvQdLXusoRAovYQO3bfn2
Y7yD+eRlMiUYFWa0MFta5xvmTYAiZ8u6sQblWegW9ATHo9RweIUfkXRAMoHDYoA=
=gNhL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----