[Uram-rejections] Wales Coast Murder of Amateur

webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Tue Mar 15 08:31:15 GMT 2016

Hash: SHA1

 This is old as well as OT - please resubmit if you want it posted!

The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a

This appears to the moderator to be off-topic for uk.radio.amateur.moderated
or has insufficient material related to amateur radio.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Tue Mar 15 06:36:08 2016
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Authentication-Warning: serv3.ams1.giganews.com: news set sender to poster at giganews.com using -f
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 04:07:10 -0600
> Subject: Re: Wales Coast Murder of Amateur
> From: g8dgc.2 at gmail.com (g8dgc)
> Reply-To: g8dgc.1 at gmail.com (g8dgc)
> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:07:10 +0000
> Message-ID: <1miv219.1x3vav518y4s6jN%g8dgc.2 at gmail.com>
> References: <n9tckm$lvj$1 at dont-email.me> <n9tlcr$ot1$2 at dont-email.me> <0g36cb9oharf3vcfdia70nec59iumi43lh at 4ax.com> <n9v3if$t66$1 at dont-email.me> <na29ub$dbr$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <na2ode$bch$1 at dont-email.me> <na326v$hkh$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <na53fc$2fq$1 at dont-email.me> <na5a4a$ta0$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <na5i4j$que$1 at dont-email.me> <na5qtk$si7$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <na6jtl$l8q$1 at dont-email.me>
> Organization: no club
> X-No-Archive: yes
> X-Face: OPUuJs&dKs|REO>*%r=\2&Gohjv|*+=0|Sq;7pd[QOWlq`L"=8t~oZpDfG~7jbOD78],Ej\
>  YZr/k]DYFZ"GD)hT>K%1f|7_5+bFM'rqox1sOR+C_/0Mw&-FMEj1RCzh]}^{omQMPG6AT`DQ>3UeP0
>  p*{Xj<vx^^R%1G<*!|Fao>I8rYR)#M*UHMg].2>bLYl^,Jk>[XuAHa6FH9yy1A%U*
> User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.4 (6da4d6e6d0) (Mac OS X version 10.11.3 (x86))
> X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
> X-Trace: sv3-8iiHMyBU0ogrgnEsfybxla7fggCjt70tWt3ySJEsKjyrSihK6VEXx5miJMUePNpo88ur9Gq0nxyHuk7!gE7yDBMkdsyME7qVwrf9rMJ7vLXTt8NlrjCbjWXqxa2YRaaFaC9ccFwT6KnZv0UxjpyYxUgkE+Yh!QVJbVfvNGfn706UD
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
> X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 58553545
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 56e7ad4d.15e2c-5616-8
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-8.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> Brian Reay <no.sp at m.com> wrote:
> [car fuel economy]
> > I assume the rest of the difference in mpg is due to emissions control
> > etc., most of our cars have air conditioning these days (which was often
> > blamed) 
> [...]
> I was horrified to find that aircon costs me ~5mpg (Imperial) - that's
> ~12%. The figures were instaneous and taken under constant conditions;
> i.e. straight and level cruising at normal motorway speed with little or
> no wind, repeated several times over several minutes. Admittedly they
> rely on the car's computer so may not be as accurate as if they were
> taken over a measured run and checked against \actual\ fuel consumption,
> but this method ensures that conditions are constant. It's a 2 litre
> engine, BTW.
> -- 
> g8dgc  <g8dgc.1 at gmail.com> 
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)


More information about the Uram-rejections mailing list