[Uram-rejections] REPOST: OBTAINING A UK FULL (RECIPROCAL) LICENCE VIA A SINGLE EXAM

webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Wed May 4 18:51:37 BST 2016


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 I think you reposted this 



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Your message has been rejected because it appears to the moderator to
be a duplicate of another post already accepted by the group.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Wed May 04 16:47:56 2016
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: Anthony R. Gold <tgold at microvst.demon.co.uk>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: REPOST: OBTAINING A UK FULL (RECIPROCAL) LICENCE VIA A SINGLE EXAM
> Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 11:45:45 -0400
> Organization: Microvest Limited, London
> Message-ID: <0n4kiblnuk9er50rcaektfih1va6bkcsq7 at 4ax.com>
> References: <ng4i6e$7nv$1 at dont-email.me> <qqrcib9pd8bc7b2jd2ken6si1tsc329cld at 4ax.com> <ng5sm8$3ub$1 at dont-email.me> <ng6a0j$1i8$2 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <ng700l$1u2$10 at stc.eternal-september.org> <ng7clp$bi0$1 at dont-email.me> <ng7kjl$851$4 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <ng803p$obf$1 at dont-email.me> <ng82lj$427$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <fvohib9athoshfkvad5tce4018fpcsv9l9 at 4ax.com> <ngbiaq$g0u$3 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
> Reply-To: tgold at panix.com
> X-Orig-X-Trace: individual.net zh5wJyPhJxB+saY3+Rf5AATDI9Bhboe4ya2IoyWgT+IFE0W58=
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:Fy6F8WTHw1Lgsb33HXuedlM040U=
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
> X-No-Archive: yes
> X-Originating-IP: 130.133.4.6
> X-ZEDAT-Hint: R
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 4001219
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 572a19a9.164b-7494-3
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-3.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> On Tue, 3 May 2016 21:16:27 -0400, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex at attglobal.net>
> wrote:
> 
> > On 5/3/2016 1:49 PM, Anthony R. Gold wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2 May 2016 13:30:44 -0400, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex at attglobal.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > >> The problem is, it's so easy to get a legally U.S. address even if you
> > >> don't live here, that requiring a U.S. address is pretty meaningless -
> > >> unless, maybe, they want to save the cost of overseas mail when they
> > >> send you the renewal reminder.
> > > 
> > > You may find it meaningless however it still remains the law.
> > > 
> > 
> > Then show how one CAN'T get a U.S. mailing address, no matter where in
> > the world one lives.
> 
> What is your point and why must I prove anything for you to agree on what is
> black letter law? Or are you generally denying that the FCC regulates
> amateur radio licensing within its territories under the force of law?
> 
> Anyway it's here for you to check for yourself:
> 
> https://www.fcc.gov/general/rules-regulations-title-47 then you would need
> to drill down to Part 97 Subpart §97.23 - Mailing address.
> 
> > If it's not "meaningless", then that should be easy to prove.
> 
> Maybe I don't understand what you mean by meaningless. If you mean it is
> ineffective then perhaps you misunderstand the purpose of Subpart §97.23. It
> is not some kind of Tumpian wall to keep out "people like that" but simply
> required as a communications channel for administrative notices. So PO Boxes
> or an address of a friend or relative who will handle the mail are all fine.
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXKjapAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeOt8H/2qSjKisyMeWzWyLkMGE+tDc
z5Jp3PH9jnN3axdbsVE/RJsX3yvFL41hHQ60xicGLKkk2cdb8MieUEPa4CAZ2wGR
ZHK5eK5UkPkdbsyYc5UYAW+HhkLeI4fPSpu1KCVfttCI3ZD6Tdu1+xNdNNhREHw+
egUP1GCUlUGIq3XdxzIzK2nrOXuQoILO834o55u7t8QKbYYvaZyfPXtUzH911VOX
LoWgGjKzPqpVtIuAxPsr9S1jgIlcF8Y5GMgQc1hrAV+BT780yLH1Y8OXh747e1DG
FaFaY4QCpzQc8SYCx/8ilf6PVoLZjnSgJBilBsMUoYJx5DwgPpNEdMFOpYlscs0=
=qTYz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Uram-rejections mailing list