[Uram-rejections] Loop Antenna 'Former' Ideas?

[webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 Either abusive or doesn't add anything to the discussion.



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Wed Mar 01 08:23:51 2017
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: "Dodgy Jim ..." <kinvig.netta at ntlworld.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Loop Antenna 'Former' Ideas?
> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:23:43 -0000
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Message-ID: <o960ap$evi$1 at dont-email.me>
> References: <o919b3$lev$1 at dont-email.me> <55b8bclbbcosf7am2dngrt0fckins6ufpl at 4ax.com> <o91fot$etg$1 at dont-email.me> <o91qal$p3u$1 at dont-email.me> <o920aq$gsl$1 at dont-email.me>
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
> X-Priority: 3
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/CSradBfINCkQ/nkbM0ffHAIwXsuwpYyI=
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:VZ8mVbNHkSM0WpLvwddY1rKB850=
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 50130201
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 58b68511.12ce9-59ef-8
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-8.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> 
> "Brian Reay" <no.sp at m.com> wrote in message 
> news:o920aq$gsl$1 at dont-email.me...
> > On 27/02/17 18:16, mm0fmf wrote:
> >> On 27/02/2017 15:16, Brian Reay wrote:
> >>> which was supposed carbon fibre.
> >>
> >> Chinese was it? Just because the manufacturer/vendor printed "Carbon
> >> Fibre" on it doesn't mean it was true. Something that makes dealing with
> >> anything from China a gamble.
> >>
> >> There's a fair number of 5.5m poles in the world sold by Chinese vendors
> >> that are not 5.5m but nearer 3.7m. When this was pointed out they
> >> offered refunds etc. but still advertise them as 5.5m.
> >>
> >> Chinese, quality, cheap: pick any two.
> >
> >
> >
> > No, it wasn't Chinese. I think it was German.
> >
> > If you shop around and avoid those 'targeted' at the radio market, you can 
> > get good prices. It seems Fishing types have even shorter arms and deeper 
> > pockets than amateurs ;-)
> >
> >
> 
> ...and are usually X M3's 
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYto4JAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeUwYH/As1Cn5o4hO4M5dR0ZbdIc2C
NvWAmiKTc44GLL0PdlaC9AB8/uupdn/2hn8U0/op5EAdsmr3ZBFHmf/Gv+xni3NY
zwvHYybYSe1TjLJVQVfQz0fPXdSACCQRg8Zpm841tLmRGjmPIc+kRHcb4A//cVl0
xf2RxOtsYHlXcZSqZ/vYz1s7utRH3rd9Sh+P455MR+Ef34jj1Qy6yZQOxAsBI7HQ
VPSD7M27G95+t5FTXkJ0DoV5C+Q3farFTBAWwWW2yqH+j3ksdgSMTJEVIb8Sqo2b
ydvxe9g0j/5Qmp0jGMEV/NVubqhogTg+HyP0PD/u3gU/ndH/2vheFce7dmOsgZo=
=lu1y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----