[Uram-rejections] Newsgroup Outage

Sat Aug 25 16:30:15 BST 2018

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

The moderator assumes that you posted this by mistake. It may be that
it quotes a previous post without adding your own comment, or the text
you have added may appear incomplete. We hope you will review and then
re-submit your message.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Sat Aug 25 16:09:09 2018
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> Delivered-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> From: Brian Howie <brian at b-howie.co.uk>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Newsgroup Outage
> Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 16:07:02 +0100
> Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
> Message-ID: <naSqMgCWCXgbFwjT at b-howie.co.uk>
> References: <UiimCkzUgDgbFwnH at b-howie.co.uk>
>  <MPG.35eaf94f97c9c5e09896ac at news.eternal-september.org>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed
> X-Complaints-To: abuse at aioe.org
> User-Agent: Turnpike/6.06-S (<y4Z4jcWX$L4lc0x61tFPnP+de4>)
> X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1
> X-Spam-Score: 21
> X-Spam-Bar: ++
> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "phantom.hostingseries.net",
>  has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
>  message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
>  similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
>  root\@localhost for details.
>  
>  Content preview:  In message <MPG.35eaf94f97c9c5e09896ac at news.eternal-september.org>,
>     Dave Sergeant <davews2 at sky.com> writes > Content preview: Is all the stuff
>     below which has appeared in both messages > today related
>  
>  Content analysis details:   (2.1 points, 5.0 required)
>  
>   pts rule name              description
>  ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
>   0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
>                              See
>                              http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
>                               for more information.
>                              [URIs: sky.com]
>   1.1 KAM_COUK               Scoring .co.uk emails higher due to poor registry security.
>   0.0 T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR   SPF: test of HELO record failed (temperror)
>   0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
>                              domains are different
>   1.0 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY Sending domain does not have any
>                              anti-forgery methods
> X-Spam-Flag: NO
> X-AuthUser: 
> X-Originating-IP: 89.187.86.9
> X-SpamExperts-Domain: pickaweb.co.uk
> X-SpamExperts-Username: phantom
> Authentication-Results: securespamfilter.com; auth=pass (login) smtp.auth=phantom at pickaweb.co.uk
> X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: unsure
> X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.35)
> X-Recommended-Action: accept
> X-Filter-ID: EX5BVjFpneJeBchSMxfU5j69ITaZvQvf1KwDmwxBQQl602E9L7XzfQH6nu9C/Fh9KJzpNe6xgvOx
>  q3u0UDjvO86fbs0q18rVPNX9+LEv7t8tB1OIIh2e7Tq20kg5HqIxFjRrqXanlYbUpxUNtrbUwGcj
>  x1JNm3o4u6lSPxFc9rZIeSQlWsIhsYZwx0hToslmSHmY2b9aM+qFioJ4GIIrDBxP+IQ6QkGYYbVF
>  qzedUwgaLmbZfPQB8OpUNn2ty7C8v5G7VEvr6qGXckZfN1iyd4rnhg2AEwr9xNg+wEShfXvstG2o
>  k7MqP+Tr3BvaAEqc18pmyihuiDosz/DfqaBCMht4DYY1oCJ/RDIYQAl3yR6X7N99r5LelpezKQZF
>  6zITLtL+rRfdMFt5EdyqQKDbyeerPCvgqWmXZbmamYuM+P5Dk2N7m1L0gx7l60Uw8oPCF8VpymDA
>  m51vSeaku+X2qYfWdHzoB2yW92yX6zvRr8FQfPIL9uzWpdgR0bbEdFUgad4U7hQTEbIk2zG7JSdE
>  mRfrBpvcv/zKGbVkC4uODsvTo9En0RQoZi/HX1Q44zhPK0R5wJAoxJrZwEUWCPNEwHMcN6qoXPje
>  nLhIOF1oeRYb0aDhp8Pvk6ylcpBwwdm5deCBXHF+wutJJu8LRaduUUWg6bHGLqkxqbrwNfsLKeEt
>  5afHFoWV8URI1/WFZQ0qaUITtC2ad1p9X1Yic8/9dg0ewX+zOgntm5g5gE8FvMvkmWsYjhsTdbGE
>  HblLYkFOb9DncSKyMqNV9LhMLLP3QZDqFWJpl3h5IcbfinWAZGGj5owYp8zGwsFgr/DB2mdKDqUq
>  raS3ri0uV9F5GfsfOe+/tQ209jZjoTrn21LN2SXhtnnV79J5rYmZEN0k8SeKQKHY6H+wSCoVvwvq
>  uzDDiIs/9/HHDt3kmd+l0dyVuQutijaXSlJUOBoOSxk3CkRR8Y0rHe7wbN1xa0oYqaqWzRouZtl8
>  9AHw6lQ2fa3LsLzCYTPXNIge3mfApGS9Ihwnz4eN8LH43VH+hbLFnyASDeVOFHaHcwTFnt2ldklH
>  sr4xL7hrJSk60SF3F6RYOYr2
> X-Report-Abuse-To: spam at server.securespamfilter.com
> 
> In message <MPG.35eaf94f97c9c5e09896ac at news.eternal-september.org>, Dave 
> Sergeant <davews2 at sky.com> writes
> > Content preview:  Is all the stuff below which has appeared in both messages
> >    today related? - note I receive NNTP posts via Eternal September so it may
> >    be an Eternal September issue. 73 Dave G3YMC In article <UiimCkzUg
> 
> It's been noted in uk.legal.moderated as well since the change to the UK 
> Usenet e-mail host.  As an experiment I've posted this from aioe to see 
> if the ES connection is holds water.
> 
> Brian
> -- 
> Brian Howie
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJbgXYHAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeSssIAIfDGdVK3D9xUN62vgR5ITLH
+n32QyYrqDy6eYfNetpY/l/Kg5MVrDoSaQQKRfMzWfGiqfhxOttgoHGwjT8Dd4Qi
VfHMaXvNEG08rWcRbXPpL2hgsOUQRaVTPg3sGJ9VfFAAPcW3DV0d0hMFfjFQT03q
XUMmbD7NFLatxOjwmMTec9rBI8OLAaW8a90wowLBzhcHE353d6D/9bjq04qcBM3X
EzgwVVShXiZKIa4yHsG+OdtFr/s0+U3BY2NSafzc8sJyizC2NAAtihBhVPEKbH4q
5BvHUZxQgODw13Pu9SgCi35lHfcZBGDcNkysNkcLM8TIC5ezw5E/zdG61ovuPgQ=
=cCOI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----