[Uram-rejections] A suitable syllabus?

[webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

This appears to the moderator to be off-topic for uk.radio.amateur.moderated
or has insufficient material related to amateur radio.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Tue Jan 23 10:59:56 2018
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> Delivered-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> From: "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj at ntlworld.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> References: <p3qf2p$8p8$1 at dont-email.me> <Jk38C.432820$9X4.56402 at fx02.am4> <MPG.34cba9d8c6789cba9896a6 at news.eternal-september.org> <Ls6j8tTpggYaFwQx at b-howie.demon.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: A suitable syllabus?
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
> Message-ID: <IAE9C.263650$Og3.131883 at fx11.am4>
> X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 10:59:52 UTC
> Organization: virginmedia.com
> Bytes: 2077
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 10:59:53 -0000
> 
> 
> "Brian Howie" <brian at b-howie.demon.co.uk> wrote in message 
> news:Ls6j8tTpggYaFwQx at b-howie.demon.co.uk...
> > In message <MPG.34cba9d8c6789cba9896a6 at news.eternal-september.org>, Dave 
> > Sergeant <davews2 at sky.com> writes
> >>In article <Jk38C.432820$9X4.56402 at fx02.am4>, jim.gm4dhj at ntlworld.com
> >>says...
> >>> I have found that propagation has gone and won't be coming back anytime
> >>> soon ......
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>Sadly you are right, the bands are dead most of the time. But there
> >>again it may be that it only works for digital modes. Everybody under
> >>the sun (another pun) has moved to the new fangled FT8 mode it seems, I
> >>am not among them as I like proper QSOs not computer to computer ones.
> >>
> >>73 Dave G3YMC
> >>
> >
> > By chance there were some stats published by G7VJR on the proportion of 
> > different types of modes in use today. There does seem to be a trnd 
> > towards FT8 away from phone and CW.
> >
> > Http://g7vjr.org/2018/01/proportion-of-modes-used-on-the-air-2017-update/
> >
> > Is this an effect of poorer propagation ?
> >
> > I don't operate on HF, but have on occasions used high speed digital modes 
> > on VHF for meteor scatter. I find however that CW has the edge over some 
> > of the other modes.
> >
> you will know this chap then ....
> 
> https://www.photobox.co.uk/my/photo?album_id=5229035244&photo_id=500512385876
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJaZy7LAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+Me6zQIAIwXxT3x3M+4GY2I2zY4BbD8
yBCaaPjv77p3ZXEO9YaAbq5+KMSTmEkgZRTawCI+jJyrGBSFXjN5NYsRFZeuy9JP
SQ7Fn32Vzz/Xi4h/0jf7LQzuwNz9eORihPj1g/4mbHbqKLsaHbUVTFuRXwZJTF3J
kKQZ5YxgTERKnwWkohRKGthTgaPjfaDDYqA4mwmTwFiioxBp5JOVwbvzSr/7GM9p
Plr03PFOug4sTJOlFRjw2PUaE61p4pR0VUqcbhVj5co9R5mOJFUGdvYsWrUBr+Xh
St3rTV80l4re2z1YDTwPT1WlSKE7AlaouU7ENgyxxak9l5AgW7EcMs5r2we52AE=
=dY9Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----