[Uram-rejections] 11.1 metre wind turbines now "permitted development". Mast workaround?

[webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 And a little combative?



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

This appears to the moderator to be off-topic for uk.radio.amateur.moderated
or has insufficient material related to amateur radio.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Fri Mar 16 14:38:02 2018
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> Delivered-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: RustyHinge <rusty.hinge at foobar.girolle.co.uk>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: 11.1 metre wind turbines now "permitted development". Mast
>  workaround?
> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:38:00 +0000
> Organization: Diss Organisation
> Message-ID: <p8gks8$m6c$2 at dont-email.me>
> References: <1058155850.538295504.507790.usenet-stephenthomascole.com at news.individual.net>
>  <265k6d1f5078cd2pm28qaao3pvngrb0mee at 4ax.com> <p4krf9$f3b$1 at dont-email.me>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
>  Thunderbird/52.6.0
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19MUdB9LsiUQ96FrFpE5ufh2o8yjKUsdyjvVj74qOyevg==
> Content-Language: en-GB
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:gKLqtAXU8onrCDHId7RqNMI8xMg=
> 
> On 28/01/18 15:50, Brian Reay wrote:
> > On 25/01/2018 17:33, Guy G4DWV 4X1LT wrote:
> 
> >> On 22 Jan 2018 06:37:12 GMT, just as I was about to take a herb,
> >> Stephen Thomas Cole <usenet at stephenthomascole.com> disturbed my
> >> reverie and wrote:
> >>
> >>> Where there's a will (and a wind turbine), there's a way!
> >>
> >> The Americans use their flag poles to similarly good effect. IIRC,
> >> there is hardly any limit on the height of flagpoles in the
> >> (patriotic) USA.
> >>
> > 
> > No reason we can't do the same. Flag poles for national flags don't need 
> > planning permission.
> 
> Have things come to such a pass that one has to remind people which 
> country they are in? Or is it to help migrating birds?
> 
> -- 
> Rusty Hinge
> To err is human. To really foul things up requires a computer and the BOFH.
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJarCDJAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeLF8H/3bFLrfFqWpPJdkE5eSRTZDJ
1byhFLd7f5vQrEkqyAgEexvNETTuQ3jRKCHScTqoInjiOZJFQ0aE/RaAWAMlGq6l
URsRi62OVKErG8ia25LlbwMIdj9HIAeKrqFogYLAHNeLG0gEdSLB0Qh6w4CqJkH5
VH9LTofRyfEr4HUfqnmmizIQNARxZeR0qihVg46ilCL4R9kNNFQQchpNar4J7lVc
9WlXr7kI9YoiULKQf80DD6YxswiHfyajd9scQb6ZjCO1SxJFxyNSfHxY4YT/sS8v
EsSc5KDgnGm2edyk/yx2pwdy77SUmnMc0i3ZnEQ6adKz8jxpwFq0BShA77QbCzY=
=+XX8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----