[Uram-rejections] Old Callsign

webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Mon May 30 18:25:50 BST 2016


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

This appears to the moderator to be off-topic for uk.radio.amateur.moderated
or has insufficient material related to amateur radio.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Mon May 30 18:11:06 2016
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <james.stewart497 at ntlworld.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Old Callsign
> Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 18:10:37 +0100
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Message-ID: <nihs6e$hu5$1 at dont-email.me>
> References: <TZSi6HBskfRXFwdU at b-howie.demon.co.uk> <facfcebb-f648-4c56-9c43-f76fe12c5fb0 at googlegroups.com> <uGMdd0IXFyRXFwri at b-howie.demon.co.uk> <738e6ca8-6c1d-4eef-b70f-6265edffb9a1 at googlegroups.com> <ni954o$4ve$1 at dont-email.me> <nicjob$nd8$1 at dont-email.me> <0oojkb5bhq7sipper3l9ugn0k0gouta35h at 4ax.com> <nid31a$ijc$1 at dont-email.me> <0kemkb5q175ki4uoii47ulacikoth7je3f at 4ax.com> <wpmmMTIiw0SXFwzo at g3ohx.demon.co.uk> <1mo150g.1x1p4uu19yrtjcN%roger at hayter.org> <nih5t9$q6c$2 at news.albasani.net> <n0iokbl9f2svd8724c7fe7lm6irtpjfd9e at 4ax.com> <nihm81$r6m$1 at dont-email.me> <nihpj9$44p$1 at news.albasani.net>
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
> X-Priority: 3
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX18BcH9iTv5LmsANBkNy3R3FQs/n0Oy8eoI=
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:5nzUrboirLGmOGs2a7fxwlniVt8=
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 9484269
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 574c7410.11079-1eff-9
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-9.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> 
> "David Wade" <dave.g4ugm at gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:nihpj9$44p$1 at news.albasani.net...
> > On 30/05/2016 16:29, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
> >> "Guy G4DWV/4X1LT" <no-email at tardis.com> wrote in message
> >> news:n0iokbl9f2svd8724c7fe7lm6irtpjfd9e at 4ax.com...
> >>> On Mon, 30 May 2016 11:50:15 +0100, just as I was about to take a
> >>> herb, David Wade <dave.g4ugm at gmail.com> disturbed my reverie and
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> You can not tell if some one passed the morse test by their call sign.
> >>>> Old calls can be re-issued to immediate family so many of the old calls
> >>>> have been re-issued to the siblings of the original holder.
> >>>
> >>> A pal of mine has a G3xxx call and got his SK father's G6xx call as
> >>> well. He only seems to use the former. IMHO, his G3 should have been
> >>> retired.
> >>>
> >>> OTOH, another G8 (old B) holder pal got a G4 that was willed to him
> >>> and he uses it. I do not know if he still holds the G8, but IMHO he
> >>> should not.
> >>>
> >>> Flame suit on and ready!
> >>
> >> shocking.....a class B G8 should never be issued a class A g4 call 
> >> .....what
> >> does he do when somebody calls him on CW? ........
> >>
> >>
> > Same as me (who passed the Morse test), ignores it. My call sign contains 
> > both letters and numbers. To pass the test I had to learn them separately, 
> > pass the numbers, pass the letters never had to put them together. So I 
> > might have a G4 but I can't read "normal" QSO type CW which is full of 
> > mixed letters and numbers, procedural symbols and punctuation (was that a 
> > question mark) that I never learnt...
> >
> > Dave
> > G4UGM
> 
> you should have just waited for the FL to come in ......... 
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXTHeeAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MerFMH/A/vcdFJ4ATdvrYFQtpAIEf9
fwEpB3vC17zJWLchWUwayydwBHR8mgOK6tep+ql34a8/C+Gayp6Mu2L0f42IbRXz
GMOvPvn9suKM4Wh0ZoxLzEQp+ns9V1hewsEZMUuIDt7roZ9ljjClfQitcXAkFPjd
yyUaB5a/sj9TANXkncLo3/e35g1Kvuf5KNF5xmFf/ntHHef+U6D4rq1SpcRt5/jJ
y9ane4zdmJjFz6jReSOgnkh3+RkDl4JupLdnyyTBrDOsnpgo4nBfM2Ndco1VK7PB
F3s25qe2TYWRa/VA4ZsVXWXUuM0+7y4CILIINa7spXf3rlildPxE52mg45PYZ/s=
=BwI8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Uram-rejections mailing list