[Uram-rejections] REPOST: OBTAINING A UK FULL (RECIPROCAL) LICENCE VIA A SINGLE EXAM

[webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 Can you re-phrase to sound less like a personal attack?



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Mon May 09 22:53:16 2016
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at eternal-september.org
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: Guy G4DWV/4X1LT <no-email at tardis.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: REPOST: OBTAINING A UK FULL (RECIPROCAL) LICENCE VIA A SINGLE EXAM
> Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 22:53:02 +0100
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Message-ID: <sg12jbl82tidq9ada495durserr9f9hpdf at 4ax.com>
> References: <ng6a0j$1i8$2 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <ng700l$1u2$10 at stc.eternal-september.org> <gshjvc-4r7.ln1 at plubb90t.plus.com> <ng88qt$vj0$1 at stc.eternal-september.org> <ng8c9r$f4p$1 at dont-email.me> <ng8epe$p1p$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <ng9lru$m5q$1 at dont-email.me> <ngaals$u4e$1 at dont-email.me> <ngantq$j5h$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <ip3sibhfps50sokhdampbtkjbhamace43s at 4ax.com> <ab61jb1sav9f86iu532411cmr69tcq7880 at 4ax.com> <fid1jb1tdofnpjp3e8a7v5bp9oa9r6fgar at 4ax.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/SIGJGXhnX2/zzTXGBOy4cT13ZlJ3Uau4=
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:j7laGaItPD3V7Y5Chk661vNGVmI=
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 5065431
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 573106c0.10c18-13d5-2
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> On Mon, 09 May 2016 12:23:33 -0400, just as I was about to take a
> herb, "Anthony R. Gold" <not-for-mail at ahjg.co.uk> disturbed my reverie
> and wrote:
> 
> >What would be the advantage, in an examination of technical knowledge and an
> >understanding of a canon of rules and regulations, from decreasing the score
> >on account of poor grammar, spelling or handwriting?
> That you ask the question just proves the point to which education has
> slumped. Such a question would never have been asked 40-50 years ago
> and shows how engrained  'dumbing down' has become. I am stunned.
> -- 
> 
> 73 de Guy G4DWV/4X1LT
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXMQ+9AAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+Me/ksIALVnlcXWWt82wjwrBf9mEvfj
5T4Gu9xfFZ+vCZAnfwv9h7f/d0f4VDJ2vCUh/Kf8MSKv0NgXJVOcVWXf6M4f+vbY
a997WyHeQOg1IYAjiiJjv38QvBWhGAzH0fYYvM4w+c+Oar00pGuaSJo8SAsTTvfJ
Uml2IPcYnIG73Osn3WOrgRoKoSj2JaNnITMBZO2dTEUCfPvVMTU/mm3E7Z/kncKC
69UxaXsrghIct+sDkgC8oireayKHQCRrhneWyCJDukTaw3HBoK/BCq/U/ZJDuPAR
rOcNUAy+VhehDX4zqHBJHFJp8pnBMclaqX0LndYV3SOmAvONAGa3o+WDHF0HI3U=
=60Bk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----