[Uram-rejections] 11.1 metre wind turbines now "permitted development". Mast workaround?

[webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 Interesting, but not AR related



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

This appears to the moderator to be off-topic for uk.radio.amateur.moderated
or has insufficient material related to amateur radio.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Tue Jan 30 07:21:11 2018
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> Delivered-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: Stephen Thomas Cole <usenet at stephenthomascole.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: 11.1 metre wind turbines now "permitted development".
>  Mast workaround?
> Date: 30 Jan 2018 07:21:08 GMT
> Message-ID: <1985753614.538989604.429185.usenet-stephenthomascole.com at news.individual.net>
> References: <1058155850.538295504.507790.usenet-stephenthomascole.com at news.individual.net>
>  <265k6d1f5078cd2pm28qaao3pvngrb0mee at 4ax.com>
>  <p4krf9$f3b$1 at dont-email.me>
>  <SLobC.514214$9X4.3988 at fx02.am4>
>  <p4l6tf$j0p$1 at dont-email.me>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-Orig-X-Trace: individual.net UC1ZwvhaIxfYsL+HM8Wk3wte293Dzyp3TII7fDrAs2ULzmBnDL
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:96076fIo35cK5UY3sVr2pl7xzG0= sha1:CzmyeuLJ4Ua2x5F6AlDB2nbWFBs=
> User-Agent: NewsTap/5.2.6 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
> X-Originating-IP: 130.133.4.5
> X-ZEDAT-Hint: R
> 
> Brian Reay <no.sp at m.com> wrote:
> > On 28/01/2018 18:37, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
> >> "Brian Reay" <no.sp at m.com> wrote in message
> >> news:p4krf9$f3b$1 at dont-email.me...
> >>> On 25/01/2018 17:33, Guy G4DWV 4X1LT wrote:
> >>>> On 22 Jan 2018 06:37:12 GMT, just as I was about to take a herb,
> >>>> Stephen Thomas Cole <usenet at stephenthomascole.com> disturbed my
> >>>> reverie and wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> Where there's a will (and a wind turbine), there's a way!
> >>>> 
> >>>> The Americans use their flag poles to similarly good effect. IIRC,
> >>>> there is hardly any limit on the height of flagpoles in the
> >>>> (patriotic) USA.
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> No reason we can't do the same. Flag poles for national flags don't need
> >>> planning permission.
> >> 
> >> what about the pirate flag? .....
> >> 
> > 
> > I specifically said national flags for a reason. Others need permission.
> > 
> 
> Is the EU flag permissible?
> 
> -- 
> STC / M0TEY / 
> http://twitter.com/ukradioamateur
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJacD8wAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+Me2hQH/3Djds2vLrQ2nSUeNdafBN6j
UigFhRy2NAJZ8tujH2iYWvQ61Fj6ZAIJIK+/TbqpLG8JaF6OleSmw84CyfuVA3l9
oGFQQjdlrRKtUEM+Zm6sBJEYNP82KypPFGJBkMm7yvp+p0TBNHMhm4Jq3ldApSB2
FkCyJwaU2Uxx3g6Tyk9yrUtiwcBwG9YA5ZS8foVadZzK4zd4ooaQDASK7lyBgT9m
aDfxXcJse7EvwUHXC6w2LeXMLDLLTrNMTt1h5tOG8085+oheNAaJmuxE+uZ/i6xf
WVyA7XaIeirPEyrbla2gcXNArP+J50ltw4Ovt4pm1BFXxl9UKXnYkfZP0XHXxZo=
=cqQl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----