[Uram-rejections] Dutch nationally distributed repeater systems and possibilities
webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Fri Jan 13 08:36:35 GMT 2017
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Looks much the same as another message in the queue.
The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator.
Your message has been rejected because it appears to the moderator to
be a duplicate of another post already accepted by the group.
The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
uk.net.news.moderation
============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Fri Jan 13 01:37:21 2017
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex at attglobal.net>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Dutch nationally distributed repeater systems and possibilities
> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 20:33:53 -0500
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Message-ID: <o59amc$8ps$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
> References: <o55g3o$ukl$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
> <memo.20170111184317.3832h at postmaster.cix.co.uk>
> <o56650$man$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <o57gn7$o7e$1 at gioia.aioe.org>
> <o587lo$a2a$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <uNbysHCV36dYFw36 at g3ohx.co.uk>
> <o58qt8$lsn$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <+lX2mQIoCAeYFwvL at g3ohx.co.uk>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
> Thunderbird/45.6.0
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19CIwefaU2VsYFTiP8/sUw3YTvZnhnRtaehWSX4OKWqmQ==
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZUzgrKbQTKULHsCBdlpG+Sh2A0Y=
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 44232377
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 58782e6f.ea09-600b-9
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-9.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
>
> On 1/12/2017 5:18 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > In message <o58qt8$lsn$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org>, Jerry Stuckle
> > <jstucklex at attglobal.net> writes
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Plus, I'd love to see a 160M 1/4 wave vertical on the back of a police
> >> car :)
> >
> > Most mobile operation on 160m uses a loaded whip!!!
> >
>
> Ah, a non-loaded 1/4 wave whip would be much more fun! :)
>
> > In the UK, it used to be THE band for relatively local contacts-
> > typically up to 20 miles, mobile-to-mobile, with ease, and much further
> > over areas of high ground conductivity (especially sea paths). I've had
> > 5&8 contacts at 200 miles (10W AM) with an 8 foot centre-loaded whip.
> >
>
> 160M hasn't been used much for mobile-to-mobile here, at least in the
> last 49 years. Back when I got my ticket, most local stuff was on 2M
> using converted Motorola and GE business band radios (I don't know how
> many Motorola's I converted to 2M for friends). Before that, I don't know.
>
> > On 80m, the groundwave doesn't go as far, but in my experience, there is
> > more chance of getting skywave contacts. I've had up to 250 miles, with
> > the same 10W.
> >
>
> No ground wave doesn't go that far. But I got WAS on 75 from Iowa in
> the 70's.
>
> > And if the dial markings on old collectable USA radios are to be
> > believed, didn't the police use something like 2.2MHz?
> >>
> >
>
> Maybe back in the 40's. In the mid-60's, when I first got interested,
> it was in the 40-50 MHz and 150-175 MHz range.
>
> --
> ==================
> Remove the "x" from my email address
> Jerry Stuckle
> jstucklex at attglobal.net
> ==================
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYeJGTAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+Meh74H/itPy0yOTXRntj770RiabVkW
1CT+3lXSOWYz2U8FCu21GQ22+u9SOcx7bYZggPy26+lEyV061kGqfTYrnBqCFC6F
lgTaHZaSa+vPtzXbQhbIx6otCK7HBTtAsooAp3SvWWwCVYPU0gYa0BGnTaBP9WGM
/VHV4BCRA0ZQlVgFBCbygyTm/KcyFXDuhpCqHHci1Jx4YMOfXFVZ3jqf/7OzV7x0
N229Z/k94irZBNiH30dVwO1g1ZpQJEtGa58EvalKYI4uF/KukCXoXukbwlLcub3s
ndp+jGP9ft+SJaJayj6Ts7D6UyVe7/4bwM1Qri8G4iUdVwfJdCheHaEffi2TqSY=
=FeDx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Uram-rejections
mailing list