[Uram-rejections] Antenna question

Tue Mar 29 20:26:55 BST 2016

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 I am sorry but this argument is going in circles

The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

This post repeats a recent post or a recent query without appearing to
add anything new. You could try to discuss the topic from a different
angle or wait a few weeks until it seems right to bring up this
subject again.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Tue Mar 29 19:51:29 2016
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> From: "szczepan  bialek" <sz.bialek at wp.pl>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Antenna question
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:51:59 +0200
> Organization: ATMAN - ATM S.A.
> Message-ID: <ndeirc$u8s$1 at node1.news.atman.pl>
> References: <ndbu3t$i4d$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <memo.20160328211351.3828f at postmaster.cix.co.uk>
> X-Trace: node1.news.atman.pl 1459277485 31004 176.221.122.169 (29 Mar 2016 18:51:25 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: usenet at atman.pl
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 18:51:25 +0000 (UTC)
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 160329-1, 2016-03-29), Outbound message
> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 61715634
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 56faceb0.4a4f-4bf3-b
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-11.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> 
>  "Paul Cummins" <agree2pay4uce at spam.vlaad.co.uk> napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci 
> news:memo.20160328211351.3828f at postmaster.cix.co.uk...
>  In article <ndbu3t$i4d$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org>,
>  jstucklex at attglobal.net (Jerry Stuckle) wrote:
> >
> > > The "clasic dipole" and "ham radio dipole" are quite different
> >> things.
> >>
> >> Sorry.  A dipole is a dipole.  Period.
> >
>  > I'm astonished to find myself agreeing with Jerry :-) but yes, a dipole
>  > is a dipole.
>  >
>  > It matters not how or with what it is fed, it is the structure of the
>  > antenna that makes it a dipole, not the feed method or band (within the
>  > limits of SWR).
> 
>  Ham dipole is mechanically symetric (the both legs are equal).
>  But antenna is the electrical equipment not mechanical..
>  Ham dipole is not electrically symetric.
> 
>  "One side of the antenna feedline is attached to the lower end of the
>  monopole, and the other side is attached to the ground plane, which is 
> often
>  the Earth. This contrasts with a dipole antenna which consists of two
>  identical rod conductors, with the signal from the transmitter applied
>  between the two halves of the antenna." From:
>  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopole_antenna
> 
>  Marconi was the first who discovered that a wire "buried" in air is the
>  best grounding. Better than wire wire buried in soil.
>  S*
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJW+tcAAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeVsQH/0+I6BGFCpZLTISnfJYa44nZ
J4UWIk2fJEkbD1eOBcF52Wu3hw4hVy7P2duPNjCRpWds/kBElk0vP1flDbYd8v5S
843SydnPLKFGaFmAbyuy5OH4fsEzr9y/2YUfLz31KzmS59WKRLl2/CZobp1mevTf
6z+cwi72XV9VOc0dxAbiuczpXeuMyNl3LGdCuKMBUjFUezDiC/Z3AKx5IswQXME0
RuPxN+bhHfNGZfnstQID46cknnvqRNstWr9PhYVSwhzJckKU0ca8gMj6U/BC4i98
TzFcf/2y68vySkmpCxcIszkl3/sgV8HKlUCc+c6bP/yjmzEsENcYQVXBjaEYf+Y=
=ZR7R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----