[Uram-rejections] Details in Callbook

webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Sun May 29 13:02:23 BST 2016


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 Sorry if this isn't a duplicate - please repost in that case.



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Your message has been rejected because it appears to the moderator to
be a duplicate of another post already accepted by the group.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Sun May 29 10:55:18 2016
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Message-ID: <llzjfyE3trSXFwhA at g3ohx.demon.co.uk>
> Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 10:50:47 +0100
> From: Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson at g3ohx.demon.co.uk>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Details in Callbook
> References: <r9iujb50d3nk9nos6h4squkqq478iv021o at 4ax.com>
>  <qYFwwDFZ+2PXFw6t at g3ohx.demon.co.uk> <nhpqen$m4k$1 at dont-email.me>
>  <rmp3kbl3275odfqstcuk35fpcbrlgldeps at 4ax.com>
>  <j9Vi5vJm8gQXFwhV at g3ohx.demon.co.uk>
>  <1sa4kbh2f1cbqbblnp11dq00mdot18g0ki at 4ax.com> <nhulii$pou$1 at dont-email.me>
>  <l5lakbtts0jt8ritjq1fbl9qvd8554noqi at 4ax.com> <ni436k$u2j$1 at gioia.aioe.org>
>  <ni72j4$3ks$1 at dont-email.me> <nid12s$qva$1 at news.albasani.net>
>  <nGYTnoBZ5pSXFwCm at g3ohx.demon.co.uk> <nie9c0$v3f$1 at stc.eternal-september.org>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed
> User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-S (<XBaqWKP7KPTwaPCjuBAoeAVYYS>)
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-MDF-HostID: 17
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 9264652
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 574abc7e.f73d-3545-b
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-11.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> In message <nie9c0$v3f$1 at stc.eternal-september.org>, Stephen Thomas Cole 
> <usenet at stephenthomascole.com> writes
> >Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson at g3ohx.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >> In message <nid12s$qva$1 at news.albasani.net>, David Wade
> >> <dave.g4ugm at gmail.com> writes
> >>>
> >>>> Having said that, I don't recall what the Lambda Inv. business was
> >>>> about. I would have thought those buying shares would have checked
> >>>> before investing.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Lamda Investments was set up in 1965 and ceased trading in 1990 some 26
> >>> years ago. I think its time to move on.
> >>>
> >>> Dave
> >>> G4UGM
> >>>
> >> Is there any reason why we should not be discussing why the Lambda
> >> Investment Company was set up?
> >>
> >
> >I don't care one way or the other as I have zero interest in the matter but
> >it would probably be helpful to ask yourself what gain such discussion may
> >bring to our community. Will we learn anything of any value and relevance?
> >Will it reopen old wounds?
> 
> No idea. Why should it? It's just (as the subject has been raised) that 
> I would be interested in being reminded of the reasons that the company 
> was set up.
> 
> > Does it have any bearing on the RSGB as it is
> >today?
> 
> No idea - but it's all part of its history.
> 
> > I'm not second-guessing the answers to these questions, I know
> >nothing and care little about the matter
> 
> So why get involved in the discussion?
> 
> >, but as 26 years have passed since
> >the thing wound up it seems that it is, indeed, time to move on.
> >
> Move on from what? You seem to assuming that there was a contentious 
> scenario that probably didn't exist.
> -- 
> Ian
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXStpPAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MebxsH/1XkULQ+warMoPFFW2V0bQWh
iJ58oI/7xnl+ZL4zgEdxziao/5sXXvspbsD3CZ8BcdEgCrz0bqkxPwTfyLqubtR4
uysSttcO24T37QqIsUn4AKE1MzM2P+7DXismSqocm4YhFkvYxU4xhpXl3thgQTTz
MBG7ETdOikJB3vhbCcstnjnkXB4YH6vtJjDZDs58f42K5k9guisbM7ofnudJxHef
3wsPXYbGAxMdN21Tjj0dTnuzAc00fAp4HiyEefZtVwdwbdqZJIfwTecMhf+2vQ7A
BO7akUG20XNuzLXBLQoQ6gAgn9+sez5FCawVqG1UWfih5NLmUeQSQGh5CYGzQTw=
=VfGg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Uram-rejections mailing list