[Uram-rejections] Point to point wireless data link

Tue Jul 31 09:34:18 BST 2018

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 Please post this qusestion in u.n.n.moderation

The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Discussions about whether someone's post should have been rejected or
accepted are not generally permitted in the group, and should be taken
to uk.net.news.moderation.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Tue Jul 31 06:49:31 2018
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> Delivered-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: Brian Reay <no.sp at m.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Point to point wireless data link
> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 06:49:30 +0100
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Message-ID: <pjot9a$7es$2 at dont-email.me>
> References: <MXC*Jg51w at news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
>  <k8ctldtchb3r178rp89mrpaveor5loa5bf at 4ax.com>
>  <juptldl1m6f1j5cr8ic4clo6a51fu1fghg at 4ax.com> <pjn1nt$psm$3 at gioia.aioe.org>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
>  Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y5zPbGw56aRPFtEDEcazGb3/ick=
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX18l26RVaX8XMLTWu0u2l+Y2Y4v867rktI8=
> Content-Language: en-GB
> 
> On 30/07/2018 13:53, Brian Reay wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 11:35:33 +0100, Graham. wrote:
> > 
> >>> On 29 Jul 2018 23:58:22 +0100 (BST), just as I was about to take a herb,
> >>> Theo <theom+news at chiark.greenend.org.uk> disturbed my reverie and wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I assume using 2.4 or 5GHz will have lots of interference.  Would there
> >>>> be any merit in a licensed band?
> >>>
> >>> In a case like this, it is often better to first decide what the
> >>> requirements are and then pick a suitable frequency. A plan view of the
> >>> two stations and the path in between them would be useful.
> >>>
> >>> ERP will factor quite heavily in any plans. AIUI, and I am not an expert
> >>> by any means, that the sort of operation that you have in mind would be
> >>> illegal in the bands that you specifically mentioned.
> >>>
> >>>> Would there be any merit in a licensed band?
> >>>
> >>> Probably. It depends if you could get a licence or not. I am not being
> >>> funny, but just because a frequency has a licence requirement does not
> >>> mean that they are freely available.
> >>>
> >>> Those of us who studied for and passed the RAE could do this on the back
> >>> of a fag packet. Absolutely no disrespect to yourself as you had no
> >>> choice on how you got your licence.
> >>
> >> I don't remember link budgets being in my RAE syllabus, I only heard of
> >> Freznel Zones 10 or 15 years ago, and still don't fully understand them.
> >> In short if I attempted such a link It would succeed or fail
> >> empirically.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > They weren't.
> > 
> > At least they weren't before the upheaval in 2010.  Before that I had
> > some input (Train the Trainers) and although they were not, successful
> > trainees would - or should - have been able to do the calculations
> > required.
> > 
> > Even so, "back of a fag packet" would be an exaggeration.
> > 
> Why can't the mods check for obvious sock puppets - especially when the 
> real poster is known and the abuser is one of their chums.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Suspect someone is claiming a benefit under false pretences? Incapacity
> Benefit or Personal Independence Payment when they don't need it? They 
> are depriving those in real need!
> 
> https://www.gov.uk/report-benefit-fraud
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJbYB8KAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeGtQH/1TyAce7pkHWmg/uf3ba6VJU
9AY3tmE0PQNC4bfz4XumjJhEi0CzpxfibHKlBn9fBPnWOim1qC0y7qSP61+UzQjY
FrNNTLJtGQwsPpMPBrfgc3ivUMEsT/36UWP6u3jsTx+qvpAuRPAg64Z80wDiiDXI
+mkSstBngEup/qpEtLu+iegbkZZ+Bh8qE2b2psStFSJ6BO25PD8oEUgKEOnhX89L
woBWiTRmbZHsQYpKjuZ9eEG/J9Chnd92fKjpvKbo1GKy3oCz1ocya9+tnSEKIloX
7lq068Lwu2Fw5K0EyVahP9LxA1jd3X8OJFZxn5RpvEvIqCIY0e4Qr6L339c5uQs=
=FU0P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----