[Uram-rejections] Revalidating Online

webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Mon Jan 2 09:32:53 GMT 2017


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 this has been covered before 



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

This post contains insufficient new material. Similar points have been
made already in this discussion, which is in danger of becoming too
repetitive.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Sun Jan 01 21:58:41 2017
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: Ian Jackson <ianTAKETHISOUTjackson at g3ohx.co.uk>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Revalidating Online
> Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 21:58:14 +0000
> Message-ID: <7RE3b4G2tXaYFwcj at g3ohx.co.uk>
> References: <o3bf72$rqk$1 at dont-email.me> <o3g3gl$leg$1 at dont-email.me>
>  <4u2p5cdan5ji63a157bfo7939emgqm702f at 4ax.com>
>  <3Nwy66AuTjYYFwN1 at g8bur.demon.co.uk> <o3uh1f$vrl$1 at dont-email.me>
>  <uDiUZWBmRtYYFwu1 at g8bur.demon.co.uk> <o3v41k$ui7$1 at dont-email.me>
>  <o403ab$1oq3$2 at gioia.aioe.org> <o40hec$cr2$1 at dont-email.me>
>  <o45p8q$stj$1 at dont-email.me> <o466ak$i61$1 at dont-email.me>
>  <BG3EudKqarZYFwjf at b-howie.demon.co.uk> <Vpo8V$BKyuZYFwzM at g3ohx.co.uk>
>  <o483oe$fdf$1 at gioia.aioe.org> <PsOq0WCTS7ZYFwhK at g3ohx.co.uk>
>  <o48q62$n8v$1 at dont-email.me> <f1L+iHJJ2AaYFwKO at g3ohx.co.uk>
>  <o4ato9$4ve$1 at dont-email.me> <i0UhSkI0TRaYFw97 at g3ohx.co.uk>
>  <o4bcuc$sjl$1 at dont-email.me> <o4bkre$qmh$1 at dont-email.me>
> X-Orig-X-Trace: individual.net 2LBYj/PrNdCH/7FdMO3/kAB4PZ+AqNApHlzW3nX01Tx+U57jBT
> X-Orig-Path: g3ohx.co.uk!ianjackson
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:4NLuM6LH+Zw9KAbnNXlnIoagpzo=
> User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-S (<XabqWmL$KPDg2PCjPRJoeA5d7c>)
> X-Originating-IP: 130.133.4.5
> X-ZEDAT-Hint: R
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 42895413
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 58697b86.d916-637b-a
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-10.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> In message <o4bkre$qmh$1 at dont-email.me>, Jim GM4DHJ ... 
> <kinvig.netta at ntlworld.com> writes
> >
> >"FranK Turner-Smith G3VKI" <g3vKi at turner-smith.uK> wrote in message
> >news:o4bcuc$sjl$1 at dont-email.me...
> >> "Ian Jackson" <ianTAKETHISOUTjackson at g3ohx.co.uk> wrote in message
> >> news:i0UhSkI0TRaYFw97 at g3ohx.co.uk...
> >>> In message <o4ato9$4ve$1 at dont-email.me>, Jim GM4DHJ ...
> >>> <kinvig.netta at ntlworld.com> writes
> >>>>"Ian Jackson" <ianTAKETHISOUTjackson at g3ohx.co.uk> wrote in message
> >>>>news:f1L+iHJJ2AaYFwKO at g3ohx.co.uk...
> >>>>> In message <o48q62$n8v$1 at dont-email.me>, Jim GM4DHJ ...
> >>>>> <kinvig.netta at ntlworld.com> writes
> >>>>>>> Like I said.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> When I was first licensed (1960), the fixed station licence cost £4,
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>> the mobile £1 - and, of course, you couldn't have a mobile licence
> >>>>>>> unless you had a fixed station licence.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>If you had an amateur mobile licence you didn't need a car radio
> >>>>>>licence
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No so, Jim.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Amateur licences had/have nothing to do with broadcast receiving
> >>>>> licences. On the other hand, I recall a time when the broadcast
> >>>>> receiving licence (both radio and TV/radio) specifically included
> >>>>> reception of amateur radio stations - which, with a few rare
> >>>>> exceptions,
> >>>>> are not broadcasting stations.
> >>>>>>.....
> >>>>naw sorry wrong there Ian you didn't need a car radio broadcast lic if
> >>>>you
> >>>>had an amateur lic in the 60's.
> >>>
> >>> Well, I might be wrong - but I don't recall any UK amateur radio licence
> >>> mentioning reception of broadcast radio.
> >>>
> >>>>....sorry to be personal but did you ever
> >>>>read your mobile licence? ....
> >>>>
> >>> If you're right - obviously not!
> >>>
> >> Back in the 1960s you needed a separate licence for a car radio. The
> >> licence
> >> allowed you to listen to "authorised broadcast transmissions and licenced
> >> amateur radio transmissions". It was, therefore, illegal to listen to the
> >> likes of Radio Caroline, although I don't recall hearing that anybody was
> >> ever prosecuted. Maybe "safety in numbers" applied.
> >> Happy 2017, all.
> >
> >an amateur mobile licence allowed you to listen to the likes of the BBC
> >........
> 
> No it didn't. It was the licence that allowed you to listen to the BBC 
> (and all the other broadcasting stations) that specifically also allowed 
> you to listen to amateurs. Spot the difference.
> >
> >
> 
> -- 
> Ian
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYah5FAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+Me03EH/jSXt6bE7j1B6e0AdNaRcCg0
fR88kThXEo/kObP4nJHXjjnMs9/Cm4x1lW7cyjv5PkCaO87EtcW2eWrxVbp+BPGw
ATonK0zzlsnCKpqKXpsexsfxS1/htPmhhJsyppplX4i+WNTgQ98C1BiiS+0rSmtH
jaL8sGJRXEXwqBXycjEYjHcbQI+Dr5WVhsZ476Ort5WUBJvQxtZEbHo1RRLhe8PU
CNuMJDsBVdKLWh79l9QushyIXOb9exZN7EPFojfxiA7O54A22xq4eBJxiqYAHHzz
aCGJNygTsNW4/VNvRBbwaCossOtg63fOR2c3M3rPXAsN0XEI9ikjHF+LZs7Y5BQ=
=vaqe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Uram-rejections mailing list