[Uram-rejections] Young licence holders - what's your opinion?

webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Sun Apr 23 08:54:57 BST 2017


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 Please drop the ad hominem facebook references etc



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Sun Apr 23 08:39:37 2017
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: "Trailer trash ....." <kinvig.netta at ntlworld.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Young licence holders - what's your opinion?
> Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 08:39:22 +0100
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Message-ID: <odhlhg$jjs$1 at dont-email.me>
> References: <odfi00$ubk$1 at stc.eternal-september.org>
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
> X-Priority: 3
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/fMhNDxewPxRRZkESlT6pTUiWTvdiLR3A=
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:gyTwuAGt+7yKFIy7OduGCmsmcBg=
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 56966186
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 58fc5a33.10fa8-1059-5
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-5.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> 
> "Stephen Thomas Cole" <usenet at stephenthomascole.com> wrote in message 
> news:odfi00$ubk$1 at stc.eternal-september.org...
> > Following the news of George M0UKK achieving the Full licence at 9 years
> > old, and having seen a couple of negative reactions to it in "the other
> > place", I'm curious what the broad opinion is, do many of us think that
> > there should be a lower limit in age to hold a licence? Personally, I 
> > think
> > there shouldn't be, if a kid has the energy, wit, and wherewithal to bone
> > up and pass the exam then they should be welcomed with open arms! There's 
> > a
> > couple of licenced youngsters (an 11 year old and a 15 year old) at my
> > club, both of them are sharp as tacks and a pleasure to work on the air.
> > Frankly, the hobby needs more of them!
> >
> Personally I think it dangerous to converse with a 9 year old on amateur 
> radio, if you did it on your smart phone you would end up in trouble. The 
> problem is that the FL standard was set very low to llegalise shall we say 
> the 11m pirate of limited intelligence to stop them pirating which didn't 
> work anyway. As we have seen parents for some reason think it is a feather 
> in their cap to force weans into the hobby and it does them no favours when 
> the hobby is then ignored and never mentioned say on their kids facebook 
> page which just proved they weren't really interested.When I was 24 I was 
> befriended by a yoof who was 14 we went to rallies went up hills /p etc the 
> difference in age made no difference to either of us.......then after a 
> while he vanished.... I later found out his parents had been advised by my 
> fellow amateurs that I was a risk to young people. But then again when I was 
> 14 and took a train to a local radio club I was ran home by a couple of 
> GM3s......changed days indeed      Anyway best to avoid any kids in the 
> hobby for good reason.
> 
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEbBAEBAgAGBQJY/F3RAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+Me/wwH+MYnpjRXgFEjUYtUAWdb0gN1
GUoiSUnVb86zAR6EUei4+8LYsxzyj3J8tQossAFj5ZHyxPJNfL35/3FT5Mr9F7lA
TMe9QezL0mCXpDaBGKAXP9OScu75+fiELUgKuJlNunpk82r77algatr/AJUZgMlT
K4NUETZyk6kjKNNc10MbCTiTr3UKFQHRG04GhOIVjljRf3b4SvDZuQWiAqwudVol
2JRWgKEvvHsrh1R8p+KvJ4n3r0/9drUXCOdDOmUxu6X5Ya3ijwgqomSoY33St+hH
EbUci4ASaoGmU4kn+gte8cq8xndnQ7VyqZJdi4USJ+mPnTck3YrH3AIHMRnSBA==
=Z7ja
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Uram-rejections mailing list