[Uram-rejections] Short callsigns recently issued

[webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 A bit too personal .



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Wed Aug 16 18:56:14 2017
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> From: "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj at ntlworld.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> References: <on12re$5lf$1 at stc.eternal-september.org>
> Subject: Re: Short callsigns recently issued
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> Message-ID: <iG%kB.524027$8M.319491 at fx47.am4>
> X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:55:26 UTC
> Organization: virginmedia.com
> Bytes: 1198
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:55:26 +0100
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 14642585
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 5994871a.4b54-4a6f-a
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-10.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> X-Warning: 195.74.61.88 is listed at dnsbl.sorbs.net
> 
> 
> "Stephen Thomas Cole" <usenet at stephenthomascole.com> wrote in message 
> news:on12re$5lf$1 at stc.eternal-september.org...
> > Well, here's some amusing news;
> >
> > http://rsgb.org/main/blog/news/2017/08/16/ofcom-licensing-problem-short-call-signs/
> >
> > This cracked me up: "Ofcom advise us that, although these call signs are
> > not invalid, per se...". So, these "swanky" two-letter callsigns, although
> > issued in error, are perfectly valid. I hope that those who have received
> > them do keep them. They'll be envied, I'm sure!
> >
> by you perhaps but not by anybody else ... 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZlKDlAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+Mej4UIAIVfIfcrfiM5NeUpNP/HMpFc
XBLrdbBqHEcfMwC3dN8kt0fnJEaeiFj+aTK7d0qFHFP4SP3+ZzjnVvpqloEtt+CD
wmQqVJtCCyMPLmplQkKTatoovCSXb833cWz8Lthf+s8yLsugEiOzMC/XuqlJuXHL
RerK0CwaOgBscoA6X7pfgcfAeEHmdtZ3iqJReTAs9gr0kNEUxbUmWS7v8AFxbn0o
AP0GziLGMHaq93nglZ7cBU/2+6yyftkuUY26cJUFzEGRQhwat+YQhLCi318wZ3jJ
EYGxsb5GcjcY9SwBIp/AxA5ZRvf/+lwJQUmeRTOD7TyK4QW/O60daS2mLueTyRw=
=j6me
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----